A search is presented for the pair production of new heavy resonances, each decaying into a top quark (t) or antiquark and a gluon (g). The analysis uses data recorded with the CMS detector from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Events with one muon or electron, multiple jets, and missing transverse momentum are selected. After using a deep neural network to enrich the data sample with signal-like events, distributions in the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of all reconstructed objects are analyzed in the search for a signal. No significant deviations from the standard model prediction are found. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the product of cross section and branching fraction squared for the pair production of excited top quarks in the $\mathrm{t^*}$ $\to$ tg decay channel. The upper limits range from 120 to 0.8 fb for a $\mathrm{t^*}$ with spin-1/2 and from 15 to 1.0 fb for a $\mathrm{t^*}$ with spin-3/2. These correspond to mass exclusion limits up to 1050 and 1700 GeV for spin-1/2 and spin-3/2 $\mathrm{t^*}$ particles, respectively. These are the most stringent limits to date on the existence of $\mathrm{t^*}$ $\to$ tg resonances.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the $t^{*} \overline{t}^{*}$ production cross section and the branching fraction squared $BR^2(t^{*} \rightarrow tg)$ for a spin-1/2 $t^{*}$ as a function of $m_{t^{*}}$. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands give the central probability intervals containing 68 and 95% of the expected upper limits under the background-only hypothesis. The cross section predicted by theory, following an EFT approach, is shown in blue, assuming $BR(t^{*} \rightarrow tg)=1$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the $t^{*} \overline{t}^{*}$ production cross section and the branching fraction squared $BR^2(t^{*} \rightarrow tg)$ for a spin-3/2 $t^{*}$ as a function of $m_{t^{*}}$. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands give the central probability intervals containing 68 and 95% of the expected upper limits under the background-only hypothesis. The cross section predicted by theory, following an EFT approach, is shown in blue, assuming $BR(t^{*} \rightarrow tg)=1$. The results of the previous CMS analysis, using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 $fb^{-1}$, are shown in red.
Distributions in $S_T$ in the SR for the muon channel, after a background-only fit to the data. The signal distributions are scaled to the cross section predicted by the theory. The hatched bands show the post-fit uncertainty band, combining all sources of uncertainty. The ratio of data to the background predictions is shown in the panels below the distributions.
The paper presents a search for supersymmetric particles produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV and decaying into final states with missing transverse momentum and jets originating from charm quarks. The data were taken with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN from 2015 to 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess of events over the expected Standard Model background expectation is observed in optimized signal regions, and limits are set on the production cross-sections of the supersymmetric particles. Pair production of charm squarks or top squarks, each decaying into a charm quark and the lightest supersymmetric particle $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$, is excluded at 95% confidence level for squarks with masses up to 900 GeV for scenarios where the mass of $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ is below 50 GeV. Additionally, the production of leptoquarks with masses up to 900 GeV is excluded for the scenario where up-type leptoquarks decay into a charm quark and a neutrino. Model-independent limits on cross-sections and event yields for processes beyond the Standard Model are also reported.
Summary of material in this HEPData record. <br/><br/> Truth Code snippets, SLHA files, Madgraph process cards and UFO files for the leptoquark models are available under "Additional Resources" (purple button on the left). <br/><br/> <b>Contours:</b> <ul> SUSY exclusion limits (best-expected SR combination) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour1">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour3">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour2">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour4">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour5">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour6">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (best-expected SR combination) as a function of $\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour7">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour9">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour8">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour10">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour11">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour12">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-HM1) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour15">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour14">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour13">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour18">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour16">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour17">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-HM2) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour21">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour20">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour19">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour24">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour22">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour23">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-HM3) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour27">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour26">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour25">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour30">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour28">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour29">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp1) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour33">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour32">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour31">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour36">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour34">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour35">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp2) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour39">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour38">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour37">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour42">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour40">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour41">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp3) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour45">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour44">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour43">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour48">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour46">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour47">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp-1c) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour50">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour49">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (scan over branching fraction for $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)=1$ GeV) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour51">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour53">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour52">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour54">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour55">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour56">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (scan over branching fraction for $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)=200$ GeV) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour57">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour59">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour58">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour60">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour61">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour62">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$ exclusion limits <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour65">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour64">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour63">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour68">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour66">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour67">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$ exclusion limits <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour71">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour70">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour69">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour74">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour72">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour73">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> </ul> <b>Cross-section upper limits:</b> <ul> SUSY signals (best-expected SR combination): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit1">Observed</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$ (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit2">Observed</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$ (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit3">Observed</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (min) (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit6">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit5">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit4">-1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit7">Observed</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM) (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit10">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit9">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit8">-1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit11">Observed</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Signal region distributions:</b> <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution2">$E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ Sig. in SR-HM1</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution3">$m_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{min}(c)$ in SR-HM2</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution4">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp1</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution5">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp2</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution6">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp3</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution1">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Acceptances:</b> <ul> SUSY signals: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance2">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance3">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance4">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance5">SR-HM-Disc</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance6">SR-Comp1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance7">SR-Comp2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance8">SR-Comp3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance1">SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance9">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance10">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance11">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance12">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance13">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance14">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance15">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance16">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (min): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance17">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance18">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance19">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance20">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance21">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance22">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance23">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance24">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Efficiencies:</b> <ul> $U(1)$ pair (min): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency1">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency2">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency3">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency4">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency5">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency6">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency7">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency8">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Acceptance times efficiency:</b> <ul> SUSY signals: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency2">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency3">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency4">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency5">SR-HM-Disc</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency6">SR-Comp1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency7">SR-Comp2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency8">SR-Comp3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency1">SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency9">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency10">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency11">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency12">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency13">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency14">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency15">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency16">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (min): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency17">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency18">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency19">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency20">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency21">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency22">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency23">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency24">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Cutflow:</b> <ul> SUSY benchmarks: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow5">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow6">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow7">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow8">SR-HM-Disc</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow2">SR-Comp1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow3">SR-Comp2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow4">SR-Comp3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow1">SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> LQ benchmarks: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow9">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow10">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow11">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow12">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul>
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.
Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.
ALICE is a large experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Located 52 meters underground, its detectors are suitable to measure muons produced by cosmic-ray interactions in the atmosphere. In this paper, the studies of the cosmic muons registered by ALICE during Run 2 (2015--2018) are described. The analysis is limited to multimuon events defined as events with more than four detected muons ($N_\mu>4$) and in the zenith angle range $0^{\circ}<\theta<50^{\circ}$. The results are compared with Monte Carlo simulations using three of the main hadronic interaction models describing the air shower development in the atmosphere: QGSJET-II-04, EPOS-LHC, and SIBYLL 2.3. The interval of the primary cosmic-ray energy involved in the measured muon multiplicity distribution is about $ 4 \times 10^{15}<E_\mathrm{prim}< 6 \times 10^{16}$~eV. In this interval none of the three models is able to describe precisely the trend of the composition of cosmic rays as the energy increases. However, QGSJET is found to be the only model capable of reproducing reasonably well the muon multiplicity distribution, assuming a heavy composition of the primary cosmic rays over the whole energy range, while SIBYLL and EPOS-LHC underpredict the number of muons in a large interval of multiplicity by more than $20\%$ and $30\%$, respectively. The rate of high muon multiplicity events ($N_\mu>100$) obtained with QGSJET and SIBYLL is compatible with the data, while EPOS-LHC produces a significantly lower rate ($55\%$ of the measured rate). For both QGSJET and SIBYLL, the rate is close to the data when the composition is assumed to be dominated by heavy elements, an outcome compatible with the average energy $E_\mathrm{prim} \sim 10^{17}$~eV of these events. This result places significant constraints on more exotic production mechanisms.
Muon multiplicity distribution measured with the ALICE apparatus and obtained for the whole data sample of Run 2 corresponding to a live time of 62.5 days. The data points are grouped in multiplicity intervals with a width of five units ($N_\mu=5-9,~N_\mu=10-14,~...$), and are located at the center of each interval ($N_\mu=7,~N_\mu=12,~...$). The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainties.
Muon multiplicity distribution measured with the ALICE apparatus and obtained for the whole data sample of Run 2 corresponding to a live time of 62.5 days. The data are the same as Fig. 3 but each bin corresponds to a single muon multiplicity ($N_\mu=1,2,3,~...$); the distribution starts at $N_\mu=5$. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainties.
Measured muon multiplicity distribution compared with simulations from CORSIKA Monte Carlo generator using QGSJET-II-04 (top), SIBYLL 2.3 (middle), and EPOS-LHC (bottom) as hadronic interaction models for proton and iron primary cosmic rays. Iron points are slightly shifted to the right to avoid overlapping with the data points. The total uncertainties in the MC simulations are given by the vertical bars, while the boxes give the systematic uncertainties of the data and the vertical bars the statistical ones.
We report results of a search for nuclear recoils induced by weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter using the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) two-phase xenon time projection chamber. This analysis uses a total exposure of $4.2\pm0.1$ tonne-years from 280 live days of LZ operation, of which $3.3\pm0.1$ tonne-years and 220 live days are new. A technique to actively tag background electronic recoils from $^{214}$Pb $\beta$ decays is featured for the first time. Enhanced electron-ion recombination is observed in two-neutrino double electron capture decays of $^{124}$Xe, representing a noteworthy new background. After removal of artificial signal-like events injected into the data set to mitigate analyzer bias, we find no evidence for an excess over expected backgrounds. World-leading constraints are placed on spin-independent (SI) and spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for masses $\geq$9 GeV/$c^2$. The strongest SI exclusion set is $2.1\times10^{-48}$ cm$^{2}$ at the 90% confidence level at a mass of 36 GeV/$c^2$, and the best SI median sensitivity achieved is $5.0\times10^{-48}$ cm$^{2}$ for a mass of 40 GeV/$c^2$.
90% CL WIMP SI cross sections, including sensitivities
90% CL WIMP SDn cross sections, including sensitivities and nuclear structure uncertainties
90% CL WIMP SDp cross sections, including sensitivities and nuclear structure uncertainties
A search for heavy, long-lived, charged particles with large ionization energy loss within the silicon tracker of the CMS experiment is presented. A data set of proton-proton collisions at a center of mass energy at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, collected in 2017 and 2018 at the CERN LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 101 fb$^{-1}$, is used in this analysis. Two different approaches for the search are taken. A new method exploits the independence of the silicon pixel and strips measurements, while the second method improves on previous techniques using ionization to determine a mass selection. No significant excess of events above the background expectation is observed. The results are interpreted in the context of the pair production of supersymmetric particles, namely gluinos, top squarks, and tau sleptons, and of the Drell-Yan pair production of fourth generation ($\tau'$) leptons with an electric charge equal to or twice the absolute value of the electron charge ($e$). An interpretation of a Z$'$ boson decaying to two $\tau'$ leptons with an electric charge equal to 2$e$ is presented for the first time. The 95% confidence upper limits on the production cross section are extracted for each of these hypothetical particles.
The $F_{\text{i}}^{\text{Pixels}}$ vs $G_{\text{i}}^{\text{Strips}}$ distribution for the SM MC after passing the selection criteria listed in Table 2.
The $F_{\text{i}}^{\text{Pixels}}$ vs $G_{\text{i}}^{\text{Strips}}$ distribution the 1800 GeV mass gluino R-hadron (right), after passing the selection criteria listed in Table 2.
The $G_{\text{i}}^{\text{Strips}}$ distribution in the FAIL region for events passing the event selection and with $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 200$ GeV.
This paper reports a search for a light CP-odd scalar resonance with a mass of 20 GeV to 90 GeV in 13 TeV proton-proton collision data with an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The analysis assumes the resonance is produced via gluon-gluon fusion and decays into a $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ pair which subsequently decays into a fully leptonic $\mu^{+}\nu_{\mu} \bar{\nu}_{\tau} e^{-} \bar{\nu}_{e} \nu_{\tau}$ or $e^{+}\nu_{e}\bar{\nu}_{\tau} \mu^-\bar{\nu}_{\mu}\nu_{\tau}$ final state. No significant excess of events above the predicted Standard Model background is observed. The results are interpreted within a flavour-aligned two-Higgs-doublet model, and a model-independent cross-section interpretation is also given. Upper limits at 95$%$ confidence level between 3.0 pb and 68 pb are set on the cross-section for producing a CP-odd Higgs boson that decays into a $\tau^+\tau^-$ pair.
Post-fit $m_\mathrm{MMC}$ distribution in the low-mass SR for the $m_A = 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ signal mass hypothesis. $m_\mathrm{MMC}$ is the mass reconstructed by the Missing Mass Calculator. Processes contributing to the background Others are $Z/\gamma^* \rightarrow ee/\mu\mu$ and SM Higgs. The subscript on the $A\to\tau\tau$ process indicates the mass of the $A$ boson. Total includes all backgrounds and the signal process. The low-mass Signal Region is defined as: - 1 electron and 1 muon with opposite charge - $p_\mathrm{T}$ requirements of the leptons are a combination of the following: - $p_\mathrm{T}^e > 18\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $p_\mathrm{T}^\mu > 15\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $p_\mathrm{T}^e > 10\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $p_\mathrm{T}^\mu > 25\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $p_\mathrm{T}^e > 27\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $p_\mathrm{T}^\mu > 10\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $\vert \eta_e \vert < 2.47$, excluding $1.37 < \vert \eta_e \vert < 1.52$ - $\vert \eta_\mu \vert < 2.7$ - no jets with $b$-quarks - $\Delta R_{\ell\ell} < 0.7$ - $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss} > 50\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $m_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{tot} = \sqrt{\left(p_\mathrm{T}^e+p_\mathrm{T}^\mu+E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}\right)^2-\left(\vec{p}_\mathrm{T}^{\,e}+\vec{p}_\mathrm{T}^{\,\mu}+\vec{E}_\mathrm{T}^{\,\mathrm{miss}}\right)^2} < 45\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $m_\mathrm{MMC} > 0\,\mathrm{GeV}$
Post-fit $m_\mathrm{MMC}$ distribution in the high-mass SR for the $m_A = 90\,\mathrm{GeV}$ signal mass hypothesis. $m_\mathrm{MMC}$ is the mass reconstructed by the Missing Mass Calculator. Processes contributing to the background Others are $Z/\gamma^* \rightarrow ee/\mu\mu$ and SM Higgs. The subscript on the $A\to\tau\tau$ process indicates the mass of the $A$ boson. otal includes all backgrounds and the signal process. The high-mass Signal Region is defined as: - 1 electron and 1 muon with opposite charge - $p_\mathrm{T}$ requirements of the leptons are a combination of the following: - $p_\mathrm{T}^e > 18\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $p_\mathrm{T}^\mu > 15\,\mathrm{GeV}$ or - $p_\mathrm{T}^e > 10\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $p_\mathrm{T}^\mu > 25\,\mathrm{GeV}$ or - $p_\mathrm{T}^e > 27\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $p_\mathrm{T}^\mu > 10\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $\vert \eta_e \vert < 2.47$, excluding $1.37 < \vert \eta_e \vert < 1.52$ - $\vert \eta_\mu \vert < 2.7$ - no jets with $b$-quarks - $\Delta R_{\ell\ell} < 1.0$ - $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $m_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{tot} = \sqrt{\left(p_\mathrm{T}^e+p_\mathrm{T}^\mu+E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}\right)^2-\left(\vec{p}_\mathrm{T}^{\,e}+\vec{p}_\mathrm{T}^{\,\mu}+\vec{E}_\mathrm{T}^{\,\mathrm{miss}}\right)^2} < 65\,\mathrm{GeV}$ - $35\,\mathrm{GeV} < m_\mathrm{MMC} < 130\,\mathrm{GeV}$
Expected and observed $95\%$ CL limits on the production cross-section for $gg\rightarrow A$ times the branching ratio for $A$ decaying into two $\tau$-leptons for $A$ boson masses ranging from $20$ to $90\,\mathrm{GeV}$.
This paper presents a search for supersymmetric particles in models with highly compressed mass spectra, in events consistent with being produced through vector boson fusion. The search uses 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Events containing at least two jets with a large gap in pseudorapidity, large missing transverse momentum, and no reconstructed leptons are selected. A boosted decision tree is used to separate events consistent with the production of supersymmetric particles from those due to Standard Model backgrounds. The data are found to be consistent with Standard Model predictions. The results are interpreted using simplified models of $R$-parity-conserving supersymmetry in which the lightest supersymmetric partner is a bino-like neutralino with a mass similar to that of the lightest chargino and second-to-lightest neutralino, both of which are wino-like. Lower limits at 95% confidence level on the masses of next-to-lightest supersymmetric partners in this simplified model are established between 117 and 120 GeV when the lightest supersymmetric partners are within 1 GeV in mass.
Observed and predicted background distributions of the BDT score in $\text{SR}_\text{2j}$ after the exclusion fit. The nominal, pre-fit prediction of an example benchmark signal with $(m(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}/\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}), \widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (100, 99)$ GeV is shown in red. The 'Other' category contains rare backgrounds from diboson, triboson and top-quark production processes. The hatched band represents the post-fit experimental, theoretical, and statistical uncertainties in the total background. The bottom panel of each plot shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
Observed and predicted background distributions of the BDT score in $\text{SR}_{\geq3\text{j}}$ after the exclusion fit. The nominal, pre-fit prediction of an example benchmark signal with $(m(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}/\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}), \widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (100, 99)$ GeV is shown in red. The 'Other' category contains rare backgrounds from diboson, triboson and top-quark production processes. The hatched band represents the post-fit experimental, theoretical, and statistical uncertainties in the total background. The bottom panel of each plot shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL exclusion limits on the compressed SUSY simplified model with a bino-like LSP and wino-like NLSPs being considered. These are shown with $\pm1\sigma_\text{exp}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm1\sigma^{\text{SUSY}}_{\text{theory}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively. The limits set by the ATLAS searches using the soft lepton signature is illustrated by the blue region while the limit imposed by the LEP experiments is shown in grey.
A search for the production of top-quark pairs with the same electric charge ($tt$ or $\bar{t}\bar{t}$) is presented. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV, recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. Events with two same-charge leptons and at least two $b$-tagged jets are selected. Neural networks are employed to define two selections sensitive to additional couplings beyond the Standard Model that would enhance the production rate of same-sign top-quark pairs. No significant signal is observed, leading to an upper limit on the total production cross-section of same-sign top-quark pairs of 1.6 fb at 95$\%$ confidence level. Corresponding limits on the three Wilson coefficients associated with the ${\cal O}_{tu}^{(1)}$, ${\cal O}_{Qu}^{(1)}$, and ${\cal O}_{Qu}^{(8)}$ operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory framework are derived.
Distributions of the $\mathrm{NN^{SvsB}}$ output for data and the expected background after the likelihood fit in the $SR_{ctu ++}$ signal region. The post-fit background expectations are shown as filled histograms, the combined pre-fit background expectations are shown as dashed lines. The signal distribution using the Wilson coefficient values $c_{tu}^{(1)}=0.04$, $c_{Qu}^{(1)}=0.1$, $c_{Qu}^{(8)}=0.1$ is shown with a dotted line, normalized to the same number of events as the background.
Distributions of the $\mathrm{NN^{SvsB}}$ output for data and the expected background after the likelihood fit in the $SR_{ctu --}$ signal region. The post-fit background expectations are shown as filled histograms, the combined pre-fit background expectations are shown as dashed lines. The signal distribution using the Wilson coefficient values $c_{tu}^{(1)}=0.04$, $c_{Qu}^{(1)}=0.1$, $c_{Qu}^{(8)}=0.1$ is shown with a dotted line, normalized to the same number of events as the background.
Distributions of the $\mathrm{NN^{SvsB}}$ output for data and the expected background after the likelihood fit in the $SR_{cQu ++}$ signal region. The post-fit background expectations are shown as filled histograms, the combined pre-fit background expectations are shown as dashed lines. The signal distribution using the Wilson coefficient values $c_{tu}^{(1)}=0.04$, $c_{Qu}^{(1)}=0.1$, $c_{Qu}^{(8)}=0.1$ is shown with a dotted line, normalized to the same number of events as the background.
The production of (multi-)strange hadrons is measured at midrapidity in proton-proton (pp) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV as a function of the local charged-particle multiplicity in the pseudorapidity interval ${|\eta|<0.5}$ and of the very-forward energy measured by the ALICE Zero-Degree Calorimeters (ZDC). The latter provides information on the effective energy available for particle production in the collision once subtracted from the centre-of-mass energy. The yields of ${\rm K}^{0}_{\rm{S}}$, $\Lambda+\overline{\Lambda}$, and $\Xi^{-}+\overline{\Xi}^{+}$ per charged-particle increase with the effective energy. In addition, this work exploits a multi-differential approach to decouple the roles of local multiplicity and effective energy in such an enhancement. The results presented in this article provide new insights into the interplay between global properties of the collision, such as the initial available energy in the event, and the locally produced final hadronic state, connected to the charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity. Notably, a strong increase of strange baryon production with effective energy is observed for fixed charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity. These results are discussed within the context of existing phenomenological models of hadronisation implemented in different tunes of the PYTHIA 8 event generator.
Self-normalised ZN energy as a function of the self-normalised charged-particle-multiplicity in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV in the standalone classification (V0M event classes).
Self-normalised ZN energy as a function of the self-normalised charged-particle-multiplicity in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV in the high-local-multiplicity classification (V0M+SPDClusters event classes).
Self-normalised ZN energy as a function of the self-normalised charged-particle-multiplicity in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV in the low-local-multiplicity classification (V0M+SPDClusters event classes).
Inclusive cross-sections for top-quark pair production in association with charm quarks are measured with proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$, collected with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC between 2015 and 2018. The measurements are performed by requiring one or two charged leptons (electrons and muons), two $b$-tagged jets, and at least one additional jet in the final state. A custom flavor-tagging algorithm is employed for the simultaneous identification of $b$-jets and $c$-jets. In a fiducial phase space that replicates the acceptance of the ATLAS detector, the cross-sections for $t\bar{t}+ {\geq} 2c$ and $t\bar{t}+1c$ production are measured to be $1.28^{+0.27}_{-0.24}\;\text{pb}$ and $6.4^{+1.0}_{-0.9}\;\text{pb}$, respectively. The measurements are primarily limited by uncertainties in the modeling of inclusive $t\bar{t}$ and $t\bar{t}+b\bar{b}$ production, in the calibration of the flavor-tagging algorithm, and by data statistics. Cross-section predictions from various $t\bar{t}$ simulations are largely consistent with the measured cross-section values, though all underpredict the observed values by 0.5 to 2.0 standard deviations. In a phase-space volume without requirements on the $t\bar{t}$ decay products and the jet multiplicity, the cross-section ratios of $t\bar{t}+ {\geq} 2c$ and $t\bar{t}+1c$ to total $t\bar{t}+\text{jets}$ production are determined to be $(1.23 \pm 0.25) \%$ and $(8.8 \pm 1.3) \%$.
Measured cross-section values in the fiducial phase space and inclusive volume for the various $t\bar{t}+jets$ categories.
Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for $SR_{\mathrm{loose}}^{1\ell5j}$ signal region, which uses the invariant mass of the two geometrically closest c-tagged jets, $m_{\mathit{cc}}^{\mathrm{min}\Delta R}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.
Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{tight}}^{1\ell5j}$ signal region, which uses the invariant mass of the two geometrically closest jets tagged with c@11%, $m_{\mathit{cc}}^{\mathrm{min}\Delta R}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.
Forum