No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

Minimum-bias (0–80% of the collision cross section) v2(pT ) for identified hadrons at |η| < 1 from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. To facilitate comparisons between panels, v2 values for inclusive charged hadrons are displayed in each panel. The error bars on the data points represent statistical uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties for the identified particles are shown as shaded bands around v2 = 0.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The unidentified charged hadron, charged pion, $K^0_S$, charged kaon, proton and Λ+Λ v2 as a function of pT for 10%–40%, 0%–10% and 40%–80% of the Au+Au interaction cross section at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. Weak-decay feed-down errors are included in the error bars on the data points while non-flow and tracking error uncertainties are plotted as bands around v2 = 0, which apply to all identified particles. The errors are asymmetric and the portion of the error band above (below) zero represents the negative (positive) error.

The ratio of Λ v2 to Λbar v2. The data are from minimum bias Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 and 200 GeV. The bands show the average values of the ratios within the indicated pT ranges.

The ratio of Λ v2 to Λbar v2. The data are from minimum bias Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 and 200 GeV. The bands show the average values of the ratios within the indicated pT ranges.

The pT integrated ratio of Λ v2 to Λbar v2 for three centrality intervals 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80%. The data are from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 and 200 GeV.

The pT integrated ratio of Λ v2 to Λbar v2 for three centrality intervals 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80%. The data are from Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 and 200 GeV.

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

Identified particle v2 from minimum bias collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV scaled by the number of valence quarks in the hadron (nq) and plotted versus pT/nq (a) and (mT − m0)/nq (b). In each case a polynomial curve is fit to all particles except pions. The ratio of v2/nq to the fit function is shown in the bottom panels (c) and (d).

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

v2/nq scaled by the mean eccentricity of the initial overlap region versus (mT − m0)/nq for 0%–10%, 10%–40%, and 40%–80% most central Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panels - minimum bias $v_4$ for pions, charged kaons, $K^0_S$, anti-protons and Λ + Λbar at √sNN = 62.4 GeV. In the left panel the solid (dashed) line shows thevalue for $v_2^2$ for pions (kaons). Intheright panel the dashedline is $v_2^2$ for Λ + Λbar. Bottom panels - $v_4$ scaled by $v_2^2$ (points where $v_4$ and $v_2$ fluctuate around zero are not plotted). Grey bands correspond to the fit results described in the text and Table II. The systematic errors on the $v_4/v_2^2$ ratio from nonflow are included in the error bars leading to asymmetric errors.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Top panel - $v_2$ for pions and protons at √sNN = 62.4 and 17.3 GeV. The 62.4 GeV data are from TOF and dE/dx measurements combined. Middle and bottom panel - ratios of $v_2$ for $\pi^++\pi^-$, $K^0_S$, p+p, Λ+Λbar and at different center-of-mass energies scaled by the values at 62.4 GeV. The grey and yellow bands represent systematic uncertainties in the v2 ratios arising from non-flow effects. The grey bands (above unity) are the uncertainties for the 200 GeV/62.4 GeV data and the yellow bands (below unity) are for the 17.3 GeV/62.4 GeV data.

Fractions of subprocesses from 2-parameter fit to the single-tag data in limited energy range. The Q=1R contribution is set equal to zero.

Fractions of subprocesses from 3-parameter fit as a function of the four-momentum transfer squared, Q**2.

Phase space acceptance corrected cross sections from no-tag data.

Phase space acceptance corrected cross sections from single tag data.

Cross sections as function of Q**2.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Data read from graph.

Data read from graph.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive single jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

The NC cross section DSIG/DX for Q**2 > 10000 GeV**2. There is an additional 1.5 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The CC cross section DSIG/DX for Q**2 > 1000 GeV**2. There is an additional 1.5 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The NC reduced cross section and the electromagnetic structure funcion F2 derived from the data. For Q**2 > 2000 GeV**2 the extraction of F2 is restricted to Y < 0.6.

The CC double differential cross section D2SIG/DX/DQ**2 and the structure function term PHI.

The NC E- P reduced cross section for the high-y analysis. All E- P data not previously reported in EPJ C19 (2001) 269 are given.. There is an additional 1.8 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The NC structure function term PHI and the structure function FL for the E-P data.

The NC structure function term PHI and the structure function FL for the E+P data.

The generalised structure function XF3.

The structure function XF3(C=GAMMA,Z) obtained by averaging over different Q**2 values and transforming to Q**2 = 1500 GeV**2.

Breakdown of errors from table 6, DSIG(C=NC)/DQ**2 as a function of Q**2. All errors are in PCT.

All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 8, DSIG(C=NC)/DX as a function of X. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 9, DSIG(C=NC)/DX as a function of X. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 10, DSIG(C=CC)/DX as a function of X. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 11, F2 as a function of Q**2, X and Y. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 11, F2 as a function of Q**2, X and Y. PHI(C=NC) is the NC structure function term.. Y+ = 1+(1-Y)**2. DEL(F2),DEL9F3) and DEL(FL) are the corrections to F2 as decribed in the text of the paper.

All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 12, SIG(C=REDUCED) as a function of Q**2 andX. All errors are in PCT.

Reduced cross section from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997.

Reduced cross section from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997.

Reduced cross section from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997.

Reduced cross section from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997.

Reduced cross section from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997.

Reduced cross section from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997.

Reduced cross section from the Data sample taken in 1999 and 2000.

Reduced cross section from the Data sample taken in 1999 and 2000.

Details of systematic errors from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the Minimum Bias data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the complete ('all') data sample taken in 1997. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the Data sample taken in 1999 and 2000. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

Details of systematic errors from the Data sample taken in 1999 and 2000. D_UNC ==> uncorrelated systematic error. D_LAR ==> LAr hadronic energy scale. D_ELE ==> SPACAL electromagnetic energy scale. D_THETA ==> scattered electron angle. D_NOISE ==> calorimeter noise treatment. D_XPOM ==> reweighting the simulation in X(pomeron). D_BETA ==> reweighting the simulation in BETA. D_BG ==> background subtraction. D_PLUG ==> plug energy scale. Q**2 ==> reweighting the simulation in Q**2. SPA ==> SPACAL hadromic energy scale.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.