The transverse-mass dependence of the correlation-strength parameter $\lambda$ in 30-40% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the correlation-strength parameter $\lambda$ in 40-50% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the correlation-strength parameter $\lambda$ in 50-60% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$ in 0-10% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$ in 10-20% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$ in 20-30% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$ in 30-40% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$ in 40-50% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$ in 50-60% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-index of stability parameter $\alpha$ in 0-10% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-index of stability parameter $\alpha$ in 10-20% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-index of stability parameter $\alpha$ in 20-30% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-index of stability parameter $\alpha$ in 30-40% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-index of stability parameter $\alpha$ in 40-50% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the Lévy-index of stability parameter $\alpha$ in 50-60% centrality bin obtained from Lévy fits with Eq. (9).

The transverse-mass dependence of the normalized correlation-strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{\rm max}$ for 0-10% centrality intervals. For each centrality bin the data are fitted with the Gaussian function of Eq. (15). This parameterization can describe the data and is discussed in detail in Section VI B. The fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 7.

The transverse-mass dependence of the normalized correlation-strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{\rm max}$ for 10-20% centrality intervals. For each centrality bin the data are fitted with the Gaussian function of Eq. (15). This parameterization can describe the data and is discussed in detail in Section VI B. The fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 7.

The transverse-mass dependence of the normalized correlation-strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{\rm max}$ for 20-30% centrality intervals. For each centrality bin the data are fitted with the Gaussian function of Eq. (15). This parameterization can describe the data and is discussed in detail in Section VI B. The fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 7.

The transverse-mass dependence of the normalized correlation-strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{\rm max}$ for 30-40% centrality intervals. For each centrality bin the data are fitted with the Gaussian function of Eq. (15). This parameterization can describe the data and is discussed in detail in Section VI B. The fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 7.

The transverse-mass dependence of the normalized correlation-strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{\rm max}$ for 40-50% centrality interval. For each centrality bin the data are fitted with the Gaussian function of Eq. (15). This parameterization can describe the data and is discussed in detail in Section VI B. The fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 7.

The transverse-mass dependence of the normalized correlation-strength parameter $\lambda/\lambda_{\rm max}$ for 50-60% centrality interval. For each centrality bin the data are fitted with the Gaussian function of Eq. (15). This parameterization can describe the data and is discussed in detail in Section VI B. The fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 7.

The transverse-mass dependence of the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$, shown in 0-10% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the A and B linear fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 8.

The transverse-mass dependence of the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$, shown in 10-20% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the A and B linear fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 8.

The transverse-mass dependence of the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$, shown in 20-30% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the A and B linear fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 8.

The transverse-mass dependence of the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$, shown in 30-40% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the A and B linear fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 8.

The transverse-mass dependence of the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$, shown in 40-50% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the A and B linear fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 8.

The transverse-mass dependence of the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter $R$, shown in 50-60% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the A and B linear fit parameters with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 8.

The transverse-mass dependence of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter, shown in 0-10% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the linear fit parameters $\widehat{A}$ and $\widehat{B}$ with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 9

The transverse-mass dependence of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter, shown in 10-20% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the linear fit parameters $\widehat{A}$ and $\widehat{B}$ with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 9

The transverse-mass dependence of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter, shown in 20-30% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the linear fit parameters $\widehat{A}$ and $\widehat{B}$ with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 9

The transverse-mass dependence of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter, shown in 30-40% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the linear fit parameters $\widehat{A}$ and $\widehat{B}$ with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 9

The transverse-mass dependence of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter, shown in 40-50% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the linear fit parameters $\widehat{A}$ and $\widehat{B}$ with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 9

The transverse-mass dependence of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter, shown in 50-60% centrality bin. The values and uncertainties of the linear fit parameters $\widehat{A}$ and $\widehat{B}$ with the statistic and systematic uncertainties are shown in Fig. 9

The $H$ parameter that characterize the magnitude of the $\lambda/\lambda_{max}(m_T)$ and is defined in Eq. (15)., shown as functions of $N_{part}$.

The $\sigma$ parameter that characterize the width of the $\lambda/\lambda_{max}(m_T)$ and is defined in Eq. (15)., shown as functions of $N_{part}$.

The parameter $A$ of the affine linear fit to the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter that are defined in Eq.(12) as function of $N_{part}$

The parameter $B$ of the affine linear fit to the inverse square of the Lévy-scale parameter that are defined in Eq.(12) as function of $N_{part}$

The parameter $\widehat{A}$ of the affine linear fit to the inverse of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter that are defined in Eq.(14) as function of $N_{part}$.

The parameter $\widehat{B}$ of the affine linear fit to the inverse of the $\widehat{R}$ parameter that are defined in Eq.(14) as function of $N_{part}$.

The centrality dependence of $\alpha_0$, the $m_T$-averaged value of $\alpha$ as a function of $N_{part}$.

The Lévy scale parameter $R$ as a function of $N^{1/3}_{part}$ at $m_T=0.326$ GeV.

The Lévy scale parameter $R$ as a function of $N^{1/3}_{part}$ at $m_T=0.438$ GeV.

The Lévy scale parameter $R$ as a function of $N^{1/3}_{part}$ at $m_T=0.553$ GeV.

The Lévy scale parameter $R$ as a function of $N^{1/3}_{part}$ at $m_T=0.670$ GeV.

The Lévy scale parameter $R$ as a function of $N^{1/3}_{part}$ at $m_T=0.787$ GeV.

Monte Carlo calcuations with no mass drop assumed in 0-10%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with no mass drop assumed in 10-20%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with no mass drop assumed in 20-30%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with no mass drop assumed in 30-40%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with no mass drop assumed in 40-50%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with no mass drop assumed in 50-60%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with the best mass drop assumed in 0-10%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with the best mass drop assumed in 10-20%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with the best mass drop assumed in 20-30%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with the best mass drop assumed in 30-40%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with the best mass drop assumed in 40-50%.

Monte Carlo calcuations with the best mass drop assumed in 50-60%.

The best values of $B^{-1}_{\eta\prime}$ spectrum of the $\eta\prime$ condensate in the six centrality classes.

The centrality dependence of the best values of the in-medium mass of the $m^{*}_{\eta\prime}$.

The CL maps of the comparison of the MC to data in 0-10% (see Fig. 11).

The CL maps of the comparison of the MC to data in 10-20% (see Fig. 11).

The CL maps of the comparison of the MC to data in 20-30% (see Fig. 11).

The CL maps of the comparison of the MC to data in 30-40% (see Fig. 11).

The CL maps of the comparison of the MC to data in 40-50% (see Fig. 11).

The CL maps of the comparison of the MC to data in 50-60% (see Fig. 11).

Numerical data for $(K^+ + K^-)/2$ from Figure 1.

Numerical data for $K^0_S$ from Figure 2.

Numerical data for $K^0_S$ from Figure 2.

Numerical data for $(K^+ + K^-)/2$ from Figure 2.

Numerical data for $(K^+ + K^-)/2$ from Figure 2.

Numerical data for $K^0_S$ lifetime from Figure 6.

Numerical data for $K^0_S$ lifetime from Figure 6.

Numerical data for $K^0_S$ $y$-$p_T$ spectrum from Figure 7.

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^+$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^-$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $p$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^+$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^-$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^+$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^-$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $p$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\bar{p}$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^+$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^-$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^+$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^-$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $p$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\bar{p}$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^+$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^-$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^+$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^-$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $p$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\bar{p}$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^+$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^-$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^+$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^-$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $p$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\bar{p}$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^+$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $\pi^-$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^+$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Two-dimensional distributions ($y$ vs. $p_T$ ) of double differential yields of $K^-$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^+$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^-$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^+$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^-$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^+$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^-$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^+$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^-$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^+$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^-$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^+$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\pi^-$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

The parameters of double-Gaussian fit to $\pi^+$ rapidity spectra

The parameters of double-Gaussian fit to $\pi^-$ rapidity spectra

Rapidity spectrum of negatively charged pions obtained with $h^-$ method in central Ar+Sc collisions at 30$A$ GeV/$c$ The results of $h^-$ analysis of Ar+Sc collisions used for comparison are published in reference [17]

Rapidity spectrum of negatively charged pions obtained with $h^-$ method in central Ar+Sc collisions at 150$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^+$ at 13$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^+$ at 19$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^+$ at 30$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^+$ at 40$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^+$ at 75$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^+$ at 150$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^-$ at 13$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^-$ at 19$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^-$ at 30$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^-$ at 40$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^-$ at 75$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T$ fitted to $p_T$ spectrum of $K^-$ at 150$A$ GeV/$c$

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^+$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^-$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^+$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^-$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^+$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^-$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^+$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^-$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^+$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^-$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^+$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $K^-$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

The parameters of double-Gaussian fit to $K^+$ rapidity spectra

The parameters of double-Gaussian fit to $K^-$ rapidity spectra

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $p$ at 13$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $p$ at 19$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $p$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\bar{p}$ at 30$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $p$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\bar{p}$ at 40$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $p$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\bar{p}$ at 75$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $p$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

Rapidity ($y$) spectra of $\bar{p}$ at 150$A$ GeV/c

The parameters of double-Gaussian fit to $\bar{p}$ rapidity spectra

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^+)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of positively charged $K$ mesons for ArSc. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^+)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of positively charged $K$ mesons for BeBe. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^+)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of positively charged $K$ mesons for ppWorld. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^+)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of positively charged $K$ mesons for pp. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^+)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of positively charged $K$ mesons for AuAu. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^+)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of positively charged $K$ mesons for PbPb. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^-)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of negatively charged $K$ mesons for ArSc. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^-)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of negatively charged $K$ mesons for BeBe. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^-)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of negatively charged $K$ mesons for ppWorld. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^-)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of negatively charged $K$ mesons for pp. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^-)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of negatively charged $K$ mesons for AuAu. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter $T(K^-)$ of $p_T$ spectra at mid-rapidity of negatively charged $K$ mesons for PbPb. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity for ArSc. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity for BeBe. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity for ppWorld. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity for pp. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity for AuAu. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity for PbPb. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^-/\pi^-$ ratio at mid-rapidity for ArSc. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^-/\pi^-$ ratio at mid-rapidity for BeBe. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^-/\pi^-$ ratio at mid-rapidity for ppWorld. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^-/\pi^-$ ratio at mid-rapidity for pp. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^-/\pi^-$ ratio at mid-rapidity for AuAu. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $K^-/\pi^-$ ratio at mid-rapidity for PbPb. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^+\rangle/\langle\pi^+\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for ArSc. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^+\rangle/\langle\pi^+\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for BeBe. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^+\rangle/\langle\pi^+\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for ppWorld. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^+\rangle/\langle\pi^+\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for pp. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^+\rangle/\langle\pi^+\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for AuAu. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^+\rangle/\langle\pi^+\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for PbPb. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^-\rangle/\langle\pi^-\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for ArSc. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^-\rangle/\langle\pi^-\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for BeBe. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^-\rangle/\langle\pi^-\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for ppWorld. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^-\rangle/\langle\pi^-\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for pp. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^-\rangle/\langle\pi^-\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for AuAu. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

The energy dependence of the $\langle K^-\rangle/\langle\pi^-\rangle$ mean multiplicity ratio for PbPb. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2-4,13,17,53-64]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Be+Be collisions at $19A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Be+Be collisions at $30A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Be+Be collisions at $40A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Be+Be collisions at $75A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Be+Be collisions at $150A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in inelastic p+p collisions at $20$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in inelastic p+p collisions at $30$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in inelastic p+p collisions at $40$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in inelastic p+p collisions at $75$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in inelastic p+p collisions at $150$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Pb+Pb collisions at $20A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Pb+Pb collisions at $30A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Pb+Pb collisions at $40A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Pb+Pb collisions at $80A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

Proton rapidity spectra in central Pb+Pb collisions at $150A$ GeV/$c$ beam momentum. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17]

System size dependence of the $K^+/\pi^+$ ratio at mid-rapidity in $central$ nucleus-nucleus and inelastic $p$+$p$ interactions obtained at beam momenta of $\approx 150A$ GeV/$c$. The data used for comparison, other than Ar+Sc, are published in references [2,13,17,53].

The performance of jet energy resolution (JER) for jets with |y| < 2.1 evaluated as a function of pT_truth in different centrality bins. Simulated hard scatter events were overlaid onto events from a dedicated sample of minimum-bias Xe+Xe data. The fit parameters are listed in a sperate table (Extras 1)

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for per-pair normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for absolutely normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for rho distributions for leading jets in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

Parameter a,b, and c from JER fits in Figure 1b.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Bayesian upper exclusion limits on the ratio $g_{W'}/g_{W}$ for an SSM-like W$\prime$ boson are shown. The unity coupling ratio (blue dotted curve) corresponds to the SSM common benchmark. The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Bayesian lower exclusion limits on the NUGIM G(221) mixing angle $\cot(\theta_{E})$ are shown as a function of the W$\prime$ boson mass. The theoretically excluded region is shaded in grey. The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Bayesian upper exclusion limits at 95% CL on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction of a QBH in an associated $ au$ lepton and neutrino final state. Minimum threshold masses $m_{th}$ of up to 6.6 TeV are excluded at 95% CL. The observed limit (solid line) is obtained from the intersection with the LO QBH cross section (blue dotted curve). The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Bayesian upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section of the process $pp\rightarrow\tau\nu$ mediated via LQ exchange in the t-channel. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The predicted LQ cross section at LO in the three coupling benchmark scenarios is depicted in different colors for $g_{U}=1$. The uncertainty bandy correspond to the sum in quadrature of PDF and scale variations. The first benchmark scenario considers only couplings to left-handed SM fermions (i.e. $\beta_{\text{R}}^{ij}=0$) and is referred to as "best fit LH". The second benchmark, referred to as "best fit LH+RH", considers $|\beta_{\text{R}}^{\text{b}\tau}|=1$ and all other $\beta_{\text{R}}^{ij}=0$. In the third "democratic" benchmark, equal couplings only to LH fermions are assumed, i.e. $\beta_{\text{L}}^{ij}=1$ and $\beta_{\text{R}}^{ij}=0$ for all $i$ and $j$.

Expected and observed lower limits of the LQ mass as a function of the coupling $g_{U}$ in the LH scenario. The blue band shows the 68% and 95% regions of $g_{U}$ preferred by the fit to the b anomalies data.

Expected and observed lower limits of the LQ mass as a function of the coupling $g_{U}$ in the LH+RH scenario. The blue band shows the 68% and 95% regions of $g_{U}$ preferred by the fit to the b anomalies data.

Expected and observed lower limits of the LQ mass as a function of the coupling $g_{U}$ in the democratic scenario. The blue band shows the 68% and 95% regions of $g_{U}$ preferred by the fit to the b anomalies data.

Bayesian upper exclusion limits at 95% CL on each of the Wilson coefficients described by the EFT model based on 2016-2018 data. The three different coupling types represent a left-handed vector coupling ($\epsilon^{cb}_{L}$), tensor-like coupling ($\epsilon^{cb}_{T}$), and scalar-tensor-like coupling ($\epsilon^{cb}_{S_{L}}$). The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively.

Summary of exclusion limits (expected and observed) calculated at 95% CL for full Run-2 CMS data.

Background prediction and observed data yields in the signal region bins. The background yields are obtained from the background-only fit and serve as input to the simplified likelihood reinterpretation scheme. The naming of the bins is "year_binnumber", following the binning from Figure 4.

Matrix of covariance coefficients between signal region bins. The coefficients are obtained from the background-only fit and serve as input to the simplified likelihood reinterpretation scheme. The naming of the bins is "year_binnumber", following the binning used in Figure 4.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to 41.3 fb$^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement (cumulative) for various signal hypothesis. The requirements listed are presented as total efficiencies w.r.t. the previous selection step.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.