Results of a search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected in the period 2015-2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Compared to previous publications, in addition to an increase of almost a factor of four in the data size, the analysis implements a number of improvements in the signal selection and the background determination leading to enhanced sensitivity. Events are required to have at least one jet with transverse momentum above 150 GeV and no reconstructed leptons ($e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$) or photons. Several signal regions are considered with increasing requirements on the missing transverse momentum starting at 200 GeV. Overall agreement is observed between the number of events in data and the Standard Model predictions. Model-independent $95%$ confidence-level limits on visible cross sections for new processes are obtained in the range between 736 fb and 0.3 fb. Results are also translated into improved exclusion limits in models with pair-produced weakly interacting dark-matter candidates, large extra spatial dimensions, supersymmetric particles in several compressed scenarios, axion-like particles, and new scalar particles in dark-energy-inspired models. In addition, the data are translated into bounds on the invisible branching ratio of the Higgs boson.
This is the HEPData space for the ATLAS monojet full Run 2 analysis. The full resolution figures can be found at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/EXOT-2018-06/ The full statistical likelihood is provided for this analysis. It can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' button above and selecting the 'Common Resources' category. <br/><br/> <b>Post-fit $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distribution:</b> <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1mu0b">CR1mu0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1e0b">CR1e0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR1L1b">CR1L1b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR2mu">CR2mu</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramCR2e">CR2e</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=HistogramSR">SR</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li>Dark Matter axial-vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMA">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMA">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMA">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMA">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_xsecDMA">observed upper limits on the cross-sections</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter pseudo-scalar mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMP">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMP">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMP">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMP">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_xsecDMP">observed upper limits on the cross-sections</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourobsDMV">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourobs_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourexpDMV">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_p2DMV">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourexp_m2DMV">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourSDneutron">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourSInucleon">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter WIMP annihilation rate: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourID">observed</a> <li>SUSY stop pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsTT_directCC">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expTT_directCC">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_directCC">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_directCC">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY stop pair production (4-body decay): <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsTT_bffN">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expTT_bffN">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_bffN">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_bffN">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY sbottom pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsBB">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1BB">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1BB">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expBB">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1BB">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1BB">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2BB">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2BB">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY squark pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obsSS">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_p1SS">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_obs_m1SS">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_expSS">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p1SS">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m1SS">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_p2SS">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=3&table=Contourg_exp_m2SS">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark energy: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourDE">observed and expected</a> <li>ADD: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourADD">observed and expected</a> <li>Axion-like particles: <a href="102093?version=3&table=ContourALPs">observed and expected</a> </ul> <b>Impact of systematic uncertainties:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablesystimpacts">Table</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of exclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM0">EM0</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM1">EM1</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM2">EM2</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM3">EM3</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM4">EM4</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM5">EM5</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM6">EM6</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM7">EM7</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM8">EM8</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM9">EM9</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM10">EM10</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM11">EM11</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsEM12">EM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of inclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM0">IM0</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM1">IM1</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM2">IM2</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM3">IM3</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM4">IM4</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM5">IM5</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM6">IM6</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM7">IM7</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM8">IM8</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM9">IM9</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM10">IM10</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM11">IM11</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=TableyieldsIM12">IM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Cutflows:</b><br/><br/> Signals filtered with a truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ cut at: <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablecutflows150GeV">150 GeV</a> <a href="102093?version=3&table=Tablecutflows350GeV">350 GeV</a><br/><br/>
The inclusive cross section of top quark-antiquark pairs produced in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV is measured in the lepton$+$jets and dilepton decay channels. The data sample corresponds to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity recorded with the D0 detector during Run II of the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. Employing multivariate analysis techniques we measure the cross section in the two decay channels and we perform a combined cross section measurement. For a top quark mass of 172.5 GeV, we measure a combined inclusive top quark-antiquark pair production cross section of $\sigma_{t\bar{t}} = 7.26 \pm 0.13\,(\mathrm{stat.})\,^{+0.57}_{-0.50}\,(\mathrm{syst.})$ pb which is consistent with standard model predictions. We also perform a likelihood fit to the measured and predicted top quark mass dependence of the inclusive cross section, which yields a measurement of the pole mass of the top quark. The extracted value is $m_t = 172.8 \pm 1.1\,(\mathrm{theo.})\,^{+3.3}_{-3.1}\,(\mathrm{exp.})$ GeV.
Exclusive production of $\rho^0$ mesons was studied at the COMPASS experiment by scattering 160 GeV/$c$ muons off transversely polarised protons. Five single-spin and three double-spin azimuthal asymmetries were measured as a function of $Q^2$, $x_{Bj}$, or $p_{T}^{2}$. The $\sin \phi_S$ asymmetry is found to be $-0.019 \pm 0.008(stat.) \pm 0.003(syst.)$. All other asymmetries are also found to be of small magnitude and consistent with zero within experimental uncertainties. Very recent calculations using a GPD-based model agree well with the present results. The data is interpreted as evidence for the existence of chiral-odd, transverse generalized parton distributions.
We present measurements of direct photon pair production cross sections using 8.5 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron $p \bar p$ collider. The results are presented as differential distributions of the photon pair invariant mass $d\sigma/dM_{\gamma \gamma}$, pair transverse momentum $d \sigma /dp^{\gamma \gamma}_T$, azimuthal angle between the photons $d\sigma/d\Delta \phi_{\gamma \gamma}$, and polar scattering angle in the Collins-Soper frame $d\sigma /d|\cos \theta^*|$. Measurements are performed for isolated photons with transverse momenta $p^{\gamma}_T>18 ~(17)$ GeV for the leading (next-to-leading) photon in $p_T$, pseudorapidities $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.9$, and a separation in $\eta-\phi$ space $\Delta\mathcal R_{\gamma\gamma} > 0.4$. We present comparisons with the predictions from Monte Carlo event generators {\sc diphox} and {\sc resbos} implementing QCD calculations at next-to-leading order, $2\gamma${\sc nnlo} at next-to-next-to-leading order, and {\sc sherpa} using matrix elements with higher-order real emissions matched to parton shower.
Exclusive electroproduction of $\phi$ mesons has been studied in $e^\pm p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=318 \gev$ with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 65.1 pb$^{-1}$. The $\gamma^*p$ cross section is presented in the kinematic range $2<Q^2<70 \gev^2$, $35<W<145 \gev$ and ${|t|}<0.6 \gev^2$. The cross sections as functions of $Q^2$, $W$, $t$ and helicity angle $\theta_h$ are compared to cross sections for other vector mesons. The ratios $R$ of the cross sections for longitudinally and transversely polarized virtual photons are presented as functions of $Q^2$ and $W$. The data are also compared to predictions from theoretical models.
The spin density matrix element R04_00 and ratios of longitudinal and transversely polarized photons as a function of W for the Q**2 region 2 to 5 GeV**2.
Measurements of the cross sections for charged current deep inelastic scattering in e-p collisions with longitudinally polarised electron beams are presented. The measurements are based on a data sample with an integrated luminosity of 175 pb-1 collected with the ZEUS detector at HERA at a centre-of-mass energy of 318 GeV. The total cross section is given for positively and negatively polarised electron beams. The differential cross-sections dsigma/dQ2, dsigma/dx and dsigma/dy are presented for Q2>200 GeV2. The double-differential cross-section d2sigma/dxdQ2 is presented in the kinematic range 280<Q2<30000 GeV2 and 0.015<x<0.65. The measured cross sections are compared with the predictions of the Standard Model.
Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.
We measure the forward-backward asymmetries $A_{\rm FB}$ of charged $\Xi$ and $\Omega$ baryons produced in $p \bar{p}$ collisions recorded by the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron collider at $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV as a function of the baryon rapidity $y$. We find that the asymmetries $A_{\rm FB}$ for charged $\Xi$ and $\Omega$ baryons are consistent with zero within statistical uncertainties.
The results of a study of the annihilation reactions n p → θπ + and n p → ωπ + are reported; the data were collected by the OBELIX apparatus, with antineutrons annihilating in flight (momenta from ∼ 50 MeV/ c to 405 MeV/ c ). Annihilation frequencies and annihilation cross sections have been deduced, for both channels, as a function of antineutron momentum. From the cross section ratio, a substantial deviation from OZI rule expectations is observed. An s s quark content in the nucleon offers a fairly plausible explanation for such an effect.
A search for the Higgs boson decaying into a photon and a pair of electrons or muons with an invariant mass $m_{\ell\ell} < 30$ GeV is presented. The analysis is performed using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data, produced by the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and collected by the ATLAS experiment. Evidence for the $H \rightarrow \ell \ell \gamma$ process is found with a significance of 3.2$\sigma$ over the background-only hypothesis, compared to an expected significance of 2.1$\sigma$. The best-fit value of the signal strength parameter, defined as the ratio of the observed signal yield to the one expected in the Standard Model, is $\mu = 1.5 \pm 0.5$. The Higgs boson production cross-section times the $H \rightarrow\ell\ell\gamma$ branching ratio for $m_{\ell\ell} <$ 30 GeV is determined to be 8.7 $^{+2.8}_{-2.7}$ fb.
The fragmentation properties of jets containing $b$-hadrons are studied using charged $B$ mesons in 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC during the period from 2015 to 2018. The $B$ mesons are reconstructed using the decay of $B^{\pm}$ into $J/\psi K^{\pm}$, with the $J/\psi$ decaying into a pair of muons. Jets are reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with radius parameter $R=0.4$. The measurement determines the longitudinal and transverse momentum profiles of the reconstructed $B$ hadrons with respect to the axes of the jets to which they are geometrically associated. These distributions are measured in intervals of the jet transverse momentum, ranging from 50 GeV to above 100 GeV. The results are corrected for detector effects and compared with several Monte Carlo predictions using different parton shower and hadronisation models. The results for the longitudinal and transverse profiles provide useful inputs to improve the description of heavy-flavour fragmentation in jets.
Forum