Nuclear modicifation factor vs. N_coll $J\psi$ with|y|<1 and pT < 3 GeV/c in d Au collisions.

The invariant cross section versus transverse momentum for J/$\psi$ with $|y|\lt 1$ in $p+p$ collisions.

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for $J/\Psi$ with |y| < 1 in 0 - 100 percent central d+Au collisions.

The effective exponential slope, $b_n$, obtained from the fit of double differential photoproduction cross sections ${\rm d^2}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}x_L{\rm d}p_{T,n}^2$ to a single exponential function in bins of $x_L$. The first uncertainty represents the fit error from the statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainty and the second one is due to the correlated systematic uncertainty.

Energy dependence of the exclusive photoproduction of a $\rho^0$ meson associated with a leading neutron, $\gamma p \to \rho^0 n \pi^+$. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The global normalisation uncertainty of $4.4\%$ is not included. $\Phi_{\gamma}$ is the integral of the photon flux, Eq. (3) of paper, in a given $W_{\gamma p}$ bin.

Differential photoproduction cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}\eta$ for the exclusive process $\gamma p \to \rho^0 n \pi^+$ as a function of the $\rho^0$ pseudorapidity in the kinematic range $0.35 < x_L < 0.95$, $\theta_n < 0.75$ mrad and $20 < W_{\gamma p} < 100$ GeV. The statistical, uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties, $\delta_{stat}$, $\delta_{sys}^{unc}$ and $\delta_{sys}^{cor}$ respectively, are given, which does not include the global normalisation error of $4.4\%$.

Differential photoproduction cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}t^{\prime}$ for the exclusive process $\gamma p \to \rho^0 n \pi^+$ as a function of the $\rho^0$ four-momentum transfer squared, $t^{\prime}$, in the kinematic range $0.35 < x_L < 0.95$, $\theta_n < 0.75$ mrad and $20 < W_{\gamma p} < 100$ GeV. The statistical, uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties, $\delta_{stat}$, $\delta_{sys}^{unc}$ and $\delta_{sys}^{cor}$ respectively, are given, which does not include the global normalisation error of $4.4\%$.

Exponential slopes, $b_1$ and $b_2$, and the ratio $\sigma_1/\sigma_2$, obtained from the components of fit, Eq. (14) of paper, to the differential cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}t^{\prime}$ in bins of $x_L$. The errors represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Exponential slopes, $b_1$ and $b_2$, and the ratio $\sigma_1/\sigma_2$, obtained from the components of fit, Eq. (14) of paper, to the differential cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}t^{\prime}$ in bins of $p_{T,n}^2$. The errors represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Energy dependence of elastic $\rho^0$ photoproduction on the pion, $\gamma \pi^+ \to \rho^0 \pi^+$, extracted in the one-pion-exchange approximation using OPE1 sample. The first uncertainty represents the full experimental error and the second is the model error coming from the pion flux uncertainty (see text). $\Gamma_\pi(x_L)$ represents the value of the pion flux, Eqs. (5-6) of paper, integrated over the $p_{T,n}<0.2$ GeV range, at a given $x_L$.

Cross section of elastic $\rho^0$ photoproduction on the pion, $\gamma \pi^+ \to \rho^0 \pi^+$, extracted in the one-pion-exchange approximation using three different samples: full sample, OPE1 and OPE2. The first uncertainty represents the full experimental error and the second is the model error coming from the pion flux uncertainty (see text). $\Gamma_\pi$ represents the value of the pion flux, Eqs. (5-6) of paper, integrated over the corresponding $(x_L,p_{T,n})$ range.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{+}$ for NC $e^{+}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 225$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{+}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{-}$ for NC $e^{-}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm NC}^{-}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{+}$ for CC $e^{+}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{+}$.

HERA combined reduced cross sections $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{-}$ for CC $e^{-}p$ scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 318$ GeV; $\delta_{\rm stat}$, $\delta_{\rm uncor}$ and $\delta_{\rm cor}$ represent the statistical, uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties, respectively; $\delta_{\rm rel}$, $\delta_{\gamma p}$, $\delta_{\rm had}$ and $\delta_{1}$ to $\delta_{4}$ are the correlated sources of uncertainties arising from the combination procedure. The uncertainties are quoted in percent relative to $\sigma_{r,\rm CC}^{-}$.

Structure function $xF_3^{\gamma Z}$ for different values of $Q^2$ and $x_{\rm Bj}$.

Structure function $xF_3^{\gamma Z}$ averaged over $Q^2 \ge 1000$ GeV$^2$ at the scale 1000 GeV$^2$.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $x_{I\!\!P}$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $y$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variable $Q^2$ for diffractive dijet DIS. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $M_X$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variable $\langle\eta^{\text{jets}}\rangle$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta_{\text{rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $x_{I\!\!P}$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $y$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variable $x_\gamma$ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $M_X$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variable $\langle\eta^{\text{jets}}\rangle$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $\vert\Delta\eta^{\text{jets}}\vert$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $y$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $z_{I\!\!P}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variable $E_T^{*\text{jet1}}$. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta_{\text{hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $\log x_P$. The global normalisation uncertainty of $7.8\%$ is not listed explicitly but is included in the total systematic uncertainty. The last two column show the correction factors for hadronisation and QED radiation, respectively. (Note: assume typo in Table 2 that $x_P$ really means $\log x_P$.).

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $z_P$. The global normalisation uncertainty of $7.8\%$ is not listed explicitly but is included in the total systematic uncertainty. The last two column show the correction factors for hadronisation and QED radiation, respectively.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $p^{\ast}_{T,1}$.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $p^{\ast}_{T,2}$.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $\langle p^{\ast}_{T}\rangle$.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $\Delta\eta^{\ast}$.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $z_P$ and $Q^2$.

Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $p^{\ast}_{\rm T,1}$ and $Q^2$.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2^{1/2}$ difference between quadruplets at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$).

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The difference in two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

No description provided.

V3{2} as a function of $\eta$.

<$V_3^2$> as a function of $\eta$.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the second harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the third harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuation $\sigma_2/<v_2>$ centrality dependence in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of ETARAP(JET) for -1.6 < ETARAP(JET) < 2.2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of Q**2 for 5 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of Q**2 for 5 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 5 < Q**2 < 20 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 20 < Q**2 < 60 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 60 < Q**2 < 120 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 120 < Q**2 < 400 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in beauty events as a function of XB for 400 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 5 < Q**2 < 20 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 20 < Q**2 < 60 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 60 < Q**2 < 120 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 120 < Q**2 < 400 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

Double-differential cross sections for inclusive jet production in charm events as a function of XB for 400 < Q**2 < 1000 GeV**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical and systematic uncertainties. Hadronisation and QED radiative corrections, CHAD and CRAD, respectively, are also shown.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR) and the reduced beauty cross sections SIGR(BOTTOM BOTTOMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The structure function F2(CHARM CHARMBAR) and the reduced charm cross sections SIGR(CHARM CHARMBAR), both as functions of XB and Q**2. The measurements are given together with their statistical, systematic and extrapolation uncertainties.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=9 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=12 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=17 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=24 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=32 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=45 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=60 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=80 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=110 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and R at nine Q^2 points.

Normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS as a function of XF. For each measurement, the statistical, the uncorrelated systematic uncertainties and the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties due to the FNC absolute energy scale (EFNC), the measurement of the particle impact position in the FNC (XYFNC) and the model dependence of the data correction (model) are given.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio at sqrt(s) = 0.9 TeV as a function of rapidity.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio at sqrt(s) = 2.76 TeV as a function of pT.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio at sqrt(s) = 2.76 TeV as a function of rapidity.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of pT.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of rapidity.

The XiBar+/Xi- ratio at sqrt(s) = 0.9 TeV integrated over rapidity |y|<0.8 as a function of pT.

The XiBar+/Xi- ratio at sqrt(s) = 2.76 TeV integrated over rapidity |y|<0.8 as a function of pT.

The XiBar+/Xi- ratio at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of pT.

The XiBar+/Xi- ratio at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of rapidity.

The OmegaBar+/Omega- ratio at sqrt(s) = 2.76 TeV integrated over rapidity |y|<0.8 as a function of pT.

The OmegaBar+/Omega- ratio at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV integrated over rapidity |y|<0.8 as a function of pT.

The pbar/p ratio in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of the relative charged-particle pseudorapidity density.

The pbar/p ratio in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 2.76 TeV as a function of the relative charged-particle pseudorapidity density.

The pbar/p ratio in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 0.9 TeV as a function of the relative charged-particle pseudorapidity density.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of the relative charged-particle pseudorapidity density.

The LambdaBar/Lambda ratio in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 2.76 TeV as a function of the relative charged-particle pseudorapidity density.

The XiBar+/Xi- ratio in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV as a function of the relative charged-particle pseudorapidity density.

D(SIG)/DQ**2 IN NB/GEV**2 as a function of Q**2 IN GEV**2.

D(SIG)/DY IN NB as a function of Y.

D(SIG)/DX IN NB as a function of X.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 5-9 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 9-14 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 14-23 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 23-45 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 45-100 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 100-158 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 158-251 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 251-1000 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 7 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 12 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 18 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 32 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 60 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 120 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 200 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 350 GeV^2.

The single-differential cross section DSIG/DX (Y<0.9,Y(1-x)**2>0.004) at Q^2=3000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The single-differential cross section DSIG/DY (Y<0.9,Y(1-x)**2>0.004) at Q^2=185 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The single-differential cross section DSIG/DY (Y<0.9,Y(1-x)**2>0.004) at Q^2=3000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=200 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=250 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=350 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=450 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=650 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=800 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=1200 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=1500 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=2000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=3000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=5000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=8000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=12000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=20000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=30000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The structure function xF3 at Q^2=1500, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2 extracted using this data at Pe=0 and previously published NC E-P DIS data.

The structure function xF3 at Q^2=5000, 8000 and 12000 GeV^2 extracted using this data at Pe=0 and previously published NC E-P DIS data.

The structure function xF3 at Q^2=20000 and 30000 GeV^2 extracted using this data at Pe=0 and previously published NC E-P DIS data.

The interference structure function XF3(gammaZ) evaulated at Q^2=1500 GeV^2 in X centred bins.

The polarisation asymmetry measured using the positively and negatively polarised positron beams.

The measured ratio of prompt negative to positive kaon production at 7000 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt negative to positive pion production at 900 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt negative to positive pion production at 7000 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt proton+antiproton to charged pion production at 900 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt proton+antiproton to charged pion production at 7000 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt charged kaon to charged pion production at 900 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt charged kaon to charged pion production at 7000 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt proton+antiproton to charged kaon production at 900 GeV.

The measured ratio of prompt proton+antiproton to charged kaon production at 7000 GeV.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of -25.8 % for Q^2 values of 8000, 12000, 20000, 30000 and 50000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of +36.0 % for Q^2 values of 120, 150, 200, 250 and 300 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of +36.0 % for Q^2 values of 400, 500, 650, 800 and 1000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of +36.0 % for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000 and 5000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of +36.0 % for Q^2 values of 8000, 12000, 20000, 30000 and GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0 % for Q^2 values of 120, 150, 200, 250 and 300 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0 % for Q^2 values of 400, 500, 650, 800 and 1000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0 % for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000 and 5000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0 % for Q^2 values of 8000, 12000, 20000, and GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of +32.5 % for Q^2 values of 120, 150, 200, 250 and 300 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of +32.5 % for Q^2 values of 400, 500, 650, 800 and 1000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of +32.5 % for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000 and 5000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of +32.5 % for Q^2 values of 8000, 12000, 20000, 30000 and GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of -25.8 % for Q^2 values of 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of -25.8 % for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 15000, 30000 and GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of +36.0 % for Q^2 values of 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of +36.0 % for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 15000, and GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0 % for Q^2 values of 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0 % for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 15000, and GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of +32.5 % for Q^2 values of 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of +32.5 % for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 15000, and GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 90, 120, 150, 200 and 250 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 300, 400, 500, 650 and 800 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 90, 120, 150, 200 and 250 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 300, 400, 500, 650 and 800 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % as a function of Q^2 at Y=0.75.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 120, 150, 200, 250 and 300 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 400, 500, 650, 800 and 1000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000 and 5000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 8000, 12000, 20000, 30000 and 50000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 120, 150, 200, 250 and 300 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 400, 500, 650, 800 and 1000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000 and 5000 GeV^2.

The Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 8000, 12000, 20000, 30000 and GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 15000, 30000 and GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 300, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 % for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 15000, and GeV^2.

The combined HERA I+II Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section and F2 for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 %.

The combined HERA I+II Neutral Current Reduced Cross Section and F2 for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 %.

The combined HERA I+II Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section and Reduced Cross Section for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 %.

The combined HERA I+II Charged Current Double Differential Cross Section and Reduced Cross Section for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0 %.

The Neutral Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of -25.8% and +36.0% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Neutral Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0% and +32.5% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Charged Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E- P interactions with a beam polarisation of -25.8% and +36.0% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Charged Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E+ P interactions with a beam polarisation of -37.0% and +32.5% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Neutral Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E+- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Charged Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E+- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Combined HERA I+ II Neutral Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E+- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The Combined HERA I+ II Neutral Current DSIG/DQ**2 for E+- P interactions with a beam polarisation of 0% as a function of Q^2 at Y<0.9.

The measured structure function F2(gZ) determined using the polarised HERA II data set for Q^2 values of 200, 250, 300 and 400 GeV^2.

The measured structure function F2(gZ) determined using the polarised HERA II data set for Q^2 values of 500, 650, 800 and 1000 GeV^2.

The measured structure function F2(gZ) determined using the polarised HERA II data set for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2.

The measured structure function F2(gZ) determined using the polarised HERA II data set for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 12000 and 20000 GeV^2.

Averaged structure function F2(gz) for a Q^2 value of 1500 GeV^2 determined using the polarised HERA II data set.

The measured structure function xF3(gZ) determined using the polarised HERA II data set for Q^2 values of 5000, 8000, 12000, 20000 and 30000 GeV^2.

The measured structure function xF3(gZ) determined using the polarised HERA II data set for Q^2 values of 1200, 1500, 2000, 3000 and GeV^2.

Averaged structure function xF3(gz) for a Q^2 value of 1500 GeV^2 determined using the polarised HERA II data set.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive ETA to PI0 production at a centre-of-mass enery of 7 TeV.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 GeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.25 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 900 GeV (0.25 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 GeV ($0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev (0.25 < pT < 2.5 GeV/c) in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ over $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev for $2.0 < y < 4.0$ in intervals of $p_T$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev for $2.0 < y < 4.0$ in intervals of $p_T$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($2.0 < y < 4.0$; $0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($2.0 < y < 4.0$; $0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7TeV in y interals for (0.15<PT<0.65),(0.65<PT<1.00),(1.00<PT<2.50) GeV/c.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.15 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7TeV in y interals for (0.15<PT<0.65),(0.65<PT<1.00),(1.00<PT<2.50) GeV/c.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.15 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7 TeV (0.15 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV ($0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 TeV (0.15 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV ($0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev for $2.0 < y < 4.5$ in $p_T$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev for $2.0 < y < 4.5$ in $p_T$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev ($2.0 < y < 4.5$; $0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev ($2.0 < y < 4.5$; $0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

The measured production spectra for xi hadrons as a function of pT.

The measured production spectra for phi hadrons as a function of pT.

The ratio of cross sections as a function of PT for LAMBDA/K0S production.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{jet}}{dP_T}}$.

2-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{2-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

3-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{3-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{jet}}{dQ^2dP_T}}$.

2-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

2-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2d\xi}}$.

3-Jet Cross Section ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{3-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

3-Jet to 2-Jet Cross Sections Ratio ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{3-jet}}{dQ^2}/\frac{d\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2}}$.

3-Jet to 2-Jet Cross Sections Ratio ${\rm\frac{d\sigma_{3-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}/\frac{d\sigma_{2-jet}}{d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

3-Jet to 2-Jet Cross Sections Ratio ${\rm\frac{d^2\sigma_{3-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}/\frac{d^2\sigma_{2-jet}}{dQ^2d\langle P_T \rangle}}$.

Bin averaged differential cross section as a function of ET in the defined phase space.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range -1.00 to -0.57.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range -0.57 to 0.20.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range 0.20 to 0.94.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range 0.94 to 1.42.

Bin averaged double differential cross section for inclusive prompt photon production in bins of ET and the pseudorapidity range 1.42 to 2.43.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the photon transverse energy.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the photon pseudorapidity.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the jet transverse energy.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the jet pseudorapidity.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of X(C=GAMMA,LO) thelongitudinal momentum fraction of the partons in the photon in LO approximation.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of X(C=P,LO) thelongitudinal momentum fraction of the partons in the proton in LO approximation.

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the photons transverse momentum perpendicular to the jet direction separated into two regions of X(C=GAMMA,LO).

Bin averaged differential cross section for prompt photon plus jet as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle between the photon and the jet separated into two regions of X(C=GAMMA,LO).

Nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$ for $\pi^0$, d + Au, compared to the STAR $\pi^{+-}$ [23,24] and PHENIX $\pi^0$ measurements [27,28]. Nucleon-nucleon inelastic cross section $\sigma^{NN}$ = 42 mb and expected number of collisions $<N_{coll}>$ = 7.5 +- 0.4 from Glauber model. Shaded bands in plot are $p_T$-correlated systematic uncertainties and the error bars are statistical uncertainties. Normalization uncertainty of 14.0% indicated by a shaded band around unity.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$ for eta, d + Au, compared to PHENIX $\eta$ measurements [27,28]. Nucleon-nucleon inelastic cross section $\sigma^{NN}$ = 42 mb and expected number of collisions $<N_{coll}>$ = 7.5 +- 0.4 from Glauber model. Shaded bands in plot are $p_T$-correlated systematic uncertainties and the error bars are statistical uncertainties. Normalization uncertainty of 14.0% indicated by a shaded band around unity.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{CP}$ for $\pi^0$ measured in d + Au collisions, compared to STAR $\pi^{+-}$ measurements [24]. Peripheral d + Au collisions were used where $R_{CP}$ = ratio of particle production in 40-100% centrality (P) events and 0-20% centrality (C) events. Shaded bands in plot are $p_T$-correlated systematic uncertainties and the error bars are statistical uncertainties. Normalization uncertainty of 11.0% indicated by a shaded band around unity.

Direct photon yield in p + p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in terms of the double ration $R_{\gamma}$. Shaded bands in plot are $p_T$-correlated systematic uncertainties and the error bars are statistical uncertainties. The curves correspond to NLO pQCD calculations of the differential cross sections for direct photon [68] and $\pi^0$ [52] production in p + p collisions for different factorization scales $\mu$ (the upper pQCD curve corresponds to $\mu$ = $p_T$/2). The upper limit of the fractional neutral hadron contamination $C_0$ is shown as the shaded band at $R_{\gamma}$ = 0.

Direct photon yield in d + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in terms of the double ration $R_{\gamma}$. Shaded bands in plot are $p_T$-correlated systematic uncertainties and the error bars are statistical uncertainties. The curves correspond to NLO pQCD calculations of the differential cross sections for direct photon [68] and $\pi^0$ [52] production in p + p collisions for different factorization scales $\mu$ (the upper pQCD curve corresponds to $\mu$ = $p_T$/2). The upper limit of the fractional neutral hadron contamination $C_0$ is shown as the shaded band at $R_{\gamma}$ = 0.

Cross sections for direct photon production at midrapidity in p + p and d + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, compared to the PHENIX measurement [29] and to the NLO pQCD calculation [68], which was scaled with $<T_{dA}>$ [Eq. (23)] in case of d + Au collisions. The error bars are statistical the shaded bands are $p_T$-correlated systematic uncertainties. The arrows correspond to the 95% confidence limits, as defined in the text. Normalization uncertainties of 11.7% for p+p and 5.3% for d+Au are not shown. Separate columns in the table show upper 95% confidence limits. The 95% confidence limits for the cross section are used when $R_{\gamma}$ did not correspond to a significant direct photon signal, assuming that the statistical and systematic errors both followed a Gaussian distribution, and using the fact that $R_{\gamma}\geq 1$ by definition.

Single differential cross section DSIG/DZ for D*+- production. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Single differential cross section DSIG/DLOG(Q**2) for D*+- production. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Single differential cross section DSIG/DX for D*+- production. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production in the LOG(Q**2) binfrom 2.0 to 2.2. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production in the LOG(Q**2) binfrom 2.2 to 2.4. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Double differential cross section for D*+- production in the LOG(Q**2) binfrom 2.4 to 3.0. The DSYS errors are the uncorrelated and correlated systematicuncertainties respectively.

Measured values of the charm contributions to F2 for a mean Q**2 of 120GeV. The third DSYS error is the model uncertainty.

Measured values of the charm contributions to F2 for a mean Q**2 of 200GeV. The third DSYS error is the model uncertainty.

Measured values of the charm contributions to F2 for a mean Q**2 of 400GeV. The third DSYS error is the model uncertainty.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DX.

Pseudorapidity distribution with additional kinematical restraints on Q**2 and ET.

The DVCS cross section DSIG/DT in three different regions of Q**2.

The DVCS cross section DSIG/DT in three regions of W.

Overall value of the SLOPE parameter of the fit to the DSIG/DT distribution.

Overall value of the fit to the W distribution of the form W**POWER.

Value of the power of the fit to the W distribution of the form W**POWER in three Q**2 regions.

Value of the fitted slope parameter in three Q**2 regions.

Value of the fitted slope parameter in three W regions.

The measured beam charge asymmetry defined as the difference in the DSIG/DPHI distributions between E+ P and E- P collisions.

The $\pi^0$ invariant mass peak positions and widths as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The $\pi^0$ invariant mass peak positions and widths as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The $\pi^0$ invariant mass peak positions and widths as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The $\pi^0$ invariant mass peak positions and widths as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The $\pi^0$ invariant mass peak positions and widths as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The $\pi^0$ invariant mass peak positions and widths as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Photon conversion point radius distribution from real data and MC simulation in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Conversion probability correction factor for $\pi^0$ as a function of $p_{T}$

The overall detection efficiency of $\pi^0$ from embedding studt in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The overall detection efficiency of $\pi^0$ from embedding studt in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The overall detection efficiency of $\pi^0$ from embedding studt in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Invariant yield of STAR $\pi^0$ as a function of $p_{T}$ at midrapidity for different collision centrality bins in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Invariant yield of STAR $\pi^0$ as a function of $p_{T}$ at midrapidity for different collision centrality bins in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Invariant yield of STAR $\pi^0$ as a function of $p_{T}$ at midrapidity for different collision centrality bins in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The ratios of STAR $\pi^0$ spectra over $\pi^{\pm}$ from STAR and $\pi^0$ from PHENIX for different collision centrality bins in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{CP}$ as a functon of $p_{T}$ of STAR $\pi^0$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{AA}$ as a functon of $p_{T}$ of STAR $\pi^0$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of Q**2 in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of X in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the laboratory frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of ETARAP in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of Q**2 in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of X in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the laboratory frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of ETARAP in the laboratoryframe.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential K0S cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Differential LAMBDA cross section as a function of XP(Breit) in the currenthemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of Q**2.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of ETARAP.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X in the target hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the LAMBDA/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of Q**2.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of X.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of PT.

Value of the HADRON+-/K0S cross section ratio as a function of ETARAP.

Differential cross section DSIG/DX for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Differential cross section DSIG/DY for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 280 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 530 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 950 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 1700 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 3000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 5300 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 9500 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 17000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 30000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and R as a function of Q**2 with no constraints on F2 or FL. The quantites are quoted such that Q**2/X is constant for each value which correspinds to Y = 0.71 at Ecm=225 GeV.

FL and R as a function of Q**2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2. The quantites are quoted such that Q**2/X is constant for each value which correspinds to Y = 0.71 at Ecm=225 GeV.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

e+e- production cross section at mid rapidity for ultra peripheral Au+Au reactions.The results are given for 3 intervals of masses of the electron pair : 2.0 to 2.3, 2.3 to 2.8 and 2.0 to 2.8 Gev/c2.

Invariant cross section of electrons from charm decay versus PT These values has been obtained using g3data software which to extract the data from the plot and should therefore be used with caution. The values in the last column indicate the level of uncertainty intoduced by g3data.

Invariant cross section of electrons from bottom decay versus PT These values has been obtained using g3data software which to extract the data from the plot and should therefore be used with caution. The values in the last column indicate the level of uncertainty intoduced by g3data.

Total bottom cross section To obtain the total bottom cross section, the differential charm cross section has been extrapolated to the whole rapidity range, using a HVQMNR rapidity distribution with aCTEQ5M PDF.

Inclusive non-diffractive photoproduction single differential cross sections as a function of rapidity in the specified kinematic range.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of X.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the D meson.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the D meson.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of Q**2.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of X.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the D meson.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the D meson.

Measured cross section for D+- mesons in Q**2 and Y bins.

Measured cross section for D0/DBAR0 mesons in Q**2 and Y bins.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 0.50 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 0.65 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 0.85 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 1.20 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 1.50 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 2.00 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 2.50 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the SVX data sample for Q**2 = 3.50 GeV**2. Additional 3 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 0.50 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 0.65 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 0.85 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 1.20 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 1.50 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 2.00 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 2.50 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 3.50 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 5.00 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 6.50 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 8.50 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-BST data sample for Q**2 = 12.00 GeV**2.. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Reduced cross section as measured in the NVX-S9 data sample. Additional 1.1 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 0.2 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 0.25 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 0.35 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 0.5 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 0.65 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 0.85 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 1.2 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 1.5 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 2.0 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 3.5 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 5.0 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 6.5 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 8.5 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Combined H1 reduced cross section and F2 measurement for Q**2 = 12.0 GeV**2. Additional 0.5 PCT luminosity uncertainty not included in the total error.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 2000 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.2 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Data from the 1996/1997 running period at Q**2 There is an additional 1.7 PCT overall normalisation uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Combined data at Q**2 There is an additional 0.5 PCT correlated uncertainty not included.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the 2000 running period.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the 1996/1997 running period.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

Details of the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties from the combined data sets after diagonisation for Q**2.

3-jet cross section normalised to 2-jet cross section in bins of $Q^{2}$.

Normalised inclusive jet cross section in bins of $Q^{2}$ and $P_{T}$.

Normalised 2-jet cross section in bins of $Q^{2}$ and $\langle P_{T} \rangle$.

Normalised 2-jet cross sections in bins of $Q^2$ and $\xi$.

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The differential cross section as a function of PHI, the angle between the positron scattering plane and the proton scattering plane for the LRG and the LPS data samples.

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of BETA.

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of ABS(T).

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of Q**2.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.9 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 7.1 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 14 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.9 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 7.1 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 14 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.9 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 7.1 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 14 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 4.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 5.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 6.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 8.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 12 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 16 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 22 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 30 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 50 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 65 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 85 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 140 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 185 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 255 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.50 TO 0.56. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.56 TO 0.62. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.62 TO 0.65. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.65 TO 0.68. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.68 TO 0.71. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.71 TO 0.74. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.74 TO 0.77. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.77 TO 0.80. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.80 TO 0.83. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.83 TO 0.86. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.86 TO 0.89. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.89 TO 0.92. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.92 TO 0.95. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.95 TO 0.98. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.98 TO 1.00. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL in 3 PT**2 ranges.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.6E-5 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.7E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.5E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.46E-3 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.4E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.36E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.67E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.98E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 5.1E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.84E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.66E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.03E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.86E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.68E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.33E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.54E-2 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.59E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.37E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.42E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.01E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.52E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.47E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.25E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.