$\psi^{\prime}(J/\psi)$ dielectron yield ratio measured at $|y|$ < 0.35 followed by point-to-point uncorrelated (uncorr.) (statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties) and correlated systematic (corr.) uncertainties.

$J/\psi$ counts obtained from the dimuon decay analysis of four different data sets, determined using the fit function. The S and N following 2006 and 2008 indicate the data sets for the south and north forward arms.

$J/\psi$ counts obtained from the dimuon decay analysis of four different data sets, determined using the fit function. The S and N following 2006 and 2008 indicate the data sets for the south and north forward arms.

Transverse momentum dependence of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ yields in $|y|$ < 0.35, and ${\psi^{\prime}}/{J/\psi}$ ratio together with ratios obtained in other experiments. Uncertainties are point-to-point uncorrelated (uncorr.) (statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties) and correlated systematic (corr.) uncertainties. The global uncertainty is 10%.

Transverse momentum dependence of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ yields in $|y|$ < 0.35, and ${\psi^{\prime}}/{J/\psi}$ ratio together with ratios obtained in other experiments. Uncertainties are point-to-point uncorrelated (uncorr.) (statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties) and correlated systematic (corr.) uncertainties. The global uncertainty is 10%.

Transverse momentum dependence of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ yields in $|y|$ < 0.35, and ${\psi^{\prime}}/{J/\psi}$ ratio together with ratios obtained in other experiments. Uncertainties are point-to-point uncorrelated (uncorr.) (statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties) and correlated systematic (corr.) uncertainties. The global uncertainty is 10%.

Transverse momentum dependence of the $J/\psi$ dimuon differential cross section obtained in the muon arms in 2006 and 2008 Runs. Uncertainties are point-to-point uncorrelated (uncorr.) (statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties) and correlated systematic (corr.) uncertainties. The global uncertainty is 10%.

Rapidity dependence of the $J/\psi$ yield combining dielectron ($|y|$ < 0.35 - full squares) with dimuon channels (1.2 < $|y|$ < 2.4 - full circles) along with the fits used to estimate the total cross section. Uncertainties are point-to-point uncorrelated (uncorr.) (statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties) and correlated systematic (corr.) uncertainties. The global uncertainty is 10%.

$\bar{d}/d$ ratio vs. $p_T$ for minimum bias data.

Correlation function, C(q) for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation function, C(q) for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation function, C(q) for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

Correlation functions, C(q), for $\pi^+\pi^+$ and $\pi^-\pi^-$ pairs.

$k_T$ dependence of extracted spheroidal source parameters for pion source functions (a) $R_T$ , (b) $a$, and (c) $\lambda$ for most central collisions & perhipheral collisions.

$k_T$ dependence of extracted spheroidal source parameters for pion source functions (a) $R_T$ , (b) $a$, and (c) $\lambda$ for most central collisions & perhipheral collisions.

$k_T$ dependence of extracted spheroidal source parameters for pion source functions (a) $R_T$ , (b) $a$, and (c) $\lambda$ for most central collisions & perhipheral collisions.

Direct photon cross section. (a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

Direct photon cross section. (a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

(a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

$R_{dA}$ ($d$+Au data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factor for $d$+Au, $R_{dA}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ . The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual- and real-photon measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The box on the right shows the uncertainty of $T_{dA}$ for $d$+Au. The curves indicate the theoretical calculations [24] with different combinations of the CNM effects such as the Cronin enhancement, isospin effect, nuclear shadowing and initial state energy loss.

$R_{dA}$ ($d$+Au data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factor for $d$+Au, $R_{dA}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ . The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual- and real-photon measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The box on the right shows the uncertainty of $T_{dA}$ for $d$+Au. The curves indicate the theoretical calculations [24] with different combinations of the CNM effects such as the Cronin enhancement, isospin effect, nuclear shadowing and initial state energy loss.

$R_{AA}$ (Au+Au MB data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factors for Au+Au (MB) and $d$+Au as a function of $p_{T}$ . The triangle symbols show results from the (closed) virtual [1] and (open) real photon [5] measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The (+) symbols for $R_{dA}$ for $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/$c$ illustrates the difference in magnitude for $R_{AA}$ between Au+Au and $d$+Au collisions.

$R_{AA}$ (Au+Au MB data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factors for Au+Au (MB) and $d$+Au as a function of $p_{T}$ . The triangle symbols show results from the (closed) virtual [1] and (open) real photon [5] measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The (+) symbols for $R_{dA}$ for $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/$c$ illustrates the difference in magnitude for $R_{AA}$ between Au+Au and $d$+Au collisions.

Exponent according to the Eq. 5 as a function of transverse momenta extracted from p+Au/p+Al and $^{3}$HeAu/p+Au collision systems. The uncertainties from the $N_{coll}$ calculations and from the overall normalization of p+p cancel in these ratios

Nuclear modification factors in p+Al, p+Au, d+Au, and $^{3}$He+Au in five centrality bins and for inelastic collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. The right boxes are the uncertainties of the $N_{coll}$ collisions from the Glauber model, while the left box represents the overall normalization uncertainty from p+p collisions

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. the number of collisions is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. Average $R_{xA}$ is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. the number of collisions is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. Average $R_{xA}$ is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. the number of collisions per projectile participant is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. Average $R_{xA}$ is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. the number of collisions per projectile participant is tabulated here.

Average $R_{xA}$ in two different $p_T$ regions versus the number of collisions (panels a,b) and the number of collisions per projectile participant (panels c,d). The tilted error bars represent the anti-correlated uncertainty on the y and x-axis due to the Ncoll calculations. Centrality vs. Average $R_{xA}$ is tabulated here.

$R_{xA}$ for inelastic collisions compared to three different nuclear PDF calculations and their uncertainties. The data points include the statistical and systematical uncertainties. Relevant data has been tabulated in Figure 7.

The upper panel (a) shows the <$R_{xA}$> above $p_T$ =8 Gev/c as a function $N_{coll}$/$N_{proj}$. The data are compared to predictions from [49] for the consequences of high-$x$ nucleon size fluctuations. The lower panels show the $R_{xA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for most central on left (b) and most peripheral on right panel (c) collisions. Panel (a) has been tabulated in Figure 10 and Panel (b) and (c) in Figure 9.

The upper panel (a) shows the <$R_{xA}$> above $p_T$ =8 Gev/c as a function $N_{coll}$/$N_{proj}$. The data are compared to predictions from [49] for the consequences of high-$x$ nucleon size fluctuations. The lower panels show the $R_{xA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for most central on left (b) and most peripheral on right panel (c) collisions. Panel (a) has been tabulated in Figure 10 and Panel (b) and (c) in Figure 9. Centrality vs. the number of collisions per projectile participant in panel (a) is tabulated here.

The upper panel (a) shows the <$R_{xA}$> above $p_T$ =8 Gev/c as a function $N_{coll}$/$N_{proj}$. The data are compared to predictions from [49] for the consequences of high-$x$ nucleon size fluctuations. The lower panels show the $R_{xA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for most central on left (b) and most peripheral on right panel (c) collisions. Panel (a) has been tabulated in Figure 10 and Panel (b) and (c) in Figure 9. Centrality vs. Average $R_{xA}$ in panel (a) is tabulated here.

The upper panel (a) shows the <$R_{xA}$> above $p_T$ =8 Gev/c as a function $N_{coll}$/$N_{proj}$. The data are compared to predictions from [49] for the consequences of high-$x$ nucleon size fluctuations. The lower panels show the $R_{xA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for most central on left (b) and most peripheral on right panel (c) collisions. Panel (a) has been tabulated in Figure 10 and Panel (b) and (c) in Figure 9. Panel(b) and panel(c) are tabulated here.

Integrated yields for 1--2 GeV/c in panel (a) and 2--3 GeV/c in panel (b) as a function of charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity.

Integrated yields for 1--2 GeV/c in panel (a) and 2--3 GeV/c in panel (b) as a function of charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity. Centrality vs. charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity is tabulated here.

Integrated yields for 1--2 GeV/c in panel (a) and 2--3 GeV/c in panel (b) as a function of charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity. Centrality vs. integrated yield is tabulated here.

Integrated yields for 1--2 GeV/c in panel (a) and 2--3 GeV/c in panel (b) as a function of charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity.

Integrated yields for 1--2 GeV/c in panel (a) and 2--3 GeV/c in panel (b) as a function of charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity. Centrality vs. charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity is tabulated here.

Integrated yields for 1--2 GeV/c in panel (a) and 2--3 GeV/c in panel (b) as a function of charged particle multiplicity density at mid rapidity. Centrality vs. integrated yield is tabulated here.

Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. The graphical representation of statistical and systematic uncertainties is the same as in Fig. 4.

Lévy index parameter $\alpha$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are indicated similarly to Fig. 4. The horizontal line, %\aplha$ = 1.207, represents the 0%-30% centrality average value of %\aplha$.

Inverse square of the Lévy scale parameter 1/$R^2$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. Statistical and systematic uncertainties shown as bars and boxes, respectively.

New scale parameter $\hat{R}$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair, with a linear fit. Statistical and systematic uncertainties shown as bars and boxes, respectively.

Normalized correlation strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{max}$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. The data are compared with parameter scans from Refs. [58, 59] using different values of in-medium $\eta^{\prime}$ mass $m^{*}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ and slope parameter $B^{-1}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ . A best fit with Eq. (63) and the resulting $H$ and $\sigma$ parameters are also shown.

Normalized correlation strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{max}$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. The data are compared with parameter scans from Refs. [58, 59] using different values of in-medium $\eta^{\prime}$ mass $m^{*}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ and slope parameter $B^{-1}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ . A best fit with Eq. (63) and the resulting $H$ and $\sigma$ parameters are also shown.

Normalized correlation strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{max}$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. The data are compared with parameter scans from Refs. [58, 59] using different values of in-medium $\eta^{\prime}$ mass $m^{*}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ and slope parameter $B^{-1}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ . A best fit with Eq. (63) and the resulting $H$ and $\sigma$ parameters are also shown.

Normalized correlation strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{max}$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. The data are compared with parameter scans from Refs. [58, 59] using different values of in-medium $\eta^{\prime}$ mass $m^{*}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ and slope parameter $B^{-1}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ . A best fit with Eq. (63) and the resulting $H$ and $\sigma$ parameters are also shown.

Normalized correlation strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{max}$ versus average $m_T$ of the pair. The data are compared with parameter scans from Refs. [58, 59] using different values of in-medium $\eta^{\prime}$ mass $m^{*}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ and slope parameter $B^{-1}_{\eta^{\prime}}$ . A best fit with Eq. (63) and the resulting $H$ and $\sigma$ parameters are also shown.

Centrality dependence of the $p_{T}$ distribution for $K^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

Centrality dependence of the $p_{T}$ distribution for protons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

Centrality dependence of the $p_{T}$ distribution for antiprotons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

Centrality dependence of the $p_{T}$ distribution for antiprotons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

Inverse slope parameters for $\pi^{+}$, $\pi^{-}$, $K^{+}$, $K^{-}$, proton, and antiproton for the 0-5%, 40-50%, and 60-92% centrality bins. Errors are statistical only.

Fit paramaters $T_{0}^{+}$ and $T_{0}^{-}$. Errors are statistical only.

Fit paramaters $u_{t}^{+}$ and $u_{t}^{-}$. Errors are statistical only.

Relationship between $N_{part}$ and centrality.

Mean transverse momentum as a function of centrality for pions, kaons, protons,and antiprotons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Errors are systematic only.

dN/dy as a function of centrality for pions, kaons, protons,and antiprotons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Errors are systematic only.

Particle ratios of $\pi^{-}$/$\pi^{+}$ for centrality 0-5% and 60-92%. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Particle ratios of $K^{-}$/$K^{+}$ for centrality 0-5% and 60-92%. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Particle ratios of antiprotons/protons for centrality 0-5%, 60-92%, and minimum bias. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Particle ratios of kaons/pions for centrality 0-5% and 60-92%. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Particle ratios of proton/$\pi^{+}$ and antiproton/$\pi^{-}$ for centrality 0-10%, 20-30%, and 60-92%. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Particle ratios of proton/$\pi^{0}$ and antiproton/$\pi^{0}$ for centrality 0-10%, 20-30%, and 60-92%. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Centrality dependence of particle ratios for $\pi^{-}$/$\pi^{+}$, $K^{-}$/$K^{+}$, and antiprotons/protons. Errors are statistical and systematic.

Rcp as a function of centrality 0-10% and 60-92% for ($\pi^{+}$ + $\pi^{-}$)/2. Errors are statistical only.

Rcp as a function of centrality 0-10% and 60-92% for ($K^{+}$ + $K^{-}$)/2. Errors are statistical only.

Rcp as a function of centrality 0-10% and 60-92% for charged (p+pbar)/2. Errors are statistical only.

Rcp as a function of centrality 0-10% and 60-92% for neutral pions. Errors are statistical only.

Integrated Rcp above $p_{T}$ = 1.5 GeV/c as a function of centrality 60-92% for pions, kaons, and (p+pbar)/2. Errors are statistical only.