Cavalli-Sforza, Matteo
Exclusive
[0.0, 1.0]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

rivet Analysis
Measurement of the direct photon spectrum from Upsilon (1S) decays

The Crystal Ball collaboration Bizzeti, A. ; Schütte, J. ; Antreasyan, D. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 267 (1991) 286-292, 1991.
Inspire Record 315873 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45174

None

1 data table match query
Table 1

No description provided.


First observation of the reaction gamma gamma ---> pi (2) ---> pi0 pi0 pi0

The Crystal Ball collaboration Antreasyan, D. ; Bartels, H.W. ; Besset, D. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 48 (1990) 561-568, 1990.
Inspire Record 296523 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.15136

The Crystal Ball detector has been used at the DORIS II storage ring at DESY to study the reactionγγ→π0π0π0 in theπ0π0π0 invariant mass range from 850 MeV/c2 to 2600 MeV/c2. An enhancement around 1750 MeV/c2 is attributed to theπ2(1670) resonance. The observedπ0π0 invariant mass distribution and theπ0 angular distributions are consistent with those expected for the decay chainπ2→π0f2(1270)→π0π0π0. From our measurements we find the following resonance parameters: two photon partial width\(\Gamma _{\pi _2 }^{\gamma \gamma }= (1.41 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.28)keV\), massM(π2)=(1742±31±49)MeV/c2. and total width\(\Gamma _{\pi _2 }^{tot}= (236 \pm 49 \pm 36)MeV\).

2 data tables match query
Table 1

Data read from graph.

Table 2

Cross section times branching ratio to 3pi0 assuming the decay chain pi2 --> pi0f2 --> 3pi0.


Measurement of alpha-s from energy-energy correlations at the Z0 resonance

The SLD collaboration Abe, K. ; Abt, I. ; Ash, W.W. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 50 (1994) 5580-5590, 1994.
Inspire Record 373005 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.17744

We have determined the strong coupling $\as$ from a comprehensive study of energy-energy correlations ($EEC$) and their asymmetry ($AEEC$) in hadronic decays of $Z~0$ bosons collected by the SLD experiment at SLAC. The data were compared with all four available predictions of QCD calculated up to $\Oa2$ in perturbation theory, and also with a resummed calculation matched to all four of these calculations. We find large discrepancies between $\as$ values extracted from the different $\Oa2$ calculations. We also find a large renormalization scale ambiguity in $\as$ determined from the $EEC$ using the $\Oa2$ calculations; this ambiguity is reduced in the case of the $AEEC$, and is very small when the matched calculations are used. Averaging over all calculations, and over the $EEC$ and $AEEC$ results, we obtain $\asz=0.124~{+0.003}_{-0.004} (exp.) \pm 0.009 (theory).$

5 data tables match query
Table 1

Statistical errors only.

Table 2

Statistical errors only.

Table 3

ALPHAS from the EEC O(ALPHAS**2) measurement.

More…