Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

The NC cross section DSIG/DX for Q**2 > 10000 GeV**2. There is an additional 1.5 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The CC cross section DSIG/DX for Q**2 > 1000 GeV**2. There is an additional 1.5 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The NC reduced cross section and the electromagnetic structure funcion F2 derived from the data. For Q**2 > 2000 GeV**2 the extraction of F2 is restricted to Y < 0.6.

The CC double differential cross section D2SIG/DX/DQ**2 and the structure function term PHI.

The NC E- P reduced cross section for the high-y analysis. All E- P data not previously reported in EPJ C19 (2001) 269 are given.. There is an additional 1.8 PCT normalization uncertainty.

The NC structure function term PHI and the structure function FL for the E-P data.

The NC structure function term PHI and the structure function FL for the E+P data.

The generalised structure function XF3.

The structure function XF3(C=GAMMA,Z) obtained by averaging over different Q**2 values and transforming to Q**2 = 1500 GeV**2.

Breakdown of errors from table 6, DSIG(C=NC)/DQ**2 as a function of Q**2. All errors are in PCT.

All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 8, DSIG(C=NC)/DX as a function of X. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 9, DSIG(C=NC)/DX as a function of X. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 10, DSIG(C=CC)/DX as a function of X. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 11, F2 as a function of Q**2, X and Y. All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 11, F2 as a function of Q**2, X and Y. PHI(C=NC) is the NC structure function term.. Y+ = 1+(1-Y)**2. DEL(F2),DEL9F3) and DEL(FL) are the corrections to F2 as decribed in the text of the paper.

All errors are in PCT.

Breakdown of errors from table 12, SIG(C=REDUCED) as a function of Q**2 andX. All errors are in PCT.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 21 to 75 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 95 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 21 to 35 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 95 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 35 to 52 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 95 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 52 to 75 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 95 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 21 to 35 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 95 to 212 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 21 to 35 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 212 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 35 to 52 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 95 to 212 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 35 to 52 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 212 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 1 GeV**2) integrated over the ET range 52 to 75 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 212 to 285 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DETARAP for inclusive jet photoproduction(Q**2 < 0.01 GeV**2) integrated over the ET ranges 5 to 12 GeV and 12 to 21 GeV and the W(C=GAMMA P) range 164 to 242 GeV.

Measured differential E+ P cross section DSIG/DET for inclusive jet photoproductionm, with jets defined by the cone algorithm with R = 1, for the two Q**2 ranges integrated over the jet pseudorapidity range -1 to 2.5 in the W(C=GAMMA P) range 164 to 242 GeV.

The scaled GAMMA P cross section at a mean W of 200 GeV as a function of the jet XT for the jet CM rapidity range -0.5 to 0.5. Jets are defined by the conealgorithm with R = 1.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/D(ET**2/Q**2) in the pseudorapidity range 0.5 to 1.5.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/D(ET**2/Q**2) in the pseudorapidity range 1.5 to 2.8.

The inclusive 3-JET cross section as a function of Bjorken scaling variableX for the Q**2 range 150 to 5000 GeV**2.

The inclusive 3-JET cross section as a function of the invariant 3-JET massfor the Q**2 range 5 to 100 GeV**2.

The inclusive 3-JET cross section as a function of the invariant 3-JET massfor the Q**2 range 150 to 5000 GeV**2.

Distribution of jet energy fraction X3 = 2E(P=4)/M(P=4_5_6) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame for Q**2 from 5 to 100 GeV**2.

Distribution of jet energy fraction X3 = 2E(P=4)/M(P=4_5_6) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame for Q**2 from 150 to 5000 GeV**2.

Distribution of jet energy fraction X4 = 2E(P=5)/M(P=4_5_6) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame for Q**2 from 5 to 100 GeV**2.

Distribution of jet energy fraction X4 = 2E(P=5)/M(P=4_5_6) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame for Q**2 from 150 to 5000 GeV**2.

Distribution of COS(THETA(C=3)) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame at Q**2 from 5 to 100 GeV**2. THETA(C=3) is the angle of the most energetic jet with respect to the proton beam direction.

Distribution of COS(THETA(C=3)) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame at Q**2 from 150 to 5000 GeV**2. THETA(C=3) is the angle of the most energetic jet with respect to the proton beam direction.

Distribution of PSI(C=3)) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame at Q**2 from 5 to 100 GeV**2. PSI(C=3) is the angle between the plane spanned by the highest energy jet and the proton beam and the plane containing the 3 jets.

Distribution of COS(THETA(C=3)) in the 3 JET centre-of-mass frame at Q**2 from 150 to 5000 GeV**2. PSI(C=3) is the angle between the plane spanned by the highest energy jet and the proton beam and the plane containing the 3 jets.

The NC single differential cross section, as a function of Q**2 in the range from 200 to 30000 Gev**2, for Y < 0.9 after correction (KCOR) according to theStandard Model expectation from the measured kinematic cuts y < 0.63 for Q**2 < 890 GeV**2. The first DSYS error is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the correlated systematic error.

No description provided.

The structure function, F2, and the reduced cross section, in NC DIS scattering at Q**2 from 150 to 30000 GeV**2 as a function if x and y. The individual corrections used to calculate F2 from the cross sections are given in the following table.

The various corrections to the cross sections used to calcuate the F2 values given in the previous table. See the text of the paper for more details.

The CC double differential cross section and the structure function term PHI(C=CC) - see text of the paper for details - at Q**2 from 150 to 1 5000 GeV**2 as a function of both x and y. Also tabulated are the QED corrections to the data, which have already been applied.

CT = The various sources of error (in percent) to the individual NC reduced cross section given in table 6 - see text of paper for more details;DTOT - TOTAL error. DSTA - STATISTICAL error. DUNC - UNCORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error. DUNC(E) - UNCORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error from the positron energy. DUNC(H) - UNCORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error from the hadronic energy. DCOR - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error. DCOR(E+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the positron energy. DCOR(T+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the positron polar angle. DCOR(H+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the hadron energy. DCOR(N+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the noise subtraction. DCOR(B+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the background subtraction.

The various sources of error (in percent) to the individual CC double differential cross sections given in table 7 - see text of paper for more details. DTOT - TOTAL error. DSTA - STATISTICAL error. DUNC - UNCORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error. DUNC(H) - UNCORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error from the hadronic energy. DCOR - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC error. DCOR(V+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variationin the cut on the Vap/Vp ratio. DCOR(H+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the hadron energy. DCOR(N+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the noise subtraction. DCOR(B+) - CORRELATED SYSTEMATIC from one sig variation in the background subtraction.

The structure function xF3 dtermined by combining the present NC E- data with previously measured E+ data at a proton enetrgy of 820 GeV. (Adloff et al. EPJ C13 (609) 2000.). The luminosity uncertainties of the E+ P and E- P data sets are included in the systematic error.

The total CC cross section in the region Q**2 > 1000 GeV**2 and Y > 0.9 after applying a small correction factor from the measured Y range from 0.03 0.85.

The longitudinal structure function FL determined from the present data. The first DSYS error is the combined uncorrelated and correlated systematics. The second DSYS error is due to the uncertainties corrected with the representationsof F2 in the derivative method for Q**2 < 10 GeV**2, and in the QCD extrapolati on method for Q**2 > 10 GeV**2.

The measured values of the derivative DF2/DLN(Q**2), calculated at fixed X bins.

Value of ALPHAS obtained by combining the H1 data with MU P scattering dataof BCDMS at large X.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of the invariant mass of the diffractive system (X).

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of W.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of BETA=X/X(NAME=POMERON).

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), the fraction of the hadronic final state energy of the DD system which is contained in the two jets.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of X(NAME=GAMMA,C=JETS), the fraction ofthe photon momentum which enters the hard scattering.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of E(NAME=REM,C=GAMMA), the energy sum of all final state hadrons in the photon hemisphere (ETARAP<0) which lie outside the two hightest PT(RF=CM) jet cones.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range -1.5 TO -1.3.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range -1.75 TO -1.5.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range -2.0 TO -1.75.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range < -2.0.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range 20 TO 35 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range 35 TO 45 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range 45 TO 60 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range > 60 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Q**2 for the restricted interval X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of the average transverse momentum of the two jets in the c.m.frame for the restricted interval X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), the fraction of the hadronic final state energy of the DD system which is contained in the two jets for the restricted interval X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of PT(NAME=REM,C=POMERON), the PT sum of all final state hadrons in the pomeron hemisphere (ETARAP>0) which lie outside the two hightest PT(RF=CM) jet cones.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level three-jet cross section as a function of the invariant mass of the 3 jet system.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level three-jet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=3-JETS).

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive single jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Normalised distribution in M(P=4_5) for NC and CC dijet events. M(P=4_5) is the dijet mass.

Normalised distribution in ZP for NC and CC dijet events. ZP corresponds to 0.5*MIN(1-COS(THETA*)) summed over the two jets. THETA* is the polar angle of each parton in the c.m. system of the virtual boson and the incoming parton.

Normalised distribution in XP for NC and CC dijet events. XP is the ratio X/PSI where PSI is the fraction of the protons for momentacarried by the parton entering the hard scattering process.

Normalised distribution in ET(C=FOWARD) for NC and CC dijet events. ET(C=FORWARD) is the transverse energy of the most (non-remnant) forward jet.

Normalised distribution in THETA(C=FORWARD) for NC and CC dijet events. THETA(C=FORWARD) is the polar angle of the most (non-remnant) forward jet.

Normalised distribution in dijet mass for CC and NC events with Q**2 > 5000GeV**2.