Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The values involving cross sections are given for $\sqrt{s}$=8 TeV, assuming the SM values for $\sigma_i(7 \mathrm{TeV})/\sigma_i(8 \mathrm{TeV})$. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\kappa_{gZ}= \kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most generic parameterisation described in the context of the $\kappa$ framework, from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The uncertainties in $\lambda_{tg}$ and $\lambda_{WZ}$, for which a negative solution is allowed, are calculated around the overall best fit value. The expected total uncertainties in the measurements are also shown. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Measured global signal strength $\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components as defined in the text. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment. The expected uncertainty, with its breakdown, is also shown.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson branching fractions are the same as in the SM.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson production process cross sections at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 8 TeV are the same as in the SM.

Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\mu_F^f = \mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\mu_V^f = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\mu_V/\mu_F = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\mu_F^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\kappa_{V}| \le$ 1, where $\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\kappa_{Z}$ or $\kappa_{W}$, and that $\mathrm{B_{BSM}} \ge$ 0. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e. $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}=0$. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured and expected uncertainties are reported for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with the individual results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $|\kappa_\mu|$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{uu}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{du}$, for which both signs are allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vu}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{qq}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{lq}$, for which there is no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vq}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and |eta| <1.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and |eta| <1.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and |eta| <1.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and |eta| <1.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and |eta| <1.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and 1< |eta| <2.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 0-10% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 10-20% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 20-30% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 30-40% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 40-50% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 50-60% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 60-70% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(pT) for centrality interval 70-80% and 2< |eta| <2.5.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 0.5< pT <0.7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 0.8< pT <1.2 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 2< pT <4 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 4< pT <7 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 0-10% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 10-20% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 20-30% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 30-40% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 40-50% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 50-60% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 60-70% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

v2(eta) for centrality interval 70-80% and 9< pT <20 GeV.

Particle PT Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV.

Standard deviation of the Particle Number Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV.

Standard deviation of the Particle Number Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV.

Standard deviation of the Particle PT Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV.

Standard deviation of the Particle PT Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV.

Mean Particle PT versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV.

Mean Particle PT versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV.

Mean Particle PT versus Region Particle Number at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV.

Mean Particle PT versus Region Particle Number at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV.

Event Number Density versus \phi_{1} - \phi_{n} at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV.

Event Number Density versus \phi_{1} - \phi_{n} at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV.

Event p_{T} Density versus \phi_{1} - \phi_{n} at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Event p_{T} Density versus \phi_{1} - \phi_{n} at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Particle Number Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Particle Number Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Particle PT Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 900 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Particle PT Density versus Lead Particle PT at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Particle Number Density versus Leading Particle Pseudorapidity at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Particle PT Density versus Leading Particle Pseudorapidity at centre-of-mass energy 7000 GeV for a lower PT cut of 0.1 GeV.

Transverse mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least three jets with pT>60,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Missing transverse energy after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Missing transverse energy after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Transverse mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Transverse mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one electron with pT>25 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass after requiring one muon with pT>20 GeV, at least four jets with pT>60,25,25,25 GeV and dphi(jets,Etmiss)>0.2.

Effective mass in the electron plus three jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus three jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus three jets top control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus three jets top control region.

Number of b-tagged jets in the combined electron plus three jets W+jets and top control region.

Number of b-tagged jets in the combined muon plus three jets W+jets and top control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus four jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus four jets W+jets control region.

Effective mass in the electron plus four jets top control region.

Effective mass in the muon plus four jets top control region.

Effective mass in the 3-jet loose signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet loose signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet tight signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 3-jet tight signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet loose signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet loose signal region (muon channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet tight signal region (electron channel).

Effective mass in the 4-jet tight signal region (muon channel).

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits in the MSUGRA/CMSSM framework with the combined electron and muon channels.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the MSUGRA/CMSSM framework with the combined electron and muon channels.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2$.

$\sqrt{s} = 900$ GeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 900$ GeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<1$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<1$.

$\sqrt{s} = 900$ GeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2$.

$\sqrt{s} = 900$ GeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 100 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 200 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 300 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 1000 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 1500 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 2000 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $\eta$ interval: $0.0 - 0.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $\eta$ interval: $0.5 - 1.0$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $\eta$ interval: $1.0 - 1.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $\eta$ interval: $1.5 - 2.0$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $\eta$ interval: $2.0 - 2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, $p_T > 100 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 900$ GeV, $p_T > 100 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

$\sqrt{s} = 900$ GeV, $p_T > 100 $ MeV, $|\eta|<2.5$.

Differential cross section as a function of the 2nd leading jet PT for events with jet multiplicity >= 2.

Differential cross section as a function of the 3rd leading jet PT for events with jet multiplicity >= 3.

Differential cross section as a function of the 4th leading jet PT for events with jet multiplicity >= 4.

Differential cross section as a function of the scalar sum of the jet PTs (HT) for events with jet multiplicity >= 2.

Differential cross section as a function of the scalar sum of the jet PTs (HT) for events with jet multiplicity >= 3.

Differential cross section as a function of the scalar sum of the jet PTs (HT) for events with jet multiplicity >= 4.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 60 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 80 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 110 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT with R=0.4 for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 60 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT with R=0.4 for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 80 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT with R=0.4 for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 110 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the sum of the PTs of the two leading jets with R=0.6. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the sum of the PTs of the two leading jets with R=0.4. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.