Statistical correlation coefficients for double-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$) and the absolute rapidity of the outermost jet ($\left| y \right|_\text{max}$)

Double-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$) and the absolute rapidity of the outermost jet ($\left| y \right|_\text{max}$)

Electroweak corrections to double-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$) and the absolute rapidity of the outermost jet ($\left| y \right|_\text{max}$)

Nonperturbative corrections to double-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$) and the absolute rapidity of the outermost jet ($\left| y \right|_\text{max}$)

Statistical correlation coefficients for double-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$) and the absolute rapidity of the outermost jet ($\left| y \right|_\text{max}$)

Triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Electroweak corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Nonperturbative corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Statistical correlation coefficients for triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Electroweak corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Nonperturbative corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Statistical correlation coefficients for triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet invariant mass ($m_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Electroweak corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Nonperturbative corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Statistical correlation coefficients for triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.4 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Electroweak corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Nonperturbative corrections to triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Statistical correlation coefficients for triple-differential dijet cross section for anti-$k_\text{T}$ jets with R = 0.8 as a function of the dijet average transverse momentum ($\langle p_\text{T} \rangle_{1,2}$), the total boost of dijet system ($y_\text{b}$), and the absolute rapidity separation of the two jets ($y^*$)

Parton dijet $M_{inv}$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties, for topology C.

Parton dijet $M_{inv}$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties, for topology D.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements.The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology B). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology C) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

Parton inclusive-jet $p_T$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for jet-$\eta$ region $0.5<|\eta|<1$.

Parton inclusive-jet $p_T$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for jet-$\eta$ region $|\eta|<0.5$.

Parton dijet invariant mass $M_{inv}$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology.

Parton dijet invariant mass $M_{inv}$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology.

Parton inclusive-jet $p_T$, $x_T$, and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for jet-$\eta$ region $|\eta|<1$.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<1$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region and jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for dijet measurements with the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for dijet measurements with the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling dijet measurements with the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology and the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The particle-level di-jet differential cross section. The systematic uncertainty on the data contains contributions from track finding efficiency, track transverse momentum resolution, calorimeter energy resolution, and unfolding uncertainties. For the theory, values are given for the underlying event and hadronization (UEH) correction uncertainty and the quadrature sum of the UEH and theoretical uncertainties. Both the UEH and theoretical uncertainties include contributions from factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties and PDF uncertainties. An 8.8% uncertainty common to all points due to the integrated luminosity determination is also present, but not included in the systematic values quoted below.

Values of gluon X1 and X2 obtained from the PYTHIA detector-level simulation for the same-sign di-jet topology compared to the gluon X distribution for inclusive jets. The inclusive distribution has been scaled down by a factor of 20 compared to the di-jet distributions.

Values of gluon X1 and X2 obtained from the PYTHIA detector-level simulation for the opposite-sign di-jet topology compared to the gluon X distribution for inclusive jets. The inclusive distribution has been scaled down by a factor of 20 compared to the di-jet distributions.

Di-jet A_LL asymmetry vs parton-level invariant mass for the same-sign di-jet topology. The systematic uncertainty on the mass includes contributions from jet energy scale, the correction to parton-level, and the difference between NLO and PYTHIA cross sections. The systematic uncertainty on the asymmetry includes contributions from trigger and reconstruction bias and residual transverse beam polarization components. A 6.5% uncertainty common to all points due to uncertainty on the measured beam polarizations is also present, but not included in the uncertainties quoted below.

Theoretical predictions for the di-jet A_LL asymmetry for the same-sign topology using the DSSV14 and NNPDFpol1.1 polarized PDF sets. The DSSV14 prediction is presented without uncertainty while the systematic uncertainty on the NNPDFpol1.1 prediction contains contributions from factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties and PDF uncertainties.

Di-jet A_LL asymmetry vs parton-level invariant mass for the opposite-sign di-jet topology. The systematic uncertainty on the mass includes contributions from jet energy scale, the correction to parton-level, and the difference between NLO and PYTHIA cross sections. The systematic uncertainty on the asymmetry includes contributions from trigger and reconstruction bias and residual transverse beam polarization components. A 6.5% uncertainty common to all points due to uncertainty on the measured beam polarizations is also present, but not included in the uncertainties quoted below.

Theoretical predictions for the di-jet A_LL asymmetry for the opposite-sign topology using the DSSV14 and NNPDFpol1.1 polarized PDF sets. The DSSV14 prediction is presented without uncertainty while the systematic uncertainty on the NNPDFpol1.1 prediction contains contributions from factorization and renormalization scale uncertainties and PDF uncertainties.

The measured fraction of events, the gap fraction, surviving the veto cut of having no additional jets in the |rapidity| interval < 2.1 having a transverse momentum greater than Q, as a function of Q.

The measured fraction of events, the gap fraction, surviving the veto cut of having no events with the scalar sum of the transverse momentum of additional jets in the |rapidity| interval < 0.8 greater than Q, as a function of Q.

The measured fraction of events, the gap fraction, surviving the veto cut of having no events with the scalar sum of the transverse momentum of additional jets in the |rapidity| interval 0.8-1.5 greater than Q, as a function of Q.

The measured fraction of events, the gap fraction, surviving the veto cut of having no events with the scalar sum of the transverse momentum of additional jets in the |rapidity| interval 1.5-2.1 greater than Q, as a function of Q.

The measured fraction of events, the gap fraction, surviving the veto cut of having no events with the scalar sum of the transverse momentum of additional jets in the |rapidity| interval < 2.1 greater than Q, as a function of Q.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Q0 for the absolute rapditiy interval < 0.8.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Q0 for the absolute rapditiy interval 0.8 TO 1.5.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Q0 for the absolute rapditiy interval 1.5 TO 2.1.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Q0 for the absolute rapditiy interval < 2.1.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Qsum for the absolute rapditiy interval < 0.8.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Qsum for the absolute rapditiy interval 0.8 TO 1.5.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Qsum for the absolute rapditiy interval 1.5 TO 2.1.

The correlation matrix (statistical) for the gap fraction measurement at different values of Qsum for the absolute rapditiy interval < 2.1.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 1.2-2.1 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.1-2.8 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.8-3.6 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 3.6-4.4 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.0-0.3 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.3-0.8 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.8-1.2 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 1.2-2.1 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.1-2.8 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.8-3.6 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 3.6-4.4 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.0-0.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.5-1.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.0-1.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.5-2.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.0-2.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.5-3.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.0-3.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.5-4.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 4.0-4.4 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.0-0.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.5-1.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.0-1.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.5-2.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.0-2.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.5-3.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.0-3.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.5-4.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 4.0-4.4 and R=0.6.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets having a rapidity difference in the range [4,5], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets having a rapidity difference in the range [5,6], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [1,2], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [2,3], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [3,4], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [4,5], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 260 to 310 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 310 to 400 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 400 to 500 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 500 to 600 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 600 to 800 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 800 to 10000 GeV.

dDeltaPhi distribution in 7 TeV P-P collisions.

CHI distribution for mass bin > 1200 GeV.

Centrality Ratio.