Measured cross sections for Z0 production.

Ratios of W to Z cross sections.

Ratios of W+ to W- cross sections.

Measured cross sections in the restricted fiducial and kinematic acceptance for W and Z production in the electron decay channel.

Measured cross sections in the restricted fiducial and kinematic acceptance for W production in the muon decay channel.

Measured cross sections in the restricted fiducial and kinematic acceptance for Z production in the muon decay channel.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 GeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.25 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 900 GeV (0.25 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 GeV ($0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev (0.25 < pT < 2.5 GeV/c) in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ over $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev for $2.0 < y < 4.0$ in intervals of $p_T$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev for $2.0 < y < 4.0$ in intervals of $p_T$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($2.0 < y < 4.0$; $0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($2.0 < y < 4.0$; $0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7TeV in y interals for (0.15<PT<0.65),(0.65<PT<1.00),(1.00<PT<2.50) GeV/c.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.15 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7TeV in y interals for (0.15<PT<0.65),(0.65<PT<1.00),(1.00<PT<2.50) GeV/c.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.15 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7 TeV (0.15 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV ($0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 TeV (0.15 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV ($0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev for $2.0 < y < 4.5$ in $p_T$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev for $2.0 < y < 4.5$ in $p_T$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev ($2.0 < y < 4.5$; $0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev ($2.0 < y < 4.5$; $0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

$\Omega + \bar{\Omega}$ invariant mass spectra from Cu+Cu $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic combined.

$K^0_S$ invariant mass spectra from Au+Au $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic combined.

$\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ invariant mass spectra from Au+Au $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ yields have not been feed down subtracted from weak decays. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic combined.

$K^0_S$, $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$, spectra divided by $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ for Cu+Cu $0 − 10\%$ ($\langle N_{part} \rangle \sim 99$) and Au+Au $20 − 40\%$ ($\langle N_{part} \rangle \sim 141$) $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ yields have been feed down subtracted from weak decays. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic; for clarity the uncertainty on $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ has not been included. The curves show the functions described in the text used to extract $dN/dy$.

$\Xi + \bar{\Xi}$ spectra divided by $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ for Cu+Cu $0 − 10\%$ ($\langle N_{part} \rangle \sim 99$) $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic; for clarity the uncertainty on $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ has not been included. The curves show the functions described in the text used to extract $dN/dy$.

$\Xi + \bar{\Xi}$ spectra divided by $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ for Au+Au $20 − 40\%$ ($\langle N_{part} \rangle \sim 141$) $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic; for clarity the uncertainty on $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ has not been included. The curves show the functions described in the text used to extract $dN/dy$.

$\Omega + \bar{\Omega}$ spectra divided by $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ for Cu+Cu $0 − 10\%$ ($\langle N_{part} \rangle \sim 99$) $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic; for clarity the uncertainty on $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ has not been included. The curves show the functions described in the text used to extract $dN/dy$.

$\Omega + \bar{\Omega}$ spectra divided by $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ for Au+Au $20 − 40\%$ ($\langle N_{part} \rangle \sim 141$) $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The uncertainties on the spectra points are statistical and systematic; for clarity the uncertainty on $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ has not been included. The curves show the functions described in the text used to extract $dN/dy$.

The enhancement factor for (multi-) strange particles in Cu+Cu $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$ yields have been feed-down subtracted in all cases. The black bars show the normalization uncertainties, and the uncertainties for the heavy-ion points are the combined statistical and systematic errors. Curves described in the text, where $B_{K} = 2.0$, $B_{\Lambda} = 2.4$, $B_{\Xi} = 5.0$ and $B_{\Omega} = 12.1$.

The enhancement factor for (multi-) strange particles in Au+Au $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV collisions, where $|y| < 0.5$. The $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$ yields have been feed-down subtracted in all cases. The black bars show the normalization uncertainties, and the uncertainties for the heavy-ion points are the combined statistical and systematic errors. Curves described in the text, where $B_{K} = 2.0$, $B_{\Lambda} = 2.4$, $B_{\Xi} = 5.0$ and $B_{\Omega} = 12.1$.

Ratio of particle yields in central Cu+Cu and midcentral Au+Au collisions when $\langle N_{part} \rangle = 99$ in each case for $|y| < 0.5$. $\pi$ yields are from elsewhere [17]. Boxed uncertainties are from the Glauber calculations and are correlated for every particle. $\langle N_{part>1} \rangle$ refers to the parameterization shown by eq. 1, while the EPOS and AMPT models are described in the text. The default settings are used for each model. The vertical lines show the remaining independent statistical and systematic uncertainties.

$\rho^0$ production cross section determined with the data set collected with trigger B, as a function of momentum transfer $t$, fitted with a double exponential fit function in the range $t < 0.1$. The statistical errors are shown. The ratio of incoherent to coherent cross sections is measured to be $0.20 \pm 0.8$. The fit parameters are shown in Table I.

Comparison of theoretical predictions to the measured total cross section for coherent $\rho^0$ production as a functionof $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ . The measured cross section is based on the dataset collected with trigger B. The error bars show the sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. See text for details.

Differential cross section as a function of the 2nd leading jet PT for events with jet multiplicity >= 2.

Differential cross section as a function of the 3rd leading jet PT for events with jet multiplicity >= 3.

Differential cross section as a function of the 4th leading jet PT for events with jet multiplicity >= 4.

Differential cross section as a function of the scalar sum of the jet PTs (HT) for events with jet multiplicity >= 2.

Differential cross section as a function of the scalar sum of the jet PTs (HT) for events with jet multiplicity >= 3.

Differential cross section as a function of the scalar sum of the jet PTs (HT) for events with jet multiplicity >= 4.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 60 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 80 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 110 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT with R=0.4 for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 60 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT with R=0.4 for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 80 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet PT with R=0.4 for a minimum non-leading jet PT of 110 GeV. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the sum of the PTs of the two leading jets with R=0.6. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

3-to-2 jet differential cross section ratio as a function of the sum of the PTs of the two leading jets with R=0.4. Also tabulated are the theoretical values from a NLO pQCD calculation with total systematic error.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets having a rapidity difference in the range [4,5], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets having a rapidity difference in the range [5,6], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [1,2], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [2,3], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [3,4], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [4,5], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

Fully corrected average charged particle scalar PT Sum per unit of pseudorapidity and per radian as a function of the leading track-jet transverse momentum for proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 0.9 TeV.

Fully corrected average charged particle scalar PT Sum per unit of pseudorapidity and per radian as a function of the leading track-jet transverse momentum for proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV.

Ratio of the fully corrected average charged particle scalar PT Sum at 7 TeV to that at 0.9 TeV.

Normalized multiplicity distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 0.9 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 3 GeV.

Normalized multiplicity distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 3 GeV.

Normalized multiplicity distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 20 GeV.

Normalized scalar PT Sum distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 0.9 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 3 GeV.

Normalized scalar PT Sum distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 3 GeV.

Normalized scalar PT Sum distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 20 GeV.

PT distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 0.9 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 3 GeV.

PT distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 3 GeV.

PT distribution of charged particles produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the leading track-jet transverse momentum > 20 GeV.