Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the FCNC top-quark candidate in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the SM top-quark candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the third lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

Asymmetry results on $\vec e-^2$H parity-violating scattering from the PVDIS experiment at JLab, for RES IV settings.

Asymmetry results on $\vec e-^2$H parity-violating scattering from the PVDIS experiment at JLab, for RES III settings.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5700 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5900 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6300 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6500 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1100 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 3.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 3.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the P target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 1.6000 GeV and W = 1.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.7950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.8950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 1.9950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.0950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.1950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.2950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.3950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.4950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.5950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.6950 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7050 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7150 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7250 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7350 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7450 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7550 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7650 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7750 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7850 GeV.

A1 and g1/F1 for the DEUT target at incident energy 5.7000 GeV and W = 2.7950 GeV.

Triple differential cross section.

Cross sections for di-jet and forward jet data.. The jets are ordered such that:-. ETARAP(P=4) > ETARAP(P=5) > ETARAP(P=6).. The first jet (P=4) is the forward jet.

Cross sections for di-jet and forward jet data.. The jets are ordered such that:-. ETARAP(P=4) > ETARAP(P=5) > ETARAP(P=6).. The first jet (P=4) is the forward jet.

Cross sections for di-jet and forward jet data.. The jets are ordered such that:-. ETARAP(P=4) > ETARAP(P=5) > ETARAP(P=6).. The first jet (P=4) is the forward jet.

Measured NC structure function F2 for BOTTOM quarks.

Measured charm fractional contribution to the total cross section.

Measured bottom fractional contribution to the total cross section.

Correlation coefficient and breakdown of systematic errors for charm events.. CORREL =Correlation coefficient.. D_UNC =Uncorrelated systematic error.. Effect of a +1 sigma change in:. D_RES =Track impact parameter.. D_EFF =Track efficiency.. D_DMULT=D multiplicity.. D_BMULT=B multiplicity.. D_FRAG =Fragmentation.. D_MODEL=QCD model.. D_UDS =Light quark contribution.. D_PHI =Quark axis phi.

Correlation coefficient and breakdown of systematic errors for bottom events.. CORREL =Correlation coefficient.. D_UNC =Uncorrelated systematic error.. Effect of a +1 sigma change in:. D_RES =Track impact parameter.. D_EFF =Track efficiency.. D_DMULT=D multiplicity.. D_BMULT=B multiplicity.. D_FRAG =Fragmentation.. D_MODEL=QCD model.. D_UDS =Light quark contribution.. D_PHI =Quark axis phi.