Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W+ signal region.

Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W+ signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the dimuon mass in the Z boson signal region.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV. The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (larger value) and quadratic (smaller value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

Comparison of the measured and theoretical cross sections for Z, W+, W-, and W production at different center-of-mass energies. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with the NNPDF 3.1 PDF set.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH3 at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 and ISR starting scale SpaceShower:pT0Ref = 1 GeV at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH3 and ISR starting scale SudakovCommon:pTmin=0.7 GeV at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 62 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1800 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1960 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 2760 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the CMS measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the LHCb measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 62 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1800 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1960 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 2760 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the CMS measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the LHCb measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 62 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1800 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1960 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 2760 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the CMS measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the LHCb measurement.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{+}$ signal selection for mu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for e final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for mu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for e final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for mu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for ee final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for mumu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for ee final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for mumu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Figure 4 Fiducial cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 13TeV

Figure 5 Fiducial cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 5.02TeV

Figure 6 Fiducial cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes between 13TeV and 5.02TeV

Figure 7 Total cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 13TeV

Figure 8 Total cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 5.02TeV

Figure 9 Total cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes between 13TeV and 5.02TeV

Summary of theoretical predictions of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at ppbar collisions.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at UA1 and UA2.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at D0.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at CDF.

Summary of theoretical predictions of the total inclusive cross sections for W boson production times leptonic branching fractions at pp collisions.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at pp collisions.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at CMS.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio RMN.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio Rincl_veto.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio RMN_veto.

Differential cross section dσincl/d∆y for inclusive dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Differential cross section dσMN/d∆y for Mueller-Navelet dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Ratio Rincl of the cross sections for inclusive to ”exclusive” dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Ratio Rincl_veto of the cross sections for inclusive to ”exclusive” with veto dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Ratio RMN of the cross sections for Mueller-Navelet to ”exclusive” dijet production together with predicgtion of different MC models.

Ratio RMN_veto of the cross sections for Mueller-Navelet to ”exclusive” with veto dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the cross section dσincl/d∆y.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the cross section dσMN/d∆y.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio Rincl.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio RMN.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio Rincl_veto.

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio RMN_veto.

Differential cross section dσincl/d∆y for inclusive dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Differential cross section dσMN/d∆y for Mueller-Navelet dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Ratio Rincl of the cross sections for inclusive to ”exclusive” dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Ratio Rincl_veto of the cross sections for inclusive to ”exclusive” with veto dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Ratio RMN of the cross sections for Mueller-Navelet to ”exclusive” dijet production together with predicgtion of different MC models.

Ratio RMN_veto of the cross sections for Mueller-Navelet to ”exclusive” with veto dijet production together with predictions of different MC models.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> mu- nu final state.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> e+ e- final state.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> mu+ mu- final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> e+ nu final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> mu+ nu final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> e- nu final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> mu- nu final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> e+ e- final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> mu+ mu- final state.

Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for W+ boson production in the W+ -> l+ nu (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for W- boson production in the W- -> l- nu (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for W boson production in the W -> l nu (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> l- l+ (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined total cross-section measurements for W+ boson production in the W+ -> l+ nu (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined total cross-section measurements for W- boson production in the W- -> l- nu (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined total cross-section measurements for W boson production in the W -> l nu (l = e, mu) final state.

Combined total cross-section measurements for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> l- l+ (l = e, mu) final state.

Measured fiducial cross-section ratio R_{W+-/Z} = sigma (W+/- -> l+/- nu/nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where l = e, mu.

Measured fiducial cross-section ratio R_{W+/W-} = sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) / sigma (W- -> l- nubar) where l = e, mu.

Measured charge asymmetry in W-boson production A_{l} = ( sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) - sigma (W- -> l- nubar) ) / ( sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) + sigma (W- -> l- nubar) ) where l = e, mu.

The ratio of measured W+ cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{W+} = sigma (W+ -> e+ nu) / sigma (W+ -> mu+ nu)

The ratio of measured W- cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{W-} = sigma (W- -> e- nu) / sigma (W- -> mu- nu)

The ratio of measured W cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{W} = sigma (W -> e nu) / sigma (W -> mu nu)

The ratio of measured Z/gamma^* cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{Z/gamma^*} = sigma (Z/gamma^* -> e+ e-) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> mu+ mu-)

Correlation coefficients among (W- -> l- nubar), (W+ -> l+ nu), (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where (l = e, mu) excluding the common normalisation uncertainty due to the luminosity calibration.

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

Invariant differential yields of tritons and antitritons in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The uncertainties of $_{-2.0}^{+5.0}$% due to the extrapolation to inelastic pp collisions are not included in the systematic uncertainties.

Invariant differential yields of $^{3}$He and $^{3}\overline{\text{He}}$ nuclei in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The uncertainties of $_{-2.0}^{+5.0}$% due to the extrapolation to inelastic pp collisions are not included in the systematic uncertainties.

Coalescence parameter ($B_{2}$) of deuterons and antideuterons in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 TeV.

Coalescence parameter ($B_{2}$) of deuterons and antideuterons in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Coalescence parameter ($B_{2}$) of deuterons and antideuterons in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Coalescence parameter ($B_{3}$) of tritons and antitritons in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Coalescence parameter ($B_{3}$) of $^{3}$He and $^{3}\overline{\text{He}}$ nuclei in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV.

Integrated deuteron-to-proton (d/p) and antideuteron-to-antiproton ($\overline{\text{d}}/\overline{\text{p}}$) ratios in inelastic pp collisions as a function of the average charged particle multiplicity for different center-of-mass energies.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 0-5% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 5-10% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 10-20% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 20-30% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 30-40% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 40-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 50-60% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 0-5% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 5-10% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 10-20% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 20-30% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 30-40% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 40-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 50-60% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$p_1$ parameter from a linear fit to $\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and MC—Glauber model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and MC—KLN CGC model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and EKRT model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

Out projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Side projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Long projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rlong^2 vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%