Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and branching fraction squared, $\sigma (\tilde{\mathrm{t}} \, \bar{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}}) \, \mathcal{B}^{2} ( \tilde{\mathrm{t}} \rightarrow \mathrm{c} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 )$ (left panel), are shown using the color scale where the $\tilde{\mathrm{t}}$ mass is on the $x$-axis and the mass difference between the $\tilde{\mathrm{t}}$ and the LSP is on the $y$-axis. The expected lower mass limits (magenta line) together with their $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainties (magenta dashed lines) and the observed lower mass limits (black line) are indicated for 100% branching fractions.

Chargino-neutralino production. Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the two branching fractions, $\sigma (\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0) \, \mathcal{B} ( \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \rightarrow \mathrm{W}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 ) \, \mathcal{B} ( \tilde{\chi}_2^0 \rightarrow \mathrm{Z} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 )$, are shown using the color scale where the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm/\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ mass is on the $x$-axis and the mass difference between the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm/\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and the LSP is on the $y$-axis. For these results, based on the TChiWZ simplified model, the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ masses are set equal. The expected lower mass limits (magenta line) together with their $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainties (magenta dashed lines) and the observed lower mass limits (black line) are indicated for 100% branching fractions for Wino-like cross-sections (left panel) and for Higgsino-like cross-sections (right panel).

Chargino-neutralino production. Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the two branching fractions, $\sigma (\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \tilde{\chi}_2^0) \, \mathcal{B} ( \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \rightarrow \mathrm{W}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 ) \, \mathcal{B} ( \tilde{\chi}_2^0 \rightarrow \mathrm{Z} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 )$, are shown using the color scale where the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm/\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ mass is on the $x$-axis and the mass difference between the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm/\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and the LSP is on the $y$-axis. For these results, based on the TChiWZ simplified model, the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ masses are set equal. The expected lower mass limits (magenta line) together with their $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainties (magenta dashed lines) and the observed lower mass limits (black line) are indicated for 100% branching fractions for Wino-like cross-sections (left panel) and for Higgsino-like cross-sections (right panel).

Chargino pair production. The left panel shows the observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction squared, $\sigma (\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^- ) \, \mathcal{B}^{2} ( \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \rightarrow \mathrm{W}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 ) $ are shown using the color scale where the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ mass is on the $x$-axis and the mass difference between the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ and the LSP is on the $y$-axis. The expected lower mass limits (magenta line) together with their $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainties (magenta dashed lines) and the observed lower mass limits (black line) are indicated for 100% branching fractions for Wino-like cross-sections. The right panel shows the results for chargino pair production with decays as in the TChiSlepSnu model with democratic decay via an intermediate sneutrino or charged slepton ($\widetilde{\ell}^{\pm}_{\mathrm{L}}$) with mass halfway between the chargino and the lightest neutralino. These model predictions also assume Wino-like cross sections.

Chargino pair production. The left panel shows the observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction squared, $\sigma (\tilde{\chi}_1^+ \tilde{\chi}_1^- ) \, \mathcal{B}^{2} ( \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \rightarrow \mathrm{W}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_1^0 ) $ are shown using the color scale where the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ mass is on the $x$-axis and the mass difference between the $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm $ and the LSP is on the $y$-axis. The expected lower mass limits (magenta line) together with their $\pm 1\sigma$ uncertainties (magenta dashed lines) and the observed lower mass limits (black line) are indicated for 100% branching fractions for Wino-like cross-sections. The right panel shows the results for chargino pair production with decays as in the TChiSlepSnu model with democratic decay via an intermediate sneutrino or charged slepton ($\widetilde{\ell}^{\pm}_{\mathrm{L}}$) with mass halfway between the chargino and the lightest neutralino. These model predictions also assume Wino-like cross sections.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction squared for direct slepton pair production followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). Slepton $\tilde{l}_{\mathrm{L}/\mathrm{R}}$ indicates the scalar supersymmetric partner of left- and right-handed electrons and muons. The limit is shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. The median expected exclusion regions for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction squared for direct slepton pair production followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). Slepton $\tilde{l}_{\mathrm{L}/\mathrm{R}}$ indicates the scalar supersymmetric partner of left- and right-handed electrons and muons. The limit is shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. The median expected exclusion regions for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction squared for direct slepton pair production followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). Slepton $\tilde{l}_{\mathrm{L}/\mathrm{R}}$ indicates the scalar supersymmetric partner of left- and right-handed electrons and muons. The limit is shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. The median expected exclusion regions for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction squared for direct selectron pair production (left) and smuon pair production (right) followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). The limits are shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino for the three different simplified possibilities of only RR, only LL, and both RR and LL where it is assumed that the R and L masses are identical. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. Median expected limits for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction squared for direct selectron pair production (left) and smuon pair production (right) followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). The limits are shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino for the three different simplified possibilities of only RR, only LL, and both RR and LL where it is assumed that the R and L masses are identical. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. Median expected limits for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction squared for direct selectron pair production (left) and smuon pair production (right) followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). The limits are shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino for the three different simplified possibilities of only RR, only LL, and both RR and LL where it is assumed that the R and L masses are identical. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. Median expected limits for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction squared for direct selectron pair production (left) and smuon pair production (right) followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). The limits are shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino for the three different simplified possibilities of only RR, only LL, and both RR and LL where it is assumed that the R and L masses are identical. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. Median expected limits for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction squared for direct selectron pair production (left) and smuon pair production (right) followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). The limits are shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino for the three different simplified possibilities of only RR, only LL, and both RR and LL where it is assumed that the R and L masses are identical. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. Median expected limits for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

Slepton pair production. Observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction squared for direct selectron pair production (left) and smuon pair production (right) followed by decay of both sleptons to the corresponding lepton and neutralino (color scale). The limits are shown as a function of the slepton mass and the mass difference between the slepton and the lightest neutralino for the three different simplified possibilities of only RR, only LL, and both RR and LL where it is assumed that the R and L masses are identical. The regions to the left of the lines denote the regions excluded for a branching fraction of 100%. Median expected limits for 100% branching fraction are delimited by the dashed lines.

The observed and expected upper limits at 95% CLs on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $m_{\mathrm{a}_1}$ for Type III 2HD+S model, $\tan\beta = 2$.

The observed and expected upper limits at 95% CLs on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $m_{\mathrm{a}_1}$ for Type IV 2HD+S model, $\tan\beta = 0.5$.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type II 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 5$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type II 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 8$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type II 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 12$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type II 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 15$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type III 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 5$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type III 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 8$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type III 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 12$ GeV.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma (\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{H}+\text{X}) {\mathcal{B}} (\mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{a}_1\,\mathrm{a}_1)$, relative to $\sigma_\text{SM}$, as a function of $\tan\beta$ for the Type III 2HD+S model for $m_{\mathrm{a}_1} = 15$ GeV.

The distributions of the $\mathrm{D}^{*}-\mathrm{D}^0$ mass difference $\Delta m$ for the normalization channel in data.

The distributions of the dimuon invariant mass $m_{\mu\mu}$ for the signal channel in data with the requirement $0.145<\Delta m<0.146$ GeV.

The distributions of the $\mathrm{D}^{*}-\mathrm{D}^0$ mass difference $\Delta m$ for the signal channel in data with the requirement $1.84<m_{\mu\mu}<1.89$ GeV.

The post-fit event yields for the signal, the combinatorial background, the $\mathrm{D}^0\to\pi^+\pi^-$ background, and the $\mathrm{D}^0\to\pi^-\mu^+\nu$ background. The observed numbers of events are given in the Data column. The subrange is in one dimension with a full range in the other dimension.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{e u}|$, versus $S_{e u}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to electrons.

Observed and Expected UL exclusions on the $BR(H\to S)$ of generic signals with $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{e d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Observed and Expected UL exclusions on the number of 'signal' yields in sideband A from the model agnostic fit, assuming no 'SUEP-like' signal contamination in the CRs.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{e d}|$, versus $S_{e d}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to electrons.

Postfit values for SR in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{\mu u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Postfit values for PR in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{\mu u}|$, versus $S_{\mu u}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to muons.

Postfit values for CRDY in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{\mu d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Postfit values for CRTT in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{\mu d}|$, versus $S_{\mu d}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to muons.

Per-selection efficiencies on Generic - $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$ Hadronic - $m_{A'} = 0.7\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow ee) = BR(A' \rightarrow \mu\mu) = 0.15$ $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 0.7$ Leptonic - $m_{A'} = 0.5\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow ee) = BR(A' \rightarrow \mu\mu) = 0.2$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 0.6$ samples. Selections: 2 OSSF leptons, one SUEP cluster, $60\leq Z_{m}\leq 120$ GeV, $p_{T}^Z\geq 25$ GeV, veto events with b-tagged jets, $p_{T}^{SUEP} > 60\;GeV$, and $dR^{Ak4}_{Ak15} < 1.5$. Efficiencies are the ratio of the histogram size at the selection step to the previous step (except twoLepton vs. initial). The final column is the total cumulative efficiency (dR vs. initial). Note that these selection numbers were all calculated using samples generated with 600,000 events for each signal point considered.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{e u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Interpolated observed and expected UL exclusions on $BR(H\to S) = 1$ for generic signals with $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$. The discreate heatmap points can be found in the UL Generic (Observed & Expected) figure in this sandbox

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{e u}|$, versus $V_{e u}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to electrons.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{e d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{e d}|$, versus $V_{e d}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to electrons.

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{\mu u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{\mu u}|$, versus $V_{\mu u}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to muons.

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{\mu d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{\mu d}|$, versus $V_{\mu d}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to muons.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the DT category in the signal region (SR). The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the DT category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the CSC category in the signal region (SR). The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the CSC category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the DT category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass for the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ = 0.025 m. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the CSC category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ for VLL Mass of 700 GeV. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass for the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ = 0.025 m. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ for VLL Mass of 700 GeV. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed exclusion contour on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the CSC category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed exclusion contour on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the DT category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the CSC category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the DT category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The cluster reconstruction efficiency, including both DT and CSC clusters, as a function of the simulated r and |z| decay positions of the pseudoscalar into photons in events with MET > 200 GeV, for a VLL mass of 300 GeV and a pseudoscalar mass of 2 GeV, and a range of ctau values uniformly distributed between 0.01 and 0.1 m.

The cluster reconstruction efficiency, including both DT and CSC clusters, as a function of the simulated r and |z| decay positions of the pseudoscalar into photons in events with MET > 200 GeV, for a VLL mass of 500 GeV and a pseudoscalar mass of 2 GeV, and a range of ctau values uniformly distributed between 0.01 and 0.1 m.

Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W+ signal region.

Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W+ signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the dimuon mass in the Z boson signal region.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV. The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (larger value) and quadratic (smaller value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

Comparison of the measured and theoretical cross sections for Z, W+, W-, and W production at different center-of-mass energies. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with the NNPDF 3.1 PDF set.

Pre-fit MC statistical uncertainties per bin. These values are used to quantify the MC statistical uncertainty contributions to the total uncertainty in $m_t$ based on elements from the covariance matrix obtained in the profile likelihood fit. Each MC statistical contribution is estimated by dividing the relevant covariance matrix entry (see Table 2) by the corresponding pre-fit MC statistical uncertainty for that bin.

The contribution of each source of systematic uncertainty to the total uncertainty in $m_t$ is provided. Each source's contribution is taken directly from the relevant element of the covariance matrix for the profile likelihood fit to $\overline{m_J}$, $m_{jj}$, and $m_{tj}$ using data. The sign of the effect of each uncertainty is included.

The fitted $m_t$ is provided for each replica generated using bootstrapping. Each replica is a 3D histogram of $m_{J}$, $m_{jj}$, and $m_{tj}$, where $m_{J}$ has 50 bins between 145.0 GeV and 205.0 GeV. This method uses the BootstrapGenerator class in ROOT to initialise a pseudo-random number generator for each event, which is seeded by the value of the eventNumber and runNumber variables for a given event in the input dataset. The pseudo-random numbers are drawn from a Poisson distribution with rate parameter equal to 1. These are used to fluctuate the amount by which each replica histogram is filled. There are 1000 replicas, numbered from 0 to 999.

Expected and observed upper limits for the b-quark-associated Higgs boson production cross section times branching fraction of the decay into a b quark pair at 95% CL as functions of $m_\phi$ for the 2018 FH category. The vertical dashed lines indicate the boundaries of usage of the different fit ranges, as reflected in the rightmost column of Table 2.

Expected and observed upper limits for the b-quark-associated Higgs boson production cross section times branching fraction of the decay into a b quark pair at 95% CL as functions of $m_\phi$, corresponding to the Run 2 combination. The vertical dashed line separates the mass range where only the 2017 SL category contributes on its left, from the region where also the 2017 FH and 2018 FH categories contribute on its right. The expected limits from the 2017 SL, 2017 FH, and 2018 FH datasets as well as from the previously published result based on the 2016 dataset are also shown as colored lines.

Interpretation in the $M_h^{125}$ scenario of the MSSM: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of the mass of the CP-odd boson, $m_{A}$. The higgsino mass parameter has been set to $\mu = +1$ TeV. The hashed area indicates the parameter region in which the mass of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson does not coincide with 125 GeV within a margin of 3 GeV.

Interpretation in the $M_h^{125}$ scenario of the MSSM: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of the mass of the CP-odd boson, $m_{A}$. The higgsino mass parameter has been set to $\mu = -1$ TeV. The hashed area indicates the parameter region in which the mass of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson does not coincide with 125 GeV within a margin of 3 GeV.

Interpretation in the $M_h^{125}$ scenario of the MSSM: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of the mass of the CP-odd boson, $m_{A}$. The higgsino mass parameter has been set to $\mu = -2$ TeV. The hashed area indicates the parameter region in which the mass of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson does not coincide with 125 GeV within a margin of 3 GeV.

Interpretation in the $M_h^{125}$ scenario of the MSSM: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of the mass of the CP-odd boson, $m_{A}$. The higgsino mass parameter has been set to $\mu = -3$ TeV. The hashed area indicates the parameter region in which the mass of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson does not coincide with 125 GeV within a margin of 3 GeV.

Interpretation in the $m_h^{mod+}$ scenario of the MSSM: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of the mass of the CP-odd boson, $m_{A}$. The hashed area indicates the parameter region in which the mass of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson does not coincide with 125 GeV within a margin of 3 GeV.

Interpretation in the hMSSM scenario of the MSSM: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of the mass of the CP-odd boson, $m_{A}$.

Interpretation in 2HDM scenarios: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as a function of $m_{A}$ for cos(beta-alpha) = 0.1, for the 2HDM $\it Type-II$ scenario.

Interpretation in 2HDM scenarios: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of cos(beta-alpha) for masses of $m_{A} = m_{H} = 300$ GeV, for the 2HDM $\it Type-II$ scenario.

Interpretation in 2HDM scenarios: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as a function of $m_{A}$ for cos(beta-alpha) = 0.1, for the 2HDM $\it Flipped$ scenario.

Interpretation in 2HDM scenarios: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of cos(beta-alpha) for masses of $m_{A} = m_{H} = 300$ GeV, for the 2HDM $\it Flipped$ scenario.

Interpretation in the 2HDM flipped scenario: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of cos(beta-alpha) for mass of $m_{A} = m_{H} = 140$ GeV.

Interpretation in the 2HDM flipped scenario: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of cos(beta-alpha) for mass of $m_{A} = m_{H} = 600$ GeV.

Interpretation in the 2HDM flipped scenario: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of cos(beta-alpha) for mass of $m_{A} = m_{H} = 900$ GeV.

Interpretation in the 2HDM flipped scenario: observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the parameter tan(beta) as functions of cos(beta-alpha) for mass of $m_{A} = m_{H} = 1200$ GeV.

Simulated signal shapes for three representative values of the Higgs boson mass $m_\phi$ in the 2017 SL channel.

Simulated signal shapes for three representative values of the Higgs boson mass $m_\phi$ in the 2017 FH channel.

Simulated signal shapes for three representative values of the Higgs boson mass $m_\phi$ in the 2018 FH channel.

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the SL category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the SL category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the SL category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2017 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2018 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2018 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2018 analysis in the FH category

Background-only fits to the M12 distribution in each fit range of the 2018 analysis in the FH category

Distributions of events for $\mathcal{D}_{\text{bkg}}$ observable in the $\gamma$-tagged (left) and Untagged (right) categories of the $\text{H}\to 4\ell$ candidate events. Observed events (black markers) and expected background estimates (solid histograms) from MC simulation (ZZ/Z$\gamma^*$) or control samples in data (Z+X) are shown. The $\gamma \text{H}$ signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}\times{\cal B}(H\to 4\ell)=1$ fb for either the $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ (solid) and $c_{z\gamma}$ (dashed) coupling hypothesis.

Distributions of events for $\mathcal{D}_{\text{bkg}}$ observable in the $\gamma$-tagged (left) and Untagged (right) categories of the $\text{H}\to 4\ell$ candidate events. Observed events (black markers) and expected background estimates (solid histograms) from MC simulation (ZZ/Z$\gamma^*$) or control samples in data (Z+X) are shown. The $\gamma \text{H}$ signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}\times{\cal B}(H\to 4\ell)=1$ fb for either the $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ (solid) and $c_{z\gamma}$ (dashed) coupling hypothesis.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.