Analyzing powers A_N(-x_F) in x_F bins at < eta > =3.3 and x_F < 0.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) for events with scaled pi^0 longitudinal momentum x_F > 0.4.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) for events with scaled pi^0 longitudinal momentum x_F < -0.4.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) in 0.25 < x_F < 0.30 bin.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) in 0.30 < x_F < 0.35 bin.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) in 0.35 < x_F < 0.40 bin.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) in 0.40 < x_F < 0.47 bin.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) in 0.47 < x_F < 0.56 bin.

Analyzing powers versus pi^0 transverse momentum (p_T) in 0.56 < x_F < 0.80 bin.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged hadrons with $|\eta| < 1.0$ in 10–40$%$ $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV, from the Lee-Yang Zero method (solid circles) with Sum Generating Function.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged hadrons with $|\eta| < 1.0$ in 0–80$%$ $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV, from the Event Plane method.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the Event Plane method ($v_{2}${EP}) (open circles). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.0$ was used.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the 4 Cumulant method ($v_{2}${4}) (solid squares). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.0$ was used.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the Lee-Yang Zero method with Sum Generating Function ($v_{2}$) (solid circles). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.3$ was used.

$p_{T}$ integrated charged hadron $v_{2}$ in the TPC as a function of geometrical cross section. Shown are the Lee-Yang Zero method with Product Generating Function ($v_{2}$) (open stars). All data are from $Au+Au$ collisions, at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For the TPC, $|\eta|< 1.3$ was used.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using $\eta$-subevent method (open crosses), are shown in (a) for $\Lambda$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using Event Plane method (open circles), are shown in (a) for $\Lambda$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using $\eta$-subevent method (open crosses), are shown in (b) for $K_{S}^{0}$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using Event Plane method (open circles), are shown in (b) for $K_{S}^{0}$. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for $10–40\%$ centrality using Lee-Yang Zero method with Sum Generating Function (solid circles), are shown in (a) and (b) for $\Lambda$ and $K_{S}^{0}$ respectively. All data are from $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV $Au+Au$ collisions.

$v_{2}$ of $K_{S}^{0}$ (open circles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$, (b) $40–80\%$, (c) $10–40\%$ and (d) $0–10\%$ centralities in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ (open squares) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$, (b) $40–80\%$, (c) $10–40\%$ and (d) $0–10\%$ centralities in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (b) $40–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (c) $10–40\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$ (filled triangles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (d) $0–10\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega}^{+}$ (filled circles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega}^{+}$ (filled circles) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (d) $0–10\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

$v_{2}$ of $p+\bar{p}$ (filled squares) and $\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ (filled stars) as a function of $p_{T}$ for (a) $0–80\%$ centrality in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV.

Fig12d inset $\Lambda$ (open squares) expansion at low $p_{T}$

Fig12d inset for $K_{S}^{0}$ (filled circles) expansion at low $p_{T}$

Fig13 Centrality dependence of $v_{2}$ versus number of participants $N_{part}$ for charged hadrons (crosses) in $Au+Au$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. For identified particle's value, $v_{2}$ in Tab. II scaled by participant eccentricity in Tab. I versus number of participant in Tab. I.

Fig14 $p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ of $K_{S}^{0}$ at 200 GeV.

Fig14 $p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ of $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.

Delta++ reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of the invariant mass for minimum bias d+Au collisions. The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Delta++ reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of the invariant mass for p+p collisions. The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Lambda* reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of pT for minimum bias d+Au collisions. The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Sigma*+- reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of pT for minimum bias d+Au collisions. The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Sigma*+- reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of pT for d+Au at 40-100% centrality. The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Sigma*+- reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of pT for d+Au at 20-40% centrality . The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Sigma*+- reconstruction efficiency times detector acceptance as a function of pT for d+Au at 0-20% centrality . The error shown is due to the available statistics in the simulation.

Raw pi+pi- invariant mass distribution at midrapidity after subtraction of the like-sign reference distribution for minimum bias d+Au collisions with the hadronic cocktail fit.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+A at 0-20 % centrality.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+A at 20-40 % centrality.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+A at 40-100 % centrality.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+A collisions.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for p+p collisions.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for high multiplicity p+p collisions.

rho0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Invariant pi+pi- mass distribution after background subtraction for minimum bias p+p collisions measured by NA27.

Mixed-event background subtracted K pi raw invariant mass distribution for a particular K*0 pT bin at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au interactions.

Mixed-event background subtracted KS*0 pi raw invariant mass distribution integrated over nvariant mass distribution for a particular K*+- pT bin at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au interactions.

K*0 mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

K*+- mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

K*0 width as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

K*+- width as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Mixed-event background subtracted p pi raw invariant mass distribution for a particular pT bin at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au interactions.

Mixed-event background subtracted p pi raw invariant mass distribution for a particular pT bin at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias p+p collisions.

Delta++ mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Delta++ width as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Delta++ mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias p+p collisions.

Delta++ width as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias p+p collisions.

Mixed-event background subtracted Lambda pi raw invariant mass distribution integrated over the Sigma* pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au interactions.

Mixed-event background subtracted p K raw invariant mass distribution integrated over the Lambda* pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au interactions.

Sigma* mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.75 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Lambda* mass as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Lambda* width as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

rho0 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 40-100% centrality.

rho0 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 20-40% centrality.

rho0 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 0-20% centrality.

rho0 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

(K*0+K*0bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

(K*0+K*0bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 0-20% centrality.

(K*0 + K*0bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 20-40% centrality.

(K*0 + K*0bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 40-100% centrality.

(K*+ + K*-)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

(K*+ +K*-)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 0-20% centrality.

(K*+ +K*-)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 20-40% centrality.

(K*+ +K*-)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 40-100% centrality.

(Delta++ + Delta--bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

(Delta++ + Delta--bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 0-20% centrality.

(Delta++ + Delta--bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 20-40% centrality.

(Delta++ + Delta--bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 40-100% centrality.

(Delta++ + Delta--bar)/2 invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias p+p collisions. The errors shown also include the systematic uncertainties.

Sigma* invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Sigma* invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 0-20% centrality.

Sigma* invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 20-40% centrality.

Sigma* invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for d+Au collisions at 40-100% centrality.

Lambda* invariant yields as a function of pT at |y| < 0.5 for minimum bias d+Au collisions.

Rescaled spectra of pion minimum bias d+Au.

Rescaled spectra of p minimum bias d+Au.

Rescaled spectra of rho0 minimum bias d+Au.

Rescaled spectra of K* minimum bias d+Au.

Rescaled spectra of Delta minimum bias d+Au.

Rescaled spectra of Sigma* minimum bias d+Au.

Rescaled spectra of Lambda* minimum bias d+Au.

pion as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

proton as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

K as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

rho0 as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

K* as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

pion as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

proton as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

K as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

Delta++ as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

Sigma* as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

Lambda* as a function of < dNch > /deta for minimum bias p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-100% of the total d+Au cross section.

rho0/pi ratios in p+p, various centralities in d+Au, and in peripheral Au+Au collisions as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

K*/k- ratios in p+p, various centralities in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Delta++/p ratios in p+p, various centralities in d+Au as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Sigma*/Lambda ratios in p+p, various centralities in d+Au, and in central Au+Au collisions as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Lambda*/Lambda ratios in p+p, minimum bias d+Au, and two different centralities in Au+Au collisions as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Delta++/p ratios normalized by their ratio measured in p+p collisions at the same beam energy as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

K*/K- ratios normalized by their ratio measured in p+p collisions at the same beam energy as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

rho0/pi- ratios normalized by their ratio measured in p+p collisions at the same beam energy as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Lambda*/Lambda ratios normalized by their ratio measured in p+p collisions at the same beam energy as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Sigma*/Lambda ratios normalized by their ratio measured in p+p collisions at the same beam energy as a function of dNch/deta. The errors shown are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

RdAu for pion.

RdAu for charged hadrons.

RdAu for charged rho0.

RdAu for pion.

RdAu for charged hadrons.

RdAu for charged K*0.

RdAu for charged K*+-.

Measured inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet transverse momentum for absolute values of the jet rapidity from 1.2 to 1.6 for cone radius R = 0.7.

Measured inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet transverse momentum for absolute values of the jet rapidity from 1.6 to 2.0 for cone radius R = 0.7.

Measured inclusive jet cross section as a function of jet transverse momentum for absolute values of the jet rapidity from 2.0 to 2.4 for cone radius R = 0.7.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.0 to 0.4: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.4 to 0.8: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 0.8 to 1.2: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.2 to 1.6: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 1.6 to 2.0: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Correction factors for hadronization, underlying event and total non-perturbative effects for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Uncorrelated uncertainty (2nd) EM energy scale (3rd) Photon energy scale (4th) High p_{T} extrapolation (5th) eta-intercalibration (6th) Detector showering.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Luminosity (2nd) eta-intercalibration (3rd) eta-intercalibration (4th) eta-intercalibration (5th) JES resolution bias (6th) Resolution method.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Non-Gaussian tails (2nd) Zero-suppression (3rd) Resolution (4th) eta-intercalibration fit (5th) JES MPF bias (6th) JES MPF bias.

Detailed systematic errors for the absolute value of the jet rapidity in the range 2.0 to 2.4: (1st) Rapidity unfolding (2nd) Trigger matching (3rd) Dijet response fit (4th) Dijet response fit (5th) Trigger matching (6th) CC response fit.

Differential cross section for the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 to 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) > 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.

Ratio of the differential cross section in the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) < 0.8 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0 to the region ABS(YRAP(JET)) 1.5 TO 2.5 and YRAP(GAMMA)*YRAP(JET) < 0.