Klein, R.
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 6763 results

Production of $\mu^- e^+$ Pairs in Neutrino interactions in the SKAT Bubble Chamber Experiment

Ammosov, V.V. ; Ivanilov, A.A. ; Ivanov, P.V. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 35 (1987) 329, 1987.
Inspire Record 238675 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.40896

The production of μe-pairs is studied in interactions of neutrinos with nuclei of heavy freon in the SKAT bubble chamber experiment. A rate of μ−e+ to charged current interactions above the charm threshold of\(R^{\mu ^ -e^ +}= (4.6 \pm 1.2) \cdot 10^{ - 3} \) is found. The properties of the observed μ−e+ events can be well described by assuming them to originate from the semileptonic decay of quasielastic produced charmed baryonsΛc and inclusive charmedD-meson production. The rates for these reactions are found to be (6.7±3.5)×10−2 and (2.5±0.9)×10−2, respectively. A total charmed particle production rate of (9.2±3.6)×10−2 is calculated.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.


THE MAIN PROPERTIES OF THE anti-p p ---> anti-p p pi+ pi- REACTION AT 22.4-GeV/c

The Alma Ata-Dubna-Moscow-Prague-Sofiya-Helsinki collaboration Batyunya, B.V. ; Boguslavsky, I.V. ; Bruncko, D. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 46 (1987) 650, 1987.
Inspire Record 239399 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.39296

None

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.


CROSS-SECTION OF TWO PRONG EXCLUSIVE REACTIONS IN anti-p p INTERACTIONS AT 22.4-GeV/c

The Alma Ata-Dubna-Moscow-Prague-Helsinki collaboration Batyunya, B.V. ; Boguslavsky, I.V. ; Bruncko, D. ; et al.
Czech.J.Phys.B 38 (1988) 257-266, 1988.
Inspire Record 239395 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38967

The results of the cross-section determination of some two-prong final states with one neutral particle (1 C-fits) in ¯pp-interactions at 22.4 GeV/c are presented. These results have been obtained from pictures of the HBC “Ludmila”.

1 data table
Table 1

No description provided.


Fragmentation of Neon-22 Relativistic Nuclei on Photoemulsion Nuclei

The Alma Ata-Bucharest-Leningrad-Dubna-Dushanbe-Yerevan- Kosice-Cracow-Leningrad-Moscow-Tashkent-Tbilisi-Ulan Bator-Zernograd collaboration Andreeva, N.P. ; Anzon, Z.V. ; Bubnov, V.I. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 47 (1988) 102-108, 1988.
Inspire Record 239909 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38972

None

4 data tables
Table 1

NUCLEUS IS THE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.

Table 2

NUCLEUS IS THE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.

Table 3

NUCLEUS IS THE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.

More…

MULTIPLICITY DISTRIBUTION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN anti-n p AND n p INTERACTIONS AND anti-n p ANNIHILATION AT 6.1-GeV/c

The Dubna-Bucharest-Kosice-Moscow-Sofiya collaboration Batyunya, B.V. ; Boguslavsky, I.V. ; Bruncko, D. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 47 (1988) 83, 1988.
Inspire Record 239906 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.39004

None

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.


OBSERVATION OF INTERNAL MUON BREMSSTRAHLUNG IN muon-neutrino A ---> mu- X

Grabosch, H.J. ; Kaufmann, H.H. ; Krecker, U. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 47 (1988) 73, 1988.
Inspire Record 238676 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.17366

None

7 data tables
Table 2

DATA FOR INTERNAL MUON BREMSSTRAHLUNG.

More…

rivet Analysis
Measurements of Total Hadronic and Inclusive $D^*$ Cross-sections in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations Between 3.87-{GeV} and 4.5-{GeV}

Osterheld, A. ; Hofstadter, R. ; Horisberger, R. ; et al.
SLAC-PUB-4160, 1986.
Inspire Record 238081 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.18759

None

2 data tables
Table 1

R measurement.

Table 2

D* cross sections.


A Study of the Emc Effect Using Neutrino and Anti-neutrino Interactions in Neon and Deuterium

The WA25 & WA59 collaborations Guy, J. ; Saitta, B. ; Apeldoorn, G.Van ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 36 (1987) 337-348, 1987.
Inspire Record 236239 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.15733

Nearly 40000 neutrino and antineutrino interactions in BEBC are compared to measure the differences between neon and deuterium in the quark and antiquark distributions and in the nucleon structure functions. The ratio of Ne to D cross sections indicates some decrease betweenx∼0.2 andx∼0.6. They distributions show there is no significant increase in the neon sea, but prefer a small decrease. Taken altogether, thex andy distributions and the measured total cross-sections indicate some change in the shape of the valence distributions. No significant dependence onA is observed for either the shape of the sea or the ratio of longitudinal to transverse cross-sections.

12 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Production and Fragmentation of the $D^*$0 Meson in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations

Low, E.H. ; Abachi, S. ; Akerlof, C. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 183 (1987) 232-236, 1987.
Inspire Record 20879 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6543

Neutral D ∗ meson production in e + e − annihilation at √ s =29 GeV has been studied using the high resolution spectrometer. The decay of D ∗0 into D 0 γ, where the D 0 decays into K −π + , has been observed. The production cross section in units of the point cross section is 0.63±0.22 for fractional energy Z ⩾0.5. The fragmentation function is compared with that of the D ∗+ meson measured in the same experiment.

5 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

Assuming additionaly BR(D0-->K PI) of 0.56 +- 0.005.

Table 3

Corresponding R value.

More…

The Production of Beauty Particles in $\pi^-$ U Interactions at 320-{GeV} Energy

The WA78 collaboration Catanesi, M.G. ; Muciaccia, M.T. ; Natali, S. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 187 (1987) 431-436, 1987.
Inspire Record 235069 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6522

B B production in π − -uranium interactions has been observed at 320 GeV beam energy looking at events with three muons in the final state. The cross section is found to be σ B B = 4.5±1.4±1.4 nb per nucleon (for a linear A -dependence) or σ B B = 17.6±5.5±5.5 nb per nucleon (assuming A 0.75 dependence). An estimate of x F distribution is given.

3 data tables
Table 1

BEAUTY INCLUSIVE SPECTRA WAS ASSUMED TO BE E*D(SIG)/D(X)/D(PT**2) = EXP(-0.9*PT**2)*(1-ABS(X))**A. THE BEST FIT FOR A IS A = 2.5.

Table 2

ASSUME A**.75 DEPENDENCE.

Table 3

No description provided.