Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W+ signal region.

Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W+ signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the dimuon mass in the Z boson signal region.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV. The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (larger value) and quadratic (smaller value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

Comparison of the measured and theoretical cross sections for Z, W+, W-, and W production at different center-of-mass energies. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with the NNPDF 3.1 PDF set.

The nuclear suppression factor $S^{\mathrm{J}/\psi}$ of incoherent $\mathrm{J}/\psi$ meson photoproduction as a function of Bjorken $x$ in PbPb ultra-peripheral collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The $x$ values are evaluated at the centers of their corresponding rapidity ranges. The theoretical uncertainties are due to the uncertainties in the photon flux.

The ratio between incoherent and coherent $\mathrm{J}/\psi$ meson photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$, measured in PbPb ultra-peripheral collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$ values used correspond to the center of each rapidity range. The theoretical uncertainties is due to the uncertainties in the photon flux.

The total covariance matrix of the total incoherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The covariance matrix includes both the experimental and theoretical (photon flux) uncertainties. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The experimental covariance matrix of the total incoherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

The theoretical (photon flux) covariance matrix of the total incoherent photoproduction cross section as a function of photon-nuclear center-of-mass energy per nucleon $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$. The bins are ordered as increasing in $W_{\gamma \mathrm{N}}^{\mathrm{Pb}}$.

Normalized $\sigma_{\psi(2S)}/\sigma_{J/\psi}$ in $6.5<p_T<30.0\,GeV$ and $ 1 < y_{CM} < 1.935$ as functions of normalized $\text{N}^{{\text{corr.}}}_{\text{track}}$

Normalized $\sigma_{\psi(2S)}/\sigma_{J/\psi}$ in $6.5<p_T<30.0\,GeV$ and $ -2.865 < y_{CM} < 1.935$ as functions of normalized $\text{N}^{{\text{corr.}}}_{\text{track}}$

Normalized $\sigma_{\psi(2S)}/\sigma_{J/\psi}$ in $3.0<p_T<6.5\,GeV$ and $ -2.865 < y_{CM} < -2 $ as functions of normalized $\text{N}^{{\text{corr.}}}_{\text{track}}$

Normalized $\sigma_{\psi(2S)}/\sigma_{J/\psi}$ in $3.0<p_T<6.5\,GeV$ and $ 1 < y_{CM} < 1.935 $ as functions of normalized $\text{N}^{{\text{corr.}}}_{\text{track}}$

The unfolded jet axis decorrelation distribution,$\frac{1}{N} \frac{dN}{d\Delta j}$, as a function of $\Delta j$ for the $0-10\%$, $10-30\%$, $30-50\%$, and $50-80\%$ centrality bins in the $230 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 300$ GeV interval.

The second-order Fourier sine coefficients of $\Lambda$ polarization along the beam direction as functions of $N_\mathrm{trk}^\mathrm{offline}$ in pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV extracted with HF based event planes. The HF-based event plane is reconstructed only with the HF detectors toward the Pb going direction.

The second-order Fourier sine coefficients of $\bar{\Lambda}$ polarization along the beam direction as functions of $N_\mathrm{trk}^\mathrm{offline}$ in pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV extracted with HF based event planes. The HF-based event plane is reconstructed only with the HF detectors toward the Pb going direction.

The second-order Fourier sine coefficients of $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ polarization along the beam direction as functions of $N_\mathrm{trk}^\mathrm{offline}$ in pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV extracted with HF based event planes. The HF-based event plane is reconstructed only with the HF detectors toward the Pb going direction.

The elliptic anisotropy $v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $\langle N_{trk}^{offline} \rangle$ with 4-subevent method compared between pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV and PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV with $p_{T}^{POI}>6$ GeV.

The elliptic anisotropy $v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $\langle N_{trk}^{corrected} \rangle$ with 4-subevent method compared between pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV and PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV with $p_{T}^{POI}>6$ GeV.

The differential cumulant $d_2\{4\}$ as a function of $p_T$ in generator level HIJING for $60 \le N_{trk}^{gen} <120$ are compared to the experimental pPb results with $60 \le N_{trk}^{offline} <120$ and $185 \le N_{trk}^{offline} <250$.

Suppl. Fig. 7. The reconstructed shower angle for all single photon events. The individual signal and background event type categories added together form the unconstrained prediction.

Suppl. Fig. 7. The constrained covariance matrix for the reconstructed shower angle for all single-photon events. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Suppl. Fig. 7. The unconstrained covariance matrix for reconstructed shower angle for all single-photon events. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Fig. 3. The reconstructed number of protons, with a proton KE energy threshold of 35 MeV, for all single-photon events. The individual signal and background event type categories added together form the unconstrained prediction.

Fig. 4, Suppl. Fig. 8. The reconstructed shower energy for zero proton events binned from 0 to 600 MeV. The individual signal and background event type categories added together form the unconstrained prediction.

Fig. 4. The constrained covariance matrix for the reconstructed shower energy for zero proton events binned from 0 to 600 MeV. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Fig. 4. The unconstrained covariance matrix for reconstructed shower energy for zero proton events binned from 0 to 600 MeV. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Fig. 6. The reconstructed shower energy for zero proton events binned from 150 to 1250 MeV, with LEE prediction. The individual signal and background event type categories added together form the unconstrained prediction. The "LEE" category is the unfolded MiniBooNE LEE model prediction scaled under the neutrino-target nucleon interaction assumption.

Fig. 6. The constrained covariance matrix for the reconstructed shower energy for zero proton events binned from 150 to 1250 MeV. Both with and without the LEE model added. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Fig. 6. The unconstrained covariance matrix for reconstructed shower energy for zero proton events binned from 150 to 1250 MeV. Both with and without the LEE model added. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Suppl. Fig. 10. The reconstructed shower backwards projected distance for zero proton events. The individual signal and background event type categories added together form the unconstrained prediction.

Suppl. Fig. 9. The reconstructed shower angle for zero proton events. Includes LEE model prediction. The individual signal and background event type categories added together form the unconstrained prediction. The "LEE" category is the unfolded MiniBooNE LEE model prediction scaled under the neutrino-target nucleon interaction assumption.

Suppl. Fig. 9. The constrained covariance matrix for the reconstructed shower angle for zero proton events. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

Suppl. Fig. 9. The unconstrained covariance matrix for reconstructed shower angle for zero proton events. The matrix shows uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Data statistical uncertainties are not included. An example of how to add Pearson data statistical uncertainties can be found in the example code repository.

1$\gamma$Xp shower energy and angle selection efficiencies for true 1$\gamma$Xp events. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied. Energy and Angle values represent bin lower edges.

1$\gamma$0p shower energy and angle selection efficiencies for true single-photon events with no other true particles of any energy. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied. Energy and Angle values represent bin lower edges.

Distributions of events for $\mathcal{D}_{\text{bkg}}$ observable in the $\gamma$-tagged (left) and Untagged (right) categories of the $\text{H}\to 4\ell$ candidate events. Observed events (black markers) and expected background estimates (solid histograms) from MC simulation (ZZ/Z$\gamma^*$) or control samples in data (Z+X) are shown. The $\gamma \text{H}$ signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}\times{\cal B}(H\to 4\ell)=1$ fb for either the $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ (solid) and $c_{z\gamma}$ (dashed) coupling hypothesis.

Distributions of events for $\mathcal{D}_{\text{bkg}}$ observable in the $\gamma$-tagged (left) and Untagged (right) categories of the $\text{H}\to 4\ell$ candidate events. Observed events (black markers) and expected background estimates (solid histograms) from MC simulation (ZZ/Z$\gamma^*$) or control samples in data (Z+X) are shown. The $\gamma \text{H}$ signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}\times{\cal B}(H\to 4\ell)=1$ fb for either the $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ (solid) and $c_{z\gamma}$ (dashed) coupling hypothesis.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Covariance matrix showing uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Pearson data statistical uncertainties have been included, and include small correlations due to events which can be selected by both WC and Pandora. The first four bins are the WC $1\gamma Np$, WC $1\gamma 0p$, Pandora $1\gamma 1p$, and Pandora $1\gamma 0p$ channels, and the next four sets of 16 bins are the NC $\pi^0 Np$, NC $\pi^0 0p$, $\nu_\mu$CC $Np$, and $\nu_\mu$CC $0p$ channels. This corresponds to Fig. 1 of the paper and Fig. 6 of the Supplemental Material.

Constrained WC $1\gamma Np$ energy distribution. There are 6 bins from 0 to 600 MeV of reconstructed shower energy, with an additional overflow bin. Constrained systematic uncertainties on the predictions are illustrated, and a more detailed covariance matrix is included in the Constrained Energy Distributions Covariance Matrix tab. This corresponds to Fig. 2 of the paper.

Constrained WC $1\gamma 0p$ energy distribution. There are 14 bins from 0 to 700 MeV of reconstructed shower energy, with an additional overflow bin. Constrained systematic uncertainties on the predictions are illustrated, and a more detailed covariance matrix is included in the Constrained Energy Distributions Covariance Matrix tab. This corresponds to Fig. 2 of the paper.

Constrained Pandora $1\gamma 1p$ energy distribution. There are 6 bins from 0 to 600 MeV of reconstructed shower energy, with an additional overflow bin. Constrained systematic uncertainties on the predictions are illustrated, and a more detailed covariance matrix is included in the Constrained Energy Distributions Covariance Matrix tab. This corresponds to Fig. 2 of the paper.

Constrained Pandora $1\gamma 0p$ energy distribution. There are 14 bins from 0 to 700 MeV of reconstructed shower energy, with an additional overflow bin. Constrained systematic uncertainties on the predictions are illustrated, and a more detailed covariance matrix is included in the Constrained Energy Distributions Covariance Matrix tab. This corresponds to Fig. 2 of the paper.

Constrained covariance matrix showing constrained uncertainties and correlations between bins due to flux uncertainties, cross-section uncertainties, hadron reinteraction uncertainties, detector systematic uncertainties, Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainties, and dirt (outside cryostat) uncertainties. Pearson data statistical uncertainties have been included, and include small correlations due to events which can be selected by both WC and Pandora. The first seven bins are the WC $1\gamma Np$ reconstructed shower energy from 0-600 MeV with an overflow bin, the next 15 bins are the WC $1\gamma 0p$ reconstructed shower energy from 0-700 MeV with an overflow bin, the next seven bins are the Pandora $1\gamma 1p$ reconstructed shower energy from 0-600 MeV with an overflow bin, and the last 15 bins are the Pandora $1\gamma 0p$ reconstructed shower energy from 0-700 MeV with an overflow bin. This corresponds to Fig. 2 of the paper.

2D efficiency matrix showing the efficiency of the WC $1\gamma Np$ selection with respect to all true NC Delta Radiative Decay events which interact in the fiducial volume. The efficiency is shown as a function of true photon energy and angle. There are 10 bins from -1 to 1 in true photon $\cos \theta$ and 15 bins from 0 to 1500 MeV in true photon energy. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied. This corresponds to Fig. 9 of the Supplemental Material.

2D efficiency matrix showing the efficiency of the WC $1\gamma 0p$ selection with respect to all true NC Delta Radiative Decay events which interact in the fiducial volume. The efficiency is shown as a function of true photon energy and angle. There are 10 bins from -1 to 1 in true photon $\cos \theta$ and 30 bins from 0 to 1500 MeV in true photon energy. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied. This corresponds to Fig. 9 of the Supplemental Material.

2D efficiency matrix showing the efficiency of the Pandora $1\gamma 1p$ selection with respect to all true NC Delta Radiative Decay events which interact in the fiducial volume. The efficiency is shown as a function of true photon energy and angle. There are 10 bins from -1 to 1 in true photon $\cos \theta$ and 15 bins from 0 to 1500 MeV in true photon energy, with lower bin edges indicated in the table. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied. This corresponds to Fig. 9 of the Supplemental Material.

2D efficiency matrix showing the efficiency of the Pandora $1\gamma 0p$ selection with respect to all true NC Delta Radiative Decay events which interact in the fiducial volume. The efficiency is shown as a function of true photon energy and angle. There are 10 bins from -1 to 1 in true photon $\cos \theta$ and 30 bins from 0 to 1500 MeV in true photon energy, with lower bin edges indicated in the table. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied. This corresponds to Fig. 9 of the Supplemental Material.

2D efficiency matrix showing the efficiency of the WC $1\gamma 0p$ selection with respect to all true zero-primary-final-state-proton NC Delta Radiative Decay events which interact in the fiducial volume. The efficiency is shown as a function of true photon energy and angle. There are 10 bins from -1 to 1 in true photon $\cos \theta$ and 30 bins from 0 to 1500 MeV in true photon energy, with lower bin edges indicated in the table. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied.

2D efficiency matrix showing the efficiency of the Pandora $1\gamma 0p$ selection with respect to all true zero-primary-final-state-proton NC Delta Radiative Decay events which interact in the fiducial volume. The efficiency is shown as a function of true photon energy and angle. There are 10 bins from -1 to 1 in true photon $\cos \theta$ and 30 bins from 0 to 1500 MeV in true photon energy, with lower bin edges indicated in the table. NaN values indicate a "divide by zero" case where zero events were present in the bin before any selection was applied.

90% CL upper limit in axion-like particle coupling to SM fermions at UV scale Lambda=1TeV vs mass parameter space for di-lepton final states.

90% CL upper limit in axion-like particle coupling to SM gluons at UV scale Lambda=1TeV vs mass parameter space for hadronic final states.

Number of expected $a \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $C_{bs}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $C_{bs}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $C_{bs}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $C_{bs}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $C_{bs}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\pi^0$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\pi^0} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in mixing with $\eta^\prime$ assuming production coupling $\theta_{\eta^\prime} = 1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\eta$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $a \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Primakoff production assuming production coupling $C_{\gamma\gamma}/\Lambda=1\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to K^+K^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to K^+K^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to K^+K^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for mixing production assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in light meson decays assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in light meson decays assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in light meson decays assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in light meson decays assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $A^\prime \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in light meson decays assuming production coupling $\varepsilon=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to K^+K^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to \pi^+\pi^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0\pi^0$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for Bremsstrahlung production assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to e^+e^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to \mu^+\mu^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to K^+K^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.

Number of expected $S \to \pi^+\pi^-$ events for BR = 1 in the plane (mass, width) after full selection, for production in B meson decays assuming production coupling $\mathrm{sin}^2\theta=1$. Acceptance for particles that reach the FV and decay therein and mass resolution.