Expected limit contour for GGM scenario

Observed limit contour for GGM scenario

Expected limit contour for GGM scenario

Observed limit contour for GGM scenario

Expected limit contour for Neutralino BF scenario

Observed limit contour for Neutralino BF scenario

Expected limit contour for Chargino BF scenario

Observed limit contour for Chargino BF scenario

Expected limit contour for T5Wg

Observed limit contour for T5Wg

Expected limit contour for Gluino BF scenario

Observed limit contour for Gluino BF scenario

Covariance matrix for all bins (additional material)

Correlation matrix for all bins (additional material)

The observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The observed and expected upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the gluino pair production cross section for a gluino GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=2400$ GeV. The one (two) standard deviation variation in the expected limit is shown in the inner green (outer yellow) band. The blue solid line shows the observed limit obtained by the CMS displaced jet search

The distribution (normalized to unity) of number of ECAL cells hit in the jet for jets in a background enriched data sample (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf > 0.08$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$ and $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$) and for signal jets satisfying signal region requirements (except those on $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}}$ and $N^{\mathrm{cell}}_{\mathrm{ECAL}}$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\mathrm{HEF}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo and noise jets (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30 \,\mathrm{GeV}$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf < 0.08$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $\mathrm{HEF}$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $E_{\mathrm{HCAL}}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo and noise jets (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30 \,\mathrm{GeV}$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf < 0.08$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $E_{\mathrm{HCAL}}$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ for data sample enriched in jets from noise (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf > 0.08$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20 \,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}$)

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}$ for data sample enriched in jets from noise (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf > 0.08$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20 \,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}$)

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $p_\mathrm{T}tf$ for a data sample enriched in main bunch backgrounds (satisfying $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$, $|t_{\mathrm{jet}}| < 3\,\mathrm{ns}$ and $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} >20\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $p_\mathrm{T}tf$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo (satisfying $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf < 0.08$, $\mathrm{HEF} < 0.2$, $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$ and $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}}$)

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{DT}})$ for a data sample enriched in cosmic muons (satisfying $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf < 0.08$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} > 3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and failing the HCAL noise rejection quality filters) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{DT}})$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{RPC}})$ for a data sample enriched in cosmic muons (satisfying $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T}tf < 0.08$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} > 3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and failing the HCAL noise rejection quality filters) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{RPC}})$).

Distribution of $t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ for jets with the full Run 2 dataset with no cleaning selection applied (a) and after all jet cleaning selections are applied (b) in events satisfying the trigger requirements and satisfying $p_T^\mathrm{miss} > 300$. The jets are required to pass an inverted selection of $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} > 0.08$ to enrich the sample in those originating from main and satellite bunch backgrounds. The cleaning selections are shown to reduce the backgrounds by many orders of magnitude.

Distribution of $t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ for jets with the full Run 2 dataset in events satisfying the trigger requirements and satisfying $p_T^\mathrm{miss} < 300$. The jets are required to pass an inverted selection of $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} > 0.08$ to enrich the sample in those originating from main and satellite bunch backgrounds (all other jet cleaning selections are applied). Clear contributions from jets from satellite bunch collisions can be seen peaked around -5, 5 and 10 ns.

Contribution to the delayed time of jets from the $\beta$ of the gluino is plotted against the delay contribution from the difference (assuming straight line paths) between the path taken by the gluino and the particle forming the jet from the path length for a particle travelling directly to the same position on the ECAL barrel for gluino $c\tau_{0} = 10$ m and mass of 1000 Gev (top) and 3000 GeV (bottom). The dominant contribution is shown to be the gluino $\beta$.

Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=1000$ and various proper decay lengths

Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=2400$ and various proper decay lengths

Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=3000$ and various proper decay lengths

The observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected plus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected minus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected plus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected minus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D0 mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$. For $0<p_{\rm{T}}<1$ GeV/$c$ the cross section is obtained from the analysis without vertexing recostruction and for $p_{\rm{T}}>1$ GeV/c the analysis with vertexing reconstruction is used.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D0 mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{\textit s}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208. For $0<p_{\rm{T}}<1$ GeV/$c$ the cross section is obtained from the analysis without vertexing recostruction and for $p_{\rm{T}}>1$ GeV/c the analysis with vertexing reconstruction is used.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D* mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D* mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D+ mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D+ mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt Ds mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt Ds mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt D0 mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt D* mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt D+ mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt Ds mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt non-strange D mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$Q_{\rm pPb}$ of prompt D mesons in different centrality classes in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

$Q_{\rm CP}$ of prompt D mesons in different centrality classes in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt D+ over D0 production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt D*+ over D0 production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D0 production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

Transverse momentum distributions of deuterons in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of deuterons in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 0-10% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 0-10% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distribution of $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for all non single diffractive (NSD) p-Pb collisions.

Transverse momentum distribution of $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ for all non single diffractive (NSD) p-Pb collisions.

Integrated yield of nuclei produced in NSD p-Pb collisions normalised by the spin degeneracy factor as a function of the mass number

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 0-10% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

Mean transverse momentum of deuteron produced in p-Pb collisions as a function of the charged particle multiplicity density ad mid-rapidity

Deuteron over proton ratio in p-Pb collisions as a function of the charged particle multiplicity density ad mid-rapidity

The ratio of the production cross sections of inclusive $\Lambda_{c}^{+}$ to prompt $D^{0}$ versus $p_{T}$ from pp collisions. The $20\%$ normalization uncertainty in pp collisions is not included in the statistical and systematic uncertainties for each data point.

The ratio of the production cross sections of inclusive $\Lambda_{c}^{+}$ to prompt $D^{0}$ versus $p_{T}$ from $0-100\%$ centrality PbPb collisions. The $31\%$ normalization uncertainty in PbPb collisions, is not included in the statistical and systematic uncertainties for each data point.

$\kappa^{\rm iso}$, fraction of prompt photons that pass the isolation criteria in PYTHIA 6 ($\gamma$-jet events) at the generator level in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV. The theoretical predictions are corrected by $\kappa^{\rm iso}$ to take into account the underlying event as well as the fragmentation in the isolation cone.

Differential cross section of isolated photons as a function of $x_\mathrm{T}^{\gamma}$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV.

$\overline{\mathrm{K}}$-p correlation function in p-p collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5$ TeV.

$\overline{\mathrm{K}}$-p correlation function in p-p collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV.

$\overline{\mathrm{K}}$-p correlation function in p-p collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV.

Combination of $\overline{\mathrm{K}}$-p correlation function in p-p collisions.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a Z' resonance decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a V' resonance decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a V' resonance decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a graviton decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the Z' cross section and the Z' -> WW branching fraction as a function of the Z' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the bulk graviton cross section and the G -> WW branching fraction as a function of the G resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the W' cross section and the W' -> WZ branching fraction as a function of the W' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the bulk graviton cross section and the G -> ZZ branching fraction as a function of the G resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the W' cross section and the W' -> WH branching fraction as a function of the W' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the Z' cross section and the Z' -> ZH branching fraction as a function of the Z' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the bulk graviton cross section and the G -> HH branching fraction as a function of the G resonance mass.

The observed $m_{T}$ and $m_{jj}$ distributions in the ejj (upper left), $\mu$~jj (upper right), $\tau_{h}$~jj (lower left), and $0\ell$~jj (lower right) signal regions compared with the post-fit SM background yields from the fit described in the text. The pre-fit background yields and shapes are determined using data-driven methods for the major backgrounds, and based on simulation for the smaller backgrounds. Expected signal distributions are overlaid. The last bin in the $m_{T}$ distributions of the $1\ell$~jj channels include all events with $m_{T} > 210$~GeV. The last bin of the $m_{jj}$ distributions of the $0\ell$~jj channel include all events with $m_{jj} > 3800$~GeV.

The observed $m_{T}$ and $m_{jj}$ distributions in the ejj (upper left), $\mu$~jj (upper right), $\tau_{h}$~jj (lower left), and $0\ell$~jj (lower right) signal regions compared with the post-fit SM background yields from the fit described in the text. The pre-fit background yields and shapes are determined using data-driven methods for the major backgrounds, and based on simulation for the smaller backgrounds. Expected signal distributions are overlaid. The last bin in the $m_{T}$ distributions of the $1\ell$~jj channels include all events with $m_{T} > 210$~GeV. The last bin of the $m_{jj}$ distributions of the $0\ell$~jj channel include all events with $m_{jj} > 3800$~GeV.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the light slepton model with slepton mass defined as the average of the \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} and \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} masses, $x_{\widetilde{\ell}}=0.5$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, assuming the light slepton model.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the light slepton model with slepton mass defined as the average of the \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} and \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} masses, $x_{\widetilde{\ell}}=0.5$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, assuming the light slepton model.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the light slepton model with slepton mass defined as the average of the \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} and \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} masses, $x_{\widetilde{\ell}}=0.5$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, assuming the light slepton model.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) The 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, after combining 0 lepton and 1 lepton channels, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) The 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, after combining 0 lepton and 1 lepton channels, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$.

Example description

Combined 95% CL expected upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=1$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Combined 95% CL expected upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=50$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Combined 95% CL observed upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=1$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Combined 95% CL observed upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=50$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Covariance matrix from the combined fit of the $m_{ extrm{jj}}$ and $m_{ extrm{T}}$ distributions in the $0\ell extrm{jj}$ and $1\ell extrm{jj}$ search regions.