MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PP collision

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

The test statistic q as a function of $\mu_{\mathrm{ttH}}$ for all decay modes at 7+8 TeV and at 13 TeV, separately, and for all decay modes at all CM energies. The expected SM result for the overall combination is also shown.

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

The nuclear modification factor of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The nuclear modification factor of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points. Bins where no data point has been reported are denoted as 'empty'.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The average N_part, N_coll, and TAA for various centrality classes of XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.

The expected and observed constraints on chargino lifetime and mass. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%. Chargino masses that are less than those on the curve are excluded at 95% CL.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section for direct production of charginos and their branching fraction to $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ as a function of chargino mass and lifetime. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2015 data-taking period, corresponding to $2.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016A data-taking period, corresponding to $8.3\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016B data-taking period, corresponding to $27.4\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 460-550

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 550-650

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 650-760

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 760-900

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 900-1000

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1000-1100

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1100-1200

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1200-1300

Absolute cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1300-\infty

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 200-260

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 260-350

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 350-460

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 460-550

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 550-650

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 650-760

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 760-900

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 900-1000

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1000-1100

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1100-1200

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1200-1300

Absolute cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1300-\infty

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 200-260

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 260-350

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 350-460

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 460-550

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 550-650

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 650-760

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 760-900

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 900-1000

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1000-1100

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1100-1200

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1200-1300

Normalized cross section for ungroomed jets for pt = 1300-\infty

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 200-260

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 260-350

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 350-460

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 460-550

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 550-650

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 650-760

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 760-900

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 900-1000

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1000-1100

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1100-1200

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1200-1300

Normalized cross section for groomed jets for pt = 1300-\infty

Observed ST distribution in the tau-tau signal region, compared to the expected SM background contributions. The distribution labeled electroweak contains the contributions from W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes. The signal distributions for single-leptoquark (LQ) production with mass 700 GeV are overlaid to illustrate the sensitivity. For the signal normalization, lambda = 1 and beta = 1 are assumed. The background uncertainty bands represent the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic uncertainties obtained from the fit. The lower panels show the ratio between the observed and expected events in each bin. In all plots, the horizontal and vertical error bars on the data points represent the bin widths and the Poisson uncertainties, respectively.

Observed ST distribution in the e-mu control region, compared to the expected SM background contributions. The distribution labeled electroweak contains the contributions from W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes. The signal distributions for single-leptoquark (LQ) production with mass 700 GeV are overlaid to illustrate the sensitivity. For the signal normalization, lambda = 1 and beta = 1 are assumed. The background uncertainty bands represent the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic uncertainties obtained from the fit. The lower panels show the ratio between the observed and expected events in each bin. In all plots, the horizontal and vertical error bars on the data points represent the bin widths and the Poisson uncertainties, respectively.

The covariance matrix of the bin contents of the background fit. em stands for e-mu channel, et for e-tau channel, mt for mu-tau channel, and tt for tau-tau channel. The numbers indicate the bin number in each final state.

Observed (black solid) and expected (black dotted) limits at 95% confidence level on the product of cross section (sigma) and branching fraction beta, obtained from the combination of the e-tau, mu-tau, and tau-tau signal regions, as well as from the emu control region, as a function of the leptoquark (LQ) mass. The green and yellow bands represent the one and two standard deviation uncertainties in the expected limits. The theory prediction is indicated by the blue solid line, together with systematic uncertainties due to the choice of PDF and renormalization and factorization scales, indicated by the blue band. For generator-level cuts, please refer to the resource.

Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% confidence level on the Yukawa coupling (lambda) at the leptoquark(LQ)-lepton-quark vertex, as a function of the LQ mass. A unit branching fraction beta of the LQ to a tau lepton and a bottom quark is assumed. The orange vertical line indicates the limit obtained from a search for pair-produced LQs decaying to lepton-tau-bb. The left-hand side of the dotted (solid) line shows the expected (observed) exclusion region for the present analysis. The gray band shows +/- 1 standard deviations of the expected exclusion limit. The region with diagonal blue shading shows the parameter space preferred by one of the models proposed to explain anomalies observed in B physics.

Distribution of $d_{BV}$ in $\geq$5-track one-vertex events for data and simulated multijet signals with $m$ = 800 GeV, production cross section 1 fb, and $c\tau$ = 0.3, 1.0, and 10 mm. Event preselection and vertex selection criteria have been applied. The last bin includes the overflow events.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with two 3-track vertices. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with one 4-track vertex and one 3-track vertex. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with two 4-track vertices. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with two $\geq$5-track vertices. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Observed 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass and mean proper decay length.

Observed 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass and mean proper decay length.

Mass exclusion curves for the multijet signals, assuming gluino pair production cross sections and 100% branching fraction.

Mass exclusion curves for the dijet signals, assuming top squark pair production cross sections and 100% branching fraction.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 0.3 mm. The gluino pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 0.3 mm. The top squark pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 1.0 mm. The gluino pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 1.0 mm. The top squark pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 10 mm. The gluino pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 10 mm. The top squark pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 1600 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 1600 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 2400 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 2400 GeV.