Data from Figure 2, panel d, upper panel, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 2, panel d, lower panel, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Figure 3, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Figure 3, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 5-10% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 20-30% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 40-50% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 5-10% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 20-30% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 40-50% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Figure 4, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Figure 5, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Figure 5, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})/v_{0}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$=1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel a, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel b, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel c, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 6, panel d, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 7, Zero Crossing Point of $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 7, $\left\langle [p_{T}]\right\rangle$ for $p_{T}$ range of 0.5-10 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 8, panel a, Closure of Sum Rule 1 for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 8, panel b, Closure of Sum Rule 2 for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 9, panel a, $v_{0}$ vs $N_{ch}$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 9, panel b, $v_{0} / v^{5\%}_{0}$ vs $N_{ch}$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 10, panel a, $v_{0}\sqrt{N_{ch}}$ vs $N_{ch}$ for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 10, panel b, $v_{0}\sqrt{N_{ch}}$ vs Centrality for $\eta_{gap}$ = 1

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 0-5% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 5-10% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 10-20% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 20-30% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 30-40% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 40-50% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 50-60% Centrality

Data from Appendix, Figure 11, $v_{0}(p_{T})\,\sqrt{\left\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}}\right\rangle}$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-2 GeV, $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Top row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Left column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 0-5% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=0

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=1

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=2

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 1, Bottom row, Right column, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ for $p^{ref}_{T}$ = 0.5-5 GeV, 60-70% Centrality, $\eta_{gap}$=3

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 2, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 0, and 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 3, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 1, and 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 4, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 2, and 60-70% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 0-5% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 5-10% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 10-20% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 20-30% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary, Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 30-40% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 40-50% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 50-60% Centrality

Data from Auxiliary Figure 5, $v_{0}(p_{T})$ For $\eta_{gap}$ = 3, and 60-70% Centrality

The Charged-hadron yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The K^{0}_{S} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The #Lambda yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The #Xi^{-} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The K^{0}_{S} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The #Lambda yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The #Xi^{-} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in p+Pb collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in p+Pb collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in p+Pb collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in p+Pb collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

Breakdown of relative systematic uncertainties in the measured ${t\bar{t}}$ cross-section. The quoted uncertainties are obtained by repeating the fit with a group of nuisance parameters fixed to their fitted values and subtracting in quadrature the resulting total uncertainty from the uncertainty of the complete fit. However, the total uncertainty is not the quadratic sum of the grouped impacts, as this approach neglects the correlation among the different groups.

The figure shows the measurement of the top quark pair production cross-section, $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$, in lead-lead (Pb+Pb) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV, based on 1.9 nb$^{-1}$ of data.

Groomed relative transverse momentum, $k_{\text{T,g}}$, spectra measured in pp collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Soft drop $z_{\text{cut}} = 0.2$, $\beta = 0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources ("unfold"), no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Groomed relative transverse momentum, $k_{\text{T,g}}$, spectra measured in 30--50% Pb-Pb collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Soft drop $z_{\text{cut}} = 0.2$, $\beta = 0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources ("unfold,bkg,non_closure"), no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Groomed relative transverse momentum, $k_{\text{T,g}}$, spectra measured in 0--10% Pb-Pb collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Soft drop $z_{\text{cut}} = 0.2$, $\beta = 0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources ("unfold,bkg,non_closure"), no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Groomed $k_{\text{T,g}}$ ratio of 30--50% Pb-Pb to pp collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Dynamical grooming $a = 1.0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources "(unfold,bkg,non_closure)", no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Groomed $k_{\text{T,g}}$ ratio of 0--10% Pb-Pb to pp collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Dynamical grooming $a = 1.0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources "(unfold,bkg,non_closure)", no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Groomed $k_{\text{T,g}}$ ratio of 30--50% Pb-Pb to pp collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Soft drop $z_{\text{cut}} = 0.2$, $\beta = 0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources "(unfold,bkg,non_closure)", no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Groomed $k_{\text{T,g}}$ ratio of 0--10% Pb-Pb to pp collisions. $60 < p_{\text{T,ch jet}}^{\text{}} < 80\:\text{GeV}/c$, Soft drop $z_{\text{cut}} = 0.2$, $\beta = 0$ For the "trk eff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$) denote correlation across bins. For the remaining sources "(unfold,bkg,non_closure)", no correlation information is specified (i.e. $\pm$ is always used). In the publication, the quadrature sum of all sources of systematic uncertainty is reported, neglecting the sign information reported here.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $v_2\{4\}$ as a function of centrality.

Charged particle $\langle v_2 \rangle$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Charged particle $\sigma_{v_2}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $\langle v_2 \rangle$ as a function of centrality.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $\sigma_{v_2}$ as a function of centrality.

Charged particle $v_3\{2, \left | \Delta\eta \right | > 0.8\}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Charged particle $v_4\{2, \left | \Delta\eta \right | > 0.8\}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $v_3\{2, \left | \Delta\eta \right | > 0.8\}$ as a function of centrality.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $v_4\{2, \left | \Delta\eta \right | > 0.8\}$ as a function of centrality.

Charged particle $v_{4,22}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Charged particle $\rho_{4,22}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $v_{4,22}$ as a function of centrality.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $\rho_{4,22}$ as a function of centrality.

Charged particle $v_4^{\rm L}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Charged particle $\chi_{4,22}$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $v_4^{\rm L}$ as a function of centrality.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle $\chi_{4,22}$ as a function of centrality.

Charged particle NSC$(3,2)$ as a function of centrality in Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV and $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, respectively.

Ratio between Xe$-$Xe and Pb$-$Pb charged particle NSC$(3,2)$ as a function of centrality.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_2)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_4)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[6(\Psi_6-\Psi_2)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[6(\Psi_6-\Psi_3)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+6\Psi_3-8\Psi_4]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[3\Psi_3+5\Psi_5-8\Psi_8]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[8\Psi_2-3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+4\Psi_4-6\Psi_6]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+5\Psi_5-7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-6\Psi_3+4\Psi_4]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[3\Psi_3+4\Psi_4-7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+4\Psi_4-8\Psi_8]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[3\Psi_3-8\Psi_4+5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[9\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4+5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+6\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-6\Psi_6]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[6\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2-3\Psi_3+4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5+7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4+5\Psi_5-6\Psi_6]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+6\Psi_3-8\Psi_4]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[6(\Psi_3-\Psi_2)]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4(\Psi_4-\Psi_2)]\rangle\times\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-6\Psi_3+4\Psi_4]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[9\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[4\Psi_2-3\Psi_3+4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-6\Psi_3+4\Psi_4]\rangle\times\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4+5\Psi_5]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[6\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4(\Psi_4-\Psi_2)]\rangle\times\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_2)]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_4)]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4(\Psi_4-\Psi_2)]\rangle\times\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+4\Psi_4-8\Psi_8]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ and $\mathrm{D}^+$ average $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.

Non-prompt $\Lambda_{c}^{+}$ $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.

Non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-integrated $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.

Non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^+$ $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-integrated $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.

Non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^+$ / non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ yield ratio in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.

Non-prompt $\Lambda_{c}^{+}$ / non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ yield ratio in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.

Ratio of the $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-integrated ($2 < p_\mathrm{{T}} < 24$ $\mathrm{{GeV}}/c$) $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ of non-prompt $\Lambda_{c}^{+}$ and non-prompt $\mathrm{D}^0$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.96 < y_{\mathrm{cms}} < 0.04$.