Light ion collisions with carbon target at 4.2 GeV/c/N are studied. Pion multiplicity distributions, momentum and angular spectra are analysed. These data are described in terms of models assuming independent interactions of nucleons from the projectile nucleus with the target.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
No description provided.
ALL NEGATIVE PARTICLES WAS CONSIDERED AS PI-.
ALL NEGATIVE PARTICLES WAS CONSIDERED AS PI-.
None
NUCLEUS IS THE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.
NUCLEUS IS THE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.
NUCLEUS IS THE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
ALL NEGATIVE PARTICLES WAS CONSIDERED AS PI-.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
ASYM is defined as follows: ASYM = (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)<1.1) - (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)>1.1)) / (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)<1.1)+ SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)>1.1)).
ASYM is defined as follows: ASYM = (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)<1.1) - (SIG(YRAP( P=3,RF=LAB)>1.1)) / (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)<1.1)+SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)>1.1)).
ASYM is defined as follows: ASYM = (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)<1.1) - (SIG(YRAP( P=3,RF=LAB)>1.1)) / (SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)<1.1)+SIG(YRAP(P=3,RF=LAB)>1.1)).
None
No description provided.
None
FRAGB - BEAM FRAGMENT WITH Z>=2.
.
.
Azimuthal anisotropy ($v_2$) and two-particle angular correlations of high $p_T$ charged hadrons have been measured in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=130 GeV for transverse momenta up to 6 GeV/c, where hard processes are expected to contribute significantly. The two-particle angular correlations exhibit elliptic flow and a structure suggestive of fragmentation of high $p_T$ partons. The monotonic rise of $v_2(p_T)$ for $p_T<2$ GeV/c is consistent with collective hydrodynamical flow calculations. At $\pT>3$ GeV/c a saturation of $v_2$ is observed which persists up to $p_T=6$ GeV/c.
$v_{2}$($p_{T}$) for different collision centralities. The errors are statistical only. The systematic uncertainties, which are highly correlated point-to-point, are $^{+5}_{-20}%$.
$v_{2}$($p_{T}$) for minimum-bias events (circles). The error bars represent the statistical errors and the caps show the systematic uncertainty. The data are compared with hydro+pQCD calculations [9] assuming the initial gluon density $dN^{g}/dy$ = 1000 (dashed line), 500 (dotted line), and 200 (dashed-dotted line). Also shown are pure hydrodynamical calculations [16] (solid line).
High $p_{T}$ azimuthal correlation functions for central events. Upper panel: Correlation function for $|\Delta\eta|$ < 0.5 (solid circles) and scaled correlation function for 0.5 < $|\Delta\eta|$ < 1.4 (open squares). Lower panel: Difference of the two correlation functions. Also shown are the fits to the data (described in the text).
We present the first data on $e^+e^-$ pair production accompanied by nuclear breakup in ultra-peripheral gold-gold collisions at a center of mass energy of 200 GeV per nucleon pair. The nuclear breakup requirement selects events at small impact parameters, where higher-order corrections to the pair production cross section should be enhanced. We compare the pair kinematic distributions with two calculations: one based on the equivalent photon approximation, and the other using lowest-order quantum electrodynamics (QED): the latter includes the photon virtuality. The cross section, pair mass, rapidity and angular distributions are in good agreement with both calculations. The pair transverse momentum, $p_T$, spectrum agrees with the QED calculation, but not with the equivalent photon approach. We set limits on higher-order contributions to the cross section. The $e^+$ and $e^-$ $p_T$ spectra are similar, with no evidence for interference effects due to higher-order diagrams.
(a) The pair mass distribution, (b) pair $p){T}$ , (c) pair rapidity and (d) pair cos($\theta′$) distributions. The data (points) are compared with predictions from the EPA (solid histogram) and lowest-order QED (dashed histogram) calculations. The error bars include both statistical and systematic errors.
(a) The pair mass distribution, (b) pair $p){T}$ , (c) pair rapidity and (d) pair cos($\theta′$) distributions. The data (points) are compared with predictions from the EPA (solid histogram) and lowest-order QED (dashed histogram) calculations. The error bars include both statistical and systematic errors.
(a) The pair mass distribution, (b) pair $p){T}$ , (c) pair rapidity and (d) pair cos($\theta′$) distributions. The data (points) are compared with predictions from the EPA (solid histogram) and lowest-order QED (dashed histogram) calculations. The error bars include both statistical and systematic errors.
Forum