Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $ee jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.

Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.

Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on first- and second-generation leptoquark masses for different values of $\beta$.

Event yields in the dimuon channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.

Event yields in the dielectron channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.

Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{min}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $ee jj$ and $\mu\mu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.

Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{T}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $e\nu jj$ and $\mu\nu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.

Dijet mass distribution for the b-tagged category. Data, estimated background and uncertainties are shown. Events are collected using the combined trigger and contain a $E_T^{\gamma} > 95$ GeV photon and two $p_T^{jet} > 65$ GeV jets.

Upper limits on Gaussian-shape contributions to the dijet mass distributions from the flavour-inclusive category and masses below 450 GeV, for which the single-photon trigger was used.

Upper limits on Gaussian-shape contributions to the dijet mass distributions from the flavour-inclusive category and masses above 450 GeV, for which the combined trigger was used.

Upper limits on Gaussian-shape contributions to the dijet mass distributions from the b-tagged category and masses below 450 GeV, for which the single-photon trigger was used.

Upper limits on Gaussian-shape contributions to the dijet mass distributions from the b-tagged category and masses above 450 GeV, for which the combined trigger was used.

Kinematic acceptance values predicted for the $Z'$ model as a function of mass $m_{Z'}$ for the flavour-inclusive category using the single-photon trigger.

Kinematic acceptance values predicted for the $Z'$ model as a function of mass $m_{Z'}$ for the flavour-inclusive category using the combined trigger.

Kinematic acceptance values predicted for the $Z'$ model as a function of mass $m_{Z'}$ for the b-tagged category using the single-photon trigger.

Kinematic acceptance values predicted for the $Z'$ model as a function of mass $m_{Z'}$ for the b-tagged category using the combined trigger.

Reconstruction efficiency for $Z'$ model, flavour inclusive category, single-photon trigger.

Reconstruction efficiency for $Z'$ model, flavour inclusive category, combined trigger.

Reconstruction efficiency for $Z'$ model, b-tagged category, single-photon trigger.

Reconstruction efficiency for $Z'$ model, b-tagged category, combined trigger.

Ratio of unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (P PB/ P P). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Ratio of unfolded Dijet conditional yields (P PB/ P P). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (Delta p_{T} > 3). Full markers represent p+Pb, open markers p+p

Unfolded Dijet conditional yields (Delta p_{T} > 3). Full markers represent p+Pb, open markers p+p

Ratio of unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (P PB/ P P) (Delta p_{T} > 3). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Ratio of unfolded Dijet conditional yields (P PB/ P P) (Delta p_{T} > 3). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Unfolded azimuthal angular correlation distributions. Black markers represent p+Pb, red markers p+p

Unfolded azimuthal angular correlation distributions (Delta p_{T} > 3). Black markers represent p+Pb, red markers p+p

Predicted ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Predicted ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Predicted ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

The 95% CL upper limits of the cross section times branching fraction of $\Phi \to \mu^+\mu^-$ for b-associated production

The observed/expected 95% CL upper limits of the cross section times branching fraction of $\Phi \to \mu^+\mu^-$ as a function of $\Phi$ mass and the cross section fraction of the b-associated production.

Signal acceptance for different masses in bTag and bVeto signal regions.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential cross section of prompt $\rm{D_{s}}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in the rapidity interval $|y|$<0.5. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_{s}}\rightarrow\phi\pi\rightarrow K K \pi$ : 0.0227.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential cross section of inclusive $\rm{D}^{0}$ mesons (including also $\rm{D}^{0}$ mesons from beauty-hadron decays) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in the rapidity interval $|y|$<0.5. Branching ratio of $\rm{D}^{0}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{*+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$: 0.0389*0.677. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm {D}^{+}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ and $\rm {D}^{+}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV were updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ and $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$), and from ($9.46\% \pm 0.24$) to ($8.98\% \pm 0.28$), respectively. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{*+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$). Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$: 0.0389*0.677. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$). Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm {D}^{+}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{+}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ from ($9.46\% \pm 0.24$) to ($8.98\% \pm 0.28$). Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898.

Ratios of $\rm {D}^{0}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D}^{0}\rightarrow K\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$). Branching ratio of $\rm{D}^{0}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratios of $\rm {D}^{+}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{+}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$ from ($9.46\% \pm 0.24$) to ($8.98\% \pm 0.28$). Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$ : 0.0898.

Ratios of $\rm {D}^{*+}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D}^{*+}\rightarrow \rm{D}^{0}\pi\rightarrow K\pi\pi$: 0.02633.

Ratios of $\rm{D_{s}}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ Branching ratio of $\rm{D_{s}}\rightarrow\phi\pi\rightarrow K K \pi$ : 0.0227.

First Column: Production cross sections for prompt D mesons (D0, D+, D*+ and D_s) at mid-rapidity in |y|<0.5 and full pT range, in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the branching-ratio uncertainty. For D+, D*+ and Ds, the fourth (sys) error is due to the extrapolation to pt=0. Second column: value of <pT> of prompt D0 mesons in |y|<0.5. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the systematic uncertainty.

Elliptic-flow coefficients $v_2$ based on the six-particle correlations technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 2.4$.

Elliptic-flow coefficients $v_2$ based on the eight-particle correlations technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 2.4$.

Triangular-flow coefficients $v_3$ based on the two-particle correlations technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 2.4$.

Triangular-flow coefficients $v_3$ based on the scalar-product technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 0.8$.

Triangular-flow coefficients $v_3$ based on the four-particle correlations technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 2.4$.

The $v_4$ coefficients based on the two-particle correlations technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 2.4$.

The $v_4$ coefficients based on the scalar-product technique, as functions of transverse momentum and in bins of centrality. The results correspond to the range $|\eta| < 0.8$.

Centrality dependence of the spectrum-weighted $v_2$ flow harmonics with $0.3 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 3.0~\mathrm{GeV}/c$. The $v_2$ results are shown for two-, four-, six-, and eight-particle correlations.

Centrality dependence of the spectrum-weighted $v_3$ flow harmonics with $0.3 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 3.0~\mathrm{GeV}/c$. The results are shown for two- and four-particle correlations.

Centrality dependence of the spectrum-weighted $v_4$ flow harmonics with $0.3 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 3.0~\mathrm{GeV}/c$. The results are shown for two-particle correlations.

Centrality dependence of $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ ratios.

Centrality dependence of $v_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ ratios.

Centrality dependence of $v_3\{4\}/v_3\{2\}$ ratios.

The $v_2$ results measured with two-particle correlations from PbPb collisions at $5.02~$TeV, shown as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in eleven centrality bins.

The $v_3$ results measured with two-particle correlations from PbPb collisions at $5.02~$TeV, shown as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in eleven centrality bins.

The $v_4$ results measured with two-particle correlations from PbPb collisions at $5.02~$TeV, shown as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in eleven centrality bins.

Ratios of the $v_2$ harmonic coefficients from two-particle correlations in XeXe and PbPb collisions as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 11 centrality bins.

Ratios of the $v_3$ harmonic coefficients from two-particle correlations in XeXe and PbPb collisions as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 11 centrality bins.

Ratios of the $v_4$ harmonic coefficients from two-particle correlations in XeXe and PbPb collisions as functions of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 11 centrality bins.

Centrality dependence of the spectrum-weighted $v_2$, $v_3$, and $v_4$ harmonic coefficients from two-particle correlations method for $0.3 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 3.0 \mathrm{GeV}/c$ for PbPb collisions at $5.02$~TeV.

Ratios of the $v_2$, $v_3$, and $v_4$ harmonic coefficients from two-particle correlations in XeXe and PbPb collisions as functions or $0.3 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 3.0~\mathrm{GeV}/c$ as a function of centrality.

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=21\pm3$

$v_{3}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=21\pm3$

$v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=21\pm3$

$v_{1}^{fluc}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=70$

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=70$

$v_{3}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=70$

$v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=70$

$v_{1}^{fluc}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=140$

$v_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=140$

$v_{3}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=140$

$v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$ as a function of $p_{T}(GeV/c)$ for various systems for $<Nch>=140$

$<Nch>$ dependence of $|v_{1}^{fluc}|$, $v_{2}$, $v_{3}$ and $K$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of $|v_{1}^{fluc}|$, $v_{2}$, $v_{3}$ and $K$ for U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 193 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of $|v_{1}^{fluc}|$, $v_{2}$, $v_{3}$ and $K$ for Cu+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of $|v_{1}^{fluc}|$, $v_{2}$, $v_{3}$ and $K$ for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of $|v_{1}^{fluc}|$, $v_{2}$, $v_{3}$ and $K$ for d+Au and p+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of elliptic flow scaled with eccentricity ($v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$) for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of elliptic flow scaled with eccentricity ($v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$) for U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 193 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of elliptic flow scaled with eccentricity ($v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$) for Cu+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of elliptic flow scaled with eccentricity ($v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$) for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

$<Nch>$ dependence of elliptic flow scaled with eccentricity ($v_{2}/\epsilon_{2}$) for d+Au and p+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

Ratios of the slopes extracted for each system relative to the slope extracted from a fit to the combined data sets