Normalised ln(1/x) distributions.

Normalised transverse momentum distributions.

Normalised sphericity distribution.

Normalised aplanarity distribution.

Normalised thrust distribution.

INTEGRATION OVER RESTRICTED X RANGE.

EXTRAPOLATION BELOW X=0.1 AND ABOVE X=0.7.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $E_{\mathrm{T}}^\gamma$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $|\eta^\gamma|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $|\eta^\gamma|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $\Delta\phi(ll,\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $\Delta\phi(ll,\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}/m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with SHERPA 2.2.2 at NLO. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

The measured fiducial cross section vs $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell\ell\gamma}/m(\ell\ell\gamma)$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The statistical and "Uncor" uncertainty should be treated as uncorrelated bin-to-bin, while the rest are correlated between bins, and they are written as signed NP variations. The parton-to-particle correction factor $C_{theory}$ is the ratio of the cross-section predicted by Sherpa LO samples at particle level within the fiducial phase-space region defined in Table 4 to the predicted cross-section at parton level within the same fiducial region but with the smooth-cone isolation prescription defined above replacing the particle-level photon isolation criterion, and with Born-level leptons in place of dressed leptons. This correction should be applied on fixed order parton-level calculations. The systematic uncertainty is evaluated from a comparison with the correction factor obtained using events generated with Sherpa 2.2.2 at NLO. The uncertainty is defined as Max(stat error, systematic difference between Sherpa LO and Sherpa 2.2.2 NLO), and cannot be considered correlated bin-to-bin. In the case that the calculations are valid for dressed leptons, a modified correction factor excluding the Born-to-dressed lepton correction should be applied instead. This correction only takes into account the particle-level isolation criteria, and is provided separately here. The Sherpa 2.2.8 NLO cross-sections given below include a small contribution from EW $Z\gamma jj$ production.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

List of experimentally considered systematic uncertainties for the WW cross section measurement.

Extrapolated unfolded fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production as a function of $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Extrapolated unfolded fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production as a function of $m_{e\mu}$.

Extrapolated unfolded fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

PARTICLE MULTIPLICITIES FROM TASSO EXPT.DATA FROM OTHER PUBLICATIONS INCLUDED. NUMBERS INCLUDE ALL DECAY PRODUCTS FROM PARTICLES WITH LIFETIMES < 3*10**-10 SEC.

No description provided.

No description provided.

CROSS SECTIONS FOR BOTH LAMBDA AND LAMBDABAR IN MOMENTUM RANGE 1 TO 7 GEV.

Data from Figure 3b on charged pion production. Data correspond to charged particle production, corrected to the contribution from (PI+ + PI-)/2.

Data from Figure 3b on charged pion production. Data correspond to charged particle production, corrected to the contribution from (PI+ + PI-)/2.

Data from Figure 3c on charged pion production. Data correspond to charged particle production, corrected to the contribution from (PI+ + PI-)/2.

Data from Figure 3d on charged pion production. Data correspond to charged particle production, corrected to the contribution from (PI+ + PI-)/2.

Data from Figure 4a on forward jet production differential in x, low PT

Data from Figure 4a on forward jet production differential in x, high PT

Data from Figure 5a on forward jet production differential in delta(phi), low x

Data from Figure 5b on forward jet production differential in delta(phi), high x

The differential cross section as a function of Y.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

The reduced cross section as a function of Q**2 and X.

Distribution of D(SIG)/DM(P=6) as a function of M(P=6) .

Distribution of D(SIG)/DBETA as a function of BETA .

Distribution of D(SIG)/DX(NAME=POMERON) as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) .

Distribution of D(SIG)/DET(P=4,5,RF=CM) as a function of ET(P=4,5,RF=CM) .

Distribution of D(SIG)/DETARAP(P=4,5,RF=CM) as a function of ETARAP(P=4,5,RF=CM) .

Distribution of D(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) .

Distribution of D(SIG)/DX(NAME=GAMMA) as a function of X(NAME=GAMMA) .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DET(P=4,RF=CM) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for ET(P=4,RF=CM) from 5 to 6.5 GeV). .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DET(P=4,RF=CM) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for ET(P=4,RF=CM) from 6.5 to 8 GeV). .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DET(P=4,RF=CM) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for ET(P=4,RF=CM) from 8 to 16 GeV). .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DQ**2) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 from 5 to 12 GeV**2). .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DQ**2) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 from 12 to 25 GeV**2). .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DQ**2) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 from 25 to 50 GeV**2). .

Distribution of D2(SIG)/DZ(NAME=POMERON)/DQ**2) as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 from 50 to 100 GeV**2). .

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.50 TO 0.56. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.56 TO 0.62. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.62 TO 0.65. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.65 TO 0.68. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.68 TO 0.71. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.71 TO 0.74. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.74 TO 0.77. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.77 TO 0.80. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.80 TO 0.83. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.83 TO 0.86. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.86 TO 0.89. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.89 TO 0.92. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.92 TO 0.95. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.95 TO 0.98. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.98 TO 1.00. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL in 3 PT**2 ranges.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.6E-5 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.7E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.5E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.46E-3 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.4E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.36E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.67E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.98E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 5.1E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.84E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.66E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.03E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.86E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.68E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.33E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.54E-2 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.59E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.37E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.42E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.01E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.52E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.47E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.25E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate, averaged over X, as a function of Q**2 for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2 in two XL ranges.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $x_{I\!\!P}$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $y$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $Q^2$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $M_X$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $\langle\eta^{\text{jets}}\rangle$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $x_{I\!\!P}$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $y$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $x_\gamma$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $M_X$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $\langle\eta^{\text{jets}}\rangle$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $y$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.