HEPData Search

Showing 6 of 926 results

Neutron form-factors from quasielastic e d scattering

Bartel, W. ; Buesser, F.W. ; Dix, W.R. ; et al.

Phys.Lett.B 30 (1969) 285-288, 1969.

Inspire Record 56662 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45282

The reaction e+d→e′+n+p was studied at electron scattering angles θ ⩽ 35° for four-momentum transfers of 0.39, 0.565 and 0.78 (GeV/ c ) 2 . By recording electron-neutron and electron-proton coincidences, the ratio of the electron scattering cross sections on quasi-free neutrons and protons was determined. An estimate of the binding effects, based on a Chew-Low-extrapolation, was made. Values for the neutron form factors were derived.

2 data tables

Table 1

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (Due to the different effective solid angles for neutron and proton detection in the counters).

Table 2

No description provided.

Electroproduction of pions near the $\Delta(1236)$ isobar and the form-factor $G^*_M(q^2)$ of the $({\gamma} N\Delta)$ vertex

Bartel, W. ; Dudelzak, B. ; Krehbiel, H. ; et al.

Phys.Lett.B 28 (1968) 148-151, 1968.

Inspire Record 52791 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45279

The cross section for inelastic electron-proton scattering was measured at incident electron energies of 1.5 to 6 GeV by magnetic analysis of the scattered electrons at angles between 10° and 35°. For invariant masses of the hardonic final state W ⩽ 1.4 GeV. the measured spectra are compared with theoretical predictions for electroproduction of the Δ(1236) isobar. The magnetic dipole transition form factor G ∗ M ( q 2 ) of the (γ N Δ)-vertex is derived for momentum transfers q 2 = 0.2 − 2.34 (GeV/ c ) 2 ard found to decrease more rapidly with q 2 than the proton form factors.

1 data table

Table 1

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution.

Quasielastic Electron-Deuteron Scattering Between q$^2$=18f$^{-2}$ and 100f$^{-2}$

Albrecht, W. ; Behrend, H.J. ; Dorner, H. ; et al.

Phys.Lett.B 26 (1968) 642-644, 1968.

Inspire Record 53149 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29312

Quasielastic e-d scattering measurements were performed up to q 2 = 100 fm −2 . Only the electron was detected. The ratio R= ( d 2 ω d Ω d E′) ed d ω d Ω) ep was measured at the quasielastic peak; the magnetic form factor G M N of the neutron was deduced using the assumption G E N = 0.

2 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

CONST(NAME=MU) is the magnetic moment. The magnetic formfarctor (GM) is evaluated ander assumption of GE=0.