FIG. 2: a) left side: The correlation data for the ratio of the histograms of same-event-pairs to mixed-event-pairs for unlike-sign charged pairs, shown in a two-dimensional (2-D) perspective plot $\Delta\phi$ - $\Delta\eta$. The plot was normalized to a mean of 1. b) right side: The similar correlation data for like-sign charge pairs.

FIG. 3: a) left side: Folded correlation data for unlike-sign charge pairs on $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$ based on demonstrated symmetries in the data. This increases the statistics in a typical bin by a factor of four. Henceforth we will be dealing with folded data only. b) right side: Similar folded data for like-sign charge pairs.

FIG. 3: a) left side: Folded correlation data for unlike-sign charge pairs on $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$ based on demonstrated symmetries in the data. This increases the statistics in a typical bin by a factor of four. Henceforth we will be dealing with folded data only. b) right side: Similar folded data for like-sign charge pairs.

FIG. 4: “(Color online)”a) left side: The 2 dimensional (2-D) approximately gaussian signal shape equation (4) from the fit to the normalized and folded unlike-sign charge pairs signal data. b) right side: The unlike-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjoining signal function on the left side.

FIG. 4: “(Color online)”a) left side: The 2 dimensional (2-D) approximately gaussian signal shape equation (4) from the fit to the normalized and folded unlike-sign charge pairs signal data. b) right side: The unlike-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjoining signal function on the left side.

FIG. 5 :“(Color online)”a) left side: A perspective plot of the fit to the 2-D like-sign charge pairs signal shape of equation (5). b) right side: Like-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left side.

FIG. 5: “(Color online)”a) left side: A perspective plot of the fit to the 2-D like-sign charge pairs signal shape of equation (5). b) right side: Like-sign charge pairs signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left side.

FIG. 6: “(Color online)”a) left side: The charge dependent (CD) signal shape is a 2 dimensional (2-D) approximate gaussian which is symmetrical. The average gaussian width is 27.5$^{\circ}$ $\pm$ 3.2$^{\circ}$ (0.48 $\pm$ 0.056 rad) both in $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$. Thus we are observing a greater probability for unlike-sign charge pairs of particles than for like-sign charge pairs emitted randomly on 2-D $\eta\phi$ directions. b) right side: The CD signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left.

FIG. 6: “(Color online)”a) left side: The charge dependent (CD) signal shape is a 2 dimensional (2-D) approximate gaussian which is symmetrical. The average gaussian width is 27.5$^{\circ}$ $\pm$ 3.2$^{\circ}$ (0.48 $\pm$ 0.056 rad) both in $\Delta\phi$ and $\Delta\eta$. Thus we are observing a greater probability for unlike-sign charge pairs of particles than for like-sign charge pairs emitted randomly on 2-D $\eta\phi$ directions. b) right side: The CD signal data corresponding to the adjacent signal fit on the left.

FIG. 7: “(Color online)”a) left side: The fit to the charge independent (CI) signal shape which is the sum of the fits of like-sign plus unlike-sign charge pairs signals. The 2-D gaussian equivalent RMS signal has a $\Delta\phi$ width of about 32$^{\circ}$ (0.52 rad), and $\Delta\eta$ width of about 66$^{\circ}$ (1.15 rad) which is about double the $\Delta\phi$ width. b) right side: The CI signal data corresponding to the adjacent fit on the left.

FIG. 7: “(Color online)”a) left side: The fit to the charge independent (CI) signal shape which is the sum of the fits of like-sign plus unlike-sign charge pairs signals. The 2-D gaussian equivalent RMS signal has a $\Delta\phi$ width of about 32$^{\circ}$ (0.52 rad), and $\Delta\eta$ width of about 66$^{\circ}$ (1.15 rad) which is about double the $\Delta\phi$ width. b) right side: The CI signal data corresponding to the adjacent fit on the left.

FIG. 8: a) left side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with the lower range of elliptic flow amplitude and the best $\chi^2$ (the same as Figure 7b) plotted as a 2-D perspective plot on $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$. b) right side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with our maximum elliptic flow amplitude used in our analysis ($\chi^2$ was worse by 1$\sigma$).

FIG. 8: a) left side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with the lower range of elliptic flow amplitude and the best $\chi^2$ (the same as Figure 7b) plotted as a 2-D perspective plot on $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$. b) right side: The charge independent (CI) signal data with our maximum elliptic flow amplitude used in our analysis ($\chi^2$ was worse by 1$\sigma$).

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The correlation between positive and negative charged particles measured by the FTPC and photons measured by the PMD using $v_{dyn}$ for real events.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

The moments $r_{m,1}$(m=1-3) for real and mixed events as a function of order m in a fixed multiplicity bin of 47$\langle \sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }\langle 54$.

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio to the dimuon decay in 40-60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio to the dimuon decay in 60-80% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio to the dielectron decay in 0-60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio to the dielectron decay in 0-20% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio to the dielectron decay in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio to the dielectron decay in 40-60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Invariant yield of inclusive J/PSI(1S) times branching ratio in p+p collisions at 200 GeV. A 10% global uncertainty is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dimuon channel in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 12.2% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dimuon channel in 0-20% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 10.7% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dimuon channel in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 14.5% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dimuon channel in 40-60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 24.1% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dimuon channel in 60-80% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 38.6% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dielectron channel in 0-60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 12.1% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dielectron channel in 0-20% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 10.7% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dielectron channel in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 14.5% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. pT measured via the dielectron channel in 40-60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. A global uncertainty of 24.1% is not shown.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. centrality measured via the dimuon channel for pT > 0 GeV/c. The pp uncertainty of 14.3% is not shown.

Relative error on Ncoll as a function of centrality for measurement of J/PSI(1S) RAA with pT > 0 GeV/c via the dimuon channel.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. centrality measured via the dimuon channel for pT > 5 GeV/c. The pp uncertainty of 15.0% is not shown.

Relative error on Ncoll as a function of centrality for measurement of J/PSI(1S) RAA with pT > 5 GeV/c via the dimuon channel.

Inclusive J/PSI(1S) RAA vs. centrality measured via the dielectron channel for pT > 5 GeV/c. The pp uncertainty of 15.0% is not shown.

Relative error on Ncoll as a function of centrality for measurement of J/PSI(1S) RAA with pT > 0 GeV/c via the dielectron channel.

The centrality dependence of e+e− invariant mass spectra within the STAR acceptance from Au+Au collisions and U+U collisions for pair pT < 0.15 GeV/c. The vertical bars on data points depict the statistical uncertainties, while the systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The hadronic cocktail yields from U+U collisions are ∼5%–12% higher than those from Au+Au collisions in given centrality bins; thus only cocktails for Au+Au collisions are shown here as solid lines, with shaded bands representing the systematic uncertainties for clarity.

The centrality dependence of e+e− invariant mass spectra within the STAR acceptance from Au+Au collisions and U+U collisions for pair pT < 0.15 GeV/c. The vertical bars on data points depict the statistical uncertainties, while the systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The hadronic cocktail yields from U+U collisions are ∼5%–12% higher than those from Au+Au collisions in given centrality bins; thus only cocktails for Au+Au collisions are shown here as solid lines, with shaded bands representing the systematic uncertainties for clarity.

The centrality dependence of e+e− invariant mass spectra within the STAR acceptance from Au+Au collisions and U+U collisions for pair pT < 0.15 GeV/c. The vertical bars on data points depict the statistical uncertainties, while the systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The hadronic cocktail yields from U+U collisions are ∼5%–12% higher than those from Au+Au collisions in given centrality bins; thus only cocktails for Au+Au collisions are shown here as solid lines, with shaded bands representing the systematic uncertainties for clarity.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 40%–60% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 40%–60% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV/c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 1.2–2.6 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 1.2–2.6 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The corresponding sqrt(p2T) of excess yields. The vertical bars on data points are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The corresponding sqrt(p2T) of excess yields. The vertical bars on data points are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Detector-level average charged particle multiplicity densities for TransMax and TransMin as functions of the leading jet pT. Points are measured data. Histograms are calculated values assuming TransMax and TransMin are derived from the same parent distribution.

Transverse charged particle densities at various center-of-mass collision energies. Uncertainties smaller than the marker sizes.

Corrected inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions for pTlead,min = 7 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

pTlead,min (7/5 GeV/c) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in peripheral Au+Au collisions. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

pTlead,min (7/5 GeV/c) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in central Au+Au collisions. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

R_CP (0-10%/60-80%) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (30%) has to be added.

R_CP (0-10%/60-80%) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2 and 0.3 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In the paper are shown all these three uncertainty sources (statistical, shape, correlated) summed in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (30%) has not been included (as for the other measurements compared with the STAR data).

R_AA for peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (29%) and PYTHIA reference (22%, 20%, 18% for R = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have to be added.

R_AA for central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (7%) and PYTHIA reference (22%, 20%, 18% for R = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have to be added. The unbiased data points are the 4 highest for R=0.2 and 3 highest for R=0.3 and 0.4, resp.

Ratio of inclusive charged-particle jet yields for R=0.2/R=0.4 for peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c (only unbiased region). The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). Please note that in the paper, the uncertainties shown are the quadrature sums of the uncertainties listed in the table.

Ratio of inclusive charged-particle jet yields for R=0.2/R=0.4 for central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c (only unbiased region). The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). Please note that in the paper, the uncertainties shown are the quadrature sums of the uncertainties listed in the table.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ as a function of pT measured through dielectron channel in the CS frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ as a function of pT measured through dielectron channel in the CS frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta\phi$ as a function of pT measured through dielectron channel in the CS frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ as a function of pT measured through dimuon channel in the HX frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ as a function of pT measured through dimuon channel in the HX frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\theta$ as a function of pT measured through dimuon channel in the CS frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_\phi$ as a function of pT measured through dimuon channel in the CS frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_inv$ as a function of pT measured through dielectron channel in the HX frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_inv$ as a function of pT measured through dielectron channel in the CS frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_inv$ as a function of pT measured through dimuon channel in the HX frame.

The J/PSI(1S) polarization parameter $\lambda_inv$ as a function of pT measured through dimuon channel in the CS frame.

Normalized symmetric cumulant NSC(2,3) and NSC(2,4) as a function of average number of participant nucleons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Data points are shown in red markers in the figure.

Normalized symmetric cumulant NSC(2,3) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 39 GeV (Narrow Mult. Bins). NSC(2,3) for 200 GeV (Narrow Mult. Bins) are the same as in Table4.

Normalized symmetric cumulant NSC(2,4) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 39 GeV (Narrow Mult. Bins). NSC(2,4) for 200 GeV (Narrow Mult. Bins) are the same as in Table4.