A measurement of the cross-sections for single and double prompt photon production in p p interactions at s = 630 GeV is presented. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 13.2 pb −1 . The results are in good agreement with the predictions of perturbative QCD. The signal from double prompt photon production has a statistical significance of 4.3 standard deviations.
There is an overall systematic error of 9 pct not included in the table.
Errors quoted include statistical and all PT dependent systematic uncertainties. There is in addition a 6.8 pct overall normalization uncertainty.
The inclusive cross section for production of isolated photons has been measured in \pbarp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 630$ GeV with the \D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. The photons span a transverse energy ($E_T$) range from 7-49 GeV and have pseudorapidity $|\eta| < 2.5$. This measurement is combined with to previous \D0 result at $\sqrt{s} = 1800$ GeV to form a ratio of the cross sections. Comparison of next-to-leading order QCD with the measured cross section at 630 GeV and ratio of cross sections show satisfactory agreement in most of the $E_T$ range.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
The first prompt photon measurement from the CDF experiment at the Fermilab pp¯ Collider is presented. Two independent methods are used to measure the cross section: one for high transverse momentum (PT) and one for lower PT. Comparisons to various theoretical calculations are shown. The cross section agrees qualitatively with QCD calculations but has a steeper slope at low PT.
Cross section using profile method and an isolation cut of 2 GeV in a cone around the photon. There is an additional 27 pct systematic uncertainty in addition to the PT dependent systematic errors shown in the table.
Cross section using conversion method and an isolation cut of 2 GeV in a cone around the photon. There is an additional +32,-46 pct systematic uncertainty in addition to the PT dependent systematic errors shown in the table.
Cross section using profile method and an isolation cut of 15 pct of the photon PT in a cone around the photon. There is an additional 29 pct systematic uncertainty in addition to the PT dependent systematic errors shown in the table.