Nuclear modicifation factor vs. N_coll $J\psi$ with|y|<1 and pT < 3 GeV/c in d Au collisions.

The invariant cross section versus transverse momentum for J/$\psi$ with $|y|\lt 1$ in $p+p$ collisions.

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for $J/\Psi$ with |y| < 1 in 0 - 100 percent central d+Au collisions.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.9\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties at $7\ TeV$ were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ and they more smaller than systematic uncertainties. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV\ HM$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.9\ TeV$ ($n_{ch} \ge 2$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ ($n_{ch} \ge 2$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$ , this represents the statistical uncertainty only. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. The statistical uncertainties at $7\ TeV$ more smaller than systematic uncertainties.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV\ HM$ ($n_{ch} \ge 150$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$.Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals of different multiplicity regions $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. The statistical uncertainties smaller than systematic uncertainties. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $0.9\ TeV$ for unlike-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $0.9\ TeV$ for like-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $7\ TeV$ for unlike-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $7\ TeV$ for like-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $0.9\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $n_{ch}$ intervals $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $0.9\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 2$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ with $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta| < 2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 2$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV\ HM$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $n_{ch}$ intervals $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured with $7\ TeV\ HM$ data using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 150$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 2-9$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 10-24$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 25-80$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 81-125$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2^{1/2}$ difference between quadruplets at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$).

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The difference in two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

No description provided.

V3{2} as a function of $\eta$.

<$V_3^2$> as a function of $\eta$.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the second harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the third harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuation $\sigma_2/<v_2>$ centrality dependence in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions.

D(SIG)/DQ**2 IN NB/GEV**2 as a function of Q**2 IN GEV**2.

D(SIG)/DY IN NB as a function of Y.

D(SIG)/DX IN NB as a function of X.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 5-9 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 9-14 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 14-23 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 23-45 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 45-100 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 100-158 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 158-251 GeV^2.

SIG(C=VIS) IN PB as a function of Y for the Q^2 range 251-1000 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 7 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 12 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 18 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 32 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 60 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 120 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 200 GeV^2.

Reduced cross section as a function of X for Q^2 = 350 GeV^2.

The single-differential cross section DSIG/DX (Y<0.9,Y(1-x)**2>0.004) at Q^2=3000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The single-differential cross section DSIG/DY (Y<0.9,Y(1-x)**2>0.004) at Q^2=185 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The single-differential cross section DSIG/DY (Y<0.9,Y(1-x)**2>0.004) at Q^2=3000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=200 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=250 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=350 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=450 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=650 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=800 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=1200 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=1500 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=2000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=3000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=5000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=8000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=12000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=20000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The reduced cross section SIG(Reduced) at Q^2=30000 GeV^2, corrected to the electroweak Born level, for zero (Pe=0), positive (Pe=+0.32) and negative (Pe=-0.36) polarisations.

The structure function xF3 at Q^2=1500, 2000 and 3000 GeV^2 extracted using this data at Pe=0 and previously published NC E-P DIS data.

The structure function xF3 at Q^2=5000, 8000 and 12000 GeV^2 extracted using this data at Pe=0 and previously published NC E-P DIS data.

The structure function xF3 at Q^2=20000 and 30000 GeV^2 extracted using this data at Pe=0 and previously published NC E-P DIS data.

The interference structure function XF3(gammaZ) evaulated at Q^2=1500 GeV^2 in X centred bins.

The polarisation asymmetry measured using the positively and negatively polarised positron beams.

The corrected transverse momentum distribution of KS mesons at 900 GeV.

The corrected rapidity distribution of KS mesons at 900 GeV.

The corrected multiplicity distribution of KS mesons at 900 GeV.

The corrected transverse momentum distribution of LAMBDA baryons at 7000 GeV.

The corrected rapidity distribution of LAMBDA baryons at 7000 GeV.

The corrected multiplicity distribution of LAMBDA baryons at 7000 GeV.

The corrected transverse momentum distribution of LAMBDA baryons at 900 GeV.

The corrected rapidity distribution of LAMBDA baryons at 900 GeV.

The corrected multiplicity distribution of LAMBDA baryons at 900 GeV.

The production ratio between LAMBDABAR and LAMBDA baryons at 7000 GeV as a function of rapidity.

The production ratio between LAMBDABAR and LAMBDA baryons at 7000 GeV as a function of transverse momentum.

The production ratio between LAMBDABAR and LAMBDA baryons at 900 GeV as a function of rapidity.

The production ratio between LAMBDABAR and LAMBDA baryons at 900 GeV as a function of transverse momentum.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 GeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.25 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 900 GeV (0.25 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 GeV ($0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev (0.25 < pT < 2.5 GeV/c) in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ over $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev for $2.0 < y < 4.0$ in intervals of $p_T$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev for $2.0 < y < 4.0$ in intervals of $p_T$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($2.0 < y < 4.0$; $0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 900 Gev for (2.0 < y < 4.0) in intervals of pT.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 900 Gev ($2.0 < y < 4.0$; $0.25 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7TeV in y interals for (0.15<PT<0.65),(0.65<PT<1.00),(1.00<PT<2.50) GeV/c.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.15 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7TeV in y interals for (0.15<PT<0.65),(0.65<PT<1.00),(1.00<PT<2.50) GeV/c.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV in $y$ intervals for ($0.15 < p_T < 0.65$), ($0.65 < p_T < 1.00$), ($1.00 < p_T < 2.50$) GeV$/c$.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7 TeV (0.15 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV ($0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 TeV (0.15 < pT < 2.5) GeV/c in y intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 TeV ($0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in $y$ intervals.

Lambdabar over Lambda @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev for $2.0 < y < 4.5$ in $p_T$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev for $2.0 < y < 4.5$ in $p_T$ intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $\Lambda$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev ($2.0 < y < 4.5$; $0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Lambdabar over K0s @ 7 Tev for (2.0 < y < 4.5) in pT intervals.

$\bar{\Lambda}$ to $K^{0}_{s}$ production ratio in $pp$ collisions at 7 Tev ($2.0 < y < 4.5$; $0.15 < p_T < 2.50$ GeV$/c$) in rapidity loss intervals.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2.

Measured differential cross section DSIG/DX.

Pseudorapidity distribution with additional kinematical restraints on Q**2 and ET.

Differential cross section DSIG/DX for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Differential cross section DSIG/DY for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 280 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 530 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 950 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 1700 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 3000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 5300 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 9500 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 17000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 30000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.