Transverse momentum dependence of inclusive J/$\psi$ $v_2$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$ TeV for the 40-60% centrality class (forward rapidity). The first uncertainty (stat) is statistical, the second (sys,uncorrel) is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one (sys,correl) is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 0-5% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 5-10% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 10-20% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 20-30% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 30-40% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 40-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 50-60% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 0-5% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 5-10% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 10-20% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 20-30% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 30-40% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 40-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 50-60% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$p_1$ parameter from a linear fit to $\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and MC—Glauber model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and MC—KLN CGC model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and EKRT model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

Most probable charge deposit signal normalised to that of minimum ionising particles as a function of $\beta\gamma$ for cosmic-ray muons (dE/dx). Statistical uncertainties as vertical error bars. Uncertainties in momentum and thus $\beta \gamma$ determination are drawn as horizontal error bars.

Most probable charge deposit signal normalised to that of minimum ionising particles as a function of $\beta\gamma$ for cosmic-ray muons (dE/dx + TR). Statistical uncertainties as vertical error bars. Uncertainties in momentum and thus $\beta \gamma$ determination are drawn as horizontal error bars.

Out projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Side projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Long projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rlong^2 vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(5,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(5,3) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,3) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables SC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(3,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables NSC(4,2) in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_2$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_3$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_2$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_3$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_2$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_3$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_2$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_3$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_2$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_3$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_2$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_3$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Transeverse momemtum dependence of observables $v_4$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Centrality dependence of observables $v_5$ in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV.

Integrated yields of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated $\eta$/$\pi^{0}$ ratio produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\pi^{0}$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive $\eta$ to $\pi^{0}$ production at a center of mass energy of 8 TeV.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of y(top).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of pt(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of y(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of m(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of dphi(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of pt(top).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of y(top).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of pt(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of y(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of m(ttbar).

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of dphi(ttbar).

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalized differential tt cross section in dilepton channel at particle level as a function of the transverse momentum pt(let).

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalized differential tt cross section in dilepton channel at particle level as a function of the transverse momentum pt(jet).

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalized differential tt cross section in dilepton channel at particle level as a function of the transverse momentum pt(top) of the top quark or antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of y(top) of the top quark or antiquark.

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalized differential tt cross section in dilepton channel at particle level as a function of the transverse momentum pt(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of y(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of m(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the particle level as a function of dphi(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalized differential tt cross section in dilepton channel at parton level as a function of the transverse momentum pt(top) of the top quark or antiquark.

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalized differential tt cross section in dilepton channel at parton level as a function of the transverse momentum y(top) of the top quark or antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of pt(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of y(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of m(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

Normalized differential ttbar cross sections with statistical and systematic uncertainties at the parton level as a function of dphi(ttbar) of the top quark and antiquark.

The mjj distribution in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria in the e+e- channel. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The mjj distribution in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria in the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The mjj distribution in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria in the mu+mu- channel. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e+e− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e+e− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the mu+mu− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the mu+mu− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e+e- channel, in three different mjj regions. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e+e- channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the mu+mu- channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the mu+mu- channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section for X and branching fraction for X -> HH -> bbVV -> bblnulnu, as a function of mX. These limits are computed using the asymptotic CLs method, combining all channels, for the spin-0 hypothesis.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section for X and branching fraction for X -> HH -> bbVV -> bblnulnu, as a function of mX. These limits are computed using the asymptotic CLs method, combining all channels, for the spin-2 hypothesis.

expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the Higgs boson pair production cross section and branching fraction for HH -> bbVV -> bblnulnu as a function of kappa_top/kappa_lambda.

Exclusions in the (\kappa_top, \kappa_\lambda) plane. Parameters excluded at 95% CL with the observed data, and expected exclusions and the 68 and 95% bands.

Data from Fig.4. Expected yields of four lepton invariant mass distribution for the EW ZZjj signal process. The last bin includes overflow.

Data from Fig.4. Expected yields of four lepton invariant mass distribution for the mixed EW-QCD qqZZjj background. The last bin includes overflow.

Data from Fig.4. Expected yields of four lepton invariant mass distribution for the mixed EW-QCD ggZZjj background. The last bin includes overflow.

Data from Fig.4. Expected yields of four lepton invariant mass distribution for the WWZ background. The last bin includes overflow.

Data from Fig.4. Expected yields of four lepton invariant mass distribution for the ttZ background. The last bin includes overflow.

Data from Fig.4. Expected yields of four lepton invariant mass distribution for the Z+X reducible background. The last bin includes overflow.