Correlation matrix of all the parameters including nuisance parameters used in the profile likelihood unfolding fit on $A_{C}$.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Comparison between data and MC simulation for kinematic distributions based on events in the signal candidate sample for \Delta|y|. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the low mass region prior to maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the low mass region after the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the high mass region prior to the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Comparison between data and MC simulation for \Delta|y| for each of the 12 analysis channels for the high mass region after the maximum likelihood fit. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data. The shaded bands represent the total uncertainty in the MC predictions. The lower panels give the ratio of the data to the sum of the MC

Measured A_{C}^{fid} in different mass regions after combining the two lepton channels. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data

Measured A_{C} in the full phase space in different mass regions after combining the two lepton channels. The vertical bars on the points show the statistical uncertainty in the data

The +/- standard deviation (\sigma) impacts of the nuisance parameters corresponding to the systematic uncertainties in the full phase space A_{C} measurement for mttbar > 750GeV. The red and blue bars show the effect on the unfolded AC values for up and down variations of the systematic uncertainty. The MC statistical uncertainties are omitted here.

The fraction of photon-induced background as compared with the total amount of DY signal plus photon-induced events ($N_{\gamma\gamma}/(N_{\gamma\gamma} + N_\mathrm{DY})$) in different dilepton mass bins. These numbers are averaged across the different years and channels.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the coupling K_L for a Z' in the sequential standard model as a function of the Z' mass.

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.3693 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.3897 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4098 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4296 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4492 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4685 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.4875 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5063 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5249 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5432 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5614 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5793 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.5970 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6146 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6319 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6491 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6660 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6828 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.6995 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7160 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7323 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7485 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7645 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7804 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.7961 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8117 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8272 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8425 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8577 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8728 GeV

Target asymmetry T for c.m. energy W= 1.8878 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3062 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3275 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3486 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3693 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.3897 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4098 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4296 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4492 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4685 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.4875 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5063 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5249 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5432 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5614 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5793 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.5970 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6146 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6319 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6491 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6660 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6828 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.6995 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7160 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7323 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7485 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7645 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7804 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.7961 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8117 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8272 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8425 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8577 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8728 GeV

Beam-target asymmetry F for c.m. energy W= 1.8878 GeV

Correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for $\sigma^{\pm}$. The statistical and integrated luminosity uncertainties are not included. The first and the last eleven indices correspond to the systematic uncertainites of $W^+$ ($\sigma^+_{1-11}$) and $W^-$ ($\sigma^-_{1-11}$) cross sections, respectively, in 11 muon pseudorapidity bins. The values are expressed as percentages.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for $\sigma^{\pm}$. The first and the last eleven indices correspond to the statistical uncertainites of $W^+$ ($\sigma^+_{1-11}$) and $W^-$ ($\sigma^-_{1-11}$) cross sections, respectively, in 11 muon pseudorapidity bins. The values are expressed as percentages.

Correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for $\mathcal{A}$. The values are expressed as percentages.

Unfolded measurements of AFB in each M-|y| bin (e+e-).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

The asymmetry $A_{\mu}$ extracted from the differential cross sections.

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.819

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.707

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.574

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.423

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.259

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= 0.087

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.087

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.259

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.423

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.574

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.707

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.819

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.906

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.966

Target asymmetry T for c.m. cos(Theta_pi0)= -0.996