Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the branching ratio of the Higgs boson decay to $Za$ times the branching ratio $a $->$ \gamma \gamma$ as a function of the $a$ particle mass in the merged ($m_a \le 2$ GeV) and the resolved ($m_a > 2$ GeV) categories. The figure uses $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV corresponding to 139 fb$^{-1}$.

ATLAS observed 95% CL exclusion contours limits in terms of the ALP mass and its effective coupling to photons, $|C_{\gamma\gamma}|/\Lambda$, for different values of the Higgs coupling to $Za$, $|C_{Zh}|/\Lambda$. The figure uses $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV corresponding to 139 fb$^{-1}$. The value 100 in the tables is presentational, denoting the upper edge of the plot.

Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{JJ}}$ in the SR (black points) compared to the background-only expectation, where the shape is derived from the CR and the normalisation is fitted in the SR.

Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model A (see the text for details). The darker and lighter shaded bands around the expected limits represent the $\pm 1 \sigma$ and $\pm 2 \sigma$ uncertainty range, respectively.

The predicted theory cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model A (see the text for details). In the theory model, a universal coupling of the $Z^\prime$ to each SM quark $g_q$ is assumed and the dark quarks are all represented by one species with an effective coupling $g_{q_d}$ to the $Z^\prime$. For model A, the predicted cross-section is shown for $g_q=0.05$ and $g_{q_d} = 0.2$.

Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model B (see the text for details). The darker and lighter shaded bands around the expected limits represent the $\pm 1 \sigma$ and $\pm 2 \sigma$ uncertainty range, respectively.

The predicted theory cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model B (see the text for details). In the theory model, a universal coupling of the $Z^\prime$ to each SM quark $g_q$ is assumed and the dark quarks are all represented by one species with an effective coupling $g_{q_d}$ to the $Z^\prime$. For model B, the predicted cross-section is shown for $g_q=0.15$ and $g_{q_d} = 0.5$.

Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model C (see the text for details). The darker and lighter shaded bands around the expected limits represent the $\pm 1 \sigma$ and $\pm 2 \sigma$ uncertainty range, respectively.

The predicted theory cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model C (see the text for details). In the theory model, a universal coupling of the $Z^\prime$ to each SM quark $g_q$ is assumed and the dark quarks are all represented by one species with an effective coupling $g_{q_d}$ to the $Z^\prime$. For model C, the predicted cross-section is shown for $g_q=0.15$ and $g_{q_d}= 0.5$.

Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model D (see the text for details). The darker and lighter shaded bands around the expected limits represent the $\pm 1 \sigma$ and $\pm 2 \sigma$ uncertainty range, respectively.

The predicted theory cross-section times branching ratio for the production of dark quarks through a $Z^\prime$ as a function of the $Z^\prime$ mass for model D (see the text for details). In the theory model, a universal coupling of the $Z^\prime$ to each SM quark $g_q$ is assumed and the dark quarks are all represented by one species with an effective coupling $g_{q_d}$ to the $Z^\prime$. For model D, the predicted cross-section is shown for $g_q=0.05$ and $g_{q_d} = 0.2$.

Relative efficiency (in %) of each stage of the analysis selection with respect to the previous one for models A through D and $m_{Z^\prime}=2.5$ TeV. Approximately 90000 events were generated per signal mass hypothesis.

Parametrization of the $A_{X}$ factor, defined as the fraction of diphoton resonances satisfying the fiducial acceptance at the particle level, as function of $m_{X}$ obtained from the narrow width simulated signal samples produced in gluon fusion.

The correction factor, $C_{X}$, defined as the ratio between the number of reconstructed signal events passing the analysis cuts and the number of signal events at the particle level generated within the fiducial volume, and acceptance correction factor, $A_{X}$, defined as the fraction of diphoton resonances satisfying the fiducial acceptance at the particle level. Both are computed for NWA spin-0 models as a function of $m_{X}$.

Effect of event selections on a scalar MC signal sample generated for $m_{X}$ = 15 GeV and on the data. For the MC sample, the efficiencies are shown after applying event weights and a truth level filter that requires two photons with $p^{\gamma\gamma}_{T}>40$ GeV; for the data, the absolute yields are shown. The initial yields for data include a trigger preselection that is the OR of a list of single photon and diphoton triggers. The "2 $loose$ photons" step includes the kinematic acceptance cuts.

Parameterization of the Double Sided Crystal Ball function parameters describing the scalar mass resolution model as a function of $m_{X}$ [GeV].

Expected and observed events in the 16 discovery regions along with the according control regions.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector R-hadron search.

p0-values and model-independent upper limits on cross-section x acceptance x efficiency for the 16 discovery regions.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic search for metastable gluino R-hadrons.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector direct-stau search.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector chargino search.

Upper cross-section limit in gluino R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in sbottom R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in stop R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in stau search.

Upper cross-section limit in chargino search.

Lower mass limit as function of gluino lifetime.

Acceptance x efficiency, acceptance and efficiency for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in meta-stable gluino R-hadron search.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

ETmiss trigger efficiency as function of true ETmiss (EtmissTurnOn).

Single-muon trigger efficiency as function of $|\eta|$ and $\beta$ (SingleMuTurnOn).

Candidate reconstruction efficiency for ID+Calo selection (IDCaloEff).

Candidate reconstruction efficiency for loose selection (LooseEff).

Efficiency for a loose candidate to be promoted to a tight candidate (TightPromotionEff).

Resolution and average of reconstructed dE/dx mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.

Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.

Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for FullDet candidates.

Distribution of missing transverse momentum in the data and for the background in the PhJetCR. The total background expectation is normali zed to the post-fit result. The errors include both statistical and systematic uncertainties determined by a bin-by-bin fit.

Distribution of missing transverse momentum in the signal region for data and for the background predicted from the fit in the CRs. Overflows are included in the final bin. The errors include both statistical and systematic components. The expected yield of events from the simplified model with $m_\chi$ = 150 GeV and $m_{med}$ = 500 GeV is also shown.

Distribution of photon transverse momentum in the signal region for data and for the background predicted from the fit in the CRs. Overflows are included in the final bin. The errors include both statistical and systematic components. The expected yield of events from the simplified model with $m_\chi$ = 150 GeV and $m_{med}$ = 500 GeV is also shown.

The observed and 95% CL exclusion limit for a simplified model of dark matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_q$ = 0.25 and $g_\chi$ = 1 as a function of the dark matter mass $m_\chi$ and the axial-mediator mass $m_{med}$.

The observed 90% CL exclusion limit on the DM-proton scattering cross section in a simplifed model of dark matter production involving an axial-vector operator, Dirac DM and couplings $g_q$ = 0.25 and $g_\chi$ = 1 as a function of the dark matter mass $m_\chi$.

The observed 95% CL lower limits on $M_\ast$ for a dimension-7 operator EFT model with a contact interaction of type $\gamma\gamma\chi\chi$ as a function of dark matter mass $m_\chi$.

The observed 95% CL lower limits on the mass scale $M_D$ in the ADD models of large extra dimensions, for several values of the number of extra dimensions.

The stransverse mass mT2 in the W+jets validation region VR2 for the two-tau MVA analysis.

The BDT response prior to applying the SR BDT requirement for the two-tau MVA analysis.

The missing transverse energy ETmiss in the two-tau MVA signal region.

The effective mass meff in the two-tau MVA signal region.

The stransverse mass mT2 in the two-tau MVA signal region.

The ratio R2 in the signal region SR2l-1a SF from the two-lepton, opposite-sign analysis, prior to the requirement on this variable.

The ratio R2 in the signal region SR2l-1a DF from the two-lepton, opposite-sign analysis, prior to the requirement on this variable.

The super razor quantity MdR in the signal region SR2l-1b SF from the two-lepton, opposite-sign analysis, prior to the requirement on this variable.

The super razor quantity MdR in the signal region SR2l-1b DF from the two-lepton, opposite-sign analysis, prior to the requirement on this variable.

The separation in phi between the leading jet and the missing transverse momentum dPhi(jet 1,ETmiss) in the ISR validation region of the two-lepton, same-sign MVA analysis.

The transverse mass using the leading lepton mTlep1 in the ISR validation region of the two-lepton, same-sign MVA analysis.

The transverse mass using the second leading lepton mTlep2 in the no-ISR validation region of the two-lepton, same-sign MVA analysis.

The scalar sum of the pT of the leptons and jets, HT in the no-ISR validation region of the two-lepton, same-sign MVA analysis.

The three-lepton invariant mass mlll in the validation region VR3l-0a from the three-lepton analysis.

The missing transverse energy ETmiss in the validation region VR3l-0b from the three-lepton analysis.

The transverse momentum of the leading jet pTjet1 in the validation region VR3l-1a from the three-lepton analysis.

The missing transverse energy ETmiss in the validation region VR3l-1b from the three-lepton analysis.

The missing transverse energy ETmiss in the signal region SR3l-0a from the three-lepton analysis.

The three-lepton invariant mass mlll in the signal region SR3l-0b from the three-lepton analysis.

The separation in phi between the leading jet and the missing transverse momentum dPhi(jet 1,ETmiss) in the signal region SR3l-1a from the three-lepton analysis.

The transverse momentum of the leading jet pTjet1 in the signal region SR3l-1b from the three-lepton analysis.

The transverse momentum of the second leading jet pTjet2 in the VV validation region from the same-sign two-lepton VBF analysis.

The invariant mass of the two leading jets mjj in the VV validation region from the same-sign two-lepton VBF analysis.

The transverse momentum of the second leading lepton pTlep2 in the Fakes validation region from the same-sign two-lepton VBF analysis.

The missing transverse momentum ETmiss in the Fakes validation region from the same-sign two-lepton VBF analysis.

The invariant mass of the two leading jets mjj in the same-sign, two lepton VBF signal region.

The separation in eta between the two leading jets dEtajj in the same-sign, two lepton VBF signal region.

The missing transverse energy ETmiss in the same-sign, two lepton VBF signal region.

The transverse momentum of the second leading lepton pTlep2 in the same-sign, two lepton VBF signal region.

The 95% CL exclusion limits (expected and observed) on the cross-section for production of left- and right-handed stau pairs for various LSP masses.

The 95% CL exclusion limits (expected and observed) on the cross-section for CHARGINO1+ CHARGINO1- production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays, where the LSP is massless and the intermediate slepton mass is set to 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% of the CHARGINO1+- mass (x).

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+ CHARGINO1- production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays as a function of the CHARGINO1+- and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+ CHARGINO1- production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays as a function of the CHARGINO1+- and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The expected and observed 95% CL exclusion limits on the cross-section for VBF CHARGINO1+-CHARGINO1+- production, as a function of the CHARGINO1-NEUTRALINO1 mass difference, for a CHARGINO1+- of 110 GeV.

The 95% CL exclusion limits (expected and observed) on the cross-section for NEUTRALINO2 NEUTRALINO3 production with SLEPTONR-mediated decays, where the LSP is massless and the intermediate slepton mass is set to 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% of the NEUTRALINO2 mass (x).

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits for NEUTRALINO2 NEUTRALINO3 production with SLEPTONR-mediated decays as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits for NEUTRALINO2 NEUTRALINO3 production with SLEPTONR-mediated decays as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The 95% CL exclusion limits (expected and observed) on the cross-section for CHARGINO1+- NEUTRALINO2 production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays, where the LSP is massless and the intermediate slepton mass is set to 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% of the CHARGINO1+- mass (x).

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays (x=0.50) as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays (x=0.50) as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays (x=0.95) as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 production with SLEPTONL-mediated decays (x=0.95) as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 production with STAU-mediated decays as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits for CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 production with STAU-mediated decays as a function of the NEUTRALINO2 and NEUTRALINO1 masses.

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits in the pMSSM scenario.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the pMSSM scenario.

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits in the NUHM2 scenario.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the NUHM2 scenario.

The expected 95% CL exclusion limits in the GMSB scenario.

The observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the GMSB scenario.

The best expected signal region in the direct STAUL STAUL SUSY model, where "1" indicates the two-tau MVA signal region is used, and "2" indicates the previously published signal regions are used.

The number of generated events in the direct STAUL STAUL SUSY model.

The cross-section in the direct STAUL STAUL SUSY model.

The experimental uncertainty in the two-tau MVA signal region in the direct STAUL STAUL SUSY model.

The expected CLs in the two-tau MVA signal region in the direct STAUL STAUL SUSY model.

The observed CLs in the two-tau MVA signal region in the direct STAUL STAUL SUSY model.

The 95% CL upper limit on the SUSY cross-section in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model using the opposite-sign, two-lepton analysis.

The best expected signal region in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model using the opposite-sign, two-lepton analysis, where "1" denotes SR2l-1a and "2" denotes SR2l-1b.

The number of generated events in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The total cross-section in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The acceptance for the opposite-sign, two-lepton signal region SR2l-1b in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The efficiency for the opposite-sign, two-lepton signal region SR2l-1b in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The experimental uncertainty for the opposite-sign, two-lepton signal region SR2l-1b in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The expected CLs for the opposite-sign, two-lepton signal region SR2l-1b in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The observed CLs for the opposite-sign, two-lepton signal region SR2l-1b in the CHARGINO1+CHARGINO1- SUSY model.

The number of generated events in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- VBF SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The total cross-section in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The acceptance for the same-sign, two-lepton VBF signal region in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The efficiency for the same-sign, two-lepton VBF signal region in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The experimental uncertainty for the same-sign, two-lepton VBF signal region in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The expected CLs for the same-sign, two-lepton VBF signal region in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The observed CLs for the same-sign, two-lepton VBF signal region in the VBF CHARGINO1+- CHARGINO1+- SUSY model, where m(CHARGINO1+-)=m(NEUTRALINO2) and x=0.5.

The best expected signal region in the same-sign, two-lepton MVA analysis for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5), where "1" indicates SR dM20, "2" indicates SR dM35, "3" indicates SR dM65, and "4" indicates SR dM100.

The number of generated events in the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The total cross-section in the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The experimental uncertainty in the same-sign, two-lepton MVA signal region SR dM20 for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The expected CLs in the same-sign, two-lepton MVA signal region SR dM20 for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The observed CLs in the same-sign, two-lepton MVA signal region SR dM20 for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The acceptance in the three-lepton signal region SR3l-1b for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The efficiency in the three-lepton signal region SR3l-1b for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The experimental uncertainty in the three-lepton signal region SR3l-1b for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The expected CLs in the three-lepton signal region SR3l-1b for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The observed CLs in the three-lepton signal region SR3l-1b for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.5).

The best expected signal region in the same-sign, two-lepton MVA analysis for the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model (x=0.95), where "1" indicates SR dM20, "2" indicates SR dM35, "3" indicates SR dM65, and "4" indicates SR dM100.

The 95% CL upper limit on the SUSY cross-section in the CHARGINO1+-NEUTRALINO2 SUSY model with STAU-mediated decays.

The 95% CL upper limit on the SUSY cross-section in the NEUTRALINO2 NEUTRALINO3 SUSY model.

Expected exclusion limits in the gluino-neutralino mass plane, for the higgsino-bino GGM model with $\mu < 0$, using the merged $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{L}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{H}$ analyses.

Observed exclusion limits in the $M_3$-$\mu$ plane, for the higgsino-bino GGM model with $\mu > 0$, using the merged $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{L}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{H}$ analyses.

Expected exclusion limits in the $M_3$-$\mu$ plane, for the higgsino-bino GGM model with $\mu > 0$, using the merged $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{L}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{H}$ analyses.

Contour of exclusion in wino production cross section from the photon+$\ell$ analysis, as a function of the wino mass parameter $m_{\tilde{W}}$. The expected limit is shown along with its $\pm 1$ and $\pm 2$ standard deviation values.

Numbers of selected data events at progressive stages of the selection, for each SR for the diphoton, photon+j and photon+$\ell$ analyses. Where no number is shown the cut was not applied.

Expected number of signal events at progressive stages of the selection, shown for points in the parameter space that typify the region for which each selection of the diphoton, photon+j and photon+$\ell$ analyses is optimized, and scaled to an integrated luminosity of $20.3\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. Where no number is shown the cut was not applied.

Expected number of signal events at progressive stages of the $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{H}$ selection, shown for data and signal Monte Carlo datasets.

Expected number of signal events at progressive stages of the $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{L}$ selection, shown for data and signal Monte Carlo datasets.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1550 and 1600 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}} = 1500$ GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1350 and 1450 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1250 and 1300 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1150 and 1200 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1000 and 1100 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for $m_{\tilde{W}}$ between 650 and 800 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for $m_{\tilde{W}}$ between 400 and 600 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for $m_{\tilde{W}}$ between 100 and 400 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{H}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu<0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu<0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{H}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu>0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu>0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

Acceptance-times-efficiency (a*e) for the photon+$\ell$ analysis SRs.

The total NLO+NLL strong production cross sections with uncertainties for GGM gluino-neutralino signal points for the diphoton and photon+b analyses. In the variant of the grid used in the diphoton analysis, the electroweak production cross section is negligible.

The total NLO cross sections with uncertainties for GGM wino-bino signal points, for all final states, for the diphoton analysis. The direct bino production cross section is negligible.

The NLO gaugino pair production cross sections with relative uncertainties for GGM gluino-neutralino signal points for the photon+b analysis.

The best signal region used for each signal point in the photon+b analysis.

The total NLO+NLL cross sections with uncertainties for the strong production GGM signal grid for the photon+j analysis.

The total NLO cross sections with uncertainties for the electroweak production GGM signal grid for the photon+j analysis.

The best signal region used for each signal point in the photon+j analysis.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. This table is for the observed limit for BR=75% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. This table is for the expected limit for BR=75% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. Observed limit for BR=50% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. Expected limit for BR=50% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. Observed limit for BR=25% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. Expected limit for BR=25% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. Observed limit for BR=0% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Combined exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde{\chi}_1^0 $ with branching ratio x and through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ with branching ratio 1-x. Expected limit for BR=0% - Observed limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d63 - Expected limit x=BR=100% See Fig 24. hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d64.

Summary of the ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct stop pair production in models where the decay mode $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}$ with $ \tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm} \rightarrow W \tilde{\chi_1^0}$ is assumed with a branching ratio of 100%. Limits for the b0L and t1L soft-lepton analyses in two scenarios Delta M = 5 GeV in light green and Delta M = 20 GeV in dark green), for a total of four limits - dM=5 GeV, b0L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d19 - dM=5 GeV, b0L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d22 - dM=5 GeV, t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d40 - dM=5 GeV, t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d41 - dM=20 GeV, b0L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d25 - dM=20 GeV, b0L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d28 - dM=20 GeV, t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d43 - dM=20 GeV, t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d44.

Summary of the ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct stop pair production in models where the decay mode $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}$ with $ \tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm} \rightarrow W \tilde{\chi_1^0}$ is assumed with a branching ratio of 100%.Limits for the b0L, t1L and t2L analyses in scenarios with a fixed chargino mass of 106 GeV (dark green) and 150 GeV (light green) - M(ch1)=150 GeV, b0L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d13 - M(ch1)=150 GeV, b0L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d16 - M(ch1)=150 GeV, t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d34 - M(ch1)=150 GeV, t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d35 - M(ch1)=106 GeV, t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d37 - M(ch1)=106 GeV, t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d38 - M(ch1)=106 GeV, t2L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d25 - M(ch1)=106 GeV, t2L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d26.

Summary of the ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct stop pair production in models where the decay mode $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}$ with $ \tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm} \rightarrow W \tilde{\chi_1^0}$ is assumed with a branching ratio of 100%.Limits for the t1L and t2L analyses in scenarios with the mass of the chargino set to twice the mass of the neutralino - M(ch1)=2M(chi0), t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d31 - M(ch1)=2M(chi0), t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d32 - M(ch1)=2M(chi0), t2L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d16 - M(ch1)=2M(chi0), t2L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d17.

Summary of the ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct stop pair production in models where the decay mode $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}$ with $ \tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm} \rightarrow W \tilde{\chi_1^0}$ is assumed with a branching ratio of 100%.Limits for the t1L and t2L and WW analyses in scenarios with the mass difference between chargino and neutralino is 10 GeV - dM=10 GeV, t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d46 - dM=10 GeV, t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d47 - dM=10 GeV, t2L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d10 - dM=10 GeV, t2L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d11 - dM=10 GeV, WW observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d45 - dM=10 GeV, WW expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1380183/d46.

Exclusion limits assuming that the stop decays through $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b + \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm + W^{(*)} + \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with branching ratio of 100% assuming a fixed stop mass of 300 GeV. - t1L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d49 - t1L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d50 - b0L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d7 - b0L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d10.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where $\tilde{t}_2$ pair production is assumed, followed by the decay $\tilde{t}_2 \rightarrow Z \tilde{t}_1$ or $\tilde{t}_2 \rightarrow \tilde{t}_1 h$ and then by $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with a branching ratio of 100%, as a function of the $\tilde{t}_2$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass. The $\tilde{t}_1$ mass is 180 GeV larger than the neutralino mass. This table is for the t2t1H observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d11 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d8.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where $\tilde{t}_2$ pair production is assumed, followed by the decay $\tilde{t}_2 \rightarrow Z \tilde{t}_1$ or $\tilde{t}_2 \rightarrow \tilde{t}_1 h$ and then by $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ with a branching ratio of 100%, as a function of the $\tilde{t}_2$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass. The $\tilde{t}_1$ mass is 180 GeV larger than the neutralino mass. This table is for the t2t1H expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d11 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d8.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=350 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t2t1H observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d14 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d15.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=350 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t2t1H expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d14 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d15.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=350 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t1L/t0L observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d14 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d15.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=350 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t1L/t0L expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d14 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d15.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t2t1H observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d16 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d17.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t2t1H expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d16 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d17.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t1L/t0L observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d16 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d17.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=20 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t1Lt0L expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d16 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d17.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=120 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t2t1H observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d18 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d19.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=120 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t2t1H expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d18 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d19.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=120 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t1L/t0L observed limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d18 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d19.

Exclusion limits as a function of the stop2 branching ratio for decays into Z, Higgs and neutralino. m(t2)=500 GeV and m(chi1)=120 GeV (top plot). This table is for the t1Lt0L expected limit. - t2t1Z observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d18 - t2t1Z expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286622/d19.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits on sbottom pair production where the sbottom is assumed to decay as b1->b chi10 with a branching ratio of 100%. - b0L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d1 - b0L expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1247462/d4 - tc observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304459 (root macro) - tc expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304459 (root macro).

Exclusion limits at 95% CL for a scenario where sbottoms are pair produced and decay as b1 -> t chi1+ with a BR of 100% - SS3L observed limit (mchi+=60 GeV): hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/resource/6164/finalExclusionGraphs/SBottomTopCharginoN60_observed.C - SS3L expected limit (mchi+=60 GeV): hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/resource/6164/finalExclusionGraphs/SBottomTopCharginoN60_expected.C - SS3L observed limit (mchi+=2 mchi0): hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/resource/6164/finalExclusionGraphs/SBottomTopCharginoNhalfC_observed.C - SS3L expected limit (mchi+=2 mchi0): hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/resource/6164/finalExclusionGraphs/SBottomTopCharginoNhalfC_expected.C.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL for a scenario where sbottoms are pair produced and decay as b1 -> b chi2 with a BR of 100% - g3b observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304457/d10 - g3b expected limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304457/d11.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits for the naturalness-inspired set of pMSSM models from the combination t0L, t1L and tb analyses using the signal region yielding the smallest CLs value for the signal- plus-background hypothesis. This table is for the observed limit.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits for the naturalness-inspired set of pMSSM models from the combination t0L, t1L and tb analyses using the signal region yielding the smallest CLs value for the signal- plus-background hypothesis. This table is for the expected limit.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits for the pMSSM model with well-tempered neutralinos as a function of M1 and mqL3. The limit is obtained as the combination of the t0L, t1L, tb and SS3L analyses, This table is for the observed limit.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits for the pMSSM model with well-tempered neutralinos as a function of M1 and mqL3. The limit is obtained as the combination of the t0L, t1L, tb and SS3L analyses, This table is for the expected limit.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits for the pMSSM model with well-tempered neutralinos as a function of M1 and mtR. The limit is obtained using the t0L analysis. This table is for the observed limit.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits for the pMSSM model with well-tempered neutralinos as a function of M1 and mtR. The limit is obtained using the t0L analysis. This table is for the expected limit.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits for the set of h/Z-enriched pMSSM models as a function of $\mu$ and m(qL3). The limit of is obtained as the combination of the t0L, g3b, t2t1Z and SS3L analyses, This table is for the observed limit.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits for the set of h/Z-enriched pMSSM models as a function of $\mu$ and m(qL3). The limit of is obtained as the combination of the t0L, g3b, t2t1Z and SS3L analyses, This table is for the expected limit.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits for the set of h/Z-enriched pMSSM models as a function of $\mu$ and m(bR). The limit of is obtained as the combination of thet0L, t2t1Z and tb analyses, This table is for the observed limit.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits for the set of h/Z-enriched pMSSM models as a function of $\mu$ and m(bR). The limit of is obtained as the combination of thet0L, t2t1Z and tb analyses, This table is for the expected limit.

Expected and observed 95% CL limits on the signal strength mu (defined as the ratio of the obtained stop cross section to the theoretical prediction) for the production of stop pairs as a function of m(stop). The stop is assumed to decay as t1->t chi0 or through its three-body decay depending on its mass. The neutralino is assumed to have a mass of 1 GeV.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where both pair-produced stop decay exclusively via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \chi^\pm_1$ followed by $\chi^\pm_1 \rightarrow W \chi_1^0$ with $\Delta m(t_1, \chi_1^0)$ = 10 GeV. This table is for the observed limit.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where both pair-produced stop decay exclusively via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \chi^\pm_1$ followed by $\chi^\pm_1 \rightarrow W \chi_1^0$ with $\Delta m(t_1, \chi_1^0)$ = 10 GeV. This table is for the expected limit.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where both pair-produced stop decay exclusively via three-body or four-body decay (depending on the neutralino and stop mass). This table is for the observed limit. - t1L observed limit (3-body) hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d25 - t1L observed limit (4-body) hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d28 - t2L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d23.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where both pair-produced stop decay exclusively via three-body or four-body decay (depending on the neutralino and stop mass). This table is for the expected limit. - t1L observed limit (3-body) hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d25 - t1L observed limit (4-body) hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1304456/d28 - t2L observed limit hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1286444/d23.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 25% and DM=5GeV. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 25% and DM=5GeV. This table is for the Expected limit.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 25% and DM=20 GeV. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 25% and DM=20 GeV. This table is for the Expected limit.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 50% and DM=5GeV. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 50% and DM=5 GeV. This table is for the Expected limit.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 50% and DM=20GeV. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 50% and DM=20 GeV. This table is for the Expected limit.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 75% and DM=5GeV. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 75% and DM=5 GeV. This table is for the Expected limit.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 75% and DM=20GeV. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions for simplified models with stop decays into both stop1->t chi10 and stop1-> b ch1 for BR(stop1->t chi10) = 75% and DM=20 GeV. This table is for the Expected limit.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions in the natural pMSSM model. This table is for the Observed limit.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the tb signal regions in the natural pMSSM model. This table is for the Expected limit.

Combined exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where both stops decay exclusively via $\tilde t_1 \rightarrow t \tilde \chi_1^0 $. Observed limit contour line for the t0L/t1L combination.

Combined exclusion limits at 95% CL in the scenario where both stops decay exclusively via $\tilde t_1 \rightarrow t \tilde \chi_1^0 $. Expected limit contour line for the t0L/t1L combination.

Best expected SR for the WW analysis and the three- and four-body decays.

Cross-section upper limit for the WW analysis and the three- and four-body decays.

Expected CLs for the WW analysis and the 3- and 4-body decays.

Observed CLs for the WW analysis and the 3- and 4-body decays.

Best expected SR for the WW analysis and the stop1->chargino1 decay.

Cross section upper limit for the WW analysis and the stop1->chargino1 decay.

Expected CLs for the WW analysis and the stop1->chargino1 decay.

Observed CLs for the WW analysis and the stop1->chargino1 decay.

Cross section upper limit for the t2t1h analysis.

Expected CLs for the t2t1h analysis.

Observed CLs for the t2t1h analysis.

Best expected SR for the tb analysis in the pMSSM model.

Cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the pMSSM model.

Efficiency for the SRinA signal region for the pMSSM model.

Efficiency for the SRinB signal region for the pMSSM model.

Efficiency for the SRinC signal region for the pMSSM model.

Efficiency for the SRexA signal region for the pMSSM model.

Best expected SR for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 5 GeV and BR=50%.

Cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 5 GeV and BR=50%.

Best expected SR for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 20 GeV and BR=50%.

Cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 20 GeV and BR=50%.

Best expected SR and cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 5 GeV and BR=25%.

Best expected SR and cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 20 GeV and BR=25%.

Best expected SR and cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 5 GeV and BR=75%.

Best expected SR and cross section upper limit for the tb analysis in the simplified model with Delta(m) = 20 GeV and BR=75%.

Exclusion limits for the naturalness-inspired set of pMSSM models from the combination t0L, t1L and tb analyses using the signal region yielding the smallest CLs value for the signal- plus-background hypothesis. This table is for the best expected signal region.

95% CL exclusion limits for the pMSSM model with well-tempered neutralinos as a function of M1 and mqL3. The limit is obtained as the combination of the t0L, t1L, tb and SS3L analyses, This table is for the best expected signal region.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits for the pMSSM model with well-tempered neutralinos as a function of M1 and mtR. The limit is obtained using the t0L analysis. This table is for the best expected signal region.

95% CL exclusion limits for the set of h/Z-enriched pMSSM models as a function of $\mu$ and m(qL3). The limit of is obtained as the combination of the t0L, g3b, t2t1Z and SS3L analyses, This table is for the best expected signal region.

95% CL exclusion limits for the set of h/Z-enriched pMSSM models as a function of $\mu$ and m(bR). The limit of is obtained as the combination of the t0L, t2t1Z and tb analyses, This table is for the best expected signal region.

Vertex-level efficiency if no re-tracking is performed, as a function of the vertex radial position for an RPV SUSY model of squark production with $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$, where $m(\tilde{q}) = 700$ GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0) = 494$ GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm. The result with re-tracking is tabulated in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d1.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+muon displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+muon displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+electron displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7c) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e qq]$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e qq]$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+electron displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7d) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton $e^+e^-$ displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to ee\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. A dash indicates results omitted due to limited statistical precision.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of $\mu^+\mu^-$ displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5c) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to \mu\mu\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. A dash indicates results omitted due to limited statistical precision.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton ($e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$) displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5d) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 400 GeV.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton ($e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$) displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5d) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 1000 GeV.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/ee\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV and 1300 GeV are $1280\pm230$ fb and $1.7\pm0.7$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/\mu\mu\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV and 1300 GeV are $1280\pm230$ fb and $1.7\pm0.7$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates results omitted due to limited statistical precision.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6c) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 400 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6c) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 1000 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 8a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 494 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV is $124\pm17$ fb. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 8b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 1000 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 108 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{q})$ = 1000 GeV is $11.9\pm1.5$ fb. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 9a) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and a $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 9b) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and a $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10a) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 400 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $18700\pm2800$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10b) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 400 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $18700\pm2800$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge or the limit is greater than $10^8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10c) for three split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV, 1000 GeV and 1400 GeV are $1270\pm230$ fb, $22\pm6$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10d) for three split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV, 1000 GeV and 1400 GeV are $1270\pm230$ fb, $22\pm6$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10e) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g}) - 480$ GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 500 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $4450\pm700$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10f) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g}) - 480$ GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 500 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $4450\pm700$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g})$ - 480 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g})$ - 480 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Choice of signal region in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY models with gluino decays and neutralino masses in GeV as indicated. A value of 1 indicates that the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel provided the best expected constraint for that point, while a value of -1 indicates the DV+jets channel. A dash indicates where results were not calculated for a particular mass/lifetime combination.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 11a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to \nu qq]$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to \nu qq]$ decays, respectively. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV and $m(\tilde{q})$ = 1000 GeV are $430\pm80$ fb, $124\pm17$ fb and $11.9\pm1.5$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 11b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV and 1000 GeV are $124\pm17$ fb and $11.9\pm1.5$ fb, respectively.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+muon channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 494 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one GGM SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+jets channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 400 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+electron channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e qq]$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 494 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one split-SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{g})$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 0, 1 and $\geq$2 charged leptons in the dilepton $e^+e^-$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/ee\nu]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1300 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 50 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 30 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 0, 1 and $\geq$2 charged leptons in the dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/ee\nu]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1300 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 50 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 30 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 0, 1 and $\geq$2 charged leptons in the dilepton $\mu^+\mu^-$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/\mu\mu\nu]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1300 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 50 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 30 mm.

Details of sparticle decay modes, model parameters, approximate number of generated events $N_{\rm evts}$ and total production cross-section $\sigma$ for selected models considered in this analysis. The long-lived particle (LLP) is the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ in all cases except for the model used for DV+$E_T^{miss}$, where it is the $\tilde{g}$. Events in some models are filtered to make better use of computing resources, details are given in the original table and the associated efficiency is already taken into account in the quoted cross-sections.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+muon channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+electron channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+jets channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the dilepton $e^+e^-$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Trigger'' line includes the event-level cosmic-muon veto and the requirements placed on the primary vertex, but not the offline filter selection. This is included in the ''Lepton reconstruction and DV match'' line, along with all other requirements placed on offline-reconstructed leptons. About 20,000 events of the full sample are analyzed, which contain an equal mixture of $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^+e^-\nu$ decays.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Trigger'' line includes the event-level cosmic-muon veto and the requirements placed on the primary vertex, but not the offline filter selection. This is included in the ''Lepton reconstruction and DV match'' line, along with all other requirements placed on offline-reconstructed leptons. The sample contains about 50% $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu$ decays, 25% $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^+e^-\nu$ and 25% $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to \mu^+\mu^-\nu$ decays.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the dilepton $\mu^+\mu^-$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Trigger'' line includes the event-level cosmic-muon veto and the requirements placed on the primary vertex, but not the offline filter selection. This is included in the ''Lepton reconstruction and DV match'' line, along with all other requirements placed on offline-reconstructed leptons. About 20,000 events of the full sample are analyzed, which contain an equal mixture of $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to \mu^+\mu^-\nu$ decays.