UrQMD model calculations for net-proton cumulant ratios and proton factorial cumulant ratios in Au+Au collisions from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 - 200 GeV for 0-5$\%$ centrality. Same choices of centrality definition are used as used for experimental data.

Significance of deviations of central 0-5$\%$ data from various choices of baselines or references.

Cumulant ratios C2/C1 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV as a function of multiplicity (RefMult3X).

Cumulant ratios C2/C1 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV as a function of average multiplicity (RefMult3X) for 8 centrality bins from 0-10$\%$ to 70-80$\%$. Data with and without CBWC are given.

Cumulant ratios C2/C1 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV as a function of average multiplicity (RefMult3X) for 16 centrality bins from 0-5$\%$ to 75-80$\%$. Data with and without CBWC are given.

Reference multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 GeV from BES-II. Three choices of multiplicity distributions (RefMult3 scaled by efficiency factor of $\epsilon$ = 0.83 or 83$\%$ to mimic RefMult3 of BES-I, RefMult3, and RefMult3X) are presented.

Cumulant ratios C2/C1 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 GeV from BES-II as a function of centrality obtained with various centrality definitions.

Reference multiplicity distributions (RefMult3, RefMult3X, and RefMult3A) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV from UrQMD model. The RefMult3 and RefMult3X distributions have been scaled by an efficiency factor of $\epsilon$ = 77.9$\%$ to mimic the distribution in experimenal data.

Cumulant ratios C2/C1 and C4/C2 of net-proton distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV from UrQMD model as a function of centrality obtained with various centrality definitions (RefMult3, RefMult3X, and RefMult3A). The RefMult3 and RefMult3X distributions have been scaled by an efficiency factor of $\epsilon$ = 77.9$\%$ to mimic the distribution in experimenal data.

Collision energy dependence of net-proton C4/C2 in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 - 27 GeV from BES-II obtained with RefMult3 centrality definition.

Difference between net-proton C4/C2 (0-5$\%$) data from various choices of baselines or references as a function of collision energy from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 - 200 GeV.

Data from Figure 2, panel d, upper panel, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 2, panel d, lower panel, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 5-10% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 20-30% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 40-50% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 5-10% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 20-30% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 40-50% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Figure 5, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 5, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel c, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel d, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 7, Zero Crossing Point of $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 7, $\left\langle [p_{T}]\right\rangle$ for $p_{T}$ range of 0.5-10 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 8, panel a, Closure of Sum Rule 1 for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 8, panel b, Closure of Sum Rule 2 for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 9, panel a, $v_{0}$ vs $N_{ch}$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 9, panel b, $v_{0} / v^{5\%}_{0}$ vs $N_{ch}$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 10, panel a, $v_{0}\sqrt{N_{ch}}$ vs $N_{ch}$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 10, panel b, $v_{0}\sqrt{N_{ch}}$ vs Centrality for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 5-10% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 20-30% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 40-50% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 60-70% Centrality

$\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{K}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{p}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{p}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\pi,\mathrm{K}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\pi,\mathrm{K}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\pi,\mathrm{p}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\pi,\mathrm{p}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\mathrm{p},\mathrm{K}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\mathrm{p},\mathrm{K}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{2}_{\mathrm{Q}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{2}_{\mathrm{Q}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\mathrm{Q},\mathrm{K}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\mathrm{Q},\mathrm{K}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\mathrm{Q},\mathrm{p}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_{\mathrm{Q},\mathrm{p}}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$C_\mathrm{Q,p}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$C_\mathrm{Q,p}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$C_\mathrm{Q,K}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$C_\mathrm{Q,K}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$C_\mathrm{p,K}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$C_\mathrm{p,K}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{Q,p}/\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{Q}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{Q,K}/\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{Q}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$(2\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{Q,K}-\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{p,K})/\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{K}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$(2\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{Q,p}-\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{p,K})/\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{p}$ as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{Q,p}/\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{Q}$ normalized by its value at 0$-$5% centrality as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 1 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

$\kappa^{11}_\mathrm{Q,p}/\kappa^{2}_\mathrm{Q}$ normalized by its value at 0$-$5% centrality as a function of centrality (%) in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV for Set 2 $p_\mathrm{T}$ acceptance.

The Charged-hadron yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The K^{0}_{S} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The #Lambda yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The #Xi^{-} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The K^{0}_{S} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The #Lambda yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The #Xi^{-} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in p+Pb collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in p+Pb collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in p+Pb collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in p+Pb collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Spectral temperature parameter for $\Delta^{++}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Width of the $\Delta^{++}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Core source size of p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ pairs in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Spectral temperature parameter for $\Delta^{0}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Width of the $\Delta^{0}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Core source size of p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ pairs in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p)-$\pi^{+}$ + (antip-antip)-$\pi^{-}$ lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p)-$\pi^{-}$ + (antip-antip)-$\pi^{+}$ lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-$\pi^{+}$)-p + (antip-$\pi^{-}$)-antip lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-$\pi^{-}$)-p + (antip-$\pi^{+}$)-antip lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p-$\pi^{+}$) + (antip-antip-$\pi^{-}$) triplet correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Total lower-order contribution of p-p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{-}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p-$\pi^{-}$) + (antip-antip-$\pi^{+}$) triplet correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Total lower-order contribution of p-p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{+}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Cumulant of p-p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{-}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Cumulant of p-p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{+}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

KNO-scaled multiplicity distribution versus the KNO variable $N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\rangle$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $|\eta|<2.4$.

KNO-scaled multiplicity distribution versus the KNO variable $N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\rangle$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $|\eta|<3.0$.

KNO-scaled multiplicity distribution versus the KNO variable $N_{\rm ch}/\langle N_{\rm ch}\rangle$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $|\eta|<3.4$.

KNO-scaled multiplicity distribution versus the KNO variable $N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\rangle$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $-3.4<\eta<5.0$.

KNO-scaled multiplicity distribution versus the KNO variable $N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\rangle$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $-3.4<\eta<-1.0$.

KNO-scaled multiplicity distribution versus the KNO variable $N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\rangle$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $2.0<\eta<5.0$.

Average charged-particle multiplicity normalised by the average number of participating nucleon pairs in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ for the pseudorapidity interval $-3.4<\eta<5.0$.

The unfolded jet axis decorrelation distribution,$\frac{1}{N} \frac{dN}{d\Delta j}$, as a function of $\Delta j$ for the $0-10\%$, $10-30\%$, $30-50\%$, and $50-80\%$ centrality bins in the $230 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 300$ GeV interval.

Upsilon 1S+2S+3S integrated cross section.

Upsilon 1S+2S+3S invariant cross section.

Upsilon 2S and 3S invariant cross section.

Upsilon 1S+2S+3S invariant cross section vs. rapidity.

Upsilon 1S invariant cross section.

Upsilon 2S invariant cross section.

Upsilon 3S invariant cross section.

Upsilon 1S invariant cross section vs. rapidity.

Upsilon 2S invariant cross section vs. rapidity.

Upsilon 3S invariant cross section vs. rapidity.

Upsilon x_{T} dependence

Upsilon x_{T} dependence.

Upsilon cross section ratios vs. collision energy.

Upsilon cross section ratios vs. charged particle multiplicity.

Upsilon cross section ratios vs. charged particle multiplicity.

Upsilon cross section ratios vs. charged particle multiplicity.

Upsilon cross section ratios vs. charged particle multiplicity.

Upsilon cross section ratios vs. charged particle multiplicity.

Self-normalized Upsilon ratio vs. charged particle multiplicity

Self-normalized Upsilon ratio vs. charged particle multiplicity

$a_2(1320)$ differential cross section in the m=-2 projection split into different reflectivity components, $\frac{d\sigma^+_{-2}}{dt}$ and $\frac{d\sigma^-_{-2}}{dt}$, in bins of four-momentum transfer. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic.

$a_2(1320)$ differential cross section in the m=0 projection split into different reflectivity components, $\frac{d\sigma^+_{0}}{dt}$ and $\frac{d\sigma^-_{0}}{dt}$, in bins of four-momentum transfer. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic.

$a_2(1320)$ differential cross section in the m=+1 projection split into different reflectivity components, $\frac{d\sigma^+_{+1}}{dt}$ and $\frac{d\sigma^-_{+1}}{dt}$, in bins of four-momentum transfer. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic.

$a_2(1320)$ differential cross section in the m=+2 projection split into different reflectivity components, $\frac{d\sigma^+_{+2}}{dt}$ and $\frac{d\sigma^-_{+2}}{dt}$, in bins of four-momentum transfer. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic.

NSC(6,3) vs centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV

NSC(5,4) vs centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV