Showing 10 of 1606 results
A model-agnostic search for Beyond the Standard Model physics is presented, targeting final states with at least four light leptons (electrons or muons). The search regions are separated by event topology and unsupervised machine learning is used to identify anomalous events in the full 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector during Run 2. No significant excess above the Standard Model background expectation is observed. Model-agnostic limits are presented in each topology, along with limits on several benchmark models including vector-like leptons, wino-like charginos and neutralinos, or smuons. Limits are set on the flavourful vector-like lepton model for the first time.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) m<sub>T</sub>(4ℓ, E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>), (b) m<sup>high</sup>(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (e) p<sub>T</sub>(Z), and (f) N<sub>jets</sub> distribution in the (a, d) 2Z 0b, (b, e) 1Z 1b 2SFOS, and (c, f) 0Z 2SFOS region, after requiring the anomaly score to be below the 90% background rejection point. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'HF ℓ' ('LF ℓ') background component refers to processes containing one non-prompt light lepton from heavy-flavour (light-flavour) hadron decays. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tWZ production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) m<sub>T</sub>(4ℓ, E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>), (b) m<sup>high</sup>(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (e) p<sub>T</sub>(Z), and (f) N<sub>jets</sub> distribution in the (a, d) 2Z 0b, (b, e) 1Z 1b 2SFOS, and (c, f) 0Z 2SFOS region, after requiring the anomaly score to be below the 90% background rejection point. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'HF ℓ' ('LF ℓ') background component refers to processes containing one non-prompt light lepton from heavy-flavour (light-flavour) hadron decays. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tWZ production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) m<sub>T</sub>(4ℓ, E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>), (b) m<sup>high</sup>(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (e) p<sub>T</sub>(Z), and (f) N<sub>jets</sub> distribution in the (a, d) 2Z 0b, (b, e) 1Z 1b 2SFOS, and (c, f) 0Z 2SFOS region, after requiring the anomaly score to be below the 90% background rejection point. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'HF ℓ' ('LF ℓ') background component refers to processes containing one non-prompt light lepton from heavy-flavour (light-flavour) hadron decays. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tWZ production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) m<sub>T</sub>(4ℓ, E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>), (b) m<sup>high</sup>(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (e) p<sub>T</sub>(Z), and (f) N<sub>jets</sub> distribution in the (a, d) 2Z 0b, (b, e) 1Z 1b 2SFOS, and (c, f) 0Z 2SFOS region, after requiring the anomaly score to be below the 90% background rejection point. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'HF ℓ' ('LF ℓ') background component refers to processes containing one non-prompt light lepton from heavy-flavour (light-flavour) hadron decays. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tWZ production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) m<sub>T</sub>(4ℓ, E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>), (b) m<sup>high</sup>(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (e) p<sub>T</sub>(Z), and (f) N<sub>jets</sub> distribution in the (a, d) 2Z 0b, (b, e) 1Z 1b 2SFOS, and (c, f) 0Z 2SFOS region, after requiring the anomaly score to be below the 90% background rejection point. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'HF ℓ' ('LF ℓ') background component refers to processes containing one non-prompt light lepton from heavy-flavour (light-flavour) hadron decays. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tWZ production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) m<sub>T</sub>(4ℓ, E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>), (b) m<sup>high</sup>(3ℓ), (c) m(Z), (d) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (e) p<sub>T</sub>(Z), and (f) N<sub>jets</sub> distribution in the (a, d) 2Z 0b, (b, e) 1Z 1b 2SFOS, and (c, f) 0Z 2SFOS region, after requiring the anomaly score to be below the 90% background rejection point. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'HF ℓ' ('LF ℓ') background component refers to processes containing one non-prompt light lepton from heavy-flavour (light-flavour) hadron decays. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tWZ production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) N<sub>jets</sub>, (b) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) H<sub>T</sub><sup>lep</sup> distribution in the (a) HFe CR, (b) HFμ CR, (c) LFe CR, and (d) the Wγ<sup>*</sup>/tt̄γ<sup>*</sup> validation region. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄W, tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution in the 2ℓSS regions is dominated by the tt̄ and tt̄W production, and in the 3ℓ regions is dominated by the ZZ + LF production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) N<sub>jets</sub>, (b) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) H<sub>T</sub><sup>lep</sup> distribution in the (a) HFe CR, (b) HFμ CR, (c) LFe CR, and (d) the Wγ<sup>*</sup>/tt̄γ<sup>*</sup> validation region. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄W, tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution in the 2ℓSS regions is dominated by the tt̄ and tt̄W production, and in the 3ℓ regions is dominated by the ZZ + LF production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) N<sub>jets</sub>, (b) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) H<sub>T</sub><sup>lep</sup> distribution in the (a) HFe CR, (b) HFμ CR, (c) LFe CR, and (d) the Wγ<sup>*</sup>/tt̄γ<sup>*</sup> validation region. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄W, tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution in the 2ℓSS regions is dominated by the tt̄ and tt̄W production, and in the 3ℓ regions is dominated by the ZZ + LF production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the (a) N<sub>jets</sub>, (b) E<sub>T</sub><sup>miss</sup>, (c) m(3ℓ), and (d) H<sub>T</sub><sup>lep</sup> distribution in the (a) HFe CR, (b) HFμ CR, (c) LFe CR, and (d) the Wγ<sup>*</sup>/tt̄γ<sup>*</sup> validation region. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The ratio of the data to the background prediction ('Bkg.') is shown in the lower panel. The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄W, tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution in the 2ℓSS regions is dominated by the tt̄ and tt̄W production, and in the 3ℓ regions is dominated by the ZZ + LF production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the discovery regions included in the model-independent fit, after a background-only fit to data in the five cut-based control regions and ten low-anomaly score discovery regions ('post-fit'). All signal bins are shown ('SR') together with the low-anomaly score discovery regions ('CR'). The various requirements on the anomaly score corresponding to the specified background rejection cuts (99.9/99/90/50%) are shown for all the applicable SRs and CRs. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Observed and expected excluded visible cross section limits, σ<sub>vis</sub> for the model-independent regions. The various requirements on the anomaly score corresponding to the specified background rejection cuts (99.9/99/90/50%) are shown for all the applicable regions.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only fit to data ('post-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only fit to data ('post-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only fit to data ('post-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only fit to data ('post-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only fit to data ('post-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions, after a background-only fit to data ('post-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the cross-section (σ) as a function of the VLL mass for the (a) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>D</sup>, (b) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>D</sup>, (c) VLL<sub>e</sub><sup>S</sup>, (d) VLL<sub>μ</sub><sup>S</sup> models, and on the plane of the S<sub>ji</sub> mass versus the VLL mass for the (e) flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub>, and (f) flavourful VLL<sub>μ</sub> models. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS search [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05%282025%29075">JHEP05(2025)075</a>], considering only the 4ℓ channel, are overlaid in dashed grey lines in (a-d). The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Combined observed and expected limits at 95% CL for the (a) wino-like chargino and neutralino, and (b) smuon models, as a function of the masses of χ̃<sup>±</sup><sub>1</sub> / χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>2</sub> and χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>, and μ<sub>L,R</sub> and Δm (μ<sub>L,R</sub>, χ̃<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub>), respectively. The expected limits from the dedicated ATLAS searches [<a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07%282021%29167">JHEP07(2021)167</a>, <a href=" https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12%282023%29081">JHEP12(2023)081</a>] are overlaid in dashed grey lines. The inner and outer bands around the expected limit are the ±1 σ and ±2 σ variations including all uncertainties, respectively.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the distribution of the b-jet multiplicity in the WZ/ttZ CR after the VV jet multiplicity correction. The background contributions after the likelihood fit to data ('post-fit') for the background-only hypothesis are shown as filled histograms. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄W, tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the tZq production. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The last bin contains the overflow.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the event yields in the HF<sub>e</sub> CR, HF<sub>μ</sub>, Conversions, and LF<sub>e</sub> CRs, after a background-only fit to data ('Post-fit'). The lower panel shows the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄W, tt̄Z, and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the ZZ+LF process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band.
Comparison between data and the background prediction for the discovery regions included in the model-independent fit, before any fit to data ('pre-fit'). All signal bins are shown ('SR') together with the low-anomaly score discovery regions ('CR'). The various requirements on the anomaly score corresponding to the specified background rejection cuts (99.9/99/90/50%) are shown for all the applicable SRs and CRs. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrows indicate points for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit to data ('pre-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit to data ('pre-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit to data ('pre-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit to data ('pre-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit to data ('pre-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
Comparison between data and the background estimate for the anomaly score distribution used in different benchmark regions before any fit to data ('pre-fit'): (a) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z 0b 2SFOS e>μ, (b) 4ℓ Q=0 0Z ≥1b 2SFOS e>μ, (c) 4ℓ Q=0 1Z 0b 2SFOS μ>e, (d) 4ℓ Q=±2 0b e>μ, (e) 4ℓ Q=±2 ≥1b μ>e, and (f) the three ≥5ℓ regions: 0Z 0b μ>e, 0Z 0b e≥μ, and 0Z ≥1b, defined without AD. Distributions for one flavourful VLL<sub>e</sub> signal point for a VLL mass of 1 TeV and scalar of 550 GeV, a wino-like chargino and neutralino signal point of mass 1.3 TeV, and a smuon signal point of mass 350 GeV and neutralino mass of 250 GeV are overlaid for comparison. The lower panels show the ratio of data to the background estimate ('Bkg.'). The 'tt+X' background component includes the tt̄Z (4ℓ only) and tt̄H processes. The 'Other' contribution is dominated by the VH process. The size of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty in the signal-plus-background prediction is indicated by the blue hatched band. The upward-pointing blue arrow indicates a point for which the data-to-background ('Data/Bkg.’) ratio exceeds the vertical range of the figure.
This paper presents a search for a Higgs boson produced in association with a charm quark (cH) which allows to probe the Higgs-charm Yukawa coupling strength modifier $κ_\mathrm{c}$. Higgs boson decays to a pair of W bosons are considered, where one W boson decays to an electron and a neutrino, and the other \PW boson decays to a muon and a neutrino. The data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$, were collected between 2016 and 2018 with the CMS detector at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. Upper limits at the 95% confidence level (CL) are set on the ratio of the measured yield to the standard model expectation for cH production. The observed (expected) upper limit is 1065 (506). When combined with the previous search for cH in the diphoton decay channel of the Higgs boson, the limits are interpreted as observed (expected) constraints at 95% CL on the value of $κ_\mathrm{c}$, $\lvertκ_\mathrm{c}\rvert$ $\lt$ 47 (51).
Upper limits of $\mu_{cH}$ at 95%CL for each data-taking period.
Two-dimensional likelihood contour of $\mu_{bkg-H+c}$ and $\mu_{cH}$.
Upper limits of $\mu_{cH}$ at 95% CL of the combined analysis
A search is presented for a new scalar resonance, X, decaying to a standard model Higgs boson and another new scalar particle, Y, in the final state where the Higgs boson decays to a $\mathrm{b\bar{b}}$ pair, while the Y particle decays to a pair of photons. The search is performed in the mass range 240$-$100 \GeV for the resonance X, and in the mass range 70$-$800 GeV for the particle Y, using proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 132 fb$^{-1}$. In general, the data are found to be compatible with the standard model expectation. Observed (expected) upper limits at 95% confidence level on the product of the production cross section and the relevant branching fraction are extracted for the X $\to$ YH process, and are found to be within the range of 0.05$-$2.69 (0.08$-$1.94) fb, depending on $m_\mathrm{X}$ and $m_\mathrm{Y}$. The most significant deviation from the background-only hypothesis is observed for X and Y masses of 300 and 77 GeV, respectively, with a local (global) significance of 3.33 (0.65) standard deviations.
Distributions of the transformed PNN score for the signal hypotheses of mX=280GeV, mY=125GeV in its corresponding SRs. The bin boundaries correspond to the SR boundaries of each mass point.The distributions are inclusive in the diphoton mass distribution. The gray bands in the lower panels show the statistical uncertainty in the background estimation.
Distributions of the transformed PNN score for the signal hypotheses of mX=600GeV, mY=70GeV in its corresponding SRs. The bin boundaries correspond to the SR boundaries of each mass point. The distributions are inclusive in the diphoton mass distribution. The gray bands in the lower panels show the statistical uncertainty in the background estimation.
Parametric models of the signal process for mX=600GeV, mY=70GeV in their most sensitive SR The histograms are normalized to unity. The acronym 'dof' stands for the numbers of degrees of freedom of the parametric model. The signal is modeled using a double-sided Crystal Ball (DCB) function defined as: DCB$(x)$ = \[ \begin{cases} N \cdot A_1 \cdot (B_1 - x_s)^{-m_1}, & x_s \leq -\beta_1 \\ N \cdot e^{-\frac{1}{2} x_s^2}, & -\beta_1 < x_s < \beta_2 \\ N \cdot A_2 \cdot (B_2 + x_s)^{-m_2}, & x_s \geq \beta_2 \end{cases} \] with \(x_s = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}\), and: \[ A_1 = \left( \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} \right)^{m_1} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_1^2}, \quad B_1 = \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} - \beta_1 \] \[ A_2 = \left( \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} \right)^{m_2} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_2^2}, \quad B_2 = \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} - \beta_2 \] The DCB parameters for this signal model are: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 1.0226, & \mu &= 69.91014, & \sigma &= 0.67412 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.35, & m_1 &= 2.9491, & \beta_2 &= 1.5468, & m_2 &= 12.7113 \end{aligned} \]
Parametric models of the signal process for mX=1000GeV, mY=800GeV in their most sensitive SR. The histograms are normalized to unity. The acronym 'dof' stands for the numbers of degrees of freedom of the parametric model. The signal is modeled using a double-sided Crystal Ball (DCB) function defined as: DCB$(x)$ = \[ \begin{cases} N \cdot A_1 \cdot (B_1 - x_s)^{-m_1}, & x_s \leq -\beta_1 \\ N \cdot e^{-\frac{1}{2} x_s^2}, & -\beta_1 < x_s < \beta_2 \\ N \cdot A_2 \cdot (B_2 + x_s)^{-m_2}, & x_s \geq \beta_2 \end{cases} \] with \(x_s = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}\), and: \[ A_1 = \left( \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} \right)^{m_1} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_1^2}, \quad B_1 = \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} - \beta_1 \] \[ A_2 = \left( \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} \right)^{m_2} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_2^2}, \quad B_2 = \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} - \beta_2 \] The DCB parameters for this signal model are: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 0.35127, & \mu &= 798.50175, & \sigma &= 7.32360 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.50996, & m_1 &= 5.30414, & \beta_2 &= 1.56253, & m_2 &= 18.3172 \end{aligned} \]
Background-only fit (red line) and signal+background fit (blue line) for the mass point hypothesis of mX=280GeV, mY=90GeV. The red line in the lower panel shows the background-only fit, which is by definition zero, and it is added as a visual aid. The most sensitive SR is shown. The choice of the background functional form is determined by the maximum likelihood fit. Category 0 is the most sensitive signal region. Drell-Yan background component is fitted as \[f_{\text{DY}}(m) = \frac{0.530965}{\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot 2.81859} \cdot \exp\left( -\frac{(m - 90.7199)^2}{2 \cdot 2.81859^2} \right)\] In the both the background-only fit and signal plus background fit, the non-resonant component of the pdf is choosing the following function. \[f(m) = \frac{1}{2.6086 \times 10^{-6}} \cdot m^{-3.82346}\] The fitted normalization factor for the function is: 23.5522 Signal fitted r value is 1.21391 in all the category simultaneous fit. The signal is fitted with a double-sided Crystal Ball (DCB) function defined as: DCB$(x)$ = \[ \begin{cases} N \cdot A_1 \cdot (B_1 - x_s)^{-m_1}, & x_s \leq -\beta_1 \\ N \cdot e^{-\frac{1}{2} x_s^2}, & -\beta_1 < x_s < \beta_2 \\ N \cdot A_2 \cdot (B_2 + x_s)^{-m_2}, & x_s \geq \beta_2 \end{cases} \] with \(x_s = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}\), and: \[ A_1 = \left( \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} \right)^{m_1} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_1^2}, \quad B_1 = \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} - \beta_1 \] \[ A_2 = \left( \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} \right)^{m_2} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_2^2}, \quad B_2 = \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} - \beta_2 \] The DCB parameters are: 2016: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 0.6422, & \mu &= 89.9423, & \sigma &= 0.8881 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.3471, & m_1 &= 2.7908, & \beta_2 &= 1.4211, & m_2 &= 19.9999 \end{aligned} \] 2017: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 0.8047, & \mu &= 89.9948, & \sigma &= 1.03024 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.6449, & m_1 &= 1.9425, & \beta_2 &= 1.7434, & m_2 &= 19.9982 \end{aligned} \] 2018: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 1.1200, & \mu &= 90.0211, & \sigma &= 0.9284 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.1778, & m_1 &= 4.4273, & \beta_2 &= 1.5851, & m_2 &= 7.1198 \end{aligned} \] The plot is filled with a bin size of 5.84GeV.
Background-only fit (red line) and signal+background fit (blue line) for the mass point hypothesis of mX=280GeV, mY=90GeV. The red line in the lower panel shows the background-only fit, which is by definition zero, and it is added as a visual aid. The second most sensitive SR is shown. The choice of the background functional form is determined by the maximum likelihood fit. Category 1 is the second most sensitive signal region. Drell-Yan background component is fitted as \[f_{\text{DY}}(m) = \frac{0.532195}{\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot 3.10187} \cdot \exp\left( -\frac{(m - 89.7677)^2}{2 \cdot 3.10187^2} \right)\] In the both the background-only fit and signal plus background fit, the non-resonant component of the pdf is choosing the following function. \[f(m) = \frac{1}{14.0606} \cdot \exp\left(-\left(0.1 \cdot \frac{m}{100} + 1.73 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{100}\right)^2\right)\right)\] The fitted normalization factor for the function is: 21.6386 Signal fitted r value is 1.21391 in all the category simultaneous fit. The signal is fitted with a double-sided Crystal Ball (DCB) function defined as: DCB$(x)$ = \[ \begin{cases} N \cdot A_1 \cdot (B_1 - x_s)^{-m_1}, & x_s \leq -\beta_1 \\ N \cdot e^{-\frac{1}{2} x_s^2}, & -\beta_1 < x_s < \beta_2 \\ N \cdot A_2 \cdot (B_2 + x_s)^{-m_2}, & x_s \geq \beta_2 \end{cases} \] with \(x_s = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}\), and: \[ A_1 = \left( \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} \right)^{m_1} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_1^2}, \quad B_1 = \frac{m_1}{\beta_1} - \beta_1 \] \[ A_2 = \left( \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} \right)^{m_2} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \beta_2^2}, \quad B_2 = \frac{m_2}{\beta_2} - \beta_2 \] The DCB parameters are: 2016: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 0.3784, & \mu &= 89.8969, & \sigma &= 0.9189 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.1920, & m_1 &= 3.7178, & \beta_2 &= 1.3318, & m_2 &= 10.9787 \end{aligned} \] 2017: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 0.4914, & \mu &= 89.8859, & \sigma &= 1.0728 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.3515, & m_1 &= 3.2846, & \beta_2 &= 1.4371, & m_2 &= 20.0000 \end{aligned} \] 2018: \[ \begin{aligned} N &= 0.6766, & \mu &= 89.9327, & \sigma &= 1.1213 \\ \beta_1 &= 1.9188, & m_1 &= 1.5353, & \beta_2 &= 1.9907, & m_2 &= 12.4664 \end{aligned} \] The plot is filled with a bin size of 5.84GeV.
Observed(expected) upper limits on the $\sigma\mathcal{B}$ for the X to $Y(\gamma\gamma)H(bb)$ signal with the different mass hypotheses are shown with solid(dashed) lines. The green and the yellow bands define the $\pm 68\%$ and $\pm 95\%$ uncertainty bands, respectively. For visualization purposes, the upper limit for mass points with different $m_X$ has been multiplied with a constant factor quoted on the right of each band. Mass points with $m_X$ ranging from 600 to 1000GeV are shown.
Observed(expected) upper limits on the $\sigma\mathcal{B}$ for the X 5p $Y(\gamma\gamma)H(bb)$ signal with the different mass hypotheses are shown with solid(dashed) lines. The green and the yellow bands define the $\pm 68\%$ and $\pm 95\%$ uncertainty bands, respectively. For visualization purposes, the upper limit for mass points with different $m_X$ has been multiplied with a constant factor quoted on the right of each band. Mass points with $m_X$ ranging from 240 to 550GeV are shown.
Observed(expected) upper limits on the $\sigma\mathcal{B}$ for the X to $Y(\gamma\gamma)H(bb)$ signal with the different $m_Y$ hypotheses are shown with solid(dashed) lines. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing $68\%$ and $95\%$, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. This plot shows the set of mass points with the lowest $m_X = 240GeV$
Observed(expected) upper limits on the $\sigma\mathcal{B}$ for the X to $Y(\gamma\gamma)H(bb)$ signal with the different $m_Y$ hypotheses are shown with solid(dashed) lines. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing $68\%$ and $95\%$, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. This plot shows the set of mass points with the highest $m_{X} = 1000GeV$
A search for flavor violating decays of the Z boson to charged leptons is performed using data from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Each of the decays Z $\to$ e$μ$, Z $\to$ e$τ$, and Z $\to$$μτ$ is considered. The data are consistent with the backgrounds expected from standard model processes. For the Z $\to$ e$μ$ channel the observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limit on the branching fraction is 1.9 (2.0) $\times$ 10$^{-7}$, which is the most stringent direct limit to date on this process; the corresponding limits for the Z $\to$ e$τ$ and Z $\to$ $μτ$ channels are 13.8 (11.4) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$ and 12.0 (5.3) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$, respectively. Additionally, the e$μ$ final state is used to search for lepton flavor violating decays of Z' resonances in the mass range from 110 to 500 GeV. No significant excess is observed above the predicted background levels.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\mu)$ for three BDT score bins and their combination, at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\mu)$ for three BDT score bins and their combination, at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1})$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1})$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow \mu\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1}$).
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow \mu\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1}$).
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma(\mathrm{pp}\rightarrow\mathrm{Z}^\prime+X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}^\prime\rightarrow e\mu)$ as a function of the Z′ mass (110–500 GeV), at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma(\mathrm{pp}\rightarrow\mathrm{Z}^\prime+X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}^\prime\rightarrow e\mu)$ as a function of the Z′ mass (110–500 GeV), at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
A search for long-lived particles originating from the decay of b hadrons produced in proton-proton collisions with a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC is presented. The analysis is performed on a data set recorded in 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 41.6 fb$^{-1}$. Interactions of the long-lived particles in the CMS endcap muon system would create hadronic or electromagnetic showers, producing clusters of detector hits. Selected events contain at least one such high-multiplicity cluster in the muon endcaps and require the presence of a displaced muon. The most stringent upper limits to date on the branching fraction $\mathcal{B}$(B $\to$ K$Φ$), where the long-lived particle $Φ$ decays to a pair of hadrons, are obtained for $Φ$ masses of 0.3$-$3.0 GeV and $Φ$ mean proper decay lengths in the range of 1$-$500 cm.
Distributions of the CSC cluster time shown for signal samples with m = 0.3 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 100 mm, m = 1.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 300 mm, m = 2.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 1000 mm and the background-enriched data.
Distributions of the CSC cluster size $N_{hits}$ shown for signal samples with m = 0.3 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 100 mm, m = 1.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 300 mm, m = 2.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 1000 mm and the background-enriched data.
Distributions of the $\Delta\Phi$ between the CSC cluster and the trigger muon, shown for signal samples with m = 0.3 GeV c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 100 mm, m = 1.0 GeV c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 300 mm, m = 2.0 GeV c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 1000 mm and the background-enriched data.
The 2D distribution of the $\Delta\Phi$ (cluster, $\mu_{trigger}$) vs the number of hits in clusters, in events from the out-of-time region.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
The estimated BR limits for a range of generator parameters: $0.3 < m_{LLP}$ < 3.0 GeV and 0 < $c\tau$ < 10000 mm.
The contour of the 2D distribution which includes the generation parameter values corresponding to the BR of 0.01.
The contour of the 2D distribution which includes the generation parameter values corresponding to the BR of 0.001.
Signal cut-flow efficiencies for the hadronic shower decay mode
Signal cut-flow efficiencies for the electromagnetic shower decay mode
Using proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV in 2016$-$2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$, the first full reconstruction of the three vector B meson states, B$^{*+}$, B$^{*0}$, and B$^{*0}_\text{s}$, is performed. The mass differences between the excited mesons and their corresponding ground states are measured to be $m(\text{B}^{*+})-m(\text{B}^+)$ = 45.277 $\pm$ 0.039 $\pm$ 0.027 MeV, $m(\text{B}^{*0})- m(\text{B}^0)$ = 45.471 $\pm$ 0.056 $\pm$ 0.028 MeV, and $m(\text{B}^{*0}_\text{s})-m(\text{B}_\text{s})$ = 49.407 $\pm$ 0.132 $\pm$ 0.041 MeV, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. These results improve on the precision of previous measurements by an order of magnitude.
The measured mass differences between vector and ground B meson states.
Extracted masses of $\mathrm{B}^{*+}$, $\mathrm{B}^{*0}$, and $\mathrm{B}^{*0}_{\mathrm{s}}$ mesons. The values are obtained using the measurements in Table 1 and the ground state masses from PDG 2024 (S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)), which are the source of the last uncertainties.
Extracted mass differences between vector B meson states of different flavour. The values are obtained using the measurements in Table 4 and the ground state mass differences from PDG 2024 (S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)), which are the source of the last uncertainties.
The measured differences of mass differences between vector and ground states.
The measured ratios of mass differences between vector and ground states.
An analysis of the flavour structure of dimension-6 effective field theory (EFT) operators in multilepton final states is presented, focusing on the interactions involving Z bosons. For the first time, the flavour structure of these operators is disentangled by simultaneously probing the interactions with different quark generations. The analysis targets the associated production of a top quark pair and a Z boson, as well as diboson processes in final states with at least three leptons, which can be electrons or muons. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment in the years 2016$-$2018 in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Consistency with the standard model of particle physics is observed and limits are set on the selected Wilson coefficients, split into couplings to light- and heavy-quark generations.
Summary of the limits obtained for the Wilson coefficients.
Likelihood scan of cHqMRe1122 versus cHqMRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHq3MRe1122 versus cHq3MRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHuRe1122 versus cHuRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHdRe1122 versus cHdRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cW versus cWtil. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHqMRe1122 versus cHqMRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cHq3MRe1122 versus cHq3MRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cHuRe1122 versus cHuRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cHdRe1122 versus cHdRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cW versus cWtil. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
A reinterpretation of a prior narrow-resonance search is performed to investigate the resonant production of pairs of dijet resonances via broad mediators. This analysis targets events with four resolved jets, requiring dijet invariant masses greater than 0.2 TeV and four-jet invariant masses greater than 1.6 TeV. The search uses a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. The reinterpretation considers the production of new heavy four-jet resonances, with widths ranging from 1.5 to 10% of their mass, which decay to a pair of dijet resonances. This analysis probes resonant production in the four-jet and dijet mass distributions. Upper limits at 95% confidence level and significances are reported on the production cross section of new resonances as functions of their widths and masses, between 2 and 10 TeV. In particular, at a four-jet resonance mass of 8.6 TeV, the local (global) significance ranges from 3.9 (1.6) to 3.6 (1.4) standard deviations (s.d.) as the resonance width is increased from 1.5 to 10%. This relative insensitivity to the choice of width indicates that a broad resonance is an equally valid interpretation of this excess. The broad resonance hypothesis at a resonance mass of 8.6 TeV is supported by the presence of an event with a four-jet mass of 5.8 TeV and an average dijet mass of 2.0 TeV. Also, we report the reinterpretation of a second effect, at a four-jet resonance mass of 3.6 TeV, which has a local (global) significance of up to 3.9 (2.2) s.d.
Observed number of events within bins of the four-jet mass and the average mass of the two dijets.
Observed number of events within bins of the four-jet mass and the ratio $\alpha$, which is the average dijet mass divided by the four-jet mass.
Predictions of a leading order (LO) QCD simulation, normalized to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The number of events are examined within bins of the four-jet mass and the average mass of the two dijets.
Predictions of a leading order (LO) QCD simulation, normalized to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The number of events are examined within bins of the four-jet mass and the ratio $\alpha$, which is the average dijet mass divided by the four-jet mass.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\overline{m}_{\mathrm{2j}}$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 1.5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\overline{m}_{\mathrm{2j}}$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\overline{m}_{\mathrm{2j}}$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 10% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\alpha$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 1.5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\alpha$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\alpha$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 10% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
Signal differential distributions as a function of four-jet mass for $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, diquark masses of 2, 5, 8.6 TeV and various widths, for all $\alpha$ bins inclusively. The integral of each distribution has been normalized to unity.
The product of acceptance, $A$, and efficiency, $\varepsilon$, of a resonant signal with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25 vs. the diquark mass for various diquark widths, and for all $\alpha$ bins inclusively. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of generated events passing the kinematic selection criteria, while the efficiency is the fraction of signal events satisfying $m_{\mathrm{4j}} > 1.6$ TeV. We also show the signal acceptance alone in the curves where $\varepsilon = 1$.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.22 < $\alpha$ < 0.24, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV, and $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5%, 10% are also shown, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.24 < $\alpha$ < 0.26, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV, and $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5%, 10% are also shown, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.26 < $\alpha$ < 0.28, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.28 < $\alpha$ < 0.30, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.30 < $\alpha$ < 0.32, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.32 < $\alpha$ < 0.34, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV, and $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5%, 10% are also shown, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The inclusive four-jet mass distribution in data for $\alpha$ > 0.10, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-5p, PowExp-5p and ModDijet-5p), each with five free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.25$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 1.5%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.25$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 5%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 5%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.25$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.11$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.13$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.15$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.17$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.19$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.21$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.23$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.27$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.29$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.31$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.33$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.42$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.11$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.13$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.15$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.17$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.19$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.21$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.23$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.27$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.29$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.31$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.33$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.42$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
Observed local $p$-value for a four-jet resonance, Y, decaying to a pair of dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}}/M_{\mathrm{Y}}$ = 0.25, and various widths of Y superimposed.
Observed local $p$-value for a four-jet resonance, Y, decaying to a pair of dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}}/M_{\mathrm{Y}}$ = 0.29, and various widths of Y superimposed.
The table presents the cumulative cutflow for a signal with $M_{\mathrm{S}} = 2.0$ TeV, $M_{\chi} = 0.5$ TeV and different width hypotheses ($\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}} =$ 1.5, 5, and 10%). Each row corresponds to the number of signal events that survive all cuts up to and including the one listed. The percentage in parentheses shows the efficiency of the current cut alone, defined as the ratio of the number of events that survive all cuts up to and including this one to the number of events that survived all previous cuts.
The table presents the cumulative cutflow for a signal with $M_{\mathrm{S}} = 5.0$ TeV, $M_{\chi} = 1.25$ TeV and different width hypotheses ($\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}} =$ 1.5, 5, and 10%). Each row corresponds to the number of signal events that survive all cuts up to and including the one listed. The percentage in parentheses shows the efficiency of the current cut alone, defined as the ratio of the number of events that survive all cuts up to and including this one to the number of events that survived all previous cuts.
The table presents the cumulative cutflow for a signal with $M_{\mathrm{S}} = 8.6$ TeV, $M_{\chi} = 2.15$ TeV and different width hypotheses ($\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}} =$ 1.5, 5, and 10%). Each row corresponds to the number of signal events that survive all cuts up to and including the one listed. The percentage in parentheses shows the efficiency of the current cut alone, defined as the ratio of the number of events that survive all cuts up to and including this one to the number of events that survived all previous cuts.
We recently measured the branching fraction of the $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}ν\barν$ decay using 362fb$^{-1}$ of on-resonance $e^+e^-$ collision data under the assumption of Standard Model kinematics, providing the first evidence for this decay. To facilitate future reinterpretations and maximize the scientific impact of this measurement, we publicly release the full analysis likelihood along with all necessary material required for reinterpretation under arbitrary theoretical models sensitive to this measurement. In this work, we demonstrate how the measurement can be reinterpreted within the framework of the Weak Effective Theory. Using a kinematic reweighting technique in combination with the published likelihood, we derive marginal posterior distributions for the Wilson coefficients, construct credible intervals, and assess the goodness of fit to the Belle II data. For the Weak Effective Theory Wilson coefficients, the posterior mode of the magnitudes $|C_\mathrm{VL}+C_\mathrm{VR}|$, $|C_\mathrm{SL}+C_\mathrm{SR}|$, and $|C_\mathrm{TL}|$ corresponds to the point ${(11.3, 0.0, 8.2)}$. The respective 95% credible intervals are $[1.9, 16.2]$, $[0.0, 15.4]$, and $[0.0, 11.2]$.
The joint number density useful for reinterpretation in terms of new physics models (https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08417). This is a 2d histogram of the ITA signal samples, combining both regions B (bins of $\eta(\rm{BDT}_2) \in [0.92, 0.94]$), binned in the kinematic variable $q^{2}_{\rm{gen}}$ and the fitting variables $q^{2}_{\rm{rec}} \times \eta(\rm{BDT}_2)$ (flattened).
The joint number density useful for reinterpretation in terms of new physics models (https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08417). This is a 2d histogram of the HTA signal samples, binned in the kinematic variable $q^{2}_{\rm{gen}}$ and the fitting variable $\eta(\rm{BDTh})$.
A search for pseudoscalar or scalar bosons decaying to a top quark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) in final states with one or two charged leptons is presented. The analyzed proton-proton collision data was recorded at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The invariant mass $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ of the reconstructed $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ system and variables sensitive to its spin and parity are used to discriminate against the standard model $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ background. Interference between pseudoscalar or scalar boson production and the standard model $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ continuum is included, leading to peak-dip structures in the $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ distribution. An excess of the data above the background prediction, based on perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) calculations, is observed near the kinematic $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production threshold, while good agreement is found for high $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The data are consistent with the background prediction if the contribution from the production of a color-singlet ${}^1\mathrm{S}_0^{[1]}$$\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ quasi-bound state $η_\mathrm{t}$, predicted by nonrelativistic QCD, is added. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the coupling between the pseudoscalar or scalar bosons and the top quark for boson masses in the range 365$-$1000 GeV, relative widths between 0.5 and 25%, and two background scenarios with or without $η_\mathrm{t}$ contribution.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A resonance signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H resonance signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A resonance signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H resonance signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
We support searching for a range of records using their HEPData record ID or Inspire ID.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.