HEPData Search

Reverse order

Showing 10 of 13 results

Proton-proton scattering at 8.5 Bev

Seb, Do In ; Kirillova, L.F. ; Markov, P.K. ; et al.

Sov.Phys.JETP 14 (1962) 1243-1248, 1962.

Inspire Record 1393118 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.69762

None

2 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Measurement of the total cross section from elastic scattering in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Abbott, Brad ; Abdallah, Jalal ; et al.

Nucl.Phys.B 889 (2014) 486-548, 2014.

Inspire Record 1312171 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.68910

A measurement of the total $pp$ cross section at the LHC at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV is presented. In a special run with high-$\beta^{\star}$ beam optics, an integrated luminosity of 80 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ was accumulated in order to measure the differential elastic cross section as a function of the Mandelstam momentum transfer variable $t$. The measurement is performed with the ALFA sub-detector of ATLAS. Using a fit to the differential elastic cross section in the $|t|$ range from 0.01 GeV$^2$ to 0.1 GeV$^2$ to extrapolate to $|t|\rightarrow 0$, the total cross section, $\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}(pp\rightarrow X)$, is measured via the optical theorem to be: $$\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}(pp\rightarrow X) = 95.35 \; \pm 0.38 \; ({\mbox{stat.}}) \pm 1.25 \; ({\mbox{exp.}}) \pm 0.37 \; (\mbox{extr.}) \; \mbox{mb},$$ where the first error is statistical, the second accounts for all experimental systematic uncertainties and the last is related to uncertainties in the extrapolation to $|t|\rightarrow 0$. In addition, the slope of the elastic cross section at small $|t|$ is determined to be $B = 19.73 \pm 0.14 \; ({\mbox{stat.}}) \pm 0.26 \; ({\mbox{syst.}}) \; \mbox{GeV}^{-2}$.

6 data tables

Table 1

The measured total cross section, the first systematic error accounts for all experimental uncertainties and the second error for the extrapolation t-->0.

Table 2

The nuclear slope of the differential eslastic cross section at small |t|, the first systematic error accounts for all experimental uncertainties and the second error for the extrapolation t-->0.

Table 3

The Optical Point dsigma/(elastic)/dt(t-->0), the total elastic cross section and the observed elastic cross section within the fiducial volume. The first systematic error accounts for all experimental uncertainties and the second error for the extrapolation t-->0.

Table 5

The measured differential elastic cross section. In addition to the statistical and total systematic uncertainties, the following 24 systematic shifts are given, which are included in the profile fit with their signs: -- Constraints: Beam optics uncertainty obtained by varying the ALFA constraints in the optics fit -- QScan: Variation by +/- 0.1 % of the quadrupole strength -- Q2: Fit of the strength of Q2 using the best value for the strength of Q1 and Q3 -- MadX: Uncertainty related to the beam transport replacing matrix transport by MadX PTC tracking -- Q5Q6: Variation of the strength of Q5 and Q6 by -0.2% as indicated by machine constraints -- Qmisal: Uncertainty due to the mis-alignment of the quadrupoles in the beam line -- Q1Q3: Propagation of the optics fit uncertainty in the strenght of Q1 and Q3 on the differential elastic cross section -- Stat2: Alignment uncertainty from the choice of a reference station -- Dist: Alignment uncertainty related to the distance calibration between the upper and lower detectors -- Leff: Alignment uncertainty related to effective lever arm used in the alignment optimization procedure -- Offv: Alignment uncertainty related to the vertical beam center offset -- Offh: Alignment uncertainty related to the horizontal beam center offset -- Ang: Alignment uncertainty related to the detector rotation in the x-y plane -- BGn: Uncertainty from the background normalization -- BGs: Uncertainty from the background shape -- MCres: Error from modelling of the detector response -- Slope: Residual dependence on the physics model estimated by varying the nuclear slope in the simulation by +/- 1 GeV^-2 -- Emit: Uncertainty from the emittance used to calculate beam divergence in the simulation -- Unf: Unfolding uncertainty from the data-driven closure test -- Trac: Uncertainty from the variation of the track reconstruction selection cuts -- Xing: Uncertainty from residual crossing angle in the horizontal plane -- Eff: Uncertainty from the reconstruction efficiency -- Lumi: Luminosity uncertainty (+/- 2.3%) -- Ebeam: Uncertainty from the nominal beam energy (+/- 0.65%) A small difference in the statistical uncertainties give here compared to the published version is related to insignificant rounding issues.

More…

EXPERIMENTAL DATA ON ELASTIC p p, n p, p d AND p gamma FORWARD SCATTERING AT INTERMEDIATE-ENERGIES

Dobrovolsky, A.V. ; Khanzadeev, A.V. ; Korolev, G.A. ; et al.

LENINGRAD-88-1454, 1988.

Inspire Record 270168 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38078

None

26 data tables

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

More…

SMALL ANGLE P P SCATTERING AT ENERGIES FROM 650-MEV TO 1000-MEV

Dobrovolsky, A.v. ; Khanzadeev, A.v. ; Korolev, G.a. ; et al.

Nucl.Phys.B 214 (1983) 1-20, 1983.

Inspire Record 192453 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.33966

Absolute differential cross sections for pp elastic scattering have been measured at kinetic energies of 648, 746, 795, 843, 892, 942 and 992 MeV and for momentum transfer 0.006 < z . sfnctz . sfnc <0.040 (GeV/ c ) 2 . Both scattered and recoil protons were detected in coincidence. The slope parameters of the diffraction cone and the contribution of the spin-spin amplitudes to forward elastic pp scattering were determined.

7 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Soft $\pi^- p$ and $p p$ Elastic Scattering in the Energy Range 30-{GeV} to 345-{GeV}

Burq, J.P. ; Chemarin, M. ; Chevallier, M. ; et al.

Nucl.Phys.B 217 (1983) 285-335, 1983.

Inspire Record 182455 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.7556

Differential cross sections for π − p and pp elastic scattering have been measured at incident momenta ranging from 30 to 345 GeV and in the t range 0.002 (GeV/ c ) 2 ⩽ | t | ⩽ 0.04 (GeV/ c ) 2 . From the analysis of the data, the ratio ϱ ( t = 0) of the real to the imaginary parts of the forward scattering amplitude was determined together with the logarithmic slope b of the diffraction cone.

13 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.