C(k*)/(quadratic baseline) for K0s K+ and all kT, systematic uncertainties negligible for k*>0.06 GeV/c

C(k*)/(quadratic baseline) for K0s K+ and kT < 0.85 GeV/c, systematic uncertainties negligible for k*>0.06 GeV/c

C(k*)/(quadratic baseline) for K0s K+ and kT > 0.85 GeV/c, systematic uncertainties negligible for k*>0.06 GeV/c

C(k*)/(quadratic baseline) for K0s K- and all kT, systematic uncertainties negligible for k*>0.06 GeV/c

C(k*)/(quadratic baseline) for K0s K- and kT < 0.85 GeV/c, systematic uncertainties negligible for k*>0.06 GeV/c

C(k*)/(quadratic baseline) for K0s K- and kT > 0.85 GeV/c, systematic uncertainties negligible for k*>0.06 GeV/c

R vs. kT for 7 TeV pp averaged over K0s K+ and K0s K- with Achasov2 parameters

R vs. kT for 2.76 TeV/nucleon Pb Pb averaged over K0s K+ and K0s K- with Achasov2 parameters

lambda/purity vs. kT for 7 TeV pp averaged over K0s K+ and K0s K- with Achasov2 parameters

lambda/purity vs. kT for 2.76 TeV/nucleon Pb Pb averaged over K0s K+ and K0s K- with Achasov2 parameters

R vs. kT for 7 TeV pp averaged over K0s K+ and K0s K- and with Achasov2 parameters

R vs. kT for 7 TeV pp --> K0s K0s averaged over event multiplicity

R vs. kT for 7 TeV pp --> K+- K+- averaged over event multiplicity and averaged between K+ and K-

lambda/purity vs. kT for 7 TeV pp averaged over K0s K+ and K0s K- and with Achasov2 parameters

lambda/purity vs. kT for 7 TeV pp --> K0s K0s averaged over event multiplicity

lambda/purity vs. kT for 7 TeV pp --> K+- K+- averaged over event multiplicity and averaged between K+ and K-

The radius $r_0$ as a function of m$_T$ obtained with the p$-$p $\oplus$ $\overline{\mathrm{p}}-\overline{\mathrm{p}}$ and the p$-\Lambda$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\mathrm{p}}-\overline{\Lambda}$ correlation functions.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The second-order Fourier coefficients, $V_{3\Delta}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles, after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, estimated from the 10 $\leq$ $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 20 range.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The triangular flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{3}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The triangular flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{3}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The triangular flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{3}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $p_{T}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)/n_{q}$, as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$.

The four-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The four-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The four-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The six-particle cumulant, $c_{2}(6)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow after correcting for back-to-back jet correlations, $v_{2}^{sub}(2, |\Delta\eta| > 2)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(4)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}(6)$, as a function of $N_{offline}^{trk}$ for charged particles.

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 35 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 80 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 35 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 90 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 80 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and 90 $<N_{offline}^{trk}<$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 0.1 $<p_{T}<$ 1.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 1.0 $<p_{T}<$ 2.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 2.0 $<p_{T}<$ 3.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 105 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 13 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Correlated yield obtained with the ZYAM procedure as a function of $|\Delta\Phi|$, averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 in for 3.0 $<p_{T}<$ 4.0 $GeV/c$ and $N_{offline}^{trk}>$ 110 bins for pp data at $\sqrt =$ 7 $TeV$. The $p_{T}$ selection applies to both particles in the pair. Only statistical uncertainties are given. The subtracted ZYAM constant is given ($C_{ZYAM}$).

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 and integrated over the region $|\Delta\Phi| < \Delta\Phi_{ZYAM}$ for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $p_{T}$ for events with $N^{offline}_{trk} \geq$ 105. The $p_{T}$ value for each $p_{T}$ bin is the average $p_{T}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 7 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $p_{T}$ for events with $N^{offline}_{trk} \geq$ 110. The $p_{T}$ value for each $p_{T}$ bin is the average $p_{T}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 and integrated over the region $|\Delta\Phi| < \Delta\Phi_{ZYAM}$ for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 for pp data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 7 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 pPb data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 5.02 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Associated yield for the near side of the correlation function averaged over 2 $<|\Delta\eta|<$ 4 PbPb data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 2.76 $TeV$. The associated yield as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ for events with 1.0 $< p_{T} <$ 2.0 GeV/c. The $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value for each $N_{trk}^{offline}$ bin is the average $N_{trk}^{offline}$ value.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-$\varphi$ windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, $\delta\varphi=\pi/4$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $0.3-1.5$ (GeV/c).

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-$\varphi$ windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, $\delta\varphi=\pi/4$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $0.3-1.5$ (GeV/c).

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, measured in several $p_{\rm T}$ ranges.

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $0.30-0.40$ (GeV/c).

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $0.40-0.52$ (GeV/c).

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $0.52-0.70$ (GeV/c).

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $0.70-1.03$ (GeV/c).

Correlation strength $b_{\rm corr}$ for $\eta$-windows of the width $\delta\eta=0.2$, measured in $p_{\rm T}$ range $1.03-6.00$ (GeV/c).

Inclusive relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C}/M(p_{\rm T})$ as a function of $\sqrt{s}$ in pp collisions.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty on the measured values of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, $R_t$, and $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. The evaluation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\,\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $1.0\,\%$ are marked with "$<1$" in the paper. To provide numerical values for this table in HEPdata, these uncertainties are approximated with $\pm 0.5\,\%$. This approximation is applied to all measurements for the following uncertainties$:$ JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by-jets, JES pileup, $b$-JES, jet vertex fraction, mistag efficiency and $W+\;$jets shape variation. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq)$ the approximation is applied in addition to the following uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $R_t$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES detector, $b$-tagging efficiency, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance and $tq$ scale variations. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(T)).

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(TBAR)).

Parametrization factors for the $m_{t}$ dependence [see Eq. (4) in the paper] of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar tq)$, and $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$.

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

The value of $|V_{tb}|^{2}$ is extracted by dividing the measured value of $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$ by the prediction of the approximate NNLO calculation. The experimental and theoretical uncertainties are added in quadrature.

Event yields for the 2-jet-$\ell^{+}$ and 2-jet-$\ell^{-}$ HPR channels. The expectation for the signal and background yields correspond to the result of the binned maximum-likelihood fit described in Sec. $\mathrm{VI~D}$ in the paper. The uncertainty of the expectations is the normalization uncertainty of each process after the fit, as described in Sec. $\mathrm{VII~F}$ in the paper.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $|y|$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(\bar t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $|y|$ distribution.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Comparison between the measured differential cross sections and the predictions from the NLO calculation using the MSTW2008 PDF set. For each variable and prediction a $\chi^{2}$ value is calculated with HERAfitter using the covariance matrix of each measured spectrum. The theory uncertainties of the predictions are treated as uncorrelated. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is equal to the number of bins in the measured spectrum.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, mistag efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The JES $\eta$ intercalibration uncertainty has a sign switch from the first to the second bin. For the $tq$ generator $+$ parton shower uncertainty a sign switch is denoted with $\mp$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $c-$tagging efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content $:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet energy resolution, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$ tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 1-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.

Measured fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section in the 2-jet region with statistical and systematic uncertainties in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$. Also shown are the cross sections obtained without single-top subtraction. UPDATE (04 MAY 2019): units corrected from nb/GeV to fb/GeV.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of statistical errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.

Fiducial $W+b$-jets cross-section correlations of systematic errors in the 2-jet region in bins of $p_T^{b-jet}$ without single-top subtraction.

Multiplicative correction factors for non-perturbative effects and additive corrections for double-parton interactions, derived from the ALPGEN simulation, applied to the MCFM and POWHEG predictions for the comparisons with unfolded results. The non-perturbative uncertainties include the hadronization and underlying event modelling, while the DPI uncertainties are based on the ATLAS measurement of $\sigma_{\rm eff}$.

Multiplicative correction factors for non-perturbative effects and additive corrections for double-parton interactions, derived from the ALPGEN simulation, applied to the MCFM and POWHEG predictions for the comparisons with unfolded results. The non-perturbative uncertainties include the hadronization and underlying event modelling, while the DPI uncertainties are based on the ATLAS measurement of $\sigma_{\rm eff}$.

Theoretical NLO predictions for the $W+b$-jet fiducial cross-section for one lepton flavour calculated with the MCFM program, corrected for non-perturbative effects and DPI contributions.