Compton scattering cross section on the proton at high momentum transfer.

The Hall A collaboration Danagoulian, A. ; Mamyan, V.H. ; Roedelbronn, M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 98 (2007) 152001, 2007.
Inspire Record 743383 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31472

Cross-section values for Compton scattering on the proton were measured at 25 kinematic settings over the range s = 5-11 and -t = 2-7 GeV2 with statistical accuracy of a few percent. The scaling power for the s-dependence of the cross section at fixed center of mass angle was found to be 8.0 +/ 0.2, strongly inconsistent with the prediction of perturbative QCD. The observed cross-section values are in fair agreement with the calculations using the handbag mechanism, in which the external photons couple to a single quark.

4 data tables

Cross section of proton Compton Scattering at centre of mass energy squared of 4.82 GeV.

Cross section of proton Compton Scattering at centre of mass energy squared of 6.79 GeV.

Cross section of proton Compton Scattering at centre of mass energy squared of 8.90 GeV.

More…

Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the neutron from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 4-GeV/c**2

Lung, A. ; Stuart, L.M. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 70 (1993) 718-721, 1993.
Inspire Record 342252 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19739

Quasielastic e-d cross sections have been measured at forward and backward angles. Rosenbluth separations were done to obtain RL and RT at Q2=1.75, 2.50, 3.25, and 4.00 (GeV/c)2. The neutron form factors GEn and GMn have been extracted using a nonrelativistic model. The sensitivity to deuteron wave function, relativistic corrections, and models of the inelastic background are reported. The results for GMn are consistent with the dipole form, while GEn is consistent with zero. Comparisons are made to theoretical models based on vector meson dominance, perturbative QCD, and QCD sum rules, as well as constituent quarks.

2 data tables

Magnetic form factors.

Electric form factors.


Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the proton from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 8.83-GeV/c**2

Bosted, Peter E. ; Clogher, L. ; Lung, A. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 68 (1992) 3841-3844, 1992.
Inspire Record 332962 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19849

The proton elastic electric and magnetic form factors, GEp(Q2) and GMp(Q2), have been separately measured in the range Q2=1.75 to 8.83 (GeV/c)2, more than doubling the Q2 range of previous data. Scaled by the dipole fit, GD(Q2), the results for GMp(Q2)/μpGD(Q2) decrease smoothly from 1.05 to 0.91, while GEp(Q2)/GD(Q2) is consistent with unity. Comparisons are made to QCD sum rule, diquark, constitutent quark, and vector meson dominance models, none of which agree with all of the new data. The ratio Q2F2/F1 approaches a constant value for Q2>3 (GeV/c)2.

2 data tables

Magnetic form factors.

Electric form factors.


A Measurement of the Energy Dependence of Elastic $\pi p$ and $p p$ Scattering at Large Angles

Jenkins, K.A. ; Price, L.E. ; Klem, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 425, 1978.
Inspire Record 6233 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3359

We have measured π±p and pp elastic differential cross sections in the range |cosθc.m.|<0.35 for incident momenta from 2 to 9.7 GeV/c for π−p and pp and from 2 to 6.3 GeV/c for π+p. We find that the fixed-c.m.-angle πp differential cross sections cannot be described as simple functions of s. The data are compared to the energy and angular dependence predicted by the constituent model of Gunion, Brodsky, and Blankenbecler.

56 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Fluctuations in Large Angle $\pi^\pm p$ Elastic Scattering

Jenkins, K.A. ; Price, L.E. ; Klem, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 429, 1978.
Inspire Record 6210 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.76245

Large-angle π±p elastic-scattering cross sections, measured between 2 and 9 GeV/c in fine intervals of incident momentum and scattering angle, are used to search for cross-section fluctuations occurring for small changes in the center-of-mass energy as suggested by Ericson and Mayer-Kuckuck and by Frautschi. Significant fluctuations are observed.

144 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…