HEPData Search

Showing 4 of 84 results

Jet fragmentation properties of anti-p p collisions at S**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV

The CDF collaboration Abe, F. ; Amidei, D. ; Apollinari, G. ; et al.

Phys.Rev.Lett. 65 (1990) 968-971, 1990.

Inspire Record 297585 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19919

The charged-particle fractional momentum distribution within jets, D(z), has been measured in dijet events from 1.8-TeV p¯p collisions in the Collider Detector at Fermilab. As expected from scale breaking in quantum chromodynamics, the fragmentation function D(z) falls more steeply as dijet invariant mass increases from 60 to 200 GeV/c2. The average fraction of the jet momentum carried by charged particles is 0.65±0.02(stat)±0.08(syst).

1 data table

Table 1

No description provided.

Determination of $\alpha^- s$ From a Differential Jet Multiplicity Distribution at {SLC} and {PEP}

Komamiya, Sachio ; Le Diberder, F. ; Abrams, G.S. ; et al.

Phys.Rev.Lett. 64 (1990) 987, 1990.

Inspire Record 283630 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19937

We measured the differential jet-multiplicity distribution in e+e− annihilation with the Mark II detector. This distribution is compared with the second-order QCD prediction and αs is determined to be 0.123±0.009±0.005 at √s≊MZ (at the SLAC Linear Collider) and 0.149±0.002±0.007 at √s=29 GeV (at the SLAC storage ring PEP). The running of αs between these two center-of-mass energies is consistent with the QCD prediction.

2 data tables

Table 1

DIFFERENTIAL JET MULTIPLICITIES.

Table 2

DIFFERENTIAL JET MULTIPLICITIES.

Two Jet Differential Cross-Section in anti-p p Collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV

The CDF collaboration Abe, F. ; Amidei, D. ; Apollinari, G. ; et al.

Phys.Rev.Lett. 64 (1990) 157, 1990.

Inspire Record 283353 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19998

The two-jet differential cross section d3σ(p¯p→jet 1+jet 2+X)/dEtdη1dη2, averaged over -0.6≤η1≤0.6, at √s =1.8 TeV, has been measured in the Collider Detector at Fermilab. The predictions of leading-order quantum chromodynamics for most choices of structure functions show agreement with the data.

6 data tables

Table 1

Systematic error contains all known systematic uncertainties, including the effect of uncertainties in the energy scale.

Table 2

Systematic error contains all known systematic uncertainties, including the effect of uncertainties in the energy scale.

Table 3

Systematic error contains all known systematic uncertainties, including the effect of uncertainties in the energy scale.