Exclusive J/psi photoproduction cross section in gamma-p.

Dissociative J/psi photoproduction gamma-p.

Cross section ratio, dissociative J/psi photoproduction gamma-p over exclusive J/psi photoproduction gamma-p.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yield of prompt ${\rm D}^{0}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of ${\rm D}^{0}$->${\rm K}^{0}\pi^{+}$ : 0.0388. The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution. The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yield of prompt ${\rm D}^{+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of ${\rm D}^{+}$->${\rm K}^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}$ : 0.0913. The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution. The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yield of prompt ${\rm D}^{*+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of ${\rm D}^{*+}$->${\rm D}^{0}\pi^{+}$->${\rm K}^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}$ : 0.0388*0.677. The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution. The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources.

Ratio of ${\rm D}^{+}$ to ${\rm D}^{0}$ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Ratio of ${\rm D}^{*+}$ to ${\rm D}^{0}$ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{0}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{*+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{0}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of ${\rm D}^{*+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of ${\rm D}^{*+}$->${\rm D}^{0}\pi^{+}$->${\rm K}^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}$ : 0.0388*0.677.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of Average ${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 0-10% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{\rm AA}$ of Average ${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the centrality class 30-50% in |y| < 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$.

Ratio of prompt D meson (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) and charged pion (charged particles for $p_{\rm T}>16~{\rm GeV/}c$) nuclear modification factors ($R_{\rm AA}$) as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ for D mesons with $|y|<0.5$ and charged pions (particles) with $|\eta|<0.8$, measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76~{\rm TeV}$ in the 0-10% centrality range.

Spin alignment RHO(00) extracted from the helicity angle distributions for PHI and OMEGA production in the given XF regions for different M(PV) regions. The uncertainty is the propagated uncertainty from the linear fits, which in turn includes the quadratic sum of statistical uncertainties and uncertainties from the background subtraction.

Spin alignment RHO(00) extracted using DELTA(P), the direction of the momentum transfer from the beam proton in the initial state to the fast proton in the final state, as the reference axis. The table includes PHI and OMEGA production. The results for different P(V) cuts are also given for OMEGA production. The uncertainty is the propagated uncertainty from the linear fits, which in turn includes the quadratic sum of statistical uncertainties and uncertainties from the background subtraction.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet pT-spectra with radius parameter R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV, for two centrality classes 0-10% and 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Measurement of the fractions of 1neutron (1n), 2 neutrons (2n), 3 neutrons (3n) events with respect to the total number of events (Ntot) for single EMD minus mutual EMD process in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV per nucleon.

Q**2 dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for proton dissociative PHI meson production at mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 5.3 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio pf the PHI to RHO0 elastic cross section for mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.0 PCT.

Q**2 + MASS(V)**2 dependence of the ratio pf the PHI to RHO0 elastic cross section for mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.0 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the longitudinal and transverse GAMMA* P cross sections for elastic RHO0 production at mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the longitudinal and transverse GAMMA* P cross sections for elastic PHI production at mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 5.3 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative PHI production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 5.3 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in elastic RHO0 production.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in elastic PHI production.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in dissociative RHO0 production.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in dissociative PHI production.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production in four ABS(T) bins at Q**2 There is an additional normalization uncertainty of 4 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production in four ABS(T) bins at Q**2 There is an additional normalization uncertainty of 4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic RHO0 meson total cross section. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic PHI meson total cross section. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic RHO0 meson differential cross section at T=0. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic PHI mesondifferential cross section at T=0. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Slope differences between elastic and proton dissociative scattering for RHO0 meson production.

Slope differences between elastic and proton dissociative scattering for PHI meson production.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Q**2 dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=5,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=5,MM=11).

Q**2 dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=1,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=1,MM=11).

T dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=5,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=5,MM=11).

T dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=1,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=1,MM=11).

Q**2 dependence of the ratio R.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio R.

W dependence of the ratio R.

W dependence of the ratio R.

W dependence of the ratio R.

T dependence of the ratio R.

T dependence of the ratio R.

Di-pion mass dependence of the ratio R.

Di-pion mass dependence of the ratio R.

Dependence of the exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of the di-pion mass for the Q**2 range 2.5 to 5 GeV**2.

Dependence of the exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of the di-pion mass for the Q**2 range 5 to 60 GeV**2.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for PHI production.

T dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 2.5 to 5 GeV**2.

T dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 5 to 60 GeV**2.

T dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for PHI production in the Q**2 range 2.5 to 60 GeV**2.

Di-pion mass dependence of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 2.5 to 5 GeV**2.

Di-pion mass dependence of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 5 to 60 GeV**2.

chi_c0 cross section from exclusive double pomeron production at mid rapidity.

upper limit on the cross section for Odderon exchange in exclusive J/psi production.

Differential cross sections for diffractive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of M(C=X).

Differential cross sections for diffractive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of PT(C=D*).

Ratio of cross sections for Diffractive to Inclusive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of PT(C=D*).

Differential cross sections for diffractive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of ETARAP(C=D*).

Ratio of cross sections for Diffractive to Inclusive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of ETARAP(C=D*).

Differential cross sections for diffractive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of Z(C=D*).

Ratio of cross sections for Diffractive to Inclusive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of Z(C=D*).

Differential cross sections for diffractive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of W.

Ratio of cross sections for Diffractive to Inclusive photoproduction of D*+- mesons as a function of W.

The differential cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

The differential cross section as a function of log(M(P=5)**2).

The differential cross section as a function of X(C=D*).

The differential cross section as a function of BETA.

The differential cross section as a function of LOG(BETA).

The differential cross section as a function of LOG(Q**2).

The differential cross section as a function of W.

Overall ratio of diffractively produced D*+- mesons to inclusive D*+- mesons.

Ratio of diffractively produced D*+- mesons to inclusive D*+- mesons as a function of transverse momentum.

Ratio of diffractively produced D*+- mesons to inclusive D*+- mesons as a function of pseudorapidity.

Ratio of diffractively produced D*+- mesons to inclusive D*+- mesons as a function of X(C=D*).

Ratio of diffractively produced D*+- mesons to inclusive D*+- mesons as a function of LOG(Q**2).

Ratio of diffractively produced D*+- mesons to inclusive D*+- mesons as a function of W.

Differential cross section as a function of LOG(BETA) in different regions of Q**2 and X(NAME=POMERON).

The measured charm contribution to the diffractive structure function of the proton F2(C=D(3),CHARM).

Couplings are triple gauge boson couplings (TGC). For definition see 'Physics at LEP2', Ed. G. Altarelli, CERN 96-01 (1996), vol. 1.