FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 2. (Color online) Fit decomposition of the $46 \%-56 \%$ centrality data for 62 -GeV Au-Au collisions. The top panels show from left to right the corrected data, model fit, fit residuals (data - model), and same-side 2D Gaussian. The bottom panels similarly show the away-side azimuth dipole, the nonjet azimuth quadrupole, the 1D $\eta_{\Delta}$ Gaussian, and the 2D exponential. This centrality is just below the sharp transition at $v_{\text {trans }}=3$. Fit residuals (c) are scaled up eightfold relative to the data.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) 2D data histogram from $0 \%-5 \%$ central 200 GeV Au-Au collisions $[(0,0)$ bin suppressed]. (b) Additional model component fitted to the $2 \mathrm{D}$ histogram and consisting of an AS azimuth dipole modulated by function $F\left(\eta_{\Delta}\right)$ described in the text. (c) Fit residuals including the new model component. (d) Data histogram in the first panel minus the additional model component and fitted offset. Remaining structure is described accurately by an AS dipole and SS 2D Gaussian.

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 11. (Color online) (Left) Uncorrected angular correlations from 62-GeV $37 \%-46 \%$ central Au-Au collisions showing pileup distortions, especially evident as the W-shaped nonuniformity of the AS ridge on $\eta_{\Delta}$. (Right) The same data with pileup correction applied.

Normalised D*+- cross section, corrected to the parton level, as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Normalised D*+- cross section, for W < 170 GeV, as a function of zJet for the D*+- jet sample.

Normalised D*+- cross section, for W > 170 GeV, as a function of zJet for the D*+- jet sample.

Normalised D*+- cross section, for W < 170 GeV, as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Normalised D*+- cross section, for W > 170 GeV, as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Normalised D*+- cross section as a function of zHem for the no D*+- jet sample.

Normalised D*+- cross section, corrected to the parton level, as a function of zHem for the no D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section as a function of zJet for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, corrected to the parton level, as a function of zJet for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, corrected to the parton level, as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, for W < 170 GeV, as a function of zJet for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, for W > 170 GeV, as a function of zJet for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, for W < 170 GeV, as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, for W > 170 GeV, as a function of zHem for the D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section as a function of zHem for the no D*+- jet sample.

Covariance Matrix for the normalised D*+- cross section, corrected to the parton level, as a function of zHem for the no D*+- jet sample.

FIG. 1: (a) Raw two-particle correlation signal $Y_2$ (red), background $aB_{inc}F_2$ (solid histogram), and background systematic uncertainty from a (dashed histograms). (b) Background-subtracted two-particle correlation $\hat{Y}_2$ (red), and systematic uncertainties due to a (dashed histograms) and flow (blue histograms). (c) Raw three-particle correlation $Y_3$. (d) $ba^2Y_{inc}^2$ . (e) Sum of trig-corr-bkgd and trigger flow. Data are from 12% central Au+Au collisions. Statistical errors in (a,b) are smaller than the point size.

FIG. 1: (a) Raw two-particle correlation signal $Y_2$ (red), background $aB_{inc}F_2$ (solid histogram), and background systematic uncertainty from a (dashed histograms). (b) Background-subtracted two-particle correlation $\hat{Y}_2$ (red), and systematic uncertainties due to a (dashed histograms) and flow (blue histograms). (c) Raw three-particle correlation $Y_3$. (d) $ba^2Y_{inc}^2$ . (e) Sum of trig-corr-bkgd and trigger flow. Data are from 12% central Au+Au collisions. Statistical errors in (a,b) are smaller than the point size.

FIG. 2: Background subtracted three-particle correlations, $\hat{Y}_3$, for (a) pp, (b) d+Au, (c) 80-50% Au+Au, (d) 50-30% Au+Au, (e) 30-10% Au+Au, and (f) 12% central Au+Au. Statistical errors per bin are approximately $\pm$0.012 in (a) and $\pm$0.006 in (b), both at ($\pi$, $\pi$), and are $\pm$0.022, $\pm$0.049, $\pm$0.099 and $\pm$0.077 from (c) to (f), similar for all bins.

FIG. 2: Background subtracted three-particle correlations, $\hat{Y}_3$, for (a) pp, (b) d+Au, (c) 80-50% Au+Au, (d) 50-30% Au+Au, (e) 30-10% Au+Au, and (f) 12% central Au+Au. Statistical errors per bin are approximately $\pm$0.012 in (a) and $\pm$0.006 in (b), both at ($\pi$, $\pi$), and are $\pm$0.022, $\pm$0.049, $\pm$0.099 and $\pm$0.077 from (c) to (f), similar for all bins.

FIG. 2: Background subtracted three-particle correlations, $\hat{Y}_3$, for (a) pp, (b) d+Au, (c) 80-50% Au+Au, (d) 50-30% Au+Au, (e) 30-10% Au+Au, and (f) 12% central Au+Au. Statistical errors per bin are approximately $\pm$0.012 in (a) and $\pm$0.006 in (b), both at ($\pi$, $\pi$), and are $\pm$0.022, $\pm$0.049, $\pm$0.099 and $\pm$0.077 from (c) to (f), similar for all bins.

FIG. 2: Background subtracted three-particle correlations, $\hat{Y}_3$, for (a) pp, (b) d+Au, (c) 80-50% Au+Au, (d) 50-30% Au+Au, (e) 30-10% Au+Au, and (f) 12% central Au+Au. Statistical errors per bin are approximately $\pm$0.012 in (a) and $\pm$0.006 in (b), both at ($\pi$, $\pi$), and are $\pm$0.022, $\pm$0.049, $\pm$0.099 and $\pm$0.077 from (c) to (f), similar for all bins.

FIG. 2: Background subtracted three-particle correlations, $\hat{Y}_3$, for (a) pp, (b) d+Au, (c) 80-50% Au+Au, (d) 50-30% Au+Au, (e) 30-10% Au+Au, and (f) 12% central Au+Au. Statistical errors per bin are approximately $\pm$0.012 in (a) and $\pm$0.006 in (b), both at ($\pi$, $\pi$), and are $\pm$0.022, $\pm$0.049, $\pm$0.099 and $\pm$0.077 from (c) to (f), similar for all bins.

FIG. 2: Background subtracted three-particle correlations, $\hat{Y}_3$, for (a) pp, (b) d+Au, (c) 80-50% Au+Au, (d) 50-30% Au+Au, (e) 30-10% Au+Au, and (f) 12% central Au+Au. Statistical errors per bin are approximately $\pm$0.012 in (a) and $\pm$0.006 in (b), both at ($\pi$, $\pi$), and are $\pm$0.022, $\pm$0.049, $\pm$0.099 and $\pm$0.077 from (c) to (f), similar for all bins.

Projections of away-side three-particle correlations along the diagonal $\Sigma$ within 0 < $\Delta$ < 0.35 (squares) and along the off-diagonal $\Delta$ within |$\Sigma$| < 0.35 (points) in (a) d+Au and (b) 12% central Au+Au collisions. The shaded areas indicate systematic uncertainties on the off-diagonal projections. The histogram in (a) is the near-side off-diagonal projection. The histogram in (b) is the away-side off-diagonal projection of our result with a = b = 1. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Projections of away-side three-particle correlations along the diagonal $\Sigma$ within 0 < $\Delta$ < 0.35 (squares) and along the off-diagonal $\Delta$ within |$\Sigma$| < 0.35 (points) in (a) d+Au and (b) 12% central Au+Au collisions. The shaded areas indicate systematic uncertainties on the off-diagonal projections. The histogram in (a) is the near-side off-diagonal projection. The histogram in (b) is the away-side off-diagonal projection of our result with a = b = 1. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Three-particle correlation strength per radian$^2$ versus ($N_{part}$/2)$^{1/3}$ where $N_{part}$ is the number of participants. Some of the data points have been displaced in $N_{part}$ for clarity.

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the axis which maximises the sum of the longitudinal momenta in the current hemisphere, for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the axis which maximises the sum of the longitudinal momenta in the current hemisphere, for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the axis which maximises the sum of the longitudinal momenta in the current hemisphere, for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the axis which maximises the sum of the longitudinal momenta in the current hemisphere, for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Normalised distribution of (1-THRUST) where THRUST is w.r.t the vitrual photon axis, for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Normalised distribution of Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Normalised distribution of the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Normalised distribution of the C-Parameter, for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Mean values of the event shape variables.

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST(C)), for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Covariance matrix for (1-THRUST), for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Covariance matrix for the Jet Broadening (B), for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Covariance matrix for the squared Jet Mass (RHO), for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 14.0 to 16.0 GeV and X = 0.00841 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 16.0 to 20.0 GeV and X = 0.01180 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 20.0 to 30.0 GeV and X = 0.02090 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 30.0 to 50.0 GeV and X = 0.04910 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 50.0 to 70.0 GeV and X = 0.11600 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 70.0 to 100.0 GeV and X = 0.19900 .

Covariance matrix for the C-Parameter, for Q = 100.0 to 200.0 GeV and X = 0.32300 .

Correlation matrices obtained with the PYTHIA Monte Carlo in the Q**2 range 11 TO 14 GeV**2.

Correlation matrices obtained with the PYTHIA Monte Carlo in the Q**2 range 14 TO 20 GeV**2.

Correlation matrices obtained with the PYTHIA Monte Carlo in the Q**2 range 20 TO 34 GeV**2.

Correlation matrices obtained with the TWOGAM Monte Carlo in the Q**2 range 11 TO 14 GeV**2.

Correlation matrices obtained with the TWOGAM Monte Carlo in the Q**2 range 14 TO 20 GeV**2.

Correlation matrices obtained with the TWOGAM Monte Carlo in the Q**2 range 20 TO 34 GeV**2.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the Q**2 range 11 TO 14 GEV**2.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the Q**2 range 14 TO 20 GEV**2.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the Q**2 range 20 TO 34 GEV**2.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the X range 0.01 TO 0.1.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the X range 0.1 TO 0.2.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the X range 0.2 TO 0.3.

Measured values of F2/APLHA in the X range 0.3 TO 0.5.

Two-parameter fit. The matrix of correlation coeffocients.

Two-parameter fit. The matrix of correlation coeffocients.

Two-parameter fit. The matrix of correlation coeffocients.

The errors are statistical. Three-parameter fit.

The errors are statistical. Three-parameter fit.

Three-parameter fit. The matrix of correlation coeffocients.

Three-parameter fit. The matrix of correlation coeffocients.

The errors are statistical. Three-parameter fit.

Three-parameter fit. The matrix of correlation coeffocients.

.

.

.

.