Showing 10 of 112 results
Parton energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is studied with a measurement of photon-tagged jet production in 1.7 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data and 260 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ data, both at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, with the ATLAS detector. The process $pp \to \gamma$+jet+$X$ and its analogue in Pb+Pb collisions is measured in events containing an isolated photon with transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$) above $50$ GeV and reported as a function of jet $p_\mathrm{T}$. This selection results in a sample of jets with a steeply falling $p_\mathrm{T}$ distribution that are mostly initiated by the showering of quarks. The $pp$ and Pb+Pb measurements are used to report the nuclear modification factor, $R_\mathrm{AA}$, and the fractional energy loss, $S_\mathrm{loss}$, for photon-tagged jets. In addition, the results are compared with the analogous ones for inclusive jets, which have a significantly smaller quark-initiated fraction. The $R_\mathrm{AA}$ and $S_\mathrm{loss}$ values are found to be significantly different between those for photon-tagged jets and inclusive jets, demonstrating that energy loss in the QGP is sensitive to the colour-charge of the initiating parton. The results are also compared with a variety of theoretical models of colour-charge-dependent energy loss.
The differential cross-section of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in pp collisions.
The yields of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in Pb+Pb collisions for different centrality intervals.
The nuclear modification factor of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for different centrality intervals.
The $\Delta p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.
The double $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ ratio of $R_{\mathrm{AA}}^{\gamma\text{-jet}}/R_{\mathrm{AA}}^{\text{inclusive jet}}$ as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.
The differential cross-section of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in pp collisions.
The yields of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in Pb+Pb collisions for different centrality intervals.
The nuclear modification factor of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for different centrality intervals.
The $\Delta p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.
The $R_{\mathrm{CP}}$ of photon-tagged jets as a function of jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$.
Azimuthal anisotropies of muons from charm and bottom hadron decays are measured in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}= 5.02$ TeV. The data were collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2018 with integrated luminosities of $0.5~\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ and $1.4~\mathrm{nb^{-1}}$, respectively. The kinematic selection for heavy-flavor muons requires transverse momentum $4 < p_\mathrm{T} < 30$ GeV and pseudorapidity $|\eta|<2.0$. The dominant sources of muons in this $p_\mathrm{T}$ range are semi-leptonic decays of charm and bottom hadrons. These heavy-flavor muons are separated from light-hadron decay muons and punch-through hadrons using the momentum imbalance between the measurements in the tracking detector and in the muon spectrometers. Azimuthal anisotropies, quantified by flow coefficients, are measured via the event-plane method for inclusive heavy-flavor muons as a function of the muon $p_\mathrm{T}$ and in intervals of Pb+Pb collision centrality. Heavy-flavor muons are separated into contributions from charm and bottom hadron decays using the muon transverse impact parameter with respect to the event primary vertex. Non-zero elliptic ($v_{2}$) and triangular ($v_{3}$) flow coefficients are extracted for charm and bottom muons, with the charm muon coefficients larger than those for bottom muons for all Pb+Pb collision centralities. The results indicate substantial modification to the charm and bottom quark angular distributions through interactions in the quark-gluon plasma produced in these Pb+Pb collisions, with smaller modifications for the bottom quarks as expected theoretically due to their larger mass.
Summary of results for Inclusive HF muon v2 as a function of pT for different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.
Summary of results for Inclusive HF muon v3 as a function of pT for different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.
Summary of results for charm muon v2 as a function of pT for different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.
Summary of results for bottom muon v2 as a function of pT for different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.
Summary of results for charm muon v3 as a function of pT for different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.
Summary of results for bottom muon v3 as a function of pT for different centrality. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.
Two-particle long-range azimuthal correlations are measured in photonuclear collisions using 1.7 nb$^{-1}$ of 5.02 TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Candidate events are selected using a dedicated high-multiplicity photonuclear event trigger, a combination of information from the zero-degree calorimeters and forward calorimeters, and from pseudorapidity gaps constructed using calorimeter energy clusters and charged-particle tracks. Distributions of event properties are compared between data and Monte Carlo simulations of photonuclear processes. Two-particle correlation functions are formed using charged-particle tracks in the selected events, and a template-fitting method is employed to subtract the non-flow contribution to the correlation. Significant nonzero values of the second- and third-order flow coefficients are observed and presented as a function of charged-particle multiplicity and transverse momentum. The results are compared with flow coefficients obtained in proton-proton and proton-lead collisions in similar multiplicity ranges, and with theoretical expectations. The unique initial conditions present in this measurement provide a new way to probe the origin of the collective signatures previously observed only in hadronic collisions.
The measured $v_2$ and $v_3$ charged-particle anisotropies as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in photonuclear collisions
The measured $v_2$ and $v_3$ charged-particle anisotropies as a function of charged-particle transverse momentum in photonuclear collisions
Measurements of the yield and nuclear modification factor, $R_\mathrm{ AA}$, for inclusive jet production are performed using 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV and 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ data at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Jets are reconstructed with the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with radius parameter $R=0.4$ and are measured over the transverse momentum range of 40-1000 GeV in six rapidity intervals covering $|y|<2.8$. The magnitude of $R_\mathrm{ AA}$ increases with increasing jet transverse momentum, reaching a value of approximately 0.6 at 1 TeV in the most central collisions. The magnitude of $R_\mathrm{ AA}$ also increases towards peripheral collisions. The value of $R_\mathrm{ AA}$ is independent of rapidity at low jet transverse momenta, but it is observed to decrease with increasing rapidity at high transverse momenta.
The ⟨TAA⟩ and ⟨Npart⟩ values and their uncertainties in each centrality bin.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Correlations of two flow harmonics $v_n$ and $v_m$ via three- and four-particle cumulants are measured in 13 TeV $pp$, 5.02 TeV $p$+Pb, and 2.76 TeV peripheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The goal is to understand the multi-particle nature of the long-range collective phenomenon in these collision systems. The large non-flow background from dijet production present in the standard cumulant method is suppressed using a method of subevent cumulants involving two, three and four subevents separated in pseudorapidity. The results show a negative correlation between $v_2$ and $v_3$ and a positive correlation between $v_2$ and $v_4$ for all collision systems and over the full multiplicity range. However, the magnitudes of the correlations are found to depend strongly on the event multiplicity, the choice of transverse momentum range and collision system. The relative correlation strength, obtained by normalisation of the cumulants with the $\langle v_n^2\rangle$ from a two-particle correlation analysis, is similar in the three collision systems and depends weakly on the event multiplicity and transverse momentum. These results based on the subevent methods provide strong evidence of a similar long-range multi-particle collectivity in $pp$, $p$+Pb and peripheral Pb+Pb collisions.
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV
The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV
The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV
The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods
The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods
The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods
The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods
The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods
The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods
Jets created in association with a photon can be used as a calibrated probe to study energy loss in the medium created in nuclear collisions. Measurements of the transverse momentum balance between isolated photons and inclusive jets are presented using integrated luminosities of 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collision data at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV and 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Photons with transverse momentum $63.1 < p_\mathrm{T}^{\gamma} < 200$ GeV and $\left|\eta^{\gamma}\right| < 2.37$ are paired inclusively with all jets in the event that have $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{jet} > 31.6$ GeV and pseudorapidity $\left|\eta^\mathrm{jet}\right| < 2.8$. The transverse momentum balance given by the jet-to-photon $p_\mathrm{T}$ ratio, $x_\mathrm{J\gamma}$, is measured for pairs with azimuthal opening angle $\Delta\phi > 7\pi/8$. Distributions of the per-photon jet yield as a function of $x_\mathrm{J\gamma}$, $(1/N_\gamma)(\mathrm{d}N/\mathrm{d}x_\mathrm{J\gamma})$, are corrected for detector effects via a two-dimensional unfolding procedure and reported at the particle level. In $pp$ collisions, the distributions are well described by Monte Carlo event generators. In Pb+Pb collisions, the $x_\mathrm{J\gamma}$ distribution is modified from that observed in $pp$ collisions with increasing centrality, consistent with the picture of parton energy loss in the hot nuclear medium. The data are compared with a suite of energy-loss models and calculations.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 63.1-79.6 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 79.6-100 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 100-158 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 158-200 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (with DeltaPhi > 7pi/8) with those obtained using DeltaPhi > 3pi/4 for the pTg = 63.1-79.6 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.
Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (inclusive jet selection) with those obtained using a photon-plus-leading-jet selection for the pTg = 100-158 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.
This paper presents a measurement of jet fragmentation functions in 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collisions and 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV collected in 2015 with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. These measurements provide insight into the jet quenching process in the quark-gluon plasma created in the aftermath of ultra-relativistic collisions between two nuclei. The modifications to the jet fragmentation functions are quantified by dividing the measurements in Pb+Pb collisions by baseline measurements in $pp$ collisions. This ratio is studied as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet, the jet rapidity, and the centrality of the collision. In both collision systems, the jet fragmentation functions are measured for jets with transverse momentum between 126 GeV and 398 GeV and with an absolute value of jet rapidity less than 2.1. An enhancement of particles carrying a small fraction of the jet momentum is observed, which increases with centrality and with increasing jet transverse momentum. Yields of particles carrying a very large fraction of the jet momentum are also observed to be enhanced. Between these two enhancements of the fragmentation functions a suppression of particles carrying an intermediate fraction of the jet momentum is observed in Pb+Pb collisions. A small dependence of the modifications on jet rapidity is observed.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.
The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.
The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.
Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.
Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.
Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.
Measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV are presented using a data sample corresponding to 0.49 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ integrated luminosity collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2015. The recorded minimum-bias sample is enhanced by triggers for "ultra-central" collisions, providing an opportunity to perform detailed study of flow harmonics in the regime where the initial state is dominated by fluctuations. The anisotropy of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distributions is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_{2}-v_{7}$, which are measured using the two-particle correlation, scalar-product and event-plane methods. The goal of the paper is to provide measurements of the differential as well as integrated flow harmonics $v_{n}$ over wide ranges of the transverse momentum, 0.5 $
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
Jet quenching is the process of color-charged partons losing energy via interactions with quark-gluon plasma droplets created in heavy-ion collisions. The collective expansion of such droplets is well described by viscous hydrodynamics. Similar evidence of collectivity is consistently observed in smaller collision systems, including $pp$ and $p$+Pb collisions. In contrast, while jet quenching is observed in Pb+Pb collisions, no evidence has been found in these small systems to date, raising fundamental questions about the nature of the system created in these collisions. The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has measured the yield of charged hadrons correlated with reconstructed jets in 0.36 nb$^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb and 3.6 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at 5.02 TeV. The yields of charged hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >0.5$ GeV near and opposite in azimuth to jets with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{jet} > 30$ or $60$ GeV, and the ratios of these yields between $p$+Pb and $pp$ collisions, $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$, are reported. The collision centrality of $p$+Pb events is categorized by the energy deposited by forward neutrons from the struck nucleus. The $I_{p\mathrm{Pb}}$ values are consistent with unity within a few percent for hadrons with $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{ch} >4$ GeV at all centralities. These data provide new, strong constraints which preclude almost any parton energy loss in central $p$+Pb collisions.
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The per-jet charged particle yield in pPb and pp collisions for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 30~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons near a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} < \pi/8$).
The ratio of per-jet charged particle yields in pPb and pp collisions, $I_{pPb}$, for hadrons opposite to a $p_{T}^{\textrm{jet}} > 60~\textrm{GeV}$ jet ($\Delta\phi_{\textrm{ch,jet}} > 7\pi/8$).
This article presents a search for new resonances decaying into a $Z$ or $W$ boson and a 125 GeV Higgs boson $h$, and it targets the $\nu\bar{\nu}b\bar{b}$, $\ell^+\ell^-b\bar{b}$, or $\ell^{\pm}{\nu}b\bar{b}$ final states, where $\ell=e$ or $\mu$, in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. The data used correspond to a total integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the LHC at CERN. The search is conducted by examining the reconstructed invariant or transverse mass distributions of $Zh$ or $Wh$ candidates for evidence of a localised excess in the mass range from 220 GeV to 5 TeV. No significant excess is observed and 95% confidence-level upper limits between 1.3 pb and 0.3 fb are placed on the production cross section times branching fraction of neutral and charged spin-1 resonances and CP-odd scalar bosons. These limits are converted into constraints on the parameter space of the Heavy Vector Triplet model and the two-Higgs-doublet model.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Zprime --> Zh --> vvbb/cc signals in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Zprime --> Zh --> vvbb/cc signals in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Zprime --> Zh --> llbb/cc signals in the 2-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Zprime --> Zh --> llbb/cc signals in the 2-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> bbA --> Zh --> vvbb signals in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> bbA --> Zh --> vvbb signals in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> bbA --> Zh --> llbb signals in the 2-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> bbA --> Zh --> llbb signals in the 2-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Wprime --> Zh --> lvbb/cc signals in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Wprime --> Zh --> lvbb/cc signals in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Wprime --> Zh --> lvbb/cc signals in the 1-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> Wprime --> Zh --> lvbb/cc signals in the 1-lepton channel.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 3+ b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 3+ b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved 3+ b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved 3+ b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region with additional b-tagged track jets not associated with the large-R jet. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region with additional b-tagged track jets not associated with the large-R jet. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the merged 1+2 b-tag signal region with additional b-tagged track jets not associated with the large-R jet. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the merged 1+2 b-tag signal region with additional b-tagged track jets not associated with the large-R jet. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood bbA fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 1-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved top control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{Vh}$ for the 2-lepton channel in the resolved top control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag sideband control region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood Z' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Upper limits on Zprime to Z h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on Zprime to Z h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on Wprime to W h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on Wprime to W h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on ggA to Z h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on ggA to Z h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on bbA to Z h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Upper limits on bbA to Z h production cross section times branching fraction in pb.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 220 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 220 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 260 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 260 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 300 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 300 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 340 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 340 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 380 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 380 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 400 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 400 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 420 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 420 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 440 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 440 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 460 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 460 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 500 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 500 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 600 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 600 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 700 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 700 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 800 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 800 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 900 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 900 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1000 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1000 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1200 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1200 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1400 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1400 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1600 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 1600 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 2000 GeV.
Expected and observed two-dimensional likelihood scans of the b-associated production cross section times branching fraction vs the gluon-fusion production cross section times branching fraction at $m_{A}$ = 2000 GeV.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> A --> Zh --> vvbb signal in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> A --> Zh --> vvbb signal in the 0-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> A --> Zh --> llbb signal in the 2-lepton channel.
Acceptance * reconstruction efficiency for the P P --> A --> Zh --> llbb signal in the 2-lepton channel.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the resolved 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 1 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Event distributions of $m_{T,Vh}$ for the 0-lepton channel in the merged 2 b-tag signal region. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood W' fit to the data. In the plot, the last bin contains the overflow.
Distributions of expected upper limits at 95% confidence level on the cross section of P P --> A --> Zh as a function of bbA fraction an signal mass.
Distributions of expected upper limits at 95% confidence level on the cross section of P P --> A --> Zh as a function of bbA fraction an signal mass.
Distributions of observed upper limits at 95% confidence level on the cross section of P P --> A --> Zh as a function of bbA fraction an signal mass.
Distributions of observed upper limits at 95% confidence level on the cross section of P P --> A --> Zh as a function of bbA fraction an signal mass.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.