Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the dilepton transverse momentum $p^{ll}_{\mathrm{T}}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the the four-body transverse momentum $p^{ll\gamma\gamma}_{\mathrm{T}}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the diphoton invariant mass $m_{\gamma\gamma}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Measured unfolded differential cross-section as a function of the four-body invariant mass $m_{ll\gamma\gamma}$. NLO predictions from Sherpa 2.2.10 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.7.3 are also shown. The uncertainty in the predictions is divided into statistical and theoretical uncertainties (scale and PDF+$\alpha_{s}$).

Expected and observed $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameters $f_{T,j}/\Lambda^{4}$ of transverse dimension-8 operators. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level. No unitarity constraints are applied.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,8}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,0}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,1}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,2}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,5}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,6}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,7}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Expected and observed unitarised $95\%$ confidence intervals for the coupling parameter $f_{T,9}/\Lambda^{4}$ in the clipping energy range between 1.1 and 5 TeV. The non-unitarised limits ($E_c = \infty$) are also shown. All parameter values outside of the stated range are excluded at the chosen confidence level.

Measured $\gamma+c$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$.

Measured $\gamma+c$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$.

Measured ratio of the $\gamma+b$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$ to that for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$.

Measured ratio of the $\gamma+c$ fiducial differential cross section as a function of $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$ to that for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$.

Statistical correlation between the $\gamma+b$ and the $\gamma+c$ cross sections in a given $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ bin and $|\eta^\gamma|$ region. The two cross sections are correlated as the heavy flavour fractions are extracted simultaneously from a template fit, performed in each $E_\text{T}^\gamma$ bin and separately for the two $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+b$ cross section for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+b$ cross section for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+c$ cross section for $|\eta^\gamma|<1.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Signed shifts of the individual systematic uncertainties on the $\gamma+c$ cross section for $1.56<|\eta^\gamma|<2.37$. The numbers after the name of the uncertainty source refer to the individual component in that uncertainty. Each bin of the MC statistical uncertainty is independent of any other bin. The first four components of the photon energy scale uncertainty are specific to this $|\eta^\gamma|$ region and are independent of the components in the other region. The region is indicated as part of their name to indicate the independence between the $|\eta^\gamma|$ regions. The uncertainties on the prompt photon modelling, non-perturbative QCD models and particle-level migration effects are only varied once and not up and down by their nature, but are symmetrised for the final results. Only uncertainties which have at least a 1% variation in at least one bin of the $\gamma+b$ and $\gamma+c$ cross section measurements, including the ratios, are listed. The others are summed in quadrature and listed as a single entry.

Measured differential cross section dsigma/dET in pb/GeV given q_T < 10 GeV. For the data values, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. For the theory values, the uncertainty combines statistical, PDF, and renormalization/factorization scale components.

Measured differential cross section dsigma/dET in pb/GeV given q_T > 50 GeV. For the data values, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. For the theory values, the uncertainty combines statistical, PDF, and renormalization/factorization scale components.

Measured differential cross section dsigma/dDR in pb/radians. For the data values, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. For the theory values, the uncertainty combines statistical, PDF, and renormalization/factorization scale components.

Measured differential cross section dsigma/dDR in pb/radians given q_T < 10 GeV. For the data values, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. For the theory values, the uncertainty combines statistical, PDF, and renormalization/factorization scale components.

Measured differential cross section dsigma/dDR in pb/radians given q_T > 50 GeV. For the data values, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. For the theory values, the uncertainty combines statistical, PDF, and renormalization/factorization scale components.

The measured bin-averaged cross-section $d\sigma/d\Delta\phi^{\gamma \rm j}$ for isolated-photon plus jet production. Other details as in the caption to Table 1.

The measured bin-averaged cross-section $d\sigma/d{\rm m}^{\gamma \rm j}$ with the requirements on $|\cos{\Theta^{\gamma \rm J}}|$ and $|\eta^\gamma + {\rm y^{jet}}|$ for isolated-photon plus jet production. Other details as in the caption to Table 1.

The measured bin-averaged cross-section $d\sigma/d|\cos{\Theta^{\gamma \rm j}}|$ with the requirements on ${\rm m}^{\gamma \rm J}$ and $|\eta^\gamma + {\rm y^{jet}}|$ for isolated-photon plus jet production. Other details as in the caption to Table 1.

The measured bin-averaged cross-section $d\sigma/d|\cos{\Theta^{\gamma \rm j}}|$ without the requirements on ${\rm m}^{\gamma \rm J}$ and $|\eta^\gamma + {\rm y^{jet}}|$ for isolated-photon plus jet production. Other details as in the caption to Table 1.

The measured cross section as a function of the photon transverse energy, ET, for pT(jet)>20 GeV, |eta(gamma)|<1.37, |y(jet)|<1.2, eta(gamma)*y(jet)<0.

The measured cross section as a function of the photon transverse energy, ET, for pT(jet)>20 GeV, |eta(gamma)|<1.37, 1.2<=|y(jet)|<2.8, eta(gamma)*y(jet)<0.

The measured cross section as a function of the photon transverse energy, ET, for pT(jet)>20 GeV, |eta(gamma)|<1.37, 2.8<=|y(jet)|<4.4, eta(gamma)*y(jet)<0.

The measured prompt photon cross section as a function of transverse energy for the |pseudorapidity| range 1.81 TO 2.37.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the mean transverse energy of thedi-jet system for the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75 .

The di-jet cross section as a function of the mean transverse energy of thedi-jet system for the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for transverse energy from 5 TO 7 GeV for the full X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) region.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for mean transverse energy 7 TO 11 GeV for the full X(C=GAMMA+)-X(C=GAMMA-) region.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for mean transverse energy 11 TO 25 for the full X(C=GAMMA+)-X(C=GAMMA-) region.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for mean transverse energy 5 TO 7 GeV in the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for mean transverse energy 7 TO 11 GeV in the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for mean transverse energy 5 TO 7 GeV in the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of X(C=GAMMA) for mean transverse energy 7 TO 11 GeV in the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of LOG10(X(C =GAMMA)) for mean transverse energy 5 TO 7 GeV for the full X(C=GAMMA+)-X(C=GAMMA-) region.

The di-jet cross section as a function of LOG10(X(C =GAMMA)) for mean transverse energy 5 TO 7 for the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-) are <0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of LOG10(X(C =GAMMA)) for mean transverse energy 5 to 7 GeV for the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity difference of the two leading jets for the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity difference of the two leading jets for the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the jet with the lower pseudorapidity in the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-)are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the jet with the lower pseudorapidity in the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the jet with the lower pseudorapidity in the region where either X(C=GAMMA+) or X(C=GAMMA-)are < 0.75.

The di-jet cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the jet with the lower pseudorapidity in the region where both X(C=GAMMA+) and X(C=GAMMA-) are < 0.75.

The differential dijet cross section dsig/dM.

The differential dijet cross section dsig/dET of the leading jet in the Breit frame.

The differential cross section dsig/detarap of the leading jet in the Breitframe.

The differential cross section dsig/dET of the non-leading jet in the Breitframe.

The differential cross section dsig/detarap of the non-leading jet in the Breit frame.

The differential inclusive cross section dsig/dQ**2.

The differential dijet cross section dsig/dQ**2.

The dijet fraction.

The measured values of ALPHA_S determined from the QCD fit to the measured dijet fraction. The first systematic (DSYS) error is the systematic uncertainty not associated with the energy scales of the jets, the second is associated with the energy scales and the third DSYS error is the total theoretical uncertainty.

The measured value of ALPHA_S at the Z0 mass determined from the QCD fit tothe measured dijet spectrum. The first DSYS error is the total experimental systematic uncertainty and the second is the total theoretical systematic uncertainty.