A mass-dependent asymmetry was observed in the decay angular distribution of a photoproduced K + K − system near the K + K − threshold. The corresponding moments 〈 Y 1 0 〉 have been evaluated. Interpreting the asymmetry as an S-P wave interface due to the states S 993 ∗ (0 + ) and ø 1019 (1 − ) one can compute the moments 〈 Y 1 0 〉 through an amplitude analysis. The theoretical calculation reproduces the experimental results well, if one assumes a real S-wave amplitude for the S 993 ∗ . The data cannot be explained by a non-resonant real S-wave. Other possibilities have been discussed. An estimate of the photoproduction cross section of the S ∗ → K + K − can be given on the basis of the above hypothesis.
No description provided.
An experimental investigation of the reaction γ p → p p p at photon energies 4.7 ⩽ E γ ⩽ 6.6 GeV is described. The main results are the measurement of the cross section as a function of energy, a discussion of the main dynamical features of the reaction and the observation of a narrow p p mass state at 2.024 ± 0.005 GeV with a width of 29 ± 13 MeV.
OBSERVATION OF THIS CHANNEL AS A CONSISTENCY CHECK ON THE NORMALIZATION.
No description provided.
MEASUREMENTS OF CROSS SECTIONS OF MASS SIGNALS AT 1.94 AND 2.024 GEV, EVALUATE BY FITTING TWO BREIT WIGNERS AND CONSTANT BACKGROUND TO (AP P) MASS SPECTRUM. ERRORS ARE STATISTICAL ONLY.
Cross section and pp¯ in variant mass distribution of the reaction γp→pp¯p are presented. Further evidence for a narrow pp¯ mass state at 2.023 GeV will be given.
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (?////SYSTEMATIC ERRORS HAVE BEEN FOLDED IN QUADRATURE WITH STATISTICAL ERRORS).
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (?////SYSTEMATIC ERRORS HAVE BEEN FOLDED IN QUADRATURE WITH STATISTICAL ERRORS).
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (?////SYSTEMATIC ERRORS HAVE BEEN FOLDED IN QUADRATURE WITH STATISTICAL ERRORS).
Final total cross sections are given for a counter experiment at SLAC on hadronic photon absorption in hydrogen, deuterium, carbon, copper, and lead at incident energies from 3.7 to 18.3 GeV. Some of the nucleon cross sections have been revised and the C, Cu, and Pb data from 3.7 to 7.4 GeV have not been reported previously. The cross sections for complex nuclei vary approximately as A0.9 in our energy range, indicating that the photon interacts, at least partially, as a strongly interacting particle. The energy dependences of the proton and neutron cross sections are also similar to those of hadron-nucleon cross sections and hence may be fitted by a typical Regge parametrization, yielding σT(γp)=(98.7±3.6)+(65.0±10.1)ν−12 μb and σT(γn)=(103.4±6.7)+(33.1±19.4)ν−12 μb, where ν is the photon energy in GeV. These extrapolate to the same value at infinite energy, consistent with Pomeranchukon exchange, and the energy-dependent part yields an isovector-to-isoscalar-exchange ratio of 0.18 ± 0.06. While these observations are qualitatively consistent with vector meson dominance, quantitatively vector dominance fails in relating our results to ρ photo-production on hydrogen or to experiments determining the ρ-nucleon cross section. Vector dominance cannot be rescued by assuming that the ρ-photon coupling constant depends on the photon mass. Instead, an additional short-range interaction is apparently required, possibly due to a heavy (≳ 2 GeV / c2) vector meson or to a bare-photon interaction. The additional interaction accounts for approximately 20% of the total photoabsorption cross section.
DATA ARE GROUPED IN SETS OF FOUR TAGGING ENERGIES FOR EACH INCIDENT POSITRON ENERGY.
CROSS SECTIONS FOR EACH INCIDENT POSITRON ENERGY AVERAGED OVER THE FOUR TAGGING ENERGIES.
Photoabsorption cross sections in hydrogen and deuterium have been measured from 3.7 to 17.9 GeV. The energy dependences are similar to those of strong-interaction total cross sections, as expected from the vector-meson-dominance model. The magnitude of σT(γp) can be compared with data from γp→ρ0p to determine a γ−p coupling constant, γρ24π=0.37±0.03. This value disagrees with that obtained on the ρ mass shell, and hence there is only qualitative agreement with the vector-meson-dominance model.
Axis error includes +- 1/1 contribution (CORRECTION OF ACCEPTANCE, POSSIBLE LOSSES, ETC).
Forum