Distributions of representative kinematic variables in the misidentified background-enriched same-sign region: (a) the Higgs boson transverse momentum ($p_\text{T}^H$) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ category, (b) the missing transverse momentum (${E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}}$) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ category, (c) the radial distance (dR$(\ell,\ell)$) between the two light leptons associated to the $Z\to\ell{}\ell$ decay process in the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ category, and (d) the invariant mass ($m_{\ell\ell}$) of the two light leptons associated to the $Z\to\ell{}\ell$ decay in the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ category. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions and are normalized as predicted by the Standard Model.

Post-fit distributions for NN-based analysis of the NN-scores in the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c) and $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit distributions for NN-based analysis of the NN-scores in the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c) and $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit distributions for NN-based analysis of the NN-scores in the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c) and $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit distributions for NN-based analysis of the NN-scores in the $ZH(\\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c) and $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit yields from the NN-based fit performed with $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}=\mu_{ZH}^{\tau\tau}=\mu_{WH}^{\tau\tau}$. The symbol $-$ is used when no events or $<10^{-2}$ events are present.

Event yields as a function of $\log_{10}(S/B)$ for data, background, and a Higgs boson signal with $m_{H} = 125$ GeV. Final-discriminant bins in all regions are combined into bins of $\log_{10}(S/B)$, where $S$ is the fitted signal and $B$ is the fitted background from the NN-based fit. The Higgs boson signal contribution is shown after re-scaling the SM cross-section according to the value of the signal strength extracted from data ($\mu = 1.28$). In the lower panel, the pull of the data relative to the background-only expectation, evaluated as the difference between the data and the background-only expectation divided by the square-root sum of the data and background statistical uncertainty, is shown. The solid line shows the expected pull in each bin for the best-fit signal value.

The fitted values of the Higgs boson signal strength $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ for $m_{H} = 125$ GeV for the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes and their combination from the NN-based fit. The individual $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ values for the $(W/Z)H$ processes are obtained from a simultaneous fit with the signal strength for each of the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes floating independently. The probability of compatibility of the individual signal strengths is 56\%.

Post-fit distributions for mass-based analysis for $m_{\mathrm{MMC}}$ in the (a) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, (b) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, and for $m_{\mathrm{2T}}$ in the (c) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ and (d) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit distributions for mass-based analysis for $m_{\mathrm{MMC}}$ in the (a) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, (b) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, and for $m_{\mathrm{2T}}$ in the (c) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ and (d) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit distributions for mass-based analysis for $m_{\mathrm{MMC}}$ in the (a) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, (b) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, and for $m_{\mathrm{2T}}$ in the (c) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ and (d) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Post-fit distributions for mass-based analysis for $m_{\mathrm{MMC}}$ in the (a) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, (b) $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, and for $m_{\mathrm{2T}}$ in the (c) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})# and (d) $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ categories. The hatched band indicates the total post-fit uncertainty of the total predicted yields. The post-fit signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

The fitted values from the NN-based fit of the Higgs boson signal strength $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ for $m_{H} = 125$ GeV are shown separately for the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ categories, the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes, and their full combination. The individual $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ values for the $(W/Z)H$ processes are obtained from a simultaneous fit with the signal strength for each of the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes floating independently.

Summary table with the expected (exp) and observed (obs) values of the $\mu^{\tau\tau}_{\text{VH}}$ and the significance resulting from the mass-based fit.

Event yields as a function of $\log_{10}(S/B)$ for data, background, and a Higgs boson signal with $m_{H} = 125$ GeV. Final-discriminant bins in all regions are combined into bins of $\log_{10}(S/B)$, where $S$ is the fitted signal and $B$ is the fitted background from the NN-based fit. The Higgs boson signal contribution is shown after re-scaling the SM cross-section according to the value of the signal strength extracted from data ($\mu = 1.28$). In the lower panel, the pull of the data relative to the background-only expectation, evaluated as the difference between the data and the background-only expectation divided by the square-root sum of the data and background statistical uncertainty, is shown. The solid line shows the expected pull in each bin for the best-fit signal value.

Summary table with the expected (exp) and observed (obs) values of the $\mu^{\tau\tau}_{\text{VH}}$ and the significance resulting from the mass-based fit.

The fitted values from the mass-based fit of the Higgs boson signal strength $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ for $m_{H} = 125$ GeV are shown for the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes and their combination. The individual $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ values for the $(W/Z)H$ processes are obtained from a simultaneous fit with the signal strength for each of the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes floating independently. The probability of compatibility of the individual signal strengths is 85\%.

The fitted values from the mass-based fit of the Higgs boson signal strength $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ for $m_{H} = 125$ GeV are shown separately for the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$, $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ categories, the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes, and their full combination. The individual $\mu_{VH}^{\tau\tau}$ values for the $(W/Z)H$ processes are obtained from a simultaneous fit with the signal strength for each of the $WH$ and $ZH$ processes floating independently.

Distributions of $d\phi({E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}},\tau_{1})$ (left) and $\eta$ of the leading $p_\text{T}$ $\tau_{\mathrm{had}-\mathrm{vis}}$ (right) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $Z\to\tau\tau$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of $d\phi({E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}},\tau_{1})$ (left) and $\eta$ of the leading $p_\text{T}$ $\tau_{\mathrm{had}-\mathrm{vis}}$ (right) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $Z\to\tau\tau$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the radial distance $dR(\tau_{1},\tau_{2})$ between the two $\tau_{\mathrm{had}-\mathrm{vis}}$ (left) and of the ${E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}}$ (right) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $W\mathrm{ +jets}$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the radial distance $dR(\tau_{1},\tau_{2})$ between the two $\tau_{\mathrm{had}-\mathrm{vis}}$ (left) and of the ${E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}}$ (right) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $W\mathrm{ +jets}$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the ${m_{\mathrm{MMC}}}$ (left) and of the $p_\text{T}$ of the leading $p_\text{T}$ light lepton (right) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $t\bar{t}$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the ${m_{\mathrm{MMC}}}$ (left) and of the $p_\text{T}$ of the leading $p_\text{T}$ light lepton (right) in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $t\bar{t}$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the $m_{\mathrm{2T}}$ (left) and of the $\eta$ of the leading $p_\text{T}$ $\tau_{\mathrm{had}-\mathrm{vis}}$ in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $Z\to\tau\tau$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the $m_{\mathrm{2T}}$ (left) and of the $\eta$ of the leading $p_\text{T}$ $\tau_{\mathrm{had}-\mathrm{vis}}$ in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ $Z\to\tau\tau$ validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the $dR({\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}},{\tau_{\mathrm{had}}})$ between the two objects associated to the Higgs boson decay and of the invariant mass $m_{\ell,\ell}$ of the two light leptons in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ all-same-sign validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the $dR({\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}},{\tau_{\mathrm{had}}})$ between the two objects associated to the Higgs boson decay and of the invariant mass $m_{\ell,\ell}$ of the two light leptons in the $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ all-same-sign validation region. The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions.

Distributions of the NN-score in the signal regions sidebands of the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories.The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions and are normalized to the fit result performed with one parameter of interest.

Distributions of the NN-score in the signal regions sidebands of the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories.The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions and are normalized to the fit result performed with one parameter of interest.

Distributions of the NN-score in the signal regions sidebands of the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories.The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions and are normalized to the fit result performed with one parameter of interest.

Distributions of the NN-score in the signal regions sidebands of the $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (a), $ZH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (b), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{lep}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (c), $WH(\tau_{\mathrm{had}}\tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ (d) categories.The hatched band represents the pre-fit statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties. The signal contributions are considered as part of the predictions and are normalized to the fit result performed with one parameter of interest.

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 9

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 12

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 7

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 13

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 3

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 5

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 11

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 14

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 4

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 10

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 1

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 6

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 15

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 3

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 10

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 13

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 12

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 8

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 1

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 4

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 5

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 7

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 11

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 15

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 9

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 14

Isovector WIMP-nucleon elastic coupling limit for Operator 6

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 12

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 3

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 9

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 7

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 10

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 15

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 8

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 4

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 5

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 6

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 13

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 11

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 14

Isoscalar WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 1

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 13

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 1

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 4

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 7

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 9

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 3

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 11

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 5

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 10

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 8

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 14

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 15

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 6

Isovector WIMP-nucleon inelastic coupling limit for Operator 12

Fiducial differential cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $N_{\mathrm{gap}\,\mathrm{jets}}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 14.

Fiducial differential cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $\xi_{\mathrm{j}3}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 15.

Fiducial differential cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\ell\ell}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 16.

Fiducial differential cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{T}}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 17.

Fiducial differential cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 18.

Fiducial differential cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $N_{\mathrm{gap}\,\mathrm{jets}}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 19.

Fiducial differential cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $\xi_{\mathrm{j}3}$. The correlation of uncertainties of the measured cross section across bins is presented in Table 20.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\ell\ell}$. See Table 1.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{T}}$. See Table 2.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. See Table 3.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $N_{\mathrm{gap}\,\mathrm{jets}}$. See Table 4.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the electroweak $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $\xi_{\mathrm{j}3}$. See Table 5.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\ell\ell}$. See Table 6.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{T}}$. See Table 7.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. See Table 8.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $N_{\mathrm{gap}\,\mathrm{jets}}$. See Table 9.

Observed correlations between the bins of the LH-unfolded cross section of the inclusive $W^\pm W^\pm jj$ production as a function of $\xi_{\mathrm{j}3}$. See Table 10.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label M0 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label M1 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label M7 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient. The limits on M7 were obtained without taking into account the SM-EFT interference for the EW W$^\pm$Zjj final state.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label S02 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label S1 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label T0 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label T1 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Evolution of the one-dimensional expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the parameters corresponding to the quartic operators with label T2 as a function of the cut-off scale. The unitarity bounds as a function of the cut-off scale are defined for one non-zero Wilson coefficient.

Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for $\sigma_{\mathrm{VBF}}(\mathrm{H}^{\pm\pm}_5) \times \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}^{\pm\pm}_5 \rightarrow W^{\pm}W^{\pm})$ as a function of the doubly-charged Higgs mass.

Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for $\sin\theta_{\mathrm{H}}$ as a function of the doubly-charged Higgs mass in the Georgi-Machacek model.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for different &gamma;_d masses and a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The limits are shown for all search channels combined, assuming an FRVZ signal model. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for a &gamma;_d mass of 100&nbsp;MeV, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The solid black curve shows the observed exclusion limit from their statistical combination. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for a &gamma;_d mass of 10&nbsp;GeV, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The solid black curve shows the observed exclusion limit from their statistical combination. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

Acceptance times efficiency extrapolated as a function of c&tau;_&gamma;d for the &mu;DPJ channel (SR_&mu;), obtained for the different FRVZ MC signal mass points.

Acceptance times efficiency extrapolated as a function of c&tau;_&gamma;d for the low E_T^miss caloDPJ channel (SR_c^L), obtained for the different FRVZ MC signal mass points.

Acceptance times efficiency extrapolated as a function of c&tau;_&gamma;d for the high E_T^miss caloDPJ channel (SR_c^H), obtained for the different FRVZ MC signal mass points.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 17&nbsp;MeV.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 50&nbsp;MeV.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 400&nbsp;MeV.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 900&nbsp;MeV.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 2&nbsp;GeV.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 6&nbsp;GeV.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for FRVZ processes with a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson as a function of dark photon mean proper decay length for the ggF, WH and VBF analyses. The full combination is shown as solid or dashed black lines for a dark photon mass of 15&nbsp;GeV.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for different &gamma;_d masses and a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The limits are shown for the SR_&mu; search channel, assuming an FRVZ signal model. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for different &gamma;_d masses and a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The limits are shown for the SR_c^L search channel, assuming an FRVZ signal model. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for different &gamma;_d masses and a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The limits are shown for the SR_c^H search channel, assuming an FRVZ signal model. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on B(H&rarr;&nbsp;2&gamma;_d+X) for different &gamma;_d masses and a 125&nbsp;GeV Higgs boson, as a function of the dark-photon mean proper decay length c&tau;. The limits are shown for all search channels combined, assuming an FRVZ signal model. The hatched band denotes the region in which the branching ratio is larger than unity.

K$^+$p (K$^+$p $\oplus$ K$^-\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in HM pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV (1.8<$m_T$<2.0 GeV/$c^{2}$).

Extracted radii from the fit as a function of \mt for the HM analysis of the K$^+$p (K$^+$p $\oplus$ K$^-\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function.

Extracted radii from the fit as a function of \mt for the HM analysis of the same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function. For the extraction two types of backgrounds were assumed either a pol1 or pol2. The assumption of pol1 exhibits a greater or equivalent compatibility with the data compared to the pol2 assumption.

Extracted radii from the fit as a function of \mt for the MB analysis of the same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function. For the extraction two types of backgrounds were assumed either a pol1 or pol2. The assumption of pol2 exhibits a greater or equivalent compatibility with the data compared to the pol1 assumption.

Extracted radii from the fit as a function of \mt for the MB analysis of the same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function. For the extraction two types of backgrounds were assumed either a pol1 or pol2. The assumption of pol2 exhibits a greater or equivalent compatibility with the data compared to the pol1 assumption.

Extracted radii from the fit as a function of \mt for the MB analysis of the same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function. For the extraction two types of backgrounds were assumed either a pol1 or pol2. The assumption of pol2 exhibits a greater or equivalent compatibility with the data compared to the pol1 assumption.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $1\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 18$ and $0.15\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.30$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}>$ 0.7.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $1\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 18$ and $0.30\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.50$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $1\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 18$ and $0.50\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.70$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $1\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 18$ and $0.70\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.90$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $1\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 18$ and $0.90\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 1.50$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $19\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 30$ and $0.15\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.30$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $19\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 30$ and $0.30\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.50$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $19\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 30$ and $0.50\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.70$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $19\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 30$ and $0.70\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.90$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $19\leq N_{\mathrm{ch}} \leq 30$ and $0.90\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 1.50$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $N_{\mathrm{ch}}\geq~31$ and $0.15\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.30$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $N_{\mathrm{ch}}\geq~31$ and $0.30\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.50$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $N_{\mathrm{ch}}\geq~31$ and $0.50\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.70$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $N_{\mathrm{ch}}\geq~31$ and $0.70\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.90$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for $N_{\mathrm{ch}}\geq~31$ and $0.90\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 1.50$ GeV/$c$ in MB pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV with selection on the event sphericiy $S_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for HM pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV and $0.15\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.30$ GeV/$c$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for HM pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV and $0.30\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.50$ GeV/$c$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for HM pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV and $0.90\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 1.50$ GeV/$c$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for HM pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV and $0.70\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 0.90$ GeV/$c$.

The same sign $\uppi$--$\uppi$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\uppi}$--$\overline{\uppi}$ correlation function for HM pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm {NN}}}=13 $ TeV and $0.90\leq k_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 1.50$ GeV/$c$.

$z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in minimum-bias (MB) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.2.

$z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in minimum-bias (MB) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.3.

$z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in minimum-bias (MB) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.4.

$z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in high-multiplicity (HM) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.2.

$z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in high-multiplicity (HM) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.3.

$z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in high-multiplicity (HM) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.4.

The ratio of $z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions for $10 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}} < 20$ GeV/c between high-multiplicity (HM) and minimum-bias (MB) events in pp collisions.

The ratio of $z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions for $30 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}} < 40$ GeV/c between high-multiplicity (HM) and minimum-bias (MB) events in pp collisions.

The ratio of $z^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions for $60 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}} < 80$ GeV/c between high-multiplicity (HM) and minimum-bias (MB) events in pp collisions.

$\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in minimum-bias (MB) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.2.

$\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in minimum-bias (MB) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.3.

$\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in minimum-bias (MB) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.4.

$\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in high-multiplicity (HM) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.2.

$\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in high-multiplicity (HM) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.3.

$\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions in leading jets for different $p_{T}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}}$ intervals in high-multiplicity (HM) pp collisions for jet resolution parameter ($R$) = 0.4.

The ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions for $10 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}} < 20$ GeV/c between high-multiplicity (HM) and minimum-bias (MB) events in pp collisions.

The ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions for $30 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}} < 40$ GeV/c between high-multiplicity (HM) and minimum-bias (MB) events in pp collisions.

The ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{ch}}$ distributions for $60 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{jet, ch}} < 80$ GeV/c between high-multiplicity (HM) and minimum-bias (MB) events in pp collisions.

Antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

Antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 50-90% centrality

Electric-charge and baryon chemical potentials, $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-30%, 30-50%, and 50-90% centrality classes

Covariance matrix of the centrality-uncorrelated uncertainties on $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 0-5% centrality class

Covariance matrix of the centrality-uncorrelated uncertainties on $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 5-10% centrality class

Covariance matrix of the centrality-uncorrelated uncertainties on $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 10-30% centrality class

Covariance matrix of the centrality-uncorrelated uncertainties on $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 30-50% centrality class

Covariance matrix of the centrality-uncorrelated uncertainties on $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 50-90% centrality class

Baryon chemical potentials, $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 0-90% centrality interval

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\pi^{-}/\pi^{+}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 0-5% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\pi^{-}/\pi^{+}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 5-10% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\pi^{-}/\pi^{+}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 10-30% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\pi^{-}/\pi^{+}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\pi^{-}/\pi^{+}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 50-90% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\overline{\mathrm{p}}/\mathrm{p}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 0-5% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\overline{\mathrm{p}}/\mathrm{p}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 5-10% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\overline{\mathrm{p}}/\mathrm{p}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 10-30% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\overline{\mathrm{p}}/\mathrm{p}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $\overline{\mathrm{p}}/\mathrm{p}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 50-90% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential $\overline{ \Omega}^{+} / \Omega^-$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 0-5% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential $\overline{ \Omega}^{+} / \Omega^-$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 5-10% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential $\overline{ \Omega}^{+} / \Omega^-$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 10-30% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential $\overline{ \Omega}^{+} / \Omega^-$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential $\overline{ \Omega}^{+} / \Omega^-$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 50-90% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential ${}_{\overline{\Lambda}}^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 0-5% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential ${}_{\overline{\Lambda}}^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 5-10% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential ${}_{\overline{\Lambda}}^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 10-30% centrality

$c\mathrm{t}$-differential ${}_{\overline{\Lambda}}^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 0-5% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 5-10% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 10-30% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{H}} / ^{3}\mathrm{H}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 50-90% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}} / ^{3}\mathrm{He}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 0-5% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}} / ^{3}\mathrm{He}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 5-10% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}} / ^{3}\mathrm{He}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 10-30% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}} / ^{3}\mathrm{He}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 30-50% centrality

$p_{\mathrm{T}}$-differential $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}} / ^{3}\mathrm{He}$ antiparticle-to-particle yield ratio, 50-90% centrality

Total covariance matrix of the baryon chemical potential, $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-30%, 30-50%, and 50-90% centrality classes

Total covariance matrix of the electric-charge chemical potential, $\mu_Q$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code, in the 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-30%, 30-50%, and 50-90% centrality classes

$\chi^{2}$ of the centrality-averaged baryon chemical potential, $\mu_B$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code

$\chi^{2}$ of the centrality-averaged electric-charge chemical potential, $\mu_Q$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code

$\chi^{2}$ of the centrality-averaged baryon chemical potential, $\mu_Q$, extracted with the Thermal-FIST code