Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the FCNC top-quark candidate in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the SM top-quark candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the third lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.325 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.375 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.425 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.475 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.525 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.575 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.625 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.675 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.725 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.775 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.825 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.875 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.925 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 0.975 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 1.950 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 2.950 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 3.950 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.050 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.150 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.250 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.350 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.450 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.550 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.650 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.750 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.850 GeV**2.

F2 measurements for a Q**2 of 4.950 GeV**2.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.23.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.23.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 19 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 23 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 28 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 19 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 23 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 28 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and R as a function of Q**2 with no constraints on F2 or FL. The quantites are quoted such that Q**2/X is constant for each value which correspinds to Y = 0.71 at Ecm=225 GeV.

FL and R as a function of Q**2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2. The quantites are quoted such that Q**2/X is constant for each value which correspinds to Y = 0.71 at Ecm=225 GeV.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.50 TO 0.56. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.56 TO 0.62. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.62 TO 0.65. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.65 TO 0.68. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.68 TO 0.71. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.71 TO 0.74. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.74 TO 0.77. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.77 TO 0.80. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.80 TO 0.83. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.83 TO 0.86. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.86 TO 0.89. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.89 TO 0.92. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.92 TO 0.95. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.95 TO 0.98. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.98 TO 1.00. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL in 3 PT**2 ranges.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.6E-5 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.7E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.5E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.46E-3 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.4E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.36E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.67E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.98E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 5.1E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.84E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.66E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.03E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.86E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.68E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.33E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.54E-2 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.59E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.37E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.42E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.01E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.52E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.47E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.25E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate, averaged over X, as a function of Q**2 for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2 in two XL ranges.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Differential cross sections as a function of X(C=GAMMA) from beauty and charm quarks.

Differential cross sections for the most energetic jet as a function of ET from beauty and charm quarks.

Differential cross sections for the most energetic jet as a function of ET from beauty and charm quarks.

Differential cross sections as a function of the electron ET for the jet associated to the electron from beauty or charm decays.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the bin of 2*E(Breit,current region) = 12 to 20.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the bin of 2*E(Breit,current region) = 20 to 30.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the bin of 2*E(Breit,current region) = 30 to 45.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the bin of 2*E(Breit,current region) = 45 to 100.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the Meff bin 1.5 to 4.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the Meff bin 4 to 8.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the Meff bin 8 to 12.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the Breit frame for the Meff bin 12 to 20.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for W = 70 to 100 GeV.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for W = 100 to 150 GeV.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for W = 150 to 225 GeV.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for the Meff bin 1.5 to 4.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for the Meff bin 4 to 8.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for the Meff bin 8 to 12.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for the Meff bin 12 to 20.

Multiplicity distributions measured in the current region of the hadronic centre of mass (HCM) frame for the Meff bin 20 to 30.

Mean charged multiplicity measured in the Breit frame as a function of 2*E(Breit current region) with the assumptions of stable or decaying K0 and LAMBDA particles.

Mean charged multiplicity measured to the current fragmentation region of the HCM frame as a function of W with the assumptions of stable or decaying K0 and LAMBDA particles.

Mean charged multiplicity measured in the Breit frame as a function of Meff with the assumptions of stable or decaying K0 and LAMBDA particles.

Mean charged multiplicity measured in the current fragmentation region of the HCM frame as a function of Meff with the assumptions of stable or decaying K0 and LAMBDA particles.

Differential cross section DSIG/DZ(NAME=POMERON) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON).

Differential cross section for the diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of ET of the highest jet.

Differential cross section for the diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of pseudorapidity (ETARAP) of the highest ET jet.

Differential cross section for the diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of X(C=GAMMA,OBS).

Differential cross section DSIG/DY for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of Y for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) > 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DM(P=5_6_7) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of M(P=5_6_7) for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) > 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DX(NAME=POMERON) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) > 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DZ(NAME=POMERON) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) > 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DY for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of Y for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) < 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DM(P=5_6_7) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of M(P=5_6_7) for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) < 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DX(NAME=POMERON) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) < 0.75.

Differential cross section DSIG/DZ(NAME=POMERON) for diffractive photoproduction of dijets as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for X(C=GAMMA,OBS) < 0.75.