Measurement of the spin correlation parameters $A_{xx}$ and $A_{yy}$ for proton-proton scattering at 47.5 MeV

Nisimura, K. ; Hasegawa, T. ; Saito, T. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 30 (1969) 612-613, 1969.
Inspire Record 1389659 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28866

A measurement of the spin correlation parameters A xx (90° cm) and A yy (90° cm) of 47.5 MeV proton-proton scattering has been performed by means of polarized beam and a polarized target.

1 data table

No description provided.


Differential cross section and analyzing power measurements for polarized n(d) elastic scattering at 248-MeV

Maeda, Y. ; Sakai, H. ; Fujita, K. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 76 (2007) 014004, 2007.
Inspire Record 756614 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.25172

The differential cross sections and vector analyzing powers for nd elastic scattering at En=248 MeV were measured for 10°–180° in the center-of-mass (c.m.) system. To cover the wide angular range, the experiments were performed separately by using two different setups for forward and backward angles. The data are compared with theoretical results based on Faddeev calculations with realistic nucleon-nucleon (NN) forces such as AV18, CD Bonn, and Nijmegen I and II, and their combinations with the three-nucleon forces (3NFs), such as Tucson-Melbourne 99 (TM99), Urbana IX, and the coupled-channel potential with Δ-isobar excitation. Large discrepancies are found between the experimental cross sections and theory with only 2N forces for θc.m.>90°. The inclusion of 3NFs brings the theoretical cross sections closer to the data but only partially explains this discrepancy. For the analyzing power, no significant improvement is found when 3NFs are included. Relativistic corrections are shown to be small for both the cross sections and the analyzing powers at this energy. For the cross sections, these effects are mostly seen in the very backward angles. Compared with the pd cross section data, quite significant differences are observed at all scattering angles that cannot be explained only by the Coulomb interaction, which is usually significant at small angles.

6 data tables

Cross section for N DEUT elastic scattering for data taken in 2003 in the backward direction in the centre-of-mass. Statistical errors only are given.

Cross section for N DEUT elastic scattering for data taken in 2000 in the backward direction in the centre-of-mass. Statistical errors only are given.

Cross section for N DEUT elastic scattering in the forward direction in the centre-of-mass. Statistical errors only are given.

More…

Measurement of the analyzing power A(N) in p p elastic scattering in the CNI region with a polarized atomic hydrogen gas jet target.

Okada, H. ; Alekseev, I.G. ; Bravar, A. ; et al.
2006.
Inspire Record 707803 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.41834

A precise measurement of the analyzing power $A_N$ in proton-proton elastic scattering in the region of 4-momentum transfer squared $0.001 < |t| < 0.032 ({\rm GeV}/c)^2$ has been performed using a polarized atomic hydrogen gas jet target and the 100 GeV/$c$ RHIC proton beam. The interference of the electromagnetic spin-flip amplitude with a hadronic spin-nonflip amplitude is predicted to generate a significant $A_N$ of 4--5%, peaking at $-t \simeq 0.003 ({\rm GeV}/c)^2$. This kinematic region is known as the Coulomb Nuclear Interference region. A possible hadronic spin-flip amplitude modifies this otherwise calculable prediction. Our data are well described by the CNI prediction with the electromagnetic spin-flip alone and do not support the presence of a large hadronic spin-flip amplitude.

1 data table

Analysing power as a function of momentum transfer T. The first DSYS error is the systematic error, the second is the normalization error on the target polarization.


Low energy analyzing powers in pion proton elastic scattering.

Meier, R. ; Croni, M. ; Bilger, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 588 (2004) 155-162, 2004.
Inspire Record 645151 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26962

Analyzing powers of pion-proton elastic scattering have been measured at PSI with the Low Energy Pion Spectrometer LEPS as well as a novel polarized scintillator target. Angular distributions between 40 and 120 deg (c.m.) were taken at 45.2, 51.2, 57.2, 68.5, 77.2, and 87.2 MeV incoming pion kinetic energy for pi+ p scattering, and at 67.3 and 87.2 MeV for pi- p scattering. These new measurements constitute a substantial extension of the polarization data base at low energies. Predictions from phase shift analyses are compared with the experimental results, and deviations are observed at low energies.

11 data tables

Analyzing power for PI+ P elastic scattering at incidient kinetic energy 87.2 MeV from the data set 1.

Analyzing power for PI+ P elastic scattering at incidient kinetic energy 68.4 MeV from the data set 1.

Analyzing power for PI+ P elastic scattering at incidient kinetic energy 57.2 MeV from the data set 1.

More…

Analyzing powers for pi- p elastic scattering at 279-MeV

Hofman, G.J. ; Craig, K. ; Pavan, M.M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 68 (2003) 018202, 2003.
Inspire Record 628373 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.25270

Analyzing powers for π−p elastic scattering have been measured at TRIUMF using the CHAOS spectrometer and a spin-polarized target. These data were collected at a bombarding energy of Tπ=279MeV and cover an angular range of 53<~θc.m.π<~180°. There is good agreement between these data and the latest partial wave analysis from the VPI/GWU group.

1 data table

Analysing power measurement.


Cross section and complete set of proton spin observables in p polarized d elastic scattering at 250 MeV

Hatanaka, K. ; Shimizu, Y. ; Hirooka, D. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 66 (2002) 044002, 2002.
Inspire Record 599502 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.25292

The angular distributions of the cross section, the proton analyzing power, and all proton polarization transfer coefficients of p→d elastic scattering were measured at 250 MeV. The range of center-of-mass angles was 10°–165° for the cross section and the analyzing power, and about 10°–95° for the polarization transfer coefficients. These are the first measurements of a complete set of proton polarization observables for p→d elastic scattering at intermediate energies. The present data are compared with theoretical predictions based on exact solutions of the three-nucleon Faddeev equations and modern realistic nucleon-nucleon potentials combined with three-nucleon forces (3NF), namely, the Tucson-Melbourne (TM) 2π-exchange model, a modification thereof (TM′) closer to chiral symmetry, and the Urbana IX model. Large effects of the three-nucleon forces are predicted. The inclusion of the three-nucleon forces gives a good description of the cross section at angles below the minimum. However, appreciable discrepancies between the data and predictions remain at backward angles. For the spin observables the predictions of the TM 3NF model deviate strongly from the other two 3NF models, which are close together, except for Kyy′. In the case of the analyzing power all 3NF models fail to describe the data at the upper half of the angular range. In the restricted measured angular range the polarization transfer coefficients are fairly well described by the TM′ and Urbana IX 3NF models, whereas the TM 3NF model mostly fails. The transfer coefficient Kyy′ is best described by the Urbana IX but the theoretical description is still insufficient to reproduce the experimental data. These results call for a better understanding of the spin structure of the three-nucleon force and very likely for a full relativistic treatment of the three-nucleon continuum.

2 data tables

Cross section and analyzing power measurements.

Proton polarization transfer coefficients.


Measurement of Analyzing Power for Proton-Carbon Elastic Scattering in the Coulomb-Nuclear Interference Region with a 22-GeV/c Polarized Proton Beam

Tojo, J. ; Alekseev, I. ; Bai, M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 89 (2002) 052302, 2002.
Inspire Record 589041 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19396

The analyzing power for proton-carbon elastic scattering in the coulomb-nuclear interference region of momentum transfer, $9.0\times10^{-3}<-t<4.1\times10^{-2}$ (GeV/$c)^{2}$, was measured with a 21.7 GeV/$c$ polarized proton beam at the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron of Brookhaven National Laboratory. The ratio of hadronic spin-flip to non-flip amplitude, $r_5$, was obtained from the analyzing power to be $\text{Re} r_5=0.088\pm 0.058$ and $\text{Im} r_5=-0.161\pm 0.226$.

1 data table

The analyzing power as a function of the momentum transfer T. The two DSYS errors are (1) the systematic error in the raw asymmetry and (2) that in the polarization of the beam.


Complete set of precise deuteron analyzing powers at intermediate energies: Comparison with modern nuclear force predictions

Sekiguchi, K. ; Sakai, H. ; Witaa, H. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 65 (2002) 034003, 2002.
Inspire Record 583095 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.25427

Precise measurements of deuteron vector and tensor analyzing powers Ayd, Axx, Ayy, and Axz in d−p elastic scattering were performed via 1H(d→,d)p and 1H(d→,p)d reactions at three incoming deuteron energies of Edlab=140, 200, and 270 MeV. A wide range of center-of-mass angles from ≈10° to 180° was covered. The cross section was measured at 140 and 270 MeV at the same angles. These high precision data were compared with theoretical predictions based on exact solutions of three-nucleon Faddeev equations and modern nucleon-nucleon potentials combined with three-nucleon forces. Three-body interactions representing a wide range of present day models have been used: the Tucson-Melbourne 2π-exchange model, a modification thereof closer to chiral symmetry, the Urbana IX model, and a phenomenological spin-orbit ansatz. Large three-nucleon force effects are predicted, especially at the two higher energies. However, only some of them, predominantly dσ/dΩ and Ayd, are supported by the present data. For tensor analyzing powers the predicted effects are in drastic conflict to the data, indicating defects of the present day three-nucleon force models.

8 data tables

Angular distribution for DEUT P elastic scattering at EKIN of 140 MeV with the SMART spectrograph.

Angular distribution for DEUT P elastic scattering at EKIN of 270 MeV with the D-room polarimeter.

Angular distribution for DEUT P elastic scattering at EKIN of 270 MeV with the SMART spectrograph.

More…

Excitation functions of the analyzing power in p p(pol.) scattering from 0.45-GeV to 2.5-GeV

The EDDA collaboration Altmeier, M. ; Bauer, F. ; Bisplinghoff, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 85 (2000) 1819-1822, 2000.
Inspire Record 537773 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19490

Excitation functions AN(pp,Θc.m.) of the analyzing power in pp→ elastic scattering have been measured with a polarized atomic hydrogen target for projectile momenta pp between 1000 and 3300 MeV/ c. The experiment was performed for scattering angles 30°≤Θc.m.≤90° using the recirculating beam of the proton storage ring COSY during acceleration. The resulting excitation functions and angular distributions of high internal consistency have significant impact on the recent phase shift solution SAID SP99, in particular, on the spin triplet phase shifts between 1000 and 1800 MeV, and demonstrate the limited predictive power of single-energy phase shift solutions at these energies.

26 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Measurement of spin observables in neutron proton elastic scattering. I: Correlation parameters

Arnold, J. ; van den Brandt, B. ; Daum, M. ; et al.
Eur.Phys.J.C 17 (2000) 67-81, 2000.
Inspire Record 537914 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.43392

The spin correlation parameters$A_{oonn}, A_{ooss}, A_{oosk}, A_{ookk}$and the analyzing power$A_{oono}$have been measured i

6 data tables

Values of the coefficients for the linear combinations of the spin correlation parameters Cpq measurements for the four different beam and target polarisation orientations. For the (z,z) and (y,y) configurations the coefficients are identical for all incident kinetic energies.

Measurement of the analysing power. Statistical errors only are shown. For the systematic errors see the systematics section above. Note that there are two overlapping angular settings.

Measurements of the spin correlation parameter CNN. Statistical errors onlyare shown. For the systematics see the systematic section above. Note the two overlapping angular settings.

More…