None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Quasielastic e-d scattering measurements were performed up to q 2 = 100 fm −2 . Only the electron was detected. The ratio R= ( d 2 ω d Ω d E′) ed d ω d Ω) ep was measured at the quasielastic peak; the magnetic form factor G M N of the neutron was deduced using the assumption G E N = 0.
No description provided.
CONST(NAME=MU) is the magnetic moment. The magnetic formfarctor (GM) is evaluated ander assumption of GE=0.
The reaction e+d→e′+n+p was studied at electron scattering angles θ ⩽ 35° for four-momentum transfers of 0.39, 0.565 and 0.78 (GeV/ c ) 2 . By recording electron-neutron and electron-proton coincidences, the ratio of the electron scattering cross sections on quasi-free neutrons and protons was determined. An estimate of the binding effects, based on a Chew-Low-extrapolation, was made. Values for the neutron form factors were derived.
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (Due to the different effective solid angles for neutron and proton detection in the counters).
No description provided.
We have measured elastic electron-proton scattering cross sections in the range of four-momentum transfers from 7 F−2[0.27 (GeV/c)2] to 150 F−2 [5.84 (GeV/c)2] and at scattered electron angles of between 20° and 34° in the laboratory. The estimated errors in the cross sections range from ±2.1% at the lowest momentum transfer to ±9.6% at the highest. Both the scattered electron and the recoil proton were detected, resulting in an overdetermination of the kinematics. When the constraint of a coincident proton is removed, there is no significant change in the estimated cross sections.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Differential cross sections for the reactions e−+p→e−+p+π0 and e−+p→e−+n+π+ have been measured near the Δ(1236) resonance at four-momentum transfers of 0.05, 0.13, 0.25, and 0.4 (GeV/c)2. A few measurements of the π+ angular distribution have been obtained at a four-momentum transfer of 0.6 (GeV/c)2. Cross sections for the π0 reaction are compared with dispersion-theory predictions at several pion-nucleon c.m. energies for each four-momentum transfer. A phenomenological analysis of the π0 results leads to the determination of the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole partial-wave amplitudes and the γNΔ transition form factor. Evidence is found for the existence of a significant scaler-transverse interference term in the cross section, which is tentatively associated with the resonant scaler quadrupole interaction. Cross sections for π+ electroproduction are compared with dispersion theories using the pion form factor as a free parameter. The results suggest a form factor similar to that of the proton. A fit to the form-factor results, using the ρ-dominance model, requires mρ=560±80 MeV. The rms pion charge radius is estimated to be 〈r2〉12=0.86±0.14 F.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Electron-proton elastic scattering cross sections have been measured to determine the proton electromagnetic form factors at squared four-momentum transfers q 2 between 10 and 50 fm −2 . At these values of q 2 we measured angular distributions between 25° and 110° and in addition at 25° and 35° cross sections for q 2 from 2 to 20 fm −2 using the external electron beam of the Bonn 2.5 GeV electron synchrotron. Our results confirm deviations from the scaling law.
Axis error includes +- 2/2 contribution (NORMALIZATION ERROR).
Axis error includes +- 2/2 contribution (NORMALIZATION ERROR).
Axis error includes +- 2/2 contribution (NORMALIZATION ERROR).
Elastic electron proton scattering has been used to check the validity of the dipole fit of the proton form factors at momentum transfer between 0.05 and 0.30 (GeV/ c ) 2 . The general behaviour of the cross sections is in agreement with previous measurements and is close to the dipole predictions but there is the suggestion of some small amplitude deviations. It is speculated that these deviations may be related to similar effects in the proton formfactor derived from the ISR pp elastic scattering data via a Chou-Yang model.
D(SIG(N=DIPOLE))/D(OMEGA) is cross-section derived in the assumption that both the magnetic and electric form - factors of the proton can be expressed by the dipole formula G(q**2) = 1/(1 + q**2/0.71)**2. Data are read from graph by BVP.
D(SIG(N=DIPOLE))/D(OMEGA) is cross-section derived in the assumption that both the magnetic and electric form - factors of the proton can be expressed by the dipole formula G(q**2) = 1/(1 + q**2/0.71)**2. Data are read from graph by BVP.
Results of fit of the combined data samples of Table 1 and Table 2. Data points was fitted by formula A + B*q**2 + C*sin(OMEGA*q**2 + PHI).
Electron-proton elastic scattering cross sections have been measured at squared four-momentum transfers q 2 of 0.67, 1.00, 1.17, 1.50, 1.75, 2.33 and 3.00 (GeV/ c ) 2 and Electron scattering angles θ e between 10° and 20° and at about 86° in the laboratory. The proton electromagnetic form factors G E p and G M p were determined. The results indicate that G E p ( q 2 ) decreases faster with increasing q 2 than G M p ( q 2 ). Quasi-elastic electron-deuteron cross sections have been determined at values of q 2 = 0.39, 0.565, 0.78, 1.0 and 1.5 (GeV/ c ) 2 and scattering angles between 10° and 12°. At q 2 = 0.565 (GeV/ c 2 data have also been taken with θ e = 35° and at q 2 = 1.0 and 1.5 (GeV/ c ) 2 with θ e = 86°. Electron-proton as well as electron-neutron scattering cross sections have been deduced by the ratio method. The theoretical uncertainties of this procedure are shown to be small by comparison of the bound with the free proton cross sections. The magnetic form factor of the neutron G M n derived from the data is consistent with the scaling law. The charge form factor of the neutron is found to be small.
Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).
Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).
Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).