The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 30-50% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.

The b-jet yield as a function of pT is for the 50-100% centrality class of PbPb collisions. The yields are scaled by the equivalent number of minimum bias events sampled and by TAA.

The b-jet cross section as a function of pT in pp collisions.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 0-100%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of centrality for 80 < jet pT < 90 GeV/c.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function centrality for 80 < jet pT < 90 GeV/c.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 0-10%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 10-30%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 30-50%.

The b-jet nuclear modification factor as a function of the pT for the centrality class 50-100%.

Kinematic distributions of single l + > 5-jet events in data (points), compared to MC simulation normalized to the number of events observed in data. Shown are pT spectra for muons (a) and electrons (b), and jet spectra for the channels $\mu$+jets (c) and e+jets (d). The reconstructed mtg distribution is shown for the $\mu$+jets channel in (e) and for e+jets in (f).

Kinematic distributions of single l + > 5-jet events in data (points), compared to MC simulation normalized to the number of events observed in data. Shown are pT spectra for muons (a) and electrons (b), and jet spectra for the channels $\mu$+jets (c) and e+jets (d). The reconstructed mtg distribution is shown for the $\mu$+jets channel in (e) and for e+jets in (f).

Kinematic distributions of single l + > 5-jet events in data (points), compared to MC simulation normalized to the number of events observed in data. Shown are pT spectra for muons (a) and electrons (b), and jet spectra for the channels $\mu$+jets (c) and e+jets (d). The reconstructed mtg distribution is shown for the $\mu$+jets channel in (e) and for e+jets in (f).

Reconstructed mass spectrum for the $tg$ system in data (points), along with a fit of the background $f(m)$ to the data in the $\mu$+jets channel (a) and $e$+jets channel (b). The reconstructed masses correspond to the results of kinematic fits for the jet-quark assignments that provide the best match to the $t^{*}\bar{t}^{*}$ hypothesis. Also shown are the expectations of $t^*$ signals for $m_{t^*}=750$ and 850 GeV normalized to the integrated luminosity of the data. Information about the fit: F = 501885/(1+exp((x+251.828)/112.311)) where x = $M_{tg}$.

Reconstructed mass spectrum for the $tg$ system in data (points), along with a fit of the background $f(m)$ to the data in the $\mu$+jets channel (a) and $e$+jets channel (b). The reconstructed masses correspond to the results of kinematic fits for the jet-quark assignments that provide the best match to the $t^{*}\bar{t}^{*}$ hypothesis. Also shown are the expectations of $t^*$ signals for $m_{t^*}=750$ and 850 GeV normalized to the integrated luminosity of the data. Information about the fit: F = 62101.5/(1+exp((x+6.58811)/107.886)) where x = $M_{tg}$.

The observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95%CL upper limits for the product of the inclusive $t^{*}\bar{t}^{*}$ production cross section and the branching fraction $B(t^{*}{\rightarrow}tg)$, as a function of the $t^{*}$ mass, for the combined lepton data. The ranges for ${\pm}1$ and ${\pm}2$ standard deviations for the expected limits are shown by the bands.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet pT-spectra with radius parameter R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV, for two centrality classes 0-10% and 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Differential cross sections for all p_T^Z, as a function of A(ZBB).

Differential cross sections for p_T^Z>50 GeV, as a function of DeltaR(BB).

Differential cross sections for p_T^Z>50 GeV, as a function of DeltaiPhi(BB).

Differential cross sections for p_T^Z>50 GeV, as a function of minDeltaR(Z,B).

Differential cross sections for p_T^Z>50 GeV, as a function of A(ZBB).

dsigma, assuming a minimal p_T^Z>x.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.5

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.4

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.3

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.2

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.1

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.0

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.1

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.2

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.3

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.4

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.8

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.7

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.6

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.5

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.4

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.3

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.2

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = -0.1

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.0

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.1

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.2

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.3

Excitation function at cos(Theta_K+)cm = 0.4

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.16-1.17, 1.17-1.18 and 1.18-1.19.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.19-1.20, 1.20-1.21 and 1.21-1.22.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.22-1.23, 1.23-1.24 and 1.24-1.25.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.25-1.26, 1.26-1.27 and 1.27-1.28.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.28-1.29, 1.29-1.30 and 1.30-1.31.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.31-1.32, 1.32-1.33 and 1.33-1.34.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.34-1.35, 1.35-1.36 and 1.36-1.37.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.37-1.38, 1.38-1.39 and 1.39-1.40.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.40-1.41, 1.41-1.42 and 1.42-1.43.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.43-1.44, 1.44-1.45 and 1.45-1.46.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.46-1.47, 1.47-1.48 and 1.48-1.49.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.49-1.50, 1.50-1.51 and 1.51-1.52.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.52-1.53, 1.53-1.54 and 1.54-1.55.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.55-1.56, 1.56-1.57 and 1.57-1.58.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.58-1.59, 1.59-1.60 and 1.60-1.61.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.61-1.62, 1.62-1.63 and 1.63-1.64.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.64-1.65, 1.65-1.66 and 1.66-1.67.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.67-1.68, 1.68-1.69 and 1.69-1.70.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.70-1.71, 1.71-1.72 and 1.72-1.73.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.73-1.74, 1.74-1.75 and 1.75-1.76.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.76-1.77, 1.77-1.78 and 1.78-1.79.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.79-1.80, 1.80-1.81 and 1.81-1.82.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.82-1.83, 1.83-1.84 and 1.84-1.85.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.85-1.86, 1.86-1.87 and 1.87-1.88.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.88-1.89, 1.89-1.90 and 1.90-1.92.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.92-1.94, 1.94-1.96 and 1.96-1.98.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 1.98-2.00, 2.00-2.02 and 2.02-2.04.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.04-2.06, 2.06-2.08 and 2.08-2.10.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.10-2.12, 2.12-2.14 and 2.14-2.16.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.16-2.18, 2.18-2.20 and 2.20-2.22.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.22-2.24, 2.24-2.26 and 2.26-2.28.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.28-2.30, 2.30-2.32 and 2.32-2.34.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.34-2.36, 2.36-2.38 and 2.38-2.40.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.40-2.44, 2.44-2.48 and 2.48-2.52.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.52-2.56, 2.56-2.60 and 2.60-2.70.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 2.70-2.80, 2.80-2.90 and 2.90-3.00.

The cos(Theta*) dependence of the differential cross section for the W ranges 3.00-3.10, 3.10-3.20 and 3.20-3.30.

The recoil polarization of the SIGMA+ for photon energy 1275, 1325, 1375 and 1425 MeV.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The proton-dissociative photoproduction cross section derived from the low-energy data set as a function of the photon-proton centre-of-mass energy W. PHI_T is the transeverse polarised photon flux.

The elastic photoproduction differential cross section derived from the high-energy data set as a function of the negative squared momentum transfer at the proton vertex T.

The proton-dissociative photoproduction differential cross section derived from the high-energy data set as a function of the negative squared momentum transfer at the proton vertex T.

The elastic photoproduction differential cross section derived from the low-energy data set as a function of the negative squared momentum transfer at the proton vertex T.

The proton-dissociative photoproduction differential cross section derived from the low-energy data set as a function of the negative squared momentum transfer at the proton vertex T.