Charged particle multiplicity distribution.

Average charged particle transverse momentum as a function of the number of charged particles in the event.

Pseusdorapidity densities for the INEL>0 class of data as a function of pseudorapidity for centre-of mass energy 0.9 TeV. Note that this data is not in the paper but has been approved by the collaboration.

Pseusdorapidity densities for the INEL>0 class of data as a function of pseudorapidity for centre-of mass energy 2.36 TeV. Note that this data is not in the paper but has been approved by the collaboration.

Pseusdorapidity densities for the INEL>0 class of data as a function of pseudorapidity for centre-of mass energy 7 TeV. Note that this data is not in the paper but has been approved by the collaboration.

The TPC mid-rapidity multiplicity distributions ($|\eta|$ < 0.5) for the corresponding E-FTPC selected centrality bins.

Uncorrected charged particle multiplicity distribution measured in the TPC within $|\eta|$ < 0.5 in pp collisions at 200 GeV.

The ratio of the transverse overlap area $S_{⊥}$ to $(N_{part}/2)^{2/3}$ versus $(N_{part}/2)^{2/3}$.

The ratio of the transverse overlap area $S_{⊥}$ to $(N_{part}/2)^{2/3}$ versus $(N_{part}/2)^{2/3}$.

The ratio of the transverse overlap area $S_{⊥}$ to $(N_{part}/2)^{2/3}$ versus $(N_{part}/2)^{2/3}$.

The ratio of the charged pion multiplicity to the transverse overlap area $dN_{\pi}/dy/S_{⊥}$ versus $N_{coll}/N_{part}$. Errors shown are total errors, dominated by systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties are correlated between Npart, Ncoll, and S⊥, and are largely canceled in the plotted ratio quantities.

The ratio of the charged pion multiplicity to the transverse overlap area $dN_{\pi}/dy/S_{⊥}$ versus $N_{coll}/N_{part}$. Errors shown are total errors, dominated by systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties are correlated between Npart, Ncoll, and S⊥, and are largely canceled in the plotted ratio quantities.

The ratio of the charged pion multiplicity to the transverse overlap area $dN_{\pi}/dy/S_{⊥}$ versus $N_{coll}/N_{part}$. Errors shown are total errors, dominated by systematic uncertainties. The systematic uncertainties are correlated between Npart, Ncoll, and S⊥, and are largely canceled in the plotted ratio quantities.

Energy loss effect for $\pi^{+-}$ (a), $K^{+-}$ (b), and p and pbar (c) at mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) as a function of particle momentum magnitude in 200 GeV pp and 62.4 GeV central 0-5% Au+Au collisions. Only negative particles are shown; energy loss for particles and antiparticles are the same. Errors shown are statistical only. The pion energy loss is already corrected by the track reconstruction algorithm.

Energy loss effect for $\pi^{+-}$ (a), $K^{+-}$ (b), and p and pbar (c) at mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) as a function of particle momentum magnitude in 200 GeV pp and 62.4 GeV central 0-5% Au+Au collisions. Only negative particles are shown; energy loss for particles and antiparticles are the same. Errors shown are statistical only. The pion energy loss is already corrected by the track reconstruction algorithm.

Energy loss effect for $\pi^{+-}$ (a), $K^{+-}$ (b), and p and pbar (c) at mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) as a function of particle momentum magnitude in 200 GeV pp and 62.4 GeV central 0-5% Au+Au collisions. Only negative particles are shown; energy loss for particles and antiparticles are the same. Errors shown are statistical only. The pion energy loss is already corrected by the track reconstruction algorithm.

Vertex-finding efficiency (ǫvtx) and fake vertex rate (δfake) as a function of the number of good global tracks (a) and the number of good primary tracks (b). Errors shown or smaller than the point size are statistical only.

Vertex-finding efficiency (ǫvtx) and fake vertex rate (δfake) as a function of the number of good global tracks (a) and the number of good primary tracks (b). Errors shown or smaller than the point size are statistical only.

The $p_{T}$ dependent correction to particle spectra due to fake vertex events, $\epsilon_{fake}(p_{T})$, in 200 GeV minimum bias pp and d+Au collisions. Errors shown are statistical only.

The $p_{T}$ dependent correction to particle spectra due to fake vertex events, $\epsilon_{fake}(p_{T})$, in 200 GeV minimum bias pp and d+Au collisions. Errors shown are statistical only.

Efficiency (product of tracking efficiency and detector acceptance) of π−, K−, and p in pp (a) and d+Au collisions (b) at 200 GeV as a function of input MC p⊥. Errors shown are binomial errors. The curves are parameterizations to the efficiency data and are used for corrections in the analysis.

Efficiency (product of tracking efficiency and detector acceptance) of π−, K−, and p in pp (a) and d+Au collisions (b) at 200 GeV as a function of input MC p⊥. Errors shown are binomial errors. The curves are parameterizations to the efficiency data and are used for corrections in the analysis.

Efficiency (product of tracking efficiency and detector acceptance) of π−, K−, and p in 70-80% peripheral Au+Au (a) and 0-5% central Au+Au collisions (b) at 62.4 GeV as a function of input MC p⊥. Errors shown are binomial errors. The curves are parameterizations to the efficiency data and are used for corrections in the analysis.

Efficiency (product of tracking efficiency and detector acceptance) of π−, K−, and p in 70-80% peripheral Au+Au (a) and 0-5% central Au+Au collisions (b) at 62.4 GeV as a function of input MC p⊥. Errors shown are binomial errors. The curves are parameterizations to the efficiency data and are used for corrections in the analysis.

Efficiency (product of tracking efficiency and detector acceptance) of π−, K−, and p in 70-80% peripheral Au+Au (a) and 0-5% central Au+Au collisions (b) at 62.4 GeV as a function of input MC p⊥. Errors shown are binomial errors. The curves are parameterizations to the efficiency data and are used for corrections in the analysis.

Efficiency (product of tracking efficiency and detector acceptance) of π−, K−, and p in 70-80% peripheral Au+Au (a) and 0-5% central Au+Au collisions (b) at 62.4 GeV as a function of input MC p⊥. Errors shown are binomial errors. The curves are parameterizations to the efficiency data and are used for corrections in the analysis.

The dca distributions of protons and antiprotons for 0.40 < p⊥ < 0.45 GeV/c in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au. Errors shown are statistical only.

The dca distributions of protons and antiprotons for 0.70 < p⊥ < 0.75 GeV/c in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au. Errors shown are statistical only.

The dca distributions of protons and antiprotons for 0.40 < p⊥ < 0.45 GeV/c in 62.4 GeV 0-5% central Au+Au collisions. Errors shown are statistical only.

The dca distributions of protons and antiprotons for 0.70 < p⊥ < 0.75 GeV/c in 62.4 GeV 0-5% central Au+Au collisions. Errors shown are statistical only.

Pion background fraction from weak decays ($\Lambda, K_S^0$) and $\mu^{+-}$ contamination as a function of p⊥ in minimum bias d+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Errors shown are statistical only.

Pion background fraction from weak decays ($\Lambda, K_S^0$) and $\mu^{+-}$ contamination as a function of p⊥ in minimum bias d+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Errors shown are statistical only.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity identified antiproton spectra in 200 GeV minimum bias d+Au (a) and 62.4 GeV central Au+Au collisions (b) measured by dE/dx together with those by TOF [46, 47]. The dE/dx data are from |y| < 0.1 and the TOF data are from |y| < 0.5. The curves are various fits to the dE/dx data for extrapolation. The quadratic sum of statistical errors and point-to-point systematic errors are plotted, but are smaller than the point size.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in d+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The p and pbar spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for three centrality bins and for minimum bias events. Spectra from top to bottom are for 0-20% scaled by 4, 20-40% scaled by 2, minimum bias not scaled, and 40-100% scaled by 1/2. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the minimum bias data; the normalizations of the curves are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in d+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The p and pbar spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for three centrality bins and for minimum bias events. Spectra from top to bottom are for 0-20% scaled by 4, 20-40% scaled by 2, minimum bias not scaled, and 40-100% scaled by 1/2. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the minimum bias data; the normalizations of the curves are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in d+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The p and pbar spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for three centrality bins and for minimum bias events. Spectra from top to bottom are for 0-20% scaled by 4, 20-40% scaled by 2, minimum bias not scaled, and 40-100% scaled by 1/2. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the minimum bias data; the normalizations of the curves are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The p and p spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for nine centrality bins, from top to bottom, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50%, 50-60%, 60-70%, and 70-80%. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the spectra; the normalizations of the curves in (a,b) are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The p and p spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for nine centrality bins, from top to bottom, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50%, 50-60%, 60-70%, and 70-80%. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the spectra; the normalizations of the curves in (a,b) are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The p and p spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for nine centrality bins, from top to bottom, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50%, 50-60%, 60-70%, and 70-80%. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the spectra; the normalizations of the curves in (a,b) are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified particle spectra in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The p and p spectra are inclusive, including weak decay products. Spectra are plotted for nine centrality bins, from top to bottom, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50%, 50-60%, 60-70%, and 70-80%. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but are smaller than the point size. The curves are the blast-wave model fits to the spectra; the normalizations of the curves in (a,b) are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) identified pion spectra in Au+Au collisions at 130 GeV. Spectra are plotted for eight centrality bins, from top to bottom, 0-6%, 6-11%, 11-18%, 18- 26%, 26-34%, 34-45%, 45-58%, and 58-85%. Errors plotted are statistical and point-to-point systematic errors added in quadrature, but they are smaller than the data point size. The curves are the Bose-Einstein fits to the spectra; the normalizations of the curves are fixed by the corresponding negative particle spectra.

Estimate of the product of the Bjorken energy density and the formation time ($\epsilon_{B_j}\tau$) as a function of centrality Npart. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Estimate of the product of the Bjorken energy density and the formation time ($\epsilon_{B_j}\tau$) as a function of centrality Npart. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Estimate of the product of the Bjorken energy density and the formation time ($\epsilon_{B_j}\tau$) as a function of centrality Npart. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The K+/π+ and K−/π− ratios as a function of the collision energy in pp and central heavy-ion collisions.

The K+/K− ratio as a function of the collision energy in central heavy-ion collisions.

The K−/π− ratio as a function of the number of participants Npart in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The K−/π− ratio as a function of the number of participants Npart in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The K−/π− ratio as a function of the number of participants Npart in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The K−/π− ratio as a function of dNπ/dy/S⊥ in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The K−/π− ratio as a function of dNπ/dy/S⊥ in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The K−/π− ratio as a function of dNπ/dy/S⊥ in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. Errors shown are the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Baryon chemical potential extracted for central heavy-ion collisions as a function of the collision energy. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

The extracted chemical freeze-out temperatures for central heavy-ion collisions as a function of the collision energy. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

The extracted chemical freeze-out temperatures for central heavy-ion collisions as a function of the collision energy. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

The extracted kinetic freeze-out temperatures for central heavy-ion collisions as a function of the collision energy. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

Average transverse radial flow velocity extracted from the blast-wave model for central heavy-ion collisions as a function of the collision energy. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

Phase diagram plot of chemical freezeout temperature versus baryon chemical potential extracted from chemical equilibrium models. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

Phase diagram plot of chemical freezeout temperature versus baryon chemical potential extracted from chemical equilibrium models. Errors shown are the total statistical and systematic errors.

Differential cross-sections obtained from the optical and MC Glauber calculations for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Statistical errors are smaller than the point size.

Differential cross-sections obtained from the optical and MC Glauber calculations for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Statistical errors are smaller than the point size.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the completed data samples. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the 'Dir' domain. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the 'SR' domain. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Distribution of the total energy outside the reconstructed jets for the 'DR' domain. Also tabulated is the estimated background.

Observed distribution of the charged particle multiplicity.

Observed distribution of the charged particle invariant mass.

Observed distribution of the mean of X(C=GAMMA-PLUS) and X(GAMMA-MINUS).

Observed mean number of particles in the reconstructed jets.

Differential cross section for XI- production.

Differential cross section for XI(1530)0 production.

Differential cross section for XI(1530)0 production.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA production.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA production.

Differential cross section for XI- production.

Mean number per hadronic event in the restricted PT and ETARAP phase space.

Mean number per hadronic event extrapolated to the full phase space.

K0S inclusive invariant PT distribution for HARD events at a centre of massenergy 630 GeV.

K0S inclusive invariant PT distribution for MB events at a centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

K0S inclusive invariant PT distribution for SOFT events at a centre of massenergy 630 GeV.

LAMBDA inclusive invariant PT distribution for HARD events at a centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

LAMBDA inclusive invariant PT distribution for MB events at a centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

LAMBDA inclusive invariant PT distribution for SOFT events at a centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

LAMBDA inclusive invariant PT distribution for HARD events at a centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

LAMBDA inclusive invariant PT distribution for MB events at a centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

LAMBDA inclusive invariant PT distribution for SOFT events at a centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Average PT of K0S at a centre of mass 1800 GeV for the MB data sample.

Average PT of LAMBDA at a centre of mass 1800 GeV for the MB data sample.

Average PT of K0S at a centre of mass 1800 GeV for the SOFT data sample.

Average PT of LAMBDA at a centre of mass 1800 GeV for the SOFT data sample.

Average PT of K0S at a centre of mass 1800 GeV for the HARD data sample.

Average PT of LAMBDA at a centre of mass 1800 GeV for the HARD data sample.

Average PT of K0S at a centre of mass 630 GeV for the MB data sample.

Average PT of LAMBDA at a centre of mass 630 GeV for the MB data sample.

Average PT of K0S at a centre of mass 630 GeV for the SOFT data sample.

Average PT of LAMBDA at a centre of mass 630 GeV for the SOFT data sample.

Average PT of K0S at a centre of mass 630 GeV for the HARD data sample.

Average PT of LAMBDA at a centre of mass 630 GeV for the HARD data sample.

Mean number of K0S per event divided by the charged multiplicity for the HARD data sample at centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

Mean number of K0S per event divided by the charged multiplicity for the MBdata sample at centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

Mean number of K0S per event divided by the charged multiplicity for the SOFT data sample at centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

Mean number of K0S per event divided by the charged multiplicity for the HARD data sample at centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Mean number of K0S per event divided by the charged multiplicity for the MBdata sample at centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Mean number of K0S per event divided by the charged multiplicity for the SOFT data sample at centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Mean number of LAMBDA per event divided by the charged multiplicity for theHARD data sample at centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

Mean number of LAMBDA per event divided by the charged multiplicity for theMB data sample at centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

Mean number of LAMBDA per event divided by the charged multiplicity for theSOFT data sample at centre of mass energy 1800 GeV.

Mean number of LAMBDA per event divided by the charged multiplicity for theHARD data sample at centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Mean number of LAMBDA per event divided by the charged multiplicity for theMB data sample at centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Mean number of LAMBDA per event divided by the charged multiplicity for theSOFT data sample at centre of mass energy 630 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 172.3 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 182.8 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 188.6 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 194.4 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 200.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 206.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 130.1 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 136.1 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 161.3 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 172.3 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 182.8 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 188.6 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 194.4 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 200.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 206.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the Cambridge algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 202.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the Cambridge algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 206.2 GeV.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for the C-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the C-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the C-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the D-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the D-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the D-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the THRUST at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the RHO(C=HEAVY) at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV forlight quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the BT at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the BW at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the C-PARAM at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the D-PARAM at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the THRUST distribution as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)) as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the total jet broadening (BT) as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the wide jet broadening (BW) as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the C-PARAM as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the D-PARAM as a function of c.m. energy.

Charged particle multiplicities at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for all flavour, light quark (udsc) and bottom (b) flavour events.

Charged particle multiplicity.

Charged particle multiplicity.

Charged particle multiplicity.

First and second moment of the charged particle multiplicity distribution at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for all flavours and for udsc an b flavours.

First and second moment of the charged particle multiplicity distribution at c.m. energy.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at higher c.m. energies.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at higher c.m. energies.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at higher c.m. energies.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

XP distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

Peak position in XI distribution for different c.m. energies.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

XI distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

XE distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

PTIN distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

PTOUT distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T THRUST AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 172.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 183.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 189.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 196.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 200.0 GeV.

RAPIDITY W.R.T. SPHERICITY AXIS distribution at c.m. energy 206.0 GeV.

Combined results for ALPHAS.

Event shape means.

THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

1-THRUST distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Heavy Jet Mass (RHO) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Total jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Wide jet broadening distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

C-PARAMETER distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Thrust Major distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Thrust Minor distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Jet Mass Difference distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Aplanarity distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Planarity distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Oblateness distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

Sphericity distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

LN(Y12) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

LN(Y23) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

LN(Y34) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y45) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

LN(Y56) distribution at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

1-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

2-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

3-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

4-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

5-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 91.20 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 133.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 161.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 172.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 183.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 189.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 200.00 GeV.

>=6-jet fraction at c.m. energy 206.00 GeV.

Measured yields as a function of Q**2.

Measured yields as a function the Bjorken X variable.

Measured yields as a function the Bjorken Y variable. Note: this data was not in the paper.

Ratios of measured yields for K0S/LAMBDA and LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR as a functionof E, the neutrino energy.

Ratios of measured yields for K0S/LAMBDA and LAMBDABAR/LAMBDA as a functionof W**2.

Ratios of measured yields for K0S/LAMBDA and LAMBDABAR/LAMBDA as a functionof Q**2.

Ratios of measured yields for K0S/LAMBDA and LAMBDABAR/LAMBDA as a functionof the Bjorken X variable.

Efficiency corrected Feynman X distributions.

Efficiency corrected Z distributions.

Efficiency corrected Z distributions for K0S production in two Feynman X regions.

Efficiency corrected Z distributions for LAMDBA production in two Feynman Xregions.

Efficiency corrected Z distributions for LAMDBABAR production in two Feynman X regions.

Efficiency corrected PT**2 distributions.

Efficiency corrected PT**2 distributions for K0S production in two Feynman X regions. Note: this data does not appear in the paper.

Efficiency corrected PT**2 distributions for LAMBDA production in two Feynman X regions. Note: this data does not appear in the paper.

Efficiency corrected PT**2 distributions for LAMBDABAR production in two Feynman X regions. Note: this data does not appear in the paper.

Efficiency corrected mean PT**2 versus Feynman X distributions.