The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.125.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.175.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.225.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.275.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.350.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.450.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.550.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.650.

Measurement of F2 at X = 0.750.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.015.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.045.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.080.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.125.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.175.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.225.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.275.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.350.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.450.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.550.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.650.

Measurement of XF3 at X = 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at neutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 35.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 45.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 55.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 65.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 75.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 85.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 95.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 110.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 130.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 150.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 170.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 190.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 215.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 245.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 275.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 305.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.550, 0.650 and 0.750.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.015, 0.045 and 0.080.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.125, 0.175 and 0.225.

Differential cross sections at antineutrino energy 340.0 GeV as a function of inelasticity Y for X values 0.275, 0.350 and 0.450.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.