The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The measured differential cross section based on the kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP -1 TO 0 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP 0 TO 1 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP 1 TO 1.5 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP 1.5 TO 2 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP 2 TO 2.5 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the anti-kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP -1 TO 2.5 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the SIScone jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ET for jet ETARAP -1 TO 2.5 . The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the anti-kT jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ETARAP for jet ET > 17 GeV. The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

The measured differential cross section based on the SIScone jet algorithm in the kinematic region Q^2<1 GeV^2 and 142 < W < 293 GeV as a function of the jet ETARAP for jet ET > 17 GeV. The first (sys) error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the jet-energy scale uncertainty.

Quadrangular flow (v4) measured with respect to symmetry plane Psi4, estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0), measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum for various centrality classes.

Quadrangular flow (v4) measured with respect to symmetry plane Psi2, estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0), measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum for various centrality classes.

Comparison of the ALICE results on v2, v3 and v4 obtained with the event plane method, measured for unidentified charged particles as a function of transverse momentum, for centrality 30-40%. Note that these results are the same as in Figure 1.

Relative event-by-event elliptic flow fluctuations for unidentified charged particles versus transverse momentum for different centrality classes.

Unidentified charged particle v2, v3, and v4 integrated over the transverse momentum range 10 < pT < 20 GeV as a function of collision centrality.

Elliptic flow (v2) estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0) of charged pion and proton as a function of transverse momentum for 10-50% centrality class compared to results for unidentified charged particles.

Triangular flow (v3) estimated with Event Plane method (with eta gap of 2.0) of charged pion and proton as a function of transverse momentum for 10-50% centrality class compared to results for unidentified charged particles.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 0-5%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 5-10%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 10-20%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 20-30%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 30-40%.

$v_{2}$ vs $p_{T}$, centrality 40-50%.

Total production cross sections of D mesons, extrapolated to the full phase space. The second (sys) error is the from the luminosity uncertainty, the third from the branching-ratio uncertainties and the fourth is from the extrapolation uncertainty.

The ratio, Pv, of cdbar D mesons produced in a vector state to those produced in a vector or a pseudoscalar state. The second (sys) error is the the branching-ratio uncertainties and the third is from the extrapolation uncertainty.

The weighted average of the total charm production cross section. The second (sys) error is the from the branching-ratio uncertainties, the third is from the Fragmentation Function uncertainties, the fourth is from the luminosity uncertainty and the fifth is from the extrapolation uncertainty.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda_c^+ X)/dp_T(J/\psi)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\Lambda_c^+)<4$, $3<p_T(\Lambda_c^+) <12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X)/dp_T(D^0)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X)/dp_T(D^+)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X)/dp_T(D_s^+)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $d\ln\sigma(pp\rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda_c^+ X)/dp_T(\Lambda_c^+)$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\Lambda_c^+)<4$, $3<p_T(\Lambda_c^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{dp_T( D^0 )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D^+ )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^+ X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12~GeV/c$, $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{dp_T( C )}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s- X \right)}{dp_T( D )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{dp_T( C )}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X \right)}{d \Delta y }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X \right)}{d \Delta y }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X \right)}{d \Delta y}$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12~GeV/c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ , $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ , $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta \phi/\pi \right|}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12~GeV/c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ , $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^- X \right)}{d \left| \Delta y \right|}$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^0 X \right)}{d m_{J/\psi D^0} }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D^+ X \right)}{d m_{J/\psi D^+} }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow J/\psi D_s^+ X \right)}{d m_{J/\psi D_s^+} }$ for $2<y(J/\psi)<4$, $p_T(J/\psi)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^0 X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D^0} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^+ X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D^+} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{D}^0 X \right)}{d m_{D^0 \bar{D}^0} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D^- X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D^-} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 D_s^- X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D_s^-} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^0 \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{d m_{D^0 D_s^-} }$ for $2<y(D^0)<4$, $3<p_T(D^0)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D^- X \right)}{d m_{D^+ D^-} }$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ D_s^- X \right)}{d m_{D^+ D_s^-} }$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(D_s^-)<4$, $3<p_T(D_s^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

Normalized differential cross-section $\frac{d\ln\sigma\left(pp\rightarrow D^+ \bar{\Lambda}_c^- X \right)}{d m_{D^+ \bar{\Lambda}_c^-} }$ for $2<y(D^+)<4$, $3<p_T(D^+)<12$ GeV/$c$, $2<y(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<4$, $3<p_T(\bar{\Lambda}_c^-)<12$ GeV/$c$ region.

$A_N$ vs. $x_F$ at average pseudorapidity of 3.68 for $\pi^0$ and $\eta$. Also shown are the previously published results for $\pi^0$ at lower $x_F$ , derived from the same data set but without the center cut [12]. The error bars are statistical uncertainties only. The error boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties.

(color online) $A_{N}$ as a function of the corrected mean $p_{T}$ for 2006 transverse data. The panels present $A_{N}$ for four different $\eta$ bins. $A_{N}$ is the left-right single-spin asymmetry for a transversely polarized beam. The errors shown combine the statistical uncertainties, which dominate, with all systematic uncertainties except trigger and reconstruction bias. See Sect. V A for a discussion of the latter.

(color online) $A_{\Sigma}$ versus corrected mean $p_{T}$ for 2006 transverse data, averaged over the range $|\eta|$ < 0.8$. A_{\Sigma}$, the transverse double-spin asymmetry for transversely polarized beams, is defined in more detail in the text.

(color online) Measured transverse double-spin asymmetry versus azimuthal angle $\phi$ for 2006 transverse data. The points are fit with the function $A_{\sigma}+A_{TT}cos(2\phi)$. These data are averaged over $7.5<p_{T}<40$ GeV/c and $|\eta|<0.8$.

(color online) $A_{LL}$ for inclusive jet production versus corrected jet $p_{T}$ for 2005 data. For 2005 data we used a cone radius equal to 0.4 and a pseudorapidity range for the jet thrust axis of $0.2<\eta<0.8$. The error bars are statistical. The gray boxes show the systematic uncertainties.

(color online) $A_{LL}$ for inclusive jet production versus corrected jet $p_{T}$ for 2006 data. For 2006 data we used a jet cone radius equal to 0.7 and a pseudorapidity range of $−0.7<\eta<0.9$ to reflect the increased detector coverage. The error bars are statistical. The gray boxes show the systematic uncertainties.