We report results of a search for nuclear recoils induced by weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter using the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) two-phase xenon time projection chamber. This analysis uses a total exposure of $4.2\pm0.1$ tonne-years from 280 live days of LZ operation, of which $3.3\pm0.1$ tonne-years and 220 live days are new. A technique to actively tag background electronic recoils from $^{214}$Pb $\beta$ decays is featured for the first time. Enhanced electron-ion recombination is observed in two-neutrino double electron capture decays of $^{124}$Xe, representing a noteworthy new background. After removal of artificial signal-like events injected into the data set to mitigate analyzer bias, we find no evidence for an excess over expected backgrounds. World-leading constraints are placed on spin-independent (SI) and spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for masses $\geq$9 GeV/$c^2$. The strongest SI exclusion set is $2.1\times10^{-48}$ cm$^{2}$ at the 90% confidence level at a mass of 36 GeV/$c^2$, and the best SI median sensitivity achieved is $5.0\times10^{-48}$ cm$^{2}$ for a mass of 40 GeV/$c^2$.
90% CL WIMP SI cross sections, including sensitivities
90% CL WIMP SDn cross sections, including sensitivities and nuclear structure uncertainties
90% CL WIMP SDp cross sections, including sensitivities and nuclear structure uncertainties
We report the differential yields at mid-rapidity of the Breit-Wheeler process ($\gamma\gamma\rightarrow e^{+}e^{-}$) in peripheral Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}} = $ 54.4 GeV and 200 GeV with the STAR experiment at RHIC, as a function of energy $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}}$, $e^{+}e^{-}$ transverse momentum $p_{\rm T}$, $p_{\rm T}^{2}$, invariant mass $M_{ee}$ and azimuthal angle. In the invariant mass range of 0.4 $<$$M_{ee}$$<$ 2.6 GeV/$c^{2}$ at low transverse momentum ($p_{\rm T}$$ < $0.15 GeV/$c$), the yields increase while the pair $\sqrt{\langle p_{\rm T}^{2} \rangle}$ decreases with increasing $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}}$, a feature is correctly predicted by the QED calculation. The energy dependencies of the measured quantities are sensitive to the nuclear form factor, infrared divergence and photon polarization. The data are compiled and used to extract the charge radius of the Au nucleus.
'54.4 GeV, Centrality: 40-60%'
'54.4 GeV, Centrality: 60-80%'
'54.4 GeV, Centrality: 80-100%'
We report multi-differential measurements of strange hadron production ranging from mid- to target-rapidity in Au+Au collisions at a center-of-momentum energy per nucleon pair of $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=3$ GeV with the STAR experiment at RHIC. $K^0_S$ meson and $\Lambda$ hyperon yields are measured via their weak decay channels. Collision centrality and rapidity dependences of the transverse momentum spectra and particle ratios are presented. Particle mass and centrality dependence of the average transverse momenta of $\Lambda$ and $K^0_S$ are compared with other strange particles, providing evidence of the development of hadronic rescattering in such collisions. The 4$\pi$ yields of each of these strange hadrons show a consistent centrality dependence. Discussions on radial flow, the strange hadron production mechanism, and properties of the medium created in such collisions are presented together with results from hadronic transport and thermal model calculations.
dN/dy of lambda for different centrality bins.
dN/dy of Ks0 for different centrality bins.
Rapidity dependence of Lambda/p for different centrality bins.
In heavy-ion collision experiments, the global collectivity of final-state particles can be quantified by anisotropic flow coefficients ($v_n$). The first-order flow coefficient, also referred to as the directed flow ($v_{1}$), describes the collective sideward motion of produced particles and nuclear fragments in heavy-ion collisions. It carries information on the very early stage of the collision, especially at large pseudorapidity ($\eta$), where it is believed to be generated during the nuclear passage time. Directed flow therefore probes the onset of bulk collective dynamics during thermalization, providing valuable experimental guidance to models of the pre-equilibrium stage. In 2018, the Event Plane Detector (EPD) was installed in STAR and used for the Beam Energy Scan phase-II (BES-II) data taking. The combination of EPD ($2.1 <|\eta|< 5.1$) and high-statistics BES-II data enables us to extend the $v_{1}$ measurement to the forward and backward $\eta$ regions. In this paper, we present the measurement of $v_{1}$ over a wide $\eta$ range in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 19.6 and 27 GeV using the STAR EPD. The results of the analysis at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$19.6 GeV exhibit excellent consistency with the previous PHOBOS measurement, while elevating the precision of the overall measurement. The increased precision of the measurement also revealed finer structures in heavy-ion collisions, including a potential observation of the first-order event-plane decorrelation. Multiple physics models were compared to the experimental results. Only a transport model and a three-fluid hybrid model can reproduce a sizable $v_{1}$ at large $\eta$ as was observed experimentally. The model comparison also indicates $v_{1}$ at large $\eta$ might be sensitive to the QGP phase transition.
Directed flow vs pseudorapidity.
Directed flow vs pseudorapidity.
Directed flow vs pseudorapidity.
Weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) may interact with a virtual pion that is exchanged between nucleons. This interaction channel is important to consider in models where the spin-independent isoscalar channel is suppressed. Using data from the first science run of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, containing 60 live days of data in a 5.5~tonne fiducial mass of liquid xenon, we report the results on a search for WIMP-pion interactions. We observe no significant excess and set an upper limit of $1.5\times10^{-46}$~cm$^2$ at a 90% confidence level for a WIMP mass of 33~GeV/c$^2$ for this interaction.
WIMP-Pion interaction cross section at the 90% CL
The first science run of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, a dual-phase xenon time project chamber operating in the Sanford Underground Research Facility in South Dakota, USA, has reported leading limits on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon interactions and interactions described from a non-relativistic effective field theory (NREFT). Using the same 5.5~t fiducial mass and 60 live days of exposure we report on the results of a relativistic extension to the NREFT. We present constraints on couplings from covariant interactions arising from the coupling of vector, axial currents, and electric dipole moments of the nucleon to the magnetic and electric dipole moments of the WIMP which cannot be described by recasting previous results described by an NREFT. Using a profile-likelihood ratio analysis, in an energy region between 0~keV$_\text{nr}$ to 270~keV$_\text{nr}$, we report 90% confidence level exclusion limits on the coupling strength of five interactions in both the isoscalar and isovector bases.
Isoscalar interaction coupling limit for Lagrangian 1
Isovector interaction coupling limit for Lagrangian 19
Isoscalar interaction coupling limit for Lagrangian 19
With the STAR experiment at the BNL Relativisic Heavy Ion Collider, we characterize $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 200 GeV p+Au collisions by event activity (EA) measured within the pseudorapidity range $eta$$in$ [-5, -3.4] in the Au-going direction and report correlations between this EA and hard- and soft- scale particle production at midrapidity ($\eta$$\in$ [-1, 1]). At the soft scale, charged particle production in low-EA p+Au collisions is comparable to that in p+p collisions and increases monotonically with increasing EA. At the hard scale, we report measurements of high transverse momentum (pT) jets in events of different EAs. In contrast with the soft particle production, high-pT particle production and EA are found to be inversely related. To investigate whether this is a signal of jet quenching in high-EA events, we also report ratios of pT imbalance and azimuthal separation of dijets in high- and low-EA events. Within our measurement precision, no significant differences are observed, disfavoring the presence of jet quenching in the highest 30% EA p+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.
Distributions of Event Activity (as measured by the BBC) from MB and HT events with the latter satisfying an offline trigger of $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{trig}>4 \mathrm{GeV}$.
Density of charged particles with $p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$ and $|\eta|\le0.9$ in ten ranges of EA for MB events and HT events selected with several offline trigger values.
Charged particle density as a function of EA, UE $\eta$, and $p_\mathrm{T,jet}^\mathrm{lead}$ for HT ($E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{trig}>4$ GeV) events with $p_\mathrm{T,jet}^\mathrm{raw,lead}>4~\mathrm{GeV}/c$.
A measurement of the production of $W$ bosons with opposite electric charges in association with two jets is presented based on 140 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. The analysis is sensitive to the scattering of $W$ bosons, which is of particular interest in the ATLAS physics programme as it can be used to probe the electroweak symmetry breaking mechanism of the Standard Model. This signal is observed with a significance of 7.1 standard deviations above the background expectation, while 6.2 standard deviations were expected. The measured cross-section is determined in a signal-enriched fiducial volume and is found to be $2.7\pm0.5$ fb, which is consistent with the theoretical prediction of $2.20^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$ fb.
Measurement of the signal strength $\mu=\mu(EWK\;W^+ W^- jj)$ from the likelihood fit described in Section 8 together with the normalisations of the backgrounds originating from the top quark and strong $W^+ W^- jj$ events.
Measurement of the measured and predicted signal cross-section.
The production of single top quarks and top antiquarks via the $t$-channel exchange of a virtual $W$ boson is measured in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC using $140\,\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$ of ATLAS data. The total cross-sections are determined to be $\sigma(tq)=137^{+8}_{-8}\,\mathrm{pb}$ and $\sigma(\bar{t}q)=84^{+6}_{-5}\,\mathrm{pb}$ for top-quark and top-antiquark production, respectively. The combined cross-section is found to be $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)=221^{+13}_{-13}\,\mathrm{pb}$ and the cross-section ratio is $R_{t}=\sigma(tq)/\sigma(\bar{t}q)=1.636^{+0.036}_{-0.034}$. The predictions at next-to-next-to-leading-order in quantum chromodynamics are in good agreement with these measurements. The predicted value of $R_{t}$ using different sets of parton distribution functions is compared with the measured value, demonstrating the potential to further constrain the functions when using this result in global fits. The measured cross-sections are interpreted in an effective field theory approach, setting limits at the 95% confidence level on the strength of a four-quark operator and an operator coupling the third quark generation to the Higgs boson doublet: $-0.37 < C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2 < 0.06$ and $-0.87 < C_{\phi Q}^{3}/\Lambda^2 < 1.42$. The constraint $|V_{tb}|>0.95$ at the 95% confidence level is derived from the measured value of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. In a more general approach, pairs of CKM matrix elements involving top quarks are simultaneously constrained, leading to confidence contours in the corresponding two-dimensional parameter spaces.
The 17 variables used for the training of the NN ordered by their discriminating power. The jet that is not \(b\)-tagged is referred to as the untagged jet. The charged lepton is denoted \(\ell\). The sphericity tensor \(S^{\alpha\beta}\) used to define the sphericity \(S\) is formed with the three-momenta \(\vec{p}_i\) of the reconstructed objects, namely the jets, the charged lepton and the reconstructed neutrino. The tensor is given by \(S^{\alpha\beta}=\frac{\sum_i p_i^\alpha p_i^\beta}{\sum_i |\vec{p}_i|^2}\) where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) correspond to the spatial components $x$, $y$ and $z$.
The impact of different groups of systematic uncertainties on the \(\sigma(tq)\) , \(\sigma(\bar t q)\), \(\sigma(tq + \bar t q)\) and \(R_t\), given in %.
The impact of the eight most important systematic uncertainties on the \(\sigma(tq)\) , \(\sigma(\bar t q)\) and \(\sigma(tq + \bar t q)\), given in %. The sequence of the uncertainties is given by the impact on \(\sigma(tq + \bar t q)\)
This paper presents a search for top-squark pair production in final states with a top quark, a charm quark and missing transverse momentum. The data were collected with the ATLAS detector during LHC Run 2 and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. The analysis is motivated by an extended Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model featuring a non-minimal flavour violation in the second- and third-generation squark sector. The top squark in this model has two possible decay modes, either $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow c\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ or $\tilde{t}_1\rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}_1^0$, where the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ is undetected. The analysis is optimised assuming that both of the decay modes are equally probable, leading to the most likely final state of $tc + E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$. Good agreement is found between the Standard Model expectation and the data in the search regions. Exclusion limits at 95% CL are obtained in the $m(\tilde{t}_1)$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ plane and, in addition, limits on the branching ratio of the $\tilde{t}_1\rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decay as a function of $m(\tilde{t}_1)$ are also produced. Top-squark masses of up to 800 GeV are excluded for scenarios with light neutralinos, and top-squark masses up to 600 GeV are excluded in scenarios where the neutralino and the top squark are almost mass degenerate.
<b>- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - -</b> <br><br> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=mass_obs">Observed exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_exp">Expected exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_band_1">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_band_2">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_obs">Observed exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_exp">Expected exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_band_1">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_band_2">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=mass_upperLimits_obs">Observed upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_upperLimits_obs">Observed upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$.</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_upperLimits_exp">Expected upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_upperLimits_exp">Expected upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$.</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=SRA_ntop">SRA region number of top-tagged jets distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRA_mttwo">SRA region $m_{\mathrm{T2}}(j^{b}_{R=1.0}, c)$ distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRB_ptc">SRB region leading c-tagged jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$</a> <li><a href="?table=SRB_mtj">SRB region $m_{\mathrm{T}}(j, E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})_{\mathrm{close}}$ distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRC_metsig">SRC region missing transverse momentum significance distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRC_mtj">SRC region $m_{\mathrm{T}}(j, E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})_{\mathrm{close}}$ distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRD_NN">SRD NN signal score distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRD_meff">SRD $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distribution</a> </ul> <b>Pull distributions:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=SRABCPull">Pull plots showing the SRA, SRB and SRC post-fit data and SM agreement using the background-only fit configuration</a> <li><a href="?table=SRDPull">Pull plots showing the SRD post-fit data and SM agreement using the background-only fit configuration</a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRA">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRA region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRB">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRB region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRC">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRC region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD750">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD750 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1000">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1000 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1250">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1250 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1500">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1500 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1750">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1750 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD2000">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD2000 region.</a> </ul> <b>Acceptance and efficiencies:</b> <ul> <li> <b>SRA_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRA_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRA$^{[450,575]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRA_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRA$^{[450,575]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRA_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRA_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRA$^{\geq 575}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRA_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRA$^{\geq 575}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRB_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRB_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRB$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRB_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRB$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRB_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRB_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRB$^{[150,400]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRB_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRB$^{[150,400]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRB_bin3:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRB_bin3">Acceptance table of the SRB$^{\geq 400}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRB_bin3">Efficiency table of the SRB$^{\geq 400}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{[150,300]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{[150,300]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin3:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin3">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{[300,500]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin3">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{[300,500]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin4:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin4">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{\geq 500}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin4">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{\geq 500}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRD750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRD750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRD1000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRD1000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin3:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin3">Acceptance table of the SRD1250 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin3">Efficiency table of the SRD1250 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin4:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin4">Acceptance table of the SRD1500 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin4">Efficiency table of the SRD1500 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin5:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin5">Acceptance table of the SRD1750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin5">Efficiency table of the SRD1750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin6:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin6">Acceptance table of the SRD2000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin6">Efficiency table of the SRD2000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> </ul> <b>Truth Code snippets</b> are available under "Resources" (purple button on the left)
Observed exclusion limits at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.
Observed exclusion limits at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$ and a $+1 \sigma$ deviation of the NNLO+NNLL theoretical cross-section of a $\tilde{t}_1$ pair-production.
Forum